Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Verified Universal Breakdown of Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fast Quenches

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single trapped-ion qubit verifies that the Kibble-Zurek scaling law breaks down universally in fast quenches: beyond a critical quench rate, defect density stops depending on quench speed and scales only with the quench range.

desk verdict The LZ half is solid and the dataset is new, but the Rice-Mele analysis imports the momentum cutoff from the theory under test, so the universality claim is not independently established as published. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06841 v1 pith:E5VFCT4V submitted 2025-06-07 quant-ph

Xinxin Rao , Yang Liu , Mingshen Li , Teng Liu , Huabi Zeng , Le Luo This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords Kibble-Zurekmechanismfastquenchesdefectdensitytrapped-ionquantumsimulationRice-MelemodelLandau-Zenertunnelinguniversalscalingbreakdownphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The Kibble-Zurek mechanism holds that the density of defects left behind when a system is driven through a phase transition falls as a universal power law of the quench speed. A recent theory [23] predicted that this law must fail for sufficiently fast quenches: beyond a critical quench rate, both the defect density and the freezing time become independent of the quench rate and scale only with the quench range, the distance the control parameter is swept. This paper reports a direct experimental test using a single trapped-ion qubit to implement the Landau-Zener and one-dimensional Rice-Mele models, finding the predicted two-regime structure: Kibble-Zurek scaling $n \sim v^{1/2}$ at slow quench rates, a rate-independent plateau $n \sim \delta_{\max}$ at fast rates, with the critical rate $v_c \sim \delta_{\max}^{2}$ separating them. The measured exponents agree with the theory, supporting the claim that the breakdown is itself universal. If correct, fast quenches in any system have a defect floor set by the quench range, a limit that matters wherever quenches or anneals are used to reach low-defect states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the freezing-time construction of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism, extended to quenches of finite range. Near the critical point the relaxation time diverges; its intersection with the inverse quench rate fixes the freezing time, and the relaxation time at that point sets the correlation length that determines the defect density. The universal breakdown mechanism adds the critical quench rate $v_c$, defined as the rate at which this intersection lands exactly on the boundary of the quench window (for the Rice-Mele model, $v_c = \delta_{\max}^{2}$). The experimental carrier is a single $^{171}\mathrm{Yb}^{+}$ hyperfine qubit driven by microwaves, realizing a Landau-Zener two-level system in which the detuning $\delta(t)$ plays the quenched parameter and, in the Rice-Mele encoding, the synthetic momentum $p$ is mapped to the microwave coupling strength. The total defect density is $n = \int_0^{p_m} n(p)\,dp$, with the momentum-resolved defect density $n(p)$ computed from the analytic two-level solution (parabolic cylinder functions) and the cutoff $p_m = 2\pi\sqrt{v}$ for $v < v_c$, $p_m = 2\pi\sqrt{v_c}$ for $v \geq v_c$, marking the size of the nonadiabatic region in momentum space.

What would settle it

Fix the quench rate above $v_c$ and vary only the sweep range $\delta_{\max}$, while also computing the total defect density by integrating $n(p)$ over the entire Brillouin zone instead of the saturating cutoff. If the rate-independent plateau and the $n \propto \delta_{\max}$ scaling survive full-zone integration, the breakdown is intrinsic; if they vanish, the reported scaling is an artifact of the cutoff. A cheaper cross-check already available from the data: confirm that the momentum-resolved curves for different quench durations collapse onto one curve when $p$ is rescaled by $\sqrt{T/\delta_{\max}}$, and verify the Landau-Zener plateau height against the closed form $x_c^2/(1+x_c^2)$ at each $\delta_{\max}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the breakdown of Kibble-Zurek scaling under fast quenches is a universal, quantitatively predictable effect, and that a single trapped-ion qubit can verify it. In the one-dimensional Rice-Mele model the authors identify a critical quench rate $v_c = \delta_{\max}^{2}$, set by the quench range $\delta_{\max}$, and observe two regimes in the total defect density. For $v < v_c$ the familiar law holds, $n \sim v^{1/2}$ with exponent fit $a = -0.51 \pm 0.07$ (theory: $a = -d\nu/(z\nu+1) = -0.5$ for $d = z = \nu = 1$); for $v > v_c$ the density saturates, $n \propto \delta_{\max}^{c}$ with $c = 0.97 \pm 0.02$ (theory: $c = d\nu = 1$), independent of the quench rate. The boundary between regimes scales as $\tau_{Q,c} \propto \delta_{\max}^{-b}$ with $b = 2.12 \pm 0.13$ (theory: $b = z\nu + 1 = 2$). The mechanism is that at these rates the freezing point falls outside the swept range, so the range itself sets the correlation length. The same two-regime structure is observed in the Landau-Zener simulator, whose saturated defect density has the closed form $x_c^2/(1+x_c^2)$ with $x_c = \delta_{\max}/2J$.

Load-bearing premise

In the lattice-model experiment, the reported plateau and its scaling with the sweep range rest on an integration cutoff in momentum that the theory fixes to stop growing once the quench is fast enough; if that cutoff instead kept growing with quench speed, the measured curves alone would not produce the claimed rate-independent defect density.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quench sweeps faster than $v_c$ buy nothing: the defect density is pinned at a floor set by the sweep range, so slowing below the critical rate is the only way to reduce defects.
  • Because the breakdown exponents are fixed by the universality class through $d$, $z$, and $\nu$, the same plateau-plus-power-law structure should appear in other systems in that class, consistent with fast-quench defect plateaus previously reported in cold-atom gases.
  • The critical rate $v_c \approx \delta_{\max}^{2}$ sets a practical boundary: Kibble-Zurek power-law fits are meaningful only for $v < v_c$, and measurements of quench-rate exponents must be made in the slow regime.
  • A single trapped-ion qubit can simulate the quench dynamics of a one-dimensional lattice model, with the full momentum-resolved defect spectrum recovered from quantum state tomography.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Landau-Zener arm's saturated defect density is fixed by the single ratio $\delta_{\max}/2J$, so the plateau height at every sweep range can be checked against a closed formula without fitting, a tighter quantitative test than the power-law fits alone.
  • Transferred to quantum annealing, the same mechanism implies a speed limit: for a fixed sweep range, defect suppression saturates at $v_c$, so the only remaining levers are shrinking the sweep range or crossing more slowly, a prediction testable on existing annealer hardware.
  • Because the experiment reads out $n(p)$ directly, it can turn an assumed cutoff into a measured quantity: mapping the size of the nonadiabatic region in momentum as a function of quench rate would verify the $\sqrt{v}$ growth in the slow regime and its saturation in the fast regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a trapped-ion single-qubit experiment that simulates fast quenches in the Landau-Zener (LZ) and one-dimensional Rice-Mele models and claims to verify the universal breakdown of Kibble-Zurek scaling predicted in Ref. [23]. In the LZ model, the measured defect density saturates at small inverse quench time, and the crossover value is reported to grow with the quench range delta_max; the data are compared with an exact solution in terms of parabolic cylinder functions. In the Rice-Mele model, momentum-resolved upper-band populations are measured and integrated up to a rate-dependent cutoff p_m; the total defect density is reported to follow n ~ tau_Q^{-0.5} for slow quenches and to saturate at n ~ delta_max with tau_Q,c ~ delta_max^{-2} for fast quenches. The paper concludes that these exponents agree with d=z=nu=1 and that the universal breakdown of KZ scaling is experimentally verified.

Significance. If the central scalings survive a cutoff-independent reanalysis, this would be a valuable experimental confirmation of a recent theoretical proposal, using a clean single-qubit platform with high-fidelity state preparation and tomography. The LZ part is supported by an exact analytical solution, and the paper makes a concrete, falsifiable prediction for the quench-range dependence of the plateau. The main weakness is that the Rice-Mele total defect density is defined with a momentum cutoff taken from the theory under test, so the reported exponents are not yet demonstrated to be independent of that choice. The availability of raw momentum-resolved data makes the required reanalysis feasible.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, 'Experiment with the Rice-Mele model'] The total defect density in the fast-quench regime is constructed from the theoretical cutoff under test, making the reported scaling circular. In the paragraph following Eq. (2), the main text defines n = integral_0^{p_m} n(p) dp with p_m = 2*pi*sqrt(v) for v < v_c and p_m = 2*pi*sqrt(v_c) for v >= v_c, where v_c = delta_max^2. In the fast regime p_m = 2*pi*delta_max, so if n(p) is approximately a function of p/delta_max (as in the sudden limit), the integral is proportional to delta_max times a constant; the fitted exponent c = 0.97 +/- 0.02 for n ~ delta_max is therefore substantially enforced by the choice of upper limit. The crossover tau_Q,c ~ delta_max^{-2} is also built into the switch at v_c = delta_max^2, so the fitted b = 2.12 +/- 0.13 is not an independent confirmation. I request a reanalysis with a fixed momentum cutoff P_max >> delta_max that is independent of delta_max, and a report of the raw momentum-resolved n(p) data.
  2. [Supplementary Materials, 'Defect Density in the Rice-Mele Model'] The supplement states that the total defect density is obtained by integrating over all momenta, while the main text integrates only up to p_m = 2*pi*sqrt(v_c) in the fast regime. These definitions are not equivalent for the fast-quench data, because n(p) does not decay fast enough to make the all-momentum integral convergent in the sudden limit. The manuscript must state which definition was actually used and must show that the reported plateau and exponents are insensitive to the integration domain.
  3. [Main text, 'Experiment with the LZ model'] The LZ analysis introduces a freeze-out parameter alpha in t_hat_c = tau_c/alpha and v_c = alpha*delta_max*sqrt(4J^2 + delta_max^2), but the value of alpha is not reported. The fit of tau_Q,c/tau_0 to 4J^2/v_c therefore contains an adjustable scale; the authors should state alpha and demonstrate that the extracted critical behavior (in particular, the delta_max^{-2} tendency for delta_max >> 2J) does not depend on its assumed value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text, LZ defect density definition] The expression n = |<chi(t_f)|Phi(t_f)>|^2 is not equal to Tr(rho |chi(t_f)> rho |Phi(t_f)>); the trace formula is incorrect as written.
  2. [Main text, after Eq. (1)] The statement that the qubit 'reach the equilibrium with the final state at t_f=T/2' is unclear; the measured quantity is the state after deterministic Schrodinger evolution, not an equilibrium state.
  3. [Main text, LZ and Rice-Mele definitions of tau_Q] The symbol tau_Q is defined differently in the LZ section (tau_Q = 2J/delta_dot, made dimensionless through tau_0) and in the Rice-Mele section (tau_Q = T/delta_max); please unify the definitions and specify units in the figures.
  4. [Fig. 3(c) and side plane] Please report how the saturated defect density in the side plane of Fig. 3(c) was extracted, for example as an average over which tau_Q range, and include the associated uncertainties.
  5. [Supplementary Materials, general] The supplement has numerous typographical errors (e.g., 'satisgy', 'T r', and a missing section heading in 'Defect Density in the Rice-Mele Model') and should be carefully edited.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Rice-Mele 'prediction' is built into the integration cutoff p_m = 2π√v_c with v_c = δ_max², so the plateau, n ∝ δ_max, and τ_Q,c ∝ δ_max^{-2} are contained in the definition of n before fitting; the LZ arm is independent, making the circularity partial but severe.

  1. self definitional [Main text, 'Experiment with the Rice-Mele model' (defect-density definition paragraph)]
    "The defect production is quantified as the sum of the net excitations to the upper band R pm 0 n(p)dp, where n(p) is the final population of the upper band. p m represents the cutoff momentum, which is determined by the size of the nonadiabatic region in momentum space[39]. For the breakdown of KZM, there exists a critical value of the quench time T, which satisfies T c δmax ∼1, i.e. the critical quench rate v c = δ max/T c = δ 2 max, then p m = 2π√v for v < v c, while p m = 2π√v c for v≥v c."

    The measured quantity is n = ∫_0^{p_m} n(p)dp, and p_m is defined via the very relation under test: for v ≥ v_c, p_m = 2π√v_c = 2πδ_max. Thus the integration interval itself carries a factor δ_max. In the fast regime n(p) approaches a sudden-quench function of p/δ_max, so the integral is δ_max times a dimensionless constant, forcing n ∝ δ_max independent of the quench rate. The plateau onset is assigned to T_cδ_max ∼ 1, i.e. τ_Q,c ∼ δ_max^{-2}, exactly the relation later 'fitted' to obtain b ≈ 2.12. The Rice-Mele scaling is therefore built into the definition of the reported defect density rather than being independently extracted from the data.

  2. other [Supplementary Materials, 'Defect Density in the Rice-Mele Model']
    "Denoting by |⟨Ψ(T)|χ(T)⟩| 2 the probability that the state with momentum p occupies the upper eigenstate at time T, the total defect density is given by n = R |⟨Ψ(T)|χ(T)⟩| 2 dp. Integration over all momenta p simulates defect formation in a one-dimensional Rice–Mele model."

    The supplement defines the RM defect density as the integral over all momenta, whereas the main text computes n with the theory-dependent upper limit p_m = 2π√v_c in the fast regime. The reported plateau and n ∝ δ_max are properties of the truncated integral, not of the full-model defect density defined in the supplement. The paper does not show that the full momentum integral saturates to the same plateau or exhibits the same δ_max scaling, so the universal-breakdown result depends entirely on the imposed cutoff.

1 more flagged steps
  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Main text, 'Experiment with the Rice-Mele model' (fits of b and c)]
    "By fitting the critical inverse quench rate τ Q,c ∼δ −b max, we obtain b= 2.12±0.13, which agrees well with the theoretical prediction b = zν + 1 = 2[23]. At small τ Q, the defect density no longer depends on the quench rate, but grows monotonically with δ max... From the theoretical prediction of n ∝ δ c max, we obtain c= 0.97±0.02 by fitting, which agrees well with c = dν = 1[23]."

    The fitted exponents b ≈ 2 and c ≈ 1 are the same exponents already inserted through p_m: v_c = δ_max² gives τ_Q,c ∼ 1/δ_max², and p_m = 2πδ_max gives an integral that scales linearly with δ_max. The cutoff ansatz is imported from Ref. [23] (authored by H.-B. Zeng, a co-author of this paper) and from the 'nonadiabatic region' citation [39], but the saturated p_m = 2π√v_c is not independently verified; the subsequent fits therefore confirm the input relation rather than provide an independent test of the theory.

full rationale

The circularity is concentrated in the Rice-Mele arm of the paper, which carries the central universality claim. The main text defines the total defect density as an integral over a momentum interval whose upper limit p_m is set by the predicted critical rate v_c = δ_max²; for v ≥ v_c, p_m = 2πδ_max, so the integrated quantity has a built-in δ_max factor and the plateau onset is fixed at τ_Q,c ≈ 1/δ_max². The fits c = 0.97 ± 0.02 and b = 2.12 ± 0.13 are then fittings of relations already contained in the definition of n and in the location of the apparent crossover. The supplement's statement that the RM defect density is the integral over all momenta directly contradicts the truncated main-text quantity, reinforcing that the reported saturation is an artifact of the chosen cutoff unless shown otherwise. The Landau-Zener experiments are much less vulnerable: the plateau and the critical-rate scaling are computed from the exact finite-range Landau-Zener dynamics and compared with the data rather than inserted into the definition of the measured quantity. Because one of the two model arms—the one supporting the headline Rice-Mele result—reduces by construction, the paper is not wholly circular, but the central evidence for universal breakdown is partially forced by the analysis, giving a score of 8.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central load-bearing input beyond standard quantum mechanics is the momentum cutoff p_m, which is imported from the theory under test and which is what generates the plateau and its δ_max dependence. The freeze-out constant α is also unspecified. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • α (freeze-out criterion constant in LZ) = not specified
    Appears in v_c = α δ_max sqrt(4J²+δ_max²) and t̂_c=τ_c/α; the value is not given and is imported from the adiabatic-impulse approximation, affecting the fitted τ_Q,c curve.
  • p_m momentum cutoff in Rice-Mele = 2π√v for v<v_c; 2π√v_c for v≥v_c
    The total defect density is integrated only up to p_m. The saturation of p_m at 2π√v_c forces the plateau and its δ_max scaling, so the fitted exponent c≈1 is effectively an input.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The single trapped-ion qubit under microwave driving faithfully emulates the 1D Rice-Mele model via the mapping p→coupling strength and δ(t)→staggered potential.
    Used to simulate the RM model with a two-level system; assumes the momentum-resolved LZ dynamics are independent and can be summed.
  • ad hoc to paper The nonadiabatic region in momentum space is bounded by p_m=2π√v (v<v_c) and p_m=2π√v_c (v≥v_c).
    This cutoff is taken from the theory being tested [23] and is used to compute the total defect density. It encodes the breakdown scaling and is not independently measured or derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The adiabatic-impulse approximation with freeze-out constant α is valid for defining v_c in the LZ model.
    Used to derive τ_Q,c/τ_0 = 4J²/v_c and the plateau formula; α's value is unspecified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Verified Universal Breakdown of Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fast Quenches." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5VFCT4V

@misc{pith2026250606841,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Verified Universal Breakdown of Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fast Quenches},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5VFCT4V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06841}
}
abstract

The Kibble-Zurek mechanism (KZM) predicts that when a system is driven through a continuous phase transition, the density of topological defects scales universally with the quench rate. Recent theoretical work [H.-B. Zeng \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{130}, 060402 (2023)] has challenged this picture, showing that under sufficiently fast quenches, both the defect density and freezing time become independent of the quench rate and instead scale universally with the quench range. Here, we experimentally test this prediction using a single trapped-ion qubit to simulate fast quantum quenches in the Landau-Zener and 1D Rice-Mele models. We identify a critical quench rate \( v_c \) that scales with the quench range \( \delta_{\max} \), separating two distinct dynamical regimes. In the Rice-Mele model, for \( v < v_c \), the defect density follows the KZM scaling \( \sim v^{1/2} \); for \( v > v_c \), it exhibits a universal scaling \( \sim \delta_{\max} \), independent of the quench rate. Our results provide direct experimental evidence of the predicted breakdown of KZM universality under fast quenches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06841 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Universal breakdown of the KZ scaling under fast [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Universal breakdown of the KZ scaling in the LZ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Universal breakdown of the KZ scaling in the 1D Rice-Mele model. (a)The schematic of the Rice-Mele model, featuring [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Quenches from the Critical Point: Theory and Experimental Validation in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For fast quenches starting at the critical point, the variance of defect counts is exactly linear in quench depth while the third cumulant shows a quadratic suppression, with trapped-ion data shown as validation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [23]

    Zeng, C.-Y

    H.-B. Zeng, C.-Y. Xia, and A. Del Campo, Universal breakdown of kibble-zurek scaling in fast quenches across a phase transition, Physical Review Letters130, 060402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature317, 505 (1985)

    1985

  3. [2]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence and the transition from quan- tum to classical, Physics Today44, 36 (1991)

    work page 1991

  4. [3]

    Kibble, Phase-transition dynamics in the lab and the universe, Physics Today60, 47 (2007)

    T. Kibble, Phase-transition dynamics in the lab and the universe, Physics Today60, 47 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [4]

    Laguna and W

    P. Laguna and W. H. Zurek, Density of kinks after a quench: When symmetry breaks, how big are the pieces?, Physical Review Letters78, 2519 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [5]

    P. M. Chaikin, T. C. Lubensky, and T. A. Witten,Prin- ciples of condensed matter physics, Vol. 10 (Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  7. [6]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Advances in Physics59, 1063 (2010)

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Advances in Physics59, 1063 (2010)

    2010

  8. [7]

    Xia and H.-B

    C.-Y. Xia and H.-B. Zeng, Winding up a finite size holo- graphic superconducting ring beyond kibble-zurek mech- anism, Physical Review D102, 126005 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Del Campo, G

    A. Del Campo, G. De Chiara, G. Morigi, M. B. Ple- nio, and A. Retzker, Structural defects in ion chains by quenching the external potential: The inhomogeneous kibble-zurek mechanism, Physical Review Letters105, 075701 (2010)

    2010

  2. [9]

    Corman, L

    L. Corman, L. Chomaz, T. Bienaim´ e, R. Desbuquois, C. Weitenberg, S. Nascimbene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, Quench-induced supercurrents in an annular bose gas, Physical Review Letters113, 135302 (2014)

    2014

  3. [10]

    Huang, R

    Q. Huang, R. Yao, L. Liang, S. Wang, Q. Zheng, D. Li, W. Xiong, X. Zhou, W. Chen, X. Chen,et al., Observa- tion of many-body quantum phase transitions beyond the kibble-zurek mechanism, Physical Review Letters127, 200601 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Liu, X.-C

    X.-P. Liu, X.-C. Yao, Y. Deng, Y.-X. Wang, X.-Q. Wang, X. Li, Q. Chen, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Dynamic for- mation of quasicondensate and spontaneous vortices in a strongly interacting fermi gas, Physical Review Research 3, 043115 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Dutta, A

    A. Dutta, A. Rahmani, and A. Del Campo, Anti-kibble- zurek behavior in crossing the quantum critical point of a thermally isolated system driven by a noisy control field, Physical Review Letters117, 080402 (2016)

    2016

  6. [13]

    Weinberg, M

    P. Weinberg, M. Tylutki, J. M. R¨ onkk¨ o, J. Wester- holm, J. A. ˚Astr¨ om, P. Manninen, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and A. W. Sandvik, Scaling and diabatic effects in quantum anneal- ing with a d-wave device, Physical Review Letters124, 090502 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    A. D. King, S. Suzuki, J. Raymond, A. Zucca, T. Lanting, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, S. Ejtemaee, E. Hoskinson, S. Huang,et al., Coherent quantum annealing in a pro- grammable 2,000 qubit ising chain, Nature Physics18, 1324 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    Donadello, S

    S. Donadello, S. Serafini, T. Bienaim´ e, F. Dalfovo, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Creation and counting of defects in a temperature-quenched bose-einstein conden- sate, Physical Review A94, 023628 (2016)

    2016

  9. [16]

    B. Ko, J. W. Park, and Y. Shin, Kibble–zurek univer- sality in a strongly interacting fermi superfluid, Nature Physics15, 1227 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    J. Goo, Y. Lim, and Y. Shin, Defect saturation in a rapidly quenched bose gas, Physical Review Letters127, 115701 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    J. Goo, Y. Lee, Y. Lim, D. Bae, T. Rabga, and Y. Shin, Universal early coarsening of quenched bose gases, Phys- ical Review Letters128, 135701 (2022)

    2022

  12. [19]

    I.-K. Liu, S. Donadello, G. Lamporesi, G. Ferrari, S.-C. Gou, F. Dalfovo, and N. Proukakis, Dynamical equili- bration across a quenched phase transition in a trapped quantum gas, Communications Physics1, 24 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    P. M. Chesler, A. M. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, and H. Liu, Defect formation beyond kibble-zurek mechanism and hologra- phy, Physical Review X5, 021015 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    Sonner, A

    J. Sonner, A. Del Campo, and W. H. Zurek, Universal far-from-equilibrium dynamics of a holographic super- conductor, Nature Communications6, 7406 (2015)

    2015

  15. [22]

    G´ omez-Ruiz and A

    F. G´ omez-Ruiz and A. Del Campo, Universal dynamics of inhomogeneous quantum phase transitions: Suppressing defect formation, Physical Review Letters122, 080604 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    B. Damski, The simplest quantum model supporting the kibble-zurek mechanism of topological defect production: Landau-zener transitions from a new perspective, Physi- cal Review Letters95, 035701 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Physical Review Letters95, 105701 (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    Damski and W

    B. Damski and W. H. Zurek, Adiabatic-impulse ap- proximation for avoided level crossings: From phase- transition dynamics to landau-zener evolutions and back again, Physical Review AAtomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics73, 063405 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Xu, Y.-J

    X.-Y. Xu, Y.-J. Han, K. Sun, J.-S. Xu, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Quantum simulation of landau-zener model dynamics supporting the kibble-zurek mechanism, Physical Review Letters112, 035701 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Cui, Y.-F

    J.-M. Cui, Y.-F. Huang, Z. Wang, D.-Y. Cao, J. Wang, W.-M. Lv, L. Luo, A. Del Campo, Y.-J. Han, C.-F. Li, et al., Experimental trapped-ion quantum simulation of 6 the kibble-zurek dynamics in momentum space, Scientific Reports6, 33381 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    D´ ora, M

    B. D´ ora, M. Heyl, and R. Moessner, The kibble-zurek mechanism at exceptional points, Nature Communica- tions10, 2254 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    L. Xiao, D. Qu, K. Wang, H.-W. Li, J.-Y. Dai, B. D´ ora, M. Heyl, R. Moessner, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non- hermitian kibble-zurek mechanism with tunable com- plexity in single-photon interferometry, PRX Quantum 2, 020313 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    P. Lu, Y. Liu, Q. Lao, T. Liu, X. Rao, J. Bian, H. Wu, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Dynamical topology of chiral and nonreciprocal state transfers in a non-hermitian quantum system, Communications Physics8, 91 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    T. Liu, F. Zhao, P. Lu, Q. Lao, X. Rao, M. Ding, J. Bian, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Chiral discrimination through holo- nomic quantum coherent control with a trapped-ion qu- dit, New Journal of Physics (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    X. Song, T. Liu, J. Bian, P. Lu, Y. Liu, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Non-hermitian chsh* game with a single trapped- ion qubit, Chinese Physics Letters41, 060301 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    P. Lu, T. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Rao, Q. Lao, H. Wu, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Realizing quantum speed limit in open system with aPT-symmetric trapped-ion qubit, New Journal of Physics26, 013043 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    P. Lu, X. Rao, T. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Bian, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Experimental demonstration of enhanced violations of leggett-garg inequalities in aPT-symmetric trapped-ion qubit, Physical Review A109, 042205 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    J. Bian, P. Lu, T. Liu, H. Wu, X. Rao, K. Wang, Q. Lao, Y. Liu, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Quantum simulation of a general anti-PT-symmetric hamiltonian with a trapped ion qubit, Fundamental Research3, 904 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    See Supplementary Materials for details

  30. [38]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A short course on topological insulators, Vol. 919 (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Raeisi and F

    S. Raeisi and F. Marquardt, Quench dynamics in one- dimensional optomechanical arrays, Physical Review A 101, 023814 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Guo, Y.-K

    S.-A. Guo, Y.-K. Wu, J. Ye, L. Zhang, W.-Q. Lian, R. Yao, Y. Wang, R.-Y. Yan, Y.-J. Yi, Y.-L. Xu,et al., A site-resolved two-dimensional quantum simulator with hundreds of trapped ions, Nature630, 613 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    F. E. ¨Ozt¨ urk, T. Lappe, G. Hellmann, J. Schmitt, J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, J. Kroha, and M. Weitz, Obser- vation of a non-hermitian phase transition in an optical quantum gas, Science372, 88 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Chertkov, Z

    E. Chertkov, Z. Cheng, A. C. Potter, S. Gopalakr- ishnan, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hall, A. Hankin,et al., Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum com- puter, Nature Physics19, 1799 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    X.-Y. Guo, C. Yang, Y. Zeng, Y. Peng, H.-K. Li, H. Deng, Y.-R. Jin, S. Chen, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of a dynamical quantum phase transition by a supercon- ducting qubit simulation, Physical Review Applied11, 044080 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Xu, Z.-H

    K. Xu, Z.-H. Sun, W. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, H. Li, H. Dong, W. Ren, P. Zhang, F. Nori, D. Zheng,et al., Probing dy- namical phase transitions with a superconducting quan- tum simulator, Science Advances6, eaba4935 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Verified Universal Breakdown of Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fast Quenches

    V. Ivakhnenko, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Nonadi- abatic landau–zener–st¨ uckelberg–majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference, Physics Reports995, 1 (2023). 1 Supplementary Materials for “Verified Universal Breakdown of Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fast Quenches” Experim...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.