Tree of Clarifications: Answering Ambiguous Questions with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:EAAMIOJKrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Questions in open-domain question answering are often ambiguous, allowing multiple interpretations. One approach to handling them is to identify all possible interpretations of the ambiguous question (AQ) and to generate a long-form answer addressing them all, as suggested by Stelmakh et al., (2022). While it provides a comprehensive response without bothering the user for clarification, considering multiple dimensions of ambiguity and gathering corresponding knowledge remains a challenge. To cope with the challenge, we propose a novel framework, Tree of Clarifications (ToC): It recursively constructs a tree of disambiguations for the AQ -- via few-shot prompting leveraging external knowledge -- and uses it to generate a long-form answer. ToC outperforms existing baselines on ASQA in a few-shot setup across the metrics, while surpassing fully-supervised baselines trained on the whole training set in terms of Disambig-F1 and Disambig-ROUGE. Code is available at https://github.com/gankim/tree-of-clarifications.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
LLM-as-an-Investigator: Evidence-First Reasoning for Robust Interactive Problem Diagnosis
LLM-as-an-Investigator improves diagnostic accuracy over direct prompting by using an evidence-first protocol of hypothesis generation, clarification questions, and iterative probability updates in technical problem solving.
-
From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization
GraphRAG improves comprehensiveness and diversity of answers to global questions over million-token document sets by constructing entity graphs and hierarchical community summaries before combining partial responses.
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
A survey of RAG paradigms, components, benchmarks, and challenges for improving LLMs on knowledge-intensive tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.