Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 74 references

Suppression of ferromagnetism in van der Waals insulator due to pressure-induced layer stacking variation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pressure suppresses ferromagnetism in CrBr3 by converting the crystal's layer stacking to an antiferromagnetically coupled AA arrangement, not by destroying the local chromium moments.

desk verdict Solid experimental paper with a genuinely new high-pressure magnetization result, but the central quantitative claim is not yet load-bearing until a sign error and an inconsistency in the critical pressure are fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13446 v2 pith:EBGQE6G5 submitted 2025-01-23 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

M. Misek , U. Dutta , P. Kral , D. Hovancik , J. Kastil , K. Pokhrel , S. Ray , J. Valenta
show 10 more authors
J. Prchal J. Kamarad F. Borodavka V. Eigner M. Dusek V. Holy K. Carva S. Kamba V. Sechovsky J. Pospisil
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el PACS 75.30.Kz62.50.-p61.50.Ks75.30.Et
keywords CrBr3vanderWaalsmagnetspressure-inducedmagnetictransitionlayerstackingfaultsinterlayerexchangetrigonalP-3m1phasehigh-pressuremagnetizationMonteCarlosimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ferromagnetism in the van der Waals insulator CrBr3 disappears under a few gigapascals of pressure, and this paper argues that the cause is structural rather than electronic: pressure generates stacking faults that turn the original ABC layer stacking into AA stacking, and AA-stacked layers are antiferromagnetically coupled. The authors provide the first direct magnetization measurements of the collapse, finding that the Curie temperature falls from 33 K to 6 K by 6.4 GPa and vanishes at a critical pressure near 6.5 GPa, well below the 8.4 GPa previously extrapolated. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction shows a previously unreported trigonal P-3m1 phase with AA stacking growing under pressure and fully replacing the rhombohedral R-3 phase between 6.4 and 8.4 GPa. Density-functional and Monte Carlo simulations give the interlayer exchange as +0.83 meV for the ferromagnetic AB stacking and -0.35 meV for the AA stacking, and reproduce the drop in Curie temperature as the AA fraction grows. The authors explicitly note that the antiferromagnetic order at high pressure is inferred, not yet directly observed.

What carries the argument

The central object is the stacking sequence of the CrBr3 layers: ABC (AB) stacking with ferromagnetic interlayer exchange versus AA stacking with antiferromagnetic exchange. The machinery is the effective interlayer exchange parameter J_L, extracted from density-functional total-energy differences between ferromagnetic and layered-antiferromagnetic states, plus Monte Carlo simulations that mix ferromagnetic AB and antiferromagnetic AA regions and track the Curie temperature as a function of AA concentration. The observational handle is the set of '1/3' satellite X-ray reflections, which are present when the rhombohedral ABC stacking exists and vanish when the AA-stacked trigonal phase takes over.

What would settle it

Measure the magnetic structure of CrBr3 above 6.5 GPa with neutron or resonant X-ray scattering: if no antiferromagnetic order with zero net moment appears, or if the collapse of TC occurs without an increase in the AA-stacked phase fraction, the mechanism is falsified. A complementary check is whether the intralayer exchange parameters remain pressure-independent, as the Monte Carlo model assumes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the pressure-driven loss of ferromagnetism in CrBr3 is caused by a structural transformation: the ambient-pressure rhombohedral R-3 phase, whose layers stack in an ABC sequence and couple ferromagnetically, is progressively replaced by a trigonal P-3m1 phase in which adjacent layers sit directly on top of each other (AA stacking) and couple antiferromagnetically. Magnetization measurements under hydrostatic pressure provide the first direct experimental proof of the suppression: both the spontaneous moment and the Curie temperature decrease continuously, with the decrease accelerating above 3 GPa, and ferromagnetism is lost at a critical pressure of roughly 6.5 GPa. The structural evidence includes the disappearance of the '1/3' satellite reflections characteristic of ABC stacking between 6.4 and 8.4 GPa, leaving pure P-3m1 phase, and the observation that even at ambient pressure the trigonal phase coexists with the rhombohedral phase in real crystals. DFT calculations yield an antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling J_L = -0.35 meV for AA stacking versus +0.83 meV for AB stacking, and Monte Carlo simulations of mixed-stacking systems show the Curie temperature falling as the AA fraction increases, matching the measured pressure dependence. The paper therefore proposes a high-pressure state that is generally antiferromagnetic with zero net moment, while pointing out that a microscopic experiment is needed to resolve the magnetic structure.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism rests on assuming that the magnetization collapse is caused solely by the growing fraction of AA-stacked layers with antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling, with intralayer exchange and the chromium moments unchanged under pressure; the high-pressure antiferromagnetic order itself is inferred, not directly observed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism is correct, the ferromagnetic state of CrBr3 can be destroyed purely by changing how layers stack, without delocalizing or altering the chromium moments, making stacking order a control knob for magnetism.
  • The measured critical pressure of about 6.5 GPa revises the earlier extrapolated value of 8.4 GPa, so pressure phase diagrams of CrBr3 should be updated to match direct magnetization data.
  • The same stacking-fault mechanism may explain the analogous pressure-induced suppression reported in CrI3 and may apply to other van der Waals magnets with stacking polymorphism.
  • Because the trigonal P-3m1 phase coexists with the rhombohedral phase even at ambient pressure and cannot be distinguished by powder diffraction, structural assignments made with powder methods on this family of materials may need re-examination.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's stacking-fault mechanism implies that mechanical processing, such as cutting or grinding, can already introduce antiferromagnetically coupled AA regions in a nominally ferromagnetic crystal, which would affect interpretation of any measurement on exfoliated or powdered samples.
  • By extension, uniaxial stress along the c-axis or bending of thin flakes could tune Tc in device geometries without applying full hydrostatic pressure, since stacking faults are a low-energy degree of freedom in these weakly bonded layers.
  • A direct microscopic probe of the high-pressure phase might reveal a more complex state than simple antiferromagnetism, such as stacking-disorder-induced cluster-glass behavior, because the paper's model assumes a random mixture of FM and AFM interlayer couplings.
  • Measurements on few-layer CrBr3 under pressure could separate intralayer from interlayer effects more cleanly than bulk data and provide a stricter test of the assumed pressure-independence of the intralayer exchange parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined experimental and computational study of CrBr3 under pressure. Magnetization measurements show a gradual suppression of ferromagnetism with increasing pressure, with TC dropping from 33 K at ambient pressure to 6 K at 6.4 GPa. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction reveals coexistence of the established R-3 rhombohedral phase with a previously unreported P-3m1 trigonal phase at ambient conditions, and pressure drives conversion to the P-3m1 phase, which becomes the sole phase above about 8.4 GPa. The authors attribute the ferromagnetic collapse to an increasing fraction of AA-stacked layers, which DFT finds to have antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange (JL = -0.35 meV versus +0.83 meV for the AB stacking), and they support this with Monte Carlo simulations of TC as a function of AA-phase concentration. The paper claims the first direct experimental proof of pressure-induced suppression of ferromagnetism in CrBr3 and proposes an antiferromagnetic high-pressure phase.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism holds, the paper resolves a long-standing puzzle in the CrX3 family and provides a concrete structural origin for pressure-driven magnetic collapse in van der Waals magnets, with implications for stacking engineering of magnetic order. The study is valuable because it combines direct high-pressure magnetization with single-crystal XRD phase quantification, identifies a new structural phase, and uses independent DFT inputs (the JL values) and Monte Carlo simulations rather than fitting the simulations to the TC(p) data. The experimental dataset is rich and the authors are appropriately cautious in calling for a microscopic magnetic-structure experiment. However, the quantitative chain from stacking fraction to TC is not yet fully established, and internal inconsistencies in the critical-pressure analysis weaken the current version of the central quantitative claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (1) and Abstract] Equation (1) in §3 is printed as TC = TC(0) * (1 - p/pc)^(-1/3). With the negative exponent, TC diverges as p approaches pc from below, which is the opposite of the observed monotonic collapse of ferromagnetism; the data described in the text (TC = 6 K at 6.4 GPa) instead require a positive exponent such as (1 - p/pc)^(1/3). In addition, the abstract reports the collapse 'above 5.8 GPa' while the text and conclusions quote pc = 6.5 GPa. These two inconsistencies affect the central quantitative phase diagram and must be corrected before the paper can be fully assessed.
  2. [§3, 'Atomistic simulations' and Figure 13] The central claim that the measured TC(p) is caused by a growing fraction of AA-stacked layers is not actually tested quantitatively. The Monte Carlo results give TC versus AA concentration x, and the XRD data in Figure 5b give the R3-phase fraction versus pressure, but the paper never combines these curves to compare the measured TC(p) with the simulated TC(x) using the measured x(p). Without such a comparison, the explanation remains a plausible correlation rather than a demonstrated mechanism. Please provide the combined plot, include the uncertainty from the phase-fraction refinement, and state explicitly whether any free parameter (for example, a mapping between stacking faults and AA concentration) is adjusted.
  3. [§2, 'High-pressure magnetization' and §3, 'Single crystal X-ray diffraction'] The magnetization sample used for the high-pressure study started with only ~80% volume fraction of the R3 phase, meaning about 20% of the AA-type P-3m1 phase was already present at ambient pressure, while the XRD phase fractions used for correlation were measured at room temperature in a different experiment. Since the initial stacking-fault content directly enters the inferred relationship between pressure and AA concentration, the paper should state the phase composition of the specific magnetization sample at each pressure (or justify why sample-to-sample variation is negligible) and discuss the possible temperature dependence of the stacking-fault population between 300 K and the magnetic ordering temperatures.
  4. [Conclusions and the paragraph beginning 'A question remains...'] The antiferromagnetic order of the high-pressure P-3m1 phase is inferred from DFT and from bilayer studies, not measured; the authors themselves state that a microscopic experiment is desirable. Because the title and abstract make a causal claim ('due to pressure-induced layer stacking variation'), the manuscript should either soften the causal wording to reflect the indirect nature of the magnetic evidence or provide a concrete falsifiable prediction (for example, the expected magnetic Bragg peaks, a muon-spin-rotation signature, or a characteristic field-pressure phase boundary) that would allow the proposed antiferromagnetic phase to be tested.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The critical pressure is given as 5.8 GPa in the abstract, while the text and conclusions give 6.5 GPa; these numbers should be reconciled and a single value with its uncertainty should be used throughout.
  2. [§3, Figure 4 caption] The caption contains a typo ('a) ambient pressure, and a) a lower b) and c) lower than the transition temperature'); it should describe the pressures shown in panels (a)-(c).
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract mentions a 'paracrystal model' that captures the coexistence of the rhombohedral and trigonal phases, but the main text provides no description of this model or its parameters; please add a brief explanation or a reference to the Supporting Information.
  4. [§2, 'Ab initio calculations'] The choice of U_eff = 2 eV in the DFT calculations is stated without justification; a brief sensitivity check (for example, U_eff = 1-3 eV) for the interlayer exchange constants JL would help establish the robustness of the sign and magnitude of the AA-stacking exchange.
  5. [Throughout] The notation for the space groups is inconsistent: both 'R3' and 'R-3' appear, and the text should use standard Hermann-Mauguin symbols consistently throughout.
  6. [§3, 'Atomistic simulations', Eq. (1) of the effective Hamiltonian] The Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) is garbled in the typesetting of the sums over intralayer, interlayer, and single-ion anisotropy terms; please restate the equation clearly and define all symbols, including the explicit form of ESIA.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: DFT-computed interlayer exchanges and an independently measured structural phase fraction are compared with measured TC(p) without fitting the model to the target data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (1) magnetization measurements give TC(p) and show ferromagnetic collapse; (2) single-crystal XRD shows growth of a P-3m1 phase with A-A stacking at the expense of R-3; (3) DFT total-energy differences yield JL = +0.83 meV (A-B) and -0.35 meV (A-A) as independent inputs; (4) Monte Carlo simulations with external intralayer exchange parameters (Ref. [73]) sweep the AA-phase fraction and compute the resulting TC; (5) the simulated TC decrease is compared qualitatively with the measured TC(p) trend. No parameter is fitted to the TC(p) data and then renamed as a prediction. The AA stacking's AFM character is obtained from DFT, not assumed from the magnetization collapse. The intralayer exchange parameters are taken from an external source, not from the present pressure data. The self-citations present (e.g., Refs. [15], [28], [40], [71]) concern crystal growth and related compounds (VI3, VBr3) and are not load-bearing for the central claim. The quantitative link between x_AA(p) and TC(p) is not established by a direct one-to-one comparison, and the power-law fit in Eq. (1) as printed has a sign error (exponent -1/3 would make TC diverge near pc), but these are correctness/robustness concerns, not circularity. No step in the argument reduces by construction to its own output.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed spin Hamiltonian, imported intralayer exchange parameters, the interpretation of the P-3m1 phase as AA stacking, and the assumption that DFT-computed interlayer exchange values remain valid at all pressures. The only numbers fitted to the data are the critical pressure pc and the U value.

free parameters (3)
  • U_eff (GGA+U parameter) = 2 eV
    Chosen for Cr d-electrons in DFT calculations; taken from prior literature (Refs [57,58]), not fitted to the data under study.
  • pc (critical pressure of ferromagnetism loss) = 6.5 GPa
    Obtained by fitting TC(p) data with a power law. The abstract quotes 5.8 GPa, so there is an inconsistency.
  • AA phase concentration in Monte Carlo simulations = 0 to 45%
    Varied by hand to demonstrate the trend of TC with antiferromagnetic layer fraction; not derived from pressure.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The magnetic Hamiltonian includes intralayer exchange, interlayer exchange, and single-ion anisotropy as in Eq. (1).
    Assumed spin model for CrBr3; no derivation given.
  • ad hoc to paper Intralayer exchange parameters J1, J2, J3 are taken from Ref [73] and are pressure independent.
    The paper uses J's from Cai et al. and neglects their pressure dependence, a simplification that could affect the TC vs pressure trend.
  • domain assumption The P-3m1 phase with 2/3 Cr occupancy is equivalent to AA stacking of the honeycomb layers.
    The paper interprets the refined P-3m1 structure as arising from AA stacking faults, but also mentions an alternative random-stacking interpretation; this assumption underlies the magnetic interpretation.
  • domain assumption Interlayer exchange JL for AB and AA stackings is computed with DFT-GGA+U at zero temperature and is representative of all pressures.
    JL values (0.83 and -0.35 meV) are used in MC simulations without explicit pressure dependence or verification at higher pressures.
  • domain assumption The methanol-ethanol-water pressure medium is hydrostatic up to 14 GPa.
    The authors assume hydrostaticity but note that CrBr3 is extremely sensitive to shear stress and that other media caused sample disintegration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Suppression of ferromagnetism in van der Waals insulator due to pressure-induced layer stacking variation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EBGQE6G5

@misc{pith2026250113446,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Suppression of ferromagnetism in van der Waals insulator due to pressure-induced layer stacking variation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EBGQE6G5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13446}
}
read the original abstract

Ferromagnetism in van der Waals insulators like CrBr3 is highly sensitive to structural modifications. We explore the pressure-driven structural and magnetic transformations of the van der Waals magnet CrBr3, establishing it as a model platform for phenomena emerging in layered vdW systems. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed intrinsic trimorphism with two known phases (monoclinic and rhombohedral) and a so-far unreported trigonal phase. The paracrystal model well captures the coexistence of the rhombohedral and trigonal phases at ambient conditions. Increasing pressure drives the growth of the AA-stacked trigonal phase at the expense of the rhombohedral phase, which becomes undetectable above 8.4 GPa. Magnetization measurements provided the first direct evidence of a collapse of ferromagnetism above 5.8 GPa. This behavior is attributed to the increasing number of AFM-coupled Cr moments in AA stackings. Ab initio DFT calculations of electronic structure and atomistic simulations of finite-temperature magnetism corroborate the scenario.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13446 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Pressure dependence of TC of CrBr3. Phase diagram was constructed from the M(T) dependences measured at low field 0.01T ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Diffraction patterns of CrBr3 single crystal at a) ambient pressure, and a) a lower b) and c) lower than the transition temperature. The lower trio of figures represents distribution histograms for a * = b * and c * vector projections. All 1/3 reflections originating in 𝑅3 are extinct at 8.4 GPa. The resulting high-pressure phase is trigonal with 𝑃3̅𝑚1 symmetry and a single Cr site with 2/3 occupancy at 1a position.… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Calculated lattice parameters a and c as a function of pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The density of states of CrBr3 for ambient pressure and 10 GPa. Recent work[36] examined the dependence of total energy and interplanar interactions of bilayer CrBr3 concerning the mutual position of the layers, finding the strength of the magnetic exchange can be sig…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: a) Average magnetization curve for bulk CrBr3 as a function of temperature for various AA (AFM) phase concentrations, obtained from atomistic simulations. b) Curie temperature TC values for bulk CrBr3 as a function of AA phase concentration. The most striking result i…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. Gong; L. Li; Z. Li; H. Ji; A. Stern; Y. Xia; T. Cao; W. Bao; C. Wang; Y. Wang; Z.Q. Qiu; R.J. Cava; S.G. Louie; J. Xia; X. Zhang Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals Nature 546 (2017) 265, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22060

    doi:10.1038/nature22060 2017

  2. [2]

    Wang; C.C

    M.C. Wang; C.C. Huang; C.H. Cheung; C.Y. Chen; S.G. Tan; T.W. Huang; Y. Zhao; Y. Zhao; G. Wu; Y.P. Feng; H.C. Wu; C.R. Chang Prospects and Opportunities of 2D van der Waals Magnetic Systems Ann. Phys.-Berlin 532 (2020) 1900452, https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201900452

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.201900452 2020

  3. [3]

    Gibertini; M

    M. Gibertini; M. Koperski; A.F. Morpurgo; K.S. Novoselov Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures Nature Nanotechnology 14 (2019) 408-419, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0438-6

    doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0438-6 2019

  4. [4]

    P. Liu; Y. Zhang; K. Li; Y. Li; Y. Pu Recent advances in 2D van der Waals magnets: Detection, modulation, and applications iScience 26 (2023) 107584, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107584

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Kajale; J

    S.N. Kajale; J. Hanna; K. Jang; D. Sarkar Two-dimensional magnetic materials for spintronic applications Nano Research 17 (2024) 743, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-024-6447-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s12274-024-6447-2 2024

  6. [6]

    S. Shi; X. Wang; Y. Zhao; W. Zhao Recent progress in strong spin-orbit coupling van der Waals materials and their heterostructures for spintronic applications Materials Today Electronics 6 (2023) 100060, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtelec.2023.100060

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Pham; S.C

    P.V. Pham; S.C. Bodepudi; K. Shehzad; Y. Liu; Y. Xu; B. Yu; X. Duan 2D Heterostructures for Ubiquitous Electronics and Optoelectronics: Principles, Opportunities, and Challenges Chemical Reviews 122 (2022) 6514, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00735

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00735 2022

  8. [8]

    Y. Li; B. Yang; S. Xu; B. Huang; W. Duan Emergent Phenomena in Magnetic Two-Dimensional Materials and van der Waals Heterostructures ACS Applied Electronic Materials 4 (2022) 3278, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c00419

    doi:10.1021/acsaelm.2c00419 2022

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Choi; K.I

    E.M. Choi; K.I. Sim; K.S. Burch; Y.H. Lee Emergent Multifunctional Magnetic Proximity in van der Waals Layered Heterostructures Advanced Science 9 (2022) 2200186, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202200186

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    Rubio-Verdú; S

    C. Rubio-Verdú; S. Turkel; Y. Song; L. Klebl; R. Samajdar; M.S. Scheurer; J.W.F. Venderbos; K. Watanabe; T. Taniguchi; H. Ochoa; L. Xian; D.M. Kennes; R.M. Fernandes; Á. Rubio; A.N. Pasupathy Moiré nematic phase in twisted double bilayer graphene Nature Physics 18 (2022) 196, ...

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Y. Cao; V. Fatemi; S. Fang; K. Watanabe; T. Taniguchi; E. Kaxiras; P. Jarillo-Herrero Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices Nature 556 (2018) 43, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26160

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    dos Santos; N.M.R

    J. dos Santos; N.M.R. Peres; A.H. Castro Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure Physical Review Letters 99 (2007) 4, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.256802

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    Y. Cao; V. Fatemi; A. Demir; S. Fang; S.L. Tomarken; J.Y. Luo; J.D. Sanchez-Yamagishi; K. Watanabe; T. Taniguchi; E. Kaxiras; R.C. Ashoori; P. Jarillo-Herrero Correlated insulator behaviour at half- filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices Nature 556 (2018) 80-+, https://...

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Yankowitz; S.W

    M. Yankowitz; S.W. Chen; H. Polshyn; Y.X. Zhang; K. Watanabe; T. Taniguchi; D. Graf; A.F. Young; C.R. Dean Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene Science 363 (2019) 1059, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav1910

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Valenta; M

    J. Valenta; M. Kratochvílová; M. Míšek; K. Carva; J. Kaštil; P. Doležal; P. Opletal; P. Čermák; P. Proschek; K. Uhlířová; J. Prchal; M.J. Coak; S. Son; J.-G. Park; V. Sechovský Pressure-induced large increase of Curie temperature of the van der Waals ferromagnet VI3 Physical R...

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    Mondal; M

    S. Mondal; M. Kannan; M. Das; L.S. Govindaraj, R.; B. Satpati; S. Arumugam; P. Mandal Effect of hydrostatic pressure on ferromagnetism in two-dimensional CrI3 Physical Review B 99 (2019) 180407(R), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.180407 20

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Ghosh; D

    A. Ghosh; D. Singh; T. Aramaki; Q. Mu; V. Borisov; Y. Kvashnin; G. Haider; M. Jonak; D. Chareev; S.A. Medvedev; R. Klingeler; M. Mito; E.H. Abdul-Hafidh; J. Vejpravova; M. Kalbàč; R. Ahuja; O. Eriksson; M. Abdel-Hafiez Exotic magnetic and electronic properties of layered CrI3 ...

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Yoshida; J

    H. Yoshida; J. Chiba; T. Kaneko; Y. Fujimori; S. Abe Pressure effect on the Curie temperature of CrBr3 Physica B 237-238 (1997) 525, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(97)00207-X

    1997 doi

  11. [19]

    M. Hong; L. Dai; H. Hu; X. Zhang; C. Li; Y. He Pressure-Induced Structural Phase Transition and Metallization of CrCl3 under Different Hydrostatic Environments up to 50.0 GPa Inorganic Chemistry 61 (2022) 4852-4864, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03486

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    O. Lis; D. Kozlenko; S. Kichanov; E. Lukin; I. Zel; B. Savenko Structural, Magnetic and Vibrational Properties of Van Der Waals Ferromagnet CrBr3 at High Pressure Materials 16 (2023) 454, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010454

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Coak; D.M

    M.J. Coak; D.M. Jarvis; H. Hamidov; A.R. Wildes; J.A.M. Paddison; C. Liu; C.R.S. Haines; N.T. Dang; S.E. Kichanov; B.N. Savenko; S. Lee; M. Kratochvílová; S. Klotz; T.C. Hansen; D.P. Kozlenko; J.-G. Park; S.S. Saxena Emergent Magnetic Phases in Pressure-Tuned van der Waals Ant...

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Pawbake; T

    A. Pawbake; T. Pelini; A. Delhomme; D. Romanin; D. Vaclavkova; G. Martinez; M. Calandra; M.-A. Measson; M. Veis; M. Potemski; M. Orlita; C. Faugeras High-Pressure Tuning of Magnon-Polarons in the Layered Antiferromagnet FePS3 ACS Nano 16 (2022) 12656-12665, https://doi.org/10....

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    W. Li; J. Feng; X. Zhang; C. Li; H. Dong; W. Deng; J. Liu; H. Tian; J. Chen; S. Jiang; H. Sheng; B. Chen; H. Zhang Metallization and Superconductivity in the van der Waals Compound CuP2Se through Pressure- Tuning of the Interlayer Coupling Journal of the American Chemical Soci...

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    M. Hong; L. Dai; H. Hu; X. Zhang; C. Li; Y. He Pressure-driven structural phase transitions and metallization in the two-dimensional ferromagnetic semiconductor CrBr3 Dalton Transactions 52 (2023) 7290, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3dt00899a

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Huang; G

    B. Huang; G. Clark; E. Navarro-Moratalla; D.R. Klein; R. Cheng; K.L. Seyler; D. Zhong; E. Schmidgall; M.A. McGuire; D.H. Cobden; W. Yao; D. Xiao; P. Jarillo-Herrero; X. Xu Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit Nature 546 (2017) 2...

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    McGuire Crystal and Magnetic Structures in Layered, Transition Metal Dihalides and Trihalides Crystals 7 (2017) 121, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7050121

    M.A. McGuire Crystal and Magnetic Structures in Layered, Transition Metal Dihalides and Trihalides Crystals 7 (2017) 121, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7050121

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Doležal; M

    P. Doležal; M. Kratochvílová; V. Holý; P. Čermák; V. Sechovský; M. Dušek; M. Míšek; T. Chakraborty; Y. Noda; S. Son; J.G. Park Crystal structures and phase transitions of the van derWaals ferromagnet VI3 Physical Review Materials 3 (2019) 121401(R), https://doi.org/10.1103/Phy...

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Kratochvílová; P

    M. Kratochvílová; P. Doležal; D. Hovančík; J. Pospíšil; A. Bendová; M. Dušek; V. Holý; V. Sechovský Crystal structure evolution in the van der Waals vanadium trihalides Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34 (2022) 294007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/ac6d38

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    Doležal; M

    P. Doležal; M. Kratochvílová; D. Hovančík; V. Holý; V. Sechovský; J. Pospíšil Formation of Domains within a Lower-to-Higher Symmetry Structural Transition in CrI3 Inorganic Chemistry 63 (2024) 976-982, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02970

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Havemann; F

    R. Havemann; F. Hammerath; P. Lepucki; P. Fritsch; A.P. Dioguardi; M. Grönke; M. Valldor; M. Roslova; A.U.B. Wolter; S. Hampel; T. Doert; H.J. Grafe; S. Wurmehl; B. Büchner Comparison of local structure of CrCl3 bulk and nanocrystals above and below the structural phase transi...

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    D. Wang; B. Sanyal Systematic Study of Monolayer to Trilayer CrI3: Stacking Sequence Dependence of Electronic Structure and Magnetism The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125 (2021) 18467, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04311

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    B. Niu; T. Su; B.A. Francisco; S. Ghosh; F. Kargar; X. Huang; M. Lohmann; J.X. Li; Y.D. Xu; T. Taniguchi; K. Watanabe; D. Wu; A. Balandin; J. Shi; Y.T. Cui Coexistence of Magnetic Orders in Two- Dimensional Magnet CrI3 Nano Letters 20 (2020) 553-558, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac...

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    Meseguer-Sánchez; C

    J. Meseguer-Sánchez; C. Popescu; J.L. García-Muñoz; H. Luetkens; G. Taniashvili; E. Navarro- Moratalla; Z. Guguchia; E.J.G. Santos Coexistence of structural and magnetic phases in van der Waals magnet CrI3 Nature Communications 12 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26342-4

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    Liu; L.J

    Y. Liu; L.J. Wu; X. Tong; J. Li; J. Tao; Y.M. Zhu; C. Petrovic Thickness-dependent magnetic order in CrI3 single crystals Scientific Reports 9 (2019) 13599, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50000-x

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    X.Y. Yu; X. Zhang; Q. Shi; S.J. Tian; H.C. Lei; K. Xu; H. Hosono Large magnetocaloric effect in van der Waals crystal CrBr3 Frontiers of Physics 14 (2019) 43501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-019-0883-6 21

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    F.R. Yao; V. Multian; Z. Wang; N. Ubrig; J. Teyssier; F. Wu; E. Giannini; M. Gibertini; I. Gutiérrez- Lezama; A.F. Morpurgo Multiple antiferromagnetic phases and magnetic anisotropy in exfoliated CrBr3 multilayers Nature Communications 14 (2023) 10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    Kipczak; A

    Ł. Kipczak; A. Karmakar; M. Grzeszczyk; R. Janiszewska; T. Woźniak; Z. Chen; J. Pawłowski; K. Watanabe; T. Taniguchi; A. Babiński; M. Koperski; M.R. Molas Resonant Raman scattering of few layers CrBr3 Scientific Reports 14 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57622-w

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Jiang; Q

    X. Jiang; Q. Liu; J. Xing; N. Liu; Y. Guo; Z. Liu; J. Zhao Recent progress on 2D magnets: Fundamental mechanism, structural design and modification Applied Physics Reviews 8 (2021) 031305, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0039979

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Olmos; S

    R. Olmos; S. Alam; P.-H. Chang; K. Gandha; I.C. Nlebedim; A. Cole; F. Tafti; R.R. Zope; S.R. Singamaneni Pressure dependent magnetic properties on bulk CrBr3 single crystals J. Alloy. Compd. 911 (2022) 165034, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165034

    2022

  32. [40]

    Hovančík; M

    D. Hovančík; M. Kratochvílová; T. Haidamak; P. Doležal; K. Carva; A. Bendová; J. Prokleška; P. Proschek; M. Míšek; D.I. Gorbunov; J. Kotek; V. Sechovský; J. Pospíšil Robust intralayer antiferromagnetism and tricriticality in the van der Waals compound VBr3 Physical Review B 10...

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Oxford Diffraction., https://doi.org/

    CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction., https://doi.org/

  34. [42]

    Palatinus; G

    L. Palatinus; G. Chapuis SUPERFLIP - a computer program for the solution of crystal structures by charge flipping in arbitrary dimensions Journal of Applied Crystallography 40 (2007) 786-790, https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889807029238

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    Petříček; L

    V. Petříček; L. Palatinus; J. Plášil; M. Dušek Jana2020 – a new version of the crystallographic computing system Jana Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials 238 (2023) 271-282, https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2023-0005

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Giriat; W

    G. Giriat; W. Wang; J.P. Attfield; A.D. Huxley; K.V. Kamenev Turnbuckle diamond anvil cell for high-pressure measurements in a superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer Review of Scientific Instruments 81 (2010) 073905, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3465311

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    Klotz; J.C

    S. Klotz; J.C. Chervin; P. Munsch; G. Le Marchand Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics 42 (2009) 7, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/7/075413

    2009 doi

  38. [46]

    Angel; M

    R.J. Angel; M. Bujak; J. Zhao; G.D. Gatta; S.D. Jacobsen Effective hydrostatic limits of pressure media for high-pressure crystallographic studies Journal of Applied Crystallography 40 (2007) 26-32, https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889806045523

    2007 doi

  39. [47]

    M.I. Eremets. High Pressure Experimental Methods; Oxford University Press, 1996. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198562696.001.0001

    1996

  40. [48]

    Supporting Information, https://doi.org/

  41. [49]

    Kresse; J

    G. Kresse; J. Furthmüller Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set Computational Materials Science 6 (1996) 15-50, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

    1996 doi

  42. [50]

    Blöchl Projector augmented-wave method Physical Review B 50 (1994) 17953-17979, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    P.E. Blöchl Projector augmented-wave method Physical Review B 50 (1994) 17953-17979, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    1994 doi

  43. [51]

    Kresse; D

    G. Kresse; D. Joubert From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method Physical Review B 59 (1999) 1758-1775, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

    1999 doi

  44. [52]

    Perdew; K

    J.P. Perdew; K. Burke; M. Ernzerhof Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple Physical Review Letters 77 (1996) 3865-3868, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  45. [53]

    Grimme; S

    S. Grimme; S. Ehrlich; L. Goerigk Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory Journal of Computational Chemistry 32 (2011) 1456-1465, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21759

    2011 doi

  46. [54]

    Klimeš; D.R

    J. Klimeš; D.R. Bowler; A. Michaelides Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids Physical Review B 83 (2011) 195131, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.195131

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    Monkhorst; J.D

    H.J. Monkhorst; J.D. Pack Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations Physical Review B 13 (1976) 5188-5192, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

    1976 doi

  48. [56]

    Anisimov; O

    V.I. Anisimov; O. Gunnarsson Density-functional calculation of effective Coulomb interactions in metals Physical Review B 43 (1991) 7570-7574, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.7570

    1991 doi

  49. [57]

    Soriano; M.I

    D. Soriano; M.I. Katsnelson; J. Fernández-Rossier Magnetic Two-Dimensional Chromium Trihalides: A Theoretical Perspective Nano Letters 20 (2020) 6225-6234, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02381

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    Torelli; K.S

    D. Torelli; K.S. Thygesen; T. Olsen High throughput computational screening for 2D ferromagnetic materials: the critical role of anisotropy and local correlations 2D Materials 6 (2019) 045018, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab2c43

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    Available under GNU General Public License, http://physics.uu.se/uppasd/ and http://github.com/UppASD/UppASD/

    Uppsala Atomistic Spin Dynamics (UppASD) code. Available under GNU General Public License, http://physics.uu.se/uppasd/ and http://github.com/UppASD/UppASD/. 22

  52. [60]

    Eriksson; A

    O. Eriksson; A. Bergman; L. Bergqvist; J. Hellsvik. Atomistic Spin Dynamics: Foundations and Applications; Oxford University Press, 2017

    2017

  53. [61]

    Skubic; J

    B. Skubic; J. Hellsvik; L. Nordström; O. Eriksson A method for atomistic spin dynamics simulations: implementation and examples Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20 (2008) 315203, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/31/315203

    2008 doi

  54. [63]

    T. Li; S. Jiang; N. Sivadas; Z. Wang; Y. Xu; D. Weber; J.E. Goldberger; K. Watanabe; T. Taniguchi; C.J. Fennie; K. Fai Mak; J. Shan Pressure-controlled interlayer magnetism in atomically thin CrI3 Nature Materials 18 (2019) 1303-1308, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0506-1

    2019 doi

  55. [64]

    T. Song; Z. Fei; M. Yankowitz; Z. Lin; Q. Jiang; K. Hwangbo; Q. Zhang; B. Sun; T. Taniguchi; K. Watanabe; M.A. McGuire; D. Graf; T. Cao; J.-H. Chu; D.H. Cobden; C.R. Dean; D. Xiao; X. Xu Switching 2D magnetic states via pressure tuning of layer stacking Nature Materials 18 (20...

    2019 doi

  56. [65]

    Samuelsen; R

    E.J. Samuelsen; R. Silberglitt; G. Shirane; J.P. Remeika Spin Waves in Ferromagnetic CrBr3 Physical Review B 3 (1971) 157-166, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.3.157

    1971 doi

  57. [66]

    T. Kong; S. Guo; D. Ni; R.J. Cava Crystal structure and magnetic properties of the layered van der Waals compound VBr3 Physical Review Materials 3 (2019) 084419, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.084419

    2019 doi

  58. [67]

    T. Kong; K. Stolze; E.I. Timmons; J. Tao; D.R. Ni; S. Guo; Z. Yang; R. Prozorov; R.J. Cava VI3-a New Layered Ferromagnetic Semiconductor Advanced Materials 31 (2019) 1808074, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201808074

    2019 doi

  59. [68]

    Kozlenko; O.N

    D.P. Kozlenko; O.N. Lis; S.E. Kichanov; E.V. Lukin; N.M. Belozerova; B.N. Savenko Spin-induced negative thermal expansion and spin–phonon coupling in van der Waals material CrBr3 npj Quantum Materials 6 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-021-00318-5

    2021 doi

  60. [69]

    T. Liu; J. Peiro; D.K. de Wal; J.C. Leutenantsmeyer; M.H.D. Guimaraes; B.J. van Wees Spin caloritronics in a CrBr3-based magnetic van der Waals heterostructure Physical Review B 101 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.205407

    2020 doi

  61. [70]

    Nikitin; B

    S.E. Nikitin; B. Fåk; K.W. Krämer; T. Fennell; B. Normand; A.M. Läuchli; C. Rüegg Thermal Evolution of Dirac Magnons in the Honeycomb Ferromagnet CrBr3 Physical Review Letters 129 (2022) 127201, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.129.127201

    2022 doi

  62. [71]

    Hovančík; D

    D. Hovančík; D. Repček; F. Borodavka; C. Kadlec; K. Carva; P. Doležal; M. Kratochvílová; P. Kužel; S. Kamba; V. Sechovský; J. Pospíšil Terahertz Magnetic and Lattice Excitations in van der Waals Ferromagnet VI3 The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13 (2022) 11095-11104, h...

    2022 doi

  63. [72]

    J.Y. Liu; Q. Sun; Y. Kawazoe; P. Jena Exfoliating biocompatible ferromagnetic Cr-trihalide monolayers Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 18 (2016) 8777-8784, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp04835d

    2016 doi

  64. [73]

    Z. Cai; S. Bao; Z.-L. Gu; Y.-P. Gao; Z. Ma; Y. Shangguan; W. Si; Z.-Y. Dong; W. Wang; Y. Wu; D. Lin; J. Wang; K. Ran; S. Li; D. Adroja; X. Xi; S.-L. Yu; X. Wu; J.-X. Li; J. Wen Topological magnon insulator spin excitations in the two-dimensional ferromagnet CrBr3 Physical Revi...

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    M. Gibertini Magnetism and stability of all primitive stacking patterns in bilayer chromium trihalides Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 54 (2021) 064002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abc2f4

    2021 doi

  66. [75]

    Wagner; E.P

    D. Wagner; E.P. Wohlfarth The pressure dependence of the Curie temperature of heterogeneous ferromagnetic alloys Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 11 (1981) 2417, https://doi.org/10.1088/0305- 4608/11/11/023 23 Supporting Information for: Suppression of ferromagnetism in van...

    1981 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.