Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 74 references

Under certainty the whole distribution grid forms one stable local energy market; under severe congestion every prosumer is better off alone.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-15 14:45 UTC pith:ECAVESQ3

load-bearing objection We do not have the energy-market manuscript: the full text supplied is a different paper (ML-SDRG for quantum spin chains), so the two limiting theorems and the partitioning algorithm cannot be checked. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.05169 v3 pith:ECAVESQ3 submitted 2026-03-05 eess.SY cs.SY

Uncertainty and Autarky: Cooperative Game Theory for Stable Local Energy Market Partitioning

Saurabh Vaishampayan , Maryam Kamgarpour This is my paper
classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords local energy marketscooperative game theorydistribution grid partitioningprosumersautarkycoalitional externalitiesprosumption uncertaintygrid congestion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks how large and how composed the local energy markets that strategic prosumers form should be, once grid limits, random load and generation, and interference between neighboring coalitions are taken seriously. It casts distribution-grid partitioning as a cooperative game and defines an optimal stable partitioning problem that trades off the grid operator’s interests against prosumers who will only stay in a market if they cannot gain by leaving. The central results are sharp limiting cases: when load and generation are deterministic the single largest coalition (everyone together) is the optimal stable partition; when the grid is heavily congested, individual self-consumption—autarky—is optimal instead. Between those extremes, with stochastic prosumption and moderate congestion, the authors give an algorithm that computes the optimal stable partition and check it on benchmark and real feeders. The point for a sympathetic reader is practical: uncertainty and line limits do not merely reduce efficiency; they qualitatively change which coalitions can form and endure.

Core claim

In a cooperative-game model of distribution grids with coalitional externalities and grid constraints, the optimal stable partition is the grand coalition when prosumption is deterministic, and is pure individual self-consumption when congestion is high; for stochastic prosumption and moderate congestion an algorithm evaluates the optimal stable partition between those extremes.

What carries the argument

The optimal stable partitioning problem: a cooperative game over grid partitions whose value function encodes uncertain prosumption, network constraints, and externalities between coalitions, solved for partitions that are stable for strategic prosumers while balancing operator objectives.

Load-bearing premise

That the paper’s chosen notion of coalitional stability and the way grid physics and uncertainty enter each coalition’s value really match how prosumers decide to join or leave a market.

What would settle it

On a feeder with near-deterministic measured load and generation and mild congestion, show that the grand coalition is unstable under the paper’s value function, or that real prosumers systematically refuse the all-in market while accepting smaller coalitions—directly contradicting the deterministic limiting claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Grid operators can treat congestion severity as a structural switch: mild congestion favors one integrated local market; severe congestion favors autarky.
  • Prosumption uncertainty alone can block the grand coalition even when lines are not heavily loaded.
  • Market-design and tariff rules must be checked for stability under externalities between multiple simultaneous local markets on the same feeder.
  • The algorithm gives a concrete way to recompute partitions as forecasts of load, generation, and congestion change.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two limiting regimes suggest a congestion-and-uncertainty driven transition in market structure that operators could monitor with a small set of network metrics.
  • The same stability-plus-partition template may transfer to other shared-network resource markets (heat, water, EV charging) where coalitions create externalities on a physical graph.
  • If the value function is misspecified, the algorithm still runs but can recommend partitions that real prosumers would leave—so field trials that observe exit behavior are the natural next test.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. From the abstract, the manuscript claims a cooperative-game framework for partitioning a distribution grid into local energy markets (LEMs) under uncertain prosumption, grid constraints, and coalitional externalities. It formulates an “optimal stable partitioning” problem balancing the grid operator against strategic prosumers, asserts that under deterministic load/generation the grand coalition is the optimal stable partition, that under high congestion individual autarky is optimal, and that for stochastic prosumption with moderate congestion an algorithm evaluates the optimal stable partition, with numerical validation on benchmark and real grids. The supplied full-text body, however, is an unrelated manuscript on machine-learning the strong-disorder renormalization group for disordered quantum spin chains (arXiv:2603.05164), so none of the energy-market theorems, value function, stability concept, algorithm, or experiments can be inspected.

Significance. If the abstract claims hold under a well-specified core/stability notion and a faithful network-physics value function, the work would clarify how uncertainty and congestion shape LEM scale and composition and would give operators a concrete partitioning tool. That significance cannot be assessed from the materials provided: the limiting theorems, the algorithm, and the numerical evidence are not present in the full text that was supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. Manuscript mismatch: the title, abstract, and arXiv id (2603.05169, eess.SY) describe cooperative-game LEM partitioning, but the full-text body is the ML-SDRG quantum-spin-chain paper (arXiv:2603.05164, cond-mat.dis-nn). No definition of the characteristic function, stability concept (core, nucleolus, etc.), uncertainty model, optimal-stable-partitioning program, algorithm, or grid experiments for the energy-market claims appears in the supplied text. The two limiting statements and the algorithm claim are therefore unverifiable.
  2. Because the correct body is absent, the load-bearing modeling choice identified in the abstract—the value function that encodes grid constraints and coalitional externalities, and the stability notion used for “optimal stable partition”—cannot be checked for internal consistency or operational fidelity. Without that, neither the deterministic grand-coalition result nor the high-congestion autarky result can be audited.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract alone does not name the cooperative-game solution concept or the prosumption uncertainty model (scenario set vs. distribution family); those should be stated explicitly once the correct manuscript is supplied.
  2. Abstract uses “largest market coalition” and “individual self-consumption” without defining the partition lattice or the congestion metric that separates the “high” vs. “moderate” regimes; precise definitions will be needed for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity can be established: the supplied full-text block is a different manuscript (ML-SDRG quantum spins) and supplies no equations or proofs for the energy-market claims.

full rationale

The abstract of 2603.05169 asserts two limiting theorems (grand coalition optimal under deterministic prosumption; autarky optimal under high congestion) plus an algorithm for the stochastic moderate-congestion regime. The CACHEABLE full-text block, however, is the unrelated arXiv:2603.05164 manuscript on graph-neural-network approximation of strong-disorder RG for long-range spin chains; it contains none of the cooperative-game value functions, stability notions, grid-constraint encodings, or partition algorithms required to audit those claims. Consequently no load-bearing step of the energy-market derivation can be quoted or reduced to its own inputs. On the abstract alone the structure is the ordinary non-circular pattern of proving extremes and supplying a computational method for the intermediate case; residual modeling risk (choice of core concept or uncertainty representation) is a correctness issue, not circularity. Score is therefore 0 with empty steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review: free parameters, axioms, and invented entities are inferred from stated modeling choices. The central claims rest on cooperative-game stability under externalities, a value function that encodes grid physics and uncertainty, and an optimality criterion balancing operator and prosumer interests. None of these are fully specified in the abstract; they are domain modeling assumptions rather than derived facts.

free parameters (2)
  • Congestion level thresholds separating 'high' vs 'moderate' regimes
    The abstract partitions results by congestion severity; the numerical cutoffs that trigger autarky vs intermediate partitions are free modeling/experimental choices not fixed by theory in the abstract.
  • Uncertainty model for prosumption (distribution family / scenario set)
    Stochastic load and generation enter the general-case algorithm; the abstract does not fix the probability model, so any fitted or chosen distribution parameters are free.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Prosumers form coalitions according to a cooperative-game stability concept that remains meaningful under coalitional externalities induced by shared grid constraints.
    Load-bearing modeling premise of the whole framework; abstract invokes stable partitioning under externalities without stating which solution concept (core, stable set, etc.).
  • domain assumption Grid constraints and network physics can be encoded into coalition values so that the optimal stable partition balances operator and prosumer interests.
    Required for the optimal stable partitioning problem to be well-posed as stated in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Deterministic and high-congestion extremes are analytically tractable and yield grand-coalition and autarky optima respectively.
    These are the paper’s claimed theorems; treated as axioms until proofs are inspectable.
invented entities (1)
  • Optimal stable partitioning problem (operator–prosumer balanced objective over stable partitions) no independent evidence
    purpose: Unifies stability of local energy market coalitions with grid-operator objectives under uncertainty and externalities.
    Named formulation introduced by the abstract; independent evidence outside this paper is not established from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 12075 in / 2713 out tokens · 27376 ms · 2026-07-15T14:45:36.706687+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Local energy markets empower prosumers in distribution grids to form coalitions for collective self-consumption. An open question is to analyze the scale and composition of local energy market coalitions formed by strategic prosumers in distribution grids. This analysis must account for grid constraints, stochasticity of load and generation, as well as the interaction between possibly multiple local energy markets in the distribution grid. In this work, we present a cooperative game theoretic framework to study distribution grid partitioning into local energy markets under uncertain prosumption, grid constraints, and coalitional externalities. We formulate the optimal stable partitioning problem to balance the interests of the grid operator with that of strategic prosumers. Under deterministic load and generation, we show that the largest market coalition is the optimal stable partition. Under high levels of grid congestion, we show that individual self-consumption corresponds to the optimal stable partition. For the general case of stochastic prosumption and moderate grid congestion levels, we provide an algorithm to evaluate the optimal stable partition. We validate our algorithm and theory using numerical experiments on benchmark and real world distribution grids. Our results help in understanding the impact of prosumption uncertainty and grid constraints on coalition formation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  2. [2]

    H. v. L¨ ohneysen, Disorder, electron-electron interactions and the metal-insulator transition in heavily doped Si:P, Adv. in Solid State Phys.40, 143 (2000)

    2000

  3. [3]

    Kettemann, Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Metal-Insulator Transitions in Doped Semiconductors, Special Issue in memory of K

    S. Kettemann, Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Metal-Insulator Transitions in Doped Semiconductors, Special Issue in memory of K. B. Efetov, Annals of Physics 456, 169306 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    S. Kettemann, Competition between Kondo Effect and RKKY Coupling, Lecture Notes of the Autumn School on Correlated Electrons 2024, Correlations and Phase Transitions, Band/Volume 14 edited by Eva Pavarini and Erik Koch,Verlag des Forschungszentrums J¨ ulich (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Salvino, S

    D. Salvino, S. Rogge, B. Tigner, D. Osheroff, Low Temperature ac Dielectric Response of Glasses to High dc Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 286 (1994)

    1994

  6. [6]

    C. C. Yu and A. J. Leggett, Low temperature properties of amorphous materials: Through a glass darkly, Commun. Condens. Mat. Phys.14, 231 (1988)

    1988

  7. [7]

    Graß and M

    T. Graß and M. Lewenstein, Trapped-ion quantum simulation of tunable-range Heisenberg chains, EPJ Quantum Tech- nology 1:8 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Signoles, T

    A. Signoles, T. Franz, R. F. Alves, M. G¨ arttner, S. Whitlock, G. Z¨ urn, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Glassy dynamics in a disordered Heisenberg quantum spin system, Phys. Rev.X 11, 011011 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Islam, C

    R. Islam, C. Senko, W. C. Campbell, S. Korenblit, J. Smith, A. Lee, E. E. Edwards, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, and C. Monroe, Emergence and Frustration of Magnetic Order with Variable-Range Interactions in a Trapped Ion Quantum Simulator, Science340, 583 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Richerme, Z.-X

    P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss- Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature (London) 511, 198 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    B. L. Dwyer, L. V. H. Rodgers, E. K. Urbach, D. Bluvstein, S. Sangtawesin, H. Zhou, Y. Nassab, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Yuan, K. De Greve, E. L. Peterson, H. Knowles, T. Sumarac, J.-P. Chou, A. Gali, V.V. Dobrovitski, M. D. Lukin and N. P. de Leon, Probing spin dynamics on diamond surfaces using a single quantum sensor, PRX Quantum3, 040328 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    E. J. Davis, B. Ye, F. Machado, S. A. Meynell, W. Wu, T. Mittiga, W. Schenken, M. Joos, B. Kobrin, Y. Lyu, Z. Wang, D. Bluvstein, S. Choi, C. Zu, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, N. Y. Yao, Probing many-body dynamics in a two dimensional dipolar spin ensemble, Nature Physics, 19, 836–844 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Altman et al., Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities, PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021)

    E. Altman et al., Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities, PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Lunkin et al., Evidence for a two-dimensional quantum glass state at high temperatures, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01309v1 (2026)

    A. Lunkin et al., Evidence for a two-dimensional quantum glass state at high temperatures, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01309v1 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    R. N. Bhatt and P. A. Lee, A scaling method for low temperature behavior of random antiferromagnetic systems, Journal of Applied Physics52, 1703-1707 (1981)

    1981

  17. [17]

    R. N. Bhatt and P. A. Lee, Scaling studies of highly disordered spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 344(1982)

    1982

  18. [18]

    D. S. Fisher, Random antiferromagnetic quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B50, 3799 (1994)

    1994

  19. [19]

    D. S. Fisher, Critical behavior of random transverse-field Ising spin chains , Phys. Rev. B51, 6411 (1995)

    1995

  20. [20]

    Igloi and C

    F. Igloi and C. Monthus, Strong disorder RG approach of random systems, Phys. Rep.412, 277 (2005)

    2005

  21. [21]

    Igl´ oi and C

    F. Igl´ oi and C. Monthus, Strong disorder RG approach - a short review of recent developments, Eur. Phys. J.B 91, 290 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    Vosk and E

    R. Vosk and E. Altman, Many-Body Localization in One Dimension as a Dynamical Renormalization Group Fixed Point, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 067204 (2013)

    2013

  23. [23]

    Igloi, Z

    F. Igloi, Z. Szatm´ ari, and Y-C. Lin, Entanglement entropy dynamics of disordered quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 85, 094417 (2012)

    2012

  24. [24]

    Moure, S

    N. Moure, S. Haas, S. Kettemann, Many Body Localization Transition in Random Quantum Spin Chains with Long Range Interactions, Europhys. Lett.111, 27003 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Moure, Hyun-Yong Lee, S

    N. Moure, Hyun-Yong Lee, S. Haas, R. N. Bhatt, S. Kettemann, Disordered Quantum SCs with Long-Range Antiferro- magnetic Interactions, Phys. Rev.B 97, 014206 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Mohdeb, J

    Y. Mohdeb, J. Vahedi, N. Moure, A. Roshani, H.Y. Lee, R. Bhatt, S. Haas, S. Kettemann, Entanglement Properties of Disordered Quantum SCs with Long-Range Antiferromagnetic Interactions, Phys. Rev.B 102, 214201 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    S. Kettemann, Strong Disorder Renormalization Group Method for Bond Disordered Antiferromagnetic Quantum Spin Chains with Long Range Interactions: Ground State Properties, accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. B (2025), https://doi.org/10.1103/b6wg-bt9k

    work page doi:10.1103/b6wg-bt9k 2025

  28. [28]

    Juh´ asz, I

    R. Juh´ asz, I. A. Kov´ acs, F. Igl´ oi, Random transverse-field Ising chain with long-range interactions, Europhys. Lett.,107, 47008 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    I. A. Kov´ acs, R. Juh´ asz, F. Igl´ oi, Long-range random transverse-field Ising model in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B93, 184203 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Pekker, G

    D. Pekker, G. Refael, E. Altman, E. Demler, and V. Oganesyan, Hilbert-glass transition: New universality of temperature- tuned many-body dynamical quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011052 (2014). 12

    2014

  31. [31]

    Huang and J

    Y. Huang and J. E. Moore, Excited-state entanglement and thermal mutual information in random spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 90, 220202 (2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    A. S. Aramthottil, P. Sierant, M. Lewenstein, and J. Zakrzewski, Phenomenology of many-body localization in bond- disordered spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 196302 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Mohdeb, J

    Y. Mohdeb, J. Vahedi, S. Kettemann, Excited-Eigenstate Properties of XX Spin Chains with Random Long-Range Inter- actions, Phys. Rev. BB 106, 104201 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Kettemann, Finite Temperature Properties of Antiferromagnetic Quantum Spin Chains with Random Long Range Couplings, submitted for publication in Phys

    S. Kettemann, Finite Temperature Properties of Antiferromagnetic Quantum Spin Chains with Random Long Range Couplings, submitted for publication in Phys. Rev. B (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17828

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Mohdeb, J

    Y. Mohdeb, J. Vahedi, S. Haas, R. N. Bhatt, S. Kettemann, Global Quench Dynamics and the Growth of Entanglement Entropy in Disordered Spin Chains with Tunable Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. B 108, L140203 (2023)

    2023

  36. [37]

    Mehta, M

    P. Mehta, M. Bukov, C.-H. Wang, A. G.R. Day, C. Richardson, C. K. Fisher, D. J. Schwab, Physics Reports810. 1–124 (2019)

    2019

  37. [38]

    Carleo, I

    G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. Vogt-Maranto, L. Zdeborov´ a, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 045002 (2019)

    2019

  38. [39]

    Carleo and M

    G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Solving the Quantum Many-Body Problem with Artificial Neural Networks, Science 355, 602 (2017)

    2017

  39. [40]

    D.-L. Deng, X. Li and S. Das Sarma, Quantum Entanglement in Neural Network States, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021021 (2017)

    2017

  40. [41]

    Nomura,Helping restricted Boltzmann machines with quantum-state representation by restoring symmetry, J

    Y. Nomura,Helping restricted Boltzmann machines with quantum-state representation by restoring symmetry, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33 (2020)

    2020

  41. [42]

    K. Choo, G. Carleo, N. Regnault, T. Neupert,Symmetries and Many-Body Excitations with Neural-Network Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 167204 (2018)

    2018

  42. [43]

    Rende, L

    R. Rende, L. L. Viteritti, F. Becca, et al., Foundation neural-networks quantum states as a unified Ansatz for multiple hamiltonians. Nat Commun 16, 7213 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62098-x

    doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62098-x 2025

  43. [44]

    Luciano Loris Viteritti, Riccardo Rende, Giacomo Bracci Testasecca, Jacopo Niedda, Roderich Moessner, Giuseppe Carleo, Antonello Scardicchio, Quantum Spin Glass in the Two-Dimensional Disordered Heisenberg Model via Foundation Neural- Network Quantum States, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05073 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    K. Choo, T. Neupert, G. Carleo,Two-dimensional frustrated J1-J2 model studied with neural network quantum states, Phys. Rev. B 100, 125124 (2019)

    2019

  45. [46]

    Roca-Jerat, M

    S. Roca-Jerat, M. Gallego, F. Luis, J. Carrete, D. Zueco,Transformer wave function for quantum long-range models, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205147 (2024)

    2024

  46. [47]

    Sharir, Y

    O. Sharir, Y. Levine, N. Wies, G. Carleo, A. Shashua,Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 020503 (2019)

    2019

  47. [48]

    Lange, A

    H. Lange, A. Van de Walle, A. Abedinnia and A. Bohrdt, From architectures to applications: a review of neural quantum states, Quantum Sci. Technol.9, 040501 (2024)

    2024

  48. [49]

    Sheshmani, Y.-Z

    A. Sheshmani, Y.-Z. You, B. Buyukates, A. Ziashahabi, S. Avestimehr,Renormalization Group flow, Optimal Transport and Diffusion-based Generative Model, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17090 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [50]

    Mehta and D

    P. Mehta and D. J. Schwab, An exact mapping between the variational renormalization group and deep learning, arXiv:1410.3831. (2014)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [51]

    C. Fan, M. Shen, Z. Nussinov, et al.,Searching for spin glass ground states through deep reinforcement learning, Nat. Commun.14, 725 (2023)

    2023

  51. [52]

    Hou and Y.-Z

    W. Hou and Y.-Z. You, Machine Learning Renormalization Group for Statistical Physics, arXiv:2306.11054 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [53]

    X.-Z. Luo, D. Luo and R. G. Melko, Operator Learning Renormalization Group, arXiv:2403.03199 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [54]

    Di Sante, M

    D. Di Sante, M. Medvid´ ovi´ c, A. Toschi, G. Sangiovanni, C. Franchini, A. M. Sengupta and A. J. Millis, Deep Learning the Functional Renormalization Group, Physical Review Letters 129, 136402 (2022)

    2022

  54. [55]

    Marchand, M

    T. Marchand, M. Ozawa, G. Biroli and S. Mallat, Wavelet Conditional Renormalization Group, arXiv:2207.04941 (2022)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [56]

    Y. Zhao, M. M. Fogler and Y.-Z. You, Application of deep neural networks for computing the renormalization group flow of the two-dimensionalϕ 4 field theory, arXiv:2510.06508 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [57]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, D. E. G¨ okmen, Z. Ringel, S. D. Huber and M. Koch-Janusz, Optimal Renormalization Group Transformation from Information Theory, Physical Review X 10, 011037 (2020)

    2020

  57. [58]

    D. E. G¨ okmen, Z. Ringel, S. D. Huber and M. Koch-Janusz, Statistical physics through the lens of real-space mutual information, Physical Review Letters 127, 240603 (2021)

    2021

  58. [59]

    D. E. G¨ okmen, S. Biswas, S. D. Huber, Z. Ringel, F. Flicker and M. Koch-Janusz, Compression theory for inhomogeneous systems, Nature Communications 15, 10123 (2024)

    2024

  59. [60]

    Erdmenger, K

    J. Erdmenger, K. T. Grosvenor and R. Jefferson, Towards quantifying information flows: relative entropy in deep neural networks and the renormalization group, SciPost Physics 12, 041 (2022)

    2022

  60. [61]

    T Ohtsuki, T Ohtsuki, Deep learning the quantum phase transitions in random two-dimensional electron systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 85 (12), 123706 (2016)

    2016

  61. [62]

    Beetar, J

    C. Beetar, J. Murugan and D. Rosa, Neural Networks as Universal Probes of Many-Body Localization in Quantum Graphs, arXiv:2108.05737 (2021)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [63]

    Chen, Many-body mobility edges in one and two dimensions revealed by convolutional neural networks, Physical Review B 109, 075124 (2024)

    A. Chen, Many-body mobility edges in one and two dimensions revealed by convolutional neural networks, Physical Review B 109, 075124 (2024)

    2024

  63. [64]

    Saleh, Predicting the von Neumann Entanglement Entropy Using a Graph Neural Network, arXiv:2503.23635 (2025)

    A. Saleh, Predicting the von Neumann Entanglement Entropy Using a Graph Neural Network, arXiv:2503.23635 (2025). 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [65]

    Huang et al., Direct entanglement detection of quantum systems using machine learning, npj Quantum Information 11, 29 (2025)

    J. Huang et al., Direct entanglement detection of quantum systems using machine learning, npj Quantum Information 11, 29 (2025)

    2025

  65. [66]

    Passetti, A

    G. Passetti, A. Mollabashi, M. Haque, F. Marquardt and N. Mohseni, Deep learning of many-body observables and quantum information scrambling, Quantum 8, 1417 (2024)

    2024

  66. [67]

    Schmidt, F

    P. Schmidt, F. Marquardt and N. Mohseni, Transfer learning in predicting quantum many-body dynamics: from physical observables to entanglement entropy, Quantum Science and Technology, doi:10.1088/2058-9565/adbd6d (2024)

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/adbd6d 2058

  67. [68]

    E. A. Meirom, H. Maron, S. Mannor and G. Chechik, Optimizing Tensor Network Contraction Using Reinforcement Learning, Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 162, 15278–15312 (2022)

    2022

  68. [69]

    Refael and J

    G. Refael and J. E. Moore, Entanglement Entropy of Random Quantum Critical Points in One Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 260602 (2004)

    2004

  69. [70]

    J. A. Hoyos, A. P. Vieira, N. Laflorencie, and E. Miranda, Correlation amplitude and entanglement entropy in random spin chains, Phys. Rev.B 76, 174425 (2007)

    2007

  70. [71]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. P06002 (2004)

    2004

  71. [72]

    Hikihara et al., Tensor-network strong-disorder renormalization groups for random quantum spin systems in two di- mensions, arXiv:2006.12857 (2020)

    T. Hikihara et al., Tensor-network strong-disorder renormalization groups for random quantum spin systems in two di- mensions, arXiv:2006.12857 (2020)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  72. [73]

    K. Seki, T. Hikihara and K. Okunishi, Entanglement-based tensor-network strong-disorder renormalization group, arXiv:2107.01555 (2021)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [74]

    Hikihara, H

    T. Hikihara, H. Ueda, K. Okunishi, K. Harada and T. Nishino, Automatic structural optimization of tree tensor networks, Physical Review Research 5, 013031 (2023)

    2023

  74. [75]

    Ozawa and Y

    T. Ozawa and Y. Kitano, Renormalization-group-inspired neural networks for computing topological invariants, Physical Review B 105, 205139 (2022)

    2022