pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02776 · v1 · pith:ECDWMWWFnew · submitted 2019-07-05 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · quant-ph

Precision measurement of the ionization energy and quantum defects of 39K I

Michael Peper , Felix Helmrich , Jonas Butscher , Josef Anton Agner , Hansj\"urg Schmutz , Fr\'ed\'eric Merkt , Johannes Deiglmayr This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph quant-ph
keywords Rydberg statespotassium-39ionization energyquantum defectsfine structurepolarizabilitieshyperfine splittingmillimeter-wave spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Global nonlinear regression of Rydberg term values in 39K gives an ionization threshold of 35009.8139710 cm^{-1}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents absolute-frequency measurements of one-photon transitions from the 4s ground state to np Rydberg states in ultracold 39K atoms. These data, together with millimeter-wave measurements of additional transitions, are fitted globally to extract an improved first ionization energy and the quantum defects of the np1/2 and np3/2 series. Refined quantum defects are also reported for the s, d, f and g series, along with confirmation of the inverted fine structure in the d series and an estimate of the K+ core polarizabilities derived from the f and g defects. The hyperfine interval of the ground state is measured separately by radio-frequency methods.

Core claim

A global nonlinear regression of the np1/2 and np3/2 term values yields an improved wave number of 35009.8139710(22)(sys)(3)(stat) cm^{-1} for the first ionization threshold of 39K and the quantum defects of the np1/2 and np3/2 series. Combining laser and millimeter-wave data improves the quantum defects of the s1/2, d3/2, d5/2, f and g states. The inverted fine structure of the d series is confirmed for n >= 32, the f-series fine-structure splitting is less than 100 kHz at n=31, and the g-series splitting matches the hydrogenic value for n >= 30. Static dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of the K+ ion are estimated from the f and g quantum defects.

What carries the argument

Global nonlinear regression of the np1/2 and np3/2 term values obtained from absolute-frequency laser spectroscopy.

If this is right

  • Quantum defects are now known to higher precision for the s1/2, d3/2, d5/2, f and g series of 39K.
  • The d-series fine structure remains inverted for all n >= 32.
  • The f-series fine-structure interval is smaller than 100 kHz at n=31, well below the hydrogenic value.
  • The g-series fine structure is regular and matches the hydrogenic prediction for n >= 30.
  • Static dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of the K+ core can be extracted directly from the measured f and g quantum defects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported ionization energy can serve as a reference standard for future calculations of potassium Rydberg wave functions.
  • The small f-series fine structure may simplify modeling of Rydberg-Rydberg interactions at high n.
  • Polarizability values derived here could be cross-checked against independent ion-core calculations or measurements in other alkali ions.

Load-bearing premise

The observed lines are correctly assigned to the np1/2 and np3/2 series and the regression accounts for all systematic frequency shifts without residual calibration or state-mixing errors.

What would settle it

An independent measurement of the ionization threshold, for example by scanning the photoionization continuum onset, that differs from 35009.8139710 cm^{-1} by more than the stated uncertainty.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02776 by Felix Helmrich, Fr\'ed\'eric Merkt, Hansj\"urg Schmutz, Johannes Deiglmayr, Jonas Butscher, Josef Anton Agner, Michael Peper.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fit residuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Black points) Population in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simultaneous fit of a linearization of the polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present absolute-frequency measurements in ultracold 39K samples of the transitions from the ground state to np Rydberg states. A global nonlinear regression of the np1/2 and np3/2 term values yields an improved wave number of 35009.8139710(22)(sys)(3)(stat) cm-1 for the first ionization threshold of 39K and the quantum defects of the np1/2 and np3/2 series. In addition, we report the frequencies of selected one-photon transitions n's <- np3/2, n'd <- np3/2, n'f <- nd and n'g <- nf and two-photon transitions nf <- np determined by millimeter-wave spectroscopy. By combining the results from the laser and millimeter-wave spectroscopic experiments, we obtain improved values for the quantum defects of the s1/2, d3/2, d5/2, f and g states. For the d series, the inverted fine structure was confirmed for n >= 32. The fine-structure splitting of the f series is less than 100 kHz at n=31, significantly smaller than the hydrogenic splitting, and the fine structure of the g series is regular for n >= 30, with a fine-structure splitting compatible with the hydrogenic prediction. From the measured quantum defects of the f and g series we derive an estimate for the static dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of the K+ ion core. Additionally, the hyperfine splitting of the 4s1/2 ground state of 39K was determined to be 461.719700(5) MHz using radio-frequency spectroscopy and Ramsey-type interferometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports absolute-frequency measurements of one-photon transitions from the 4s1/2 ground state to np1/2 and np3/2 Rydberg states in ultracold 39K. A global nonlinear regression of the resulting term values determines the ionization threshold as 35009.8139710(22)(sys)(3)(stat) cm^{-1} together with the np quantum defects. Millimeter-wave spectroscopy supplies additional transition frequencies (n's <- np3/2, n'd <- np3/2, n'f <- nd, n'g <- nf, and two-photon nf <- np), from which improved quantum defects are extracted for the s1/2, d3/2, d5/2, f, and g series. The work confirms inverted fine structure in the d series for n >= 32, a sub-100 kHz fine-structure interval in the f series at n=31, and hydrogenic-like fine structure in the g series for n >= 30; static dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of the K+ core are derived from the f and g defects. The 4s1/2 hyperfine splitting is measured as 461.719700(5) MHz by RF spectroscopy and Ramsey interferometry.

Significance. If the assignments and error budget are robust, the work supplies benchmark experimental values for the ionization energy and quantum defects of 39K that will serve as reference data for Rydberg-atom experiments, core-polarization calculations, and alkali-atom theory. The dual optical-plus-millimeter-wave approach together with explicit separation of statistical and systematic uncertainties strengthens the central result; the polarizability extraction from the high-l series is a useful additional outcome.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the n-range included in the global nonlinear regression and the explicit functional form (including any calibration parameters) are not stated; adding these details would allow readers to assess the fit directly.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a consolidated table listing all reported quantum defects (with uncertainties) for the s, p, d, f, and g series.
  3. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly indicate whether plotted quantities are term values, transition frequencies, or residuals.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation to accept the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental fit extracts ionization threshold and quantum defects directly from measured term values

full rationale

The paper performs absolute-frequency measurements of transitions to np Rydberg states in ultracold 39K and applies a global nonlinear regression to the resulting np1/2 and np3/2 term values to determine the ionization threshold and quantum defects. This is a standard parameter extraction from data; the fitted values are not renamed predictions or self-defined. Additional quantum defects for other series are obtained by combining independent laser and millimeter-wave measurements. The polarizability estimate is derived from the measured f and g quantum defects via standard Rydberg formulas. No self-citation chains, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The derivation chain is self-contained against external frequency data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of quantum-defect theory for extracting the ionization limit from observed term values and on the assumption that the selected transitions belong to the intended series. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • ionization threshold = 35009.8139710 cm^{-1}
    The primary fitted parameter obtained from the global nonlinear regression of np term values.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Rydberg term values are described by the standard quantum-defect formula with series-specific defects that are constant or slowly varying with n.
    Invoked when performing the global regression to separate the ionization limit from the quantum defects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5868 in / 1434 out tokens · 27048 ms · 2026-05-25T01:48:59.713614+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references

  1. [1]

    The fit to the term values of the s1/2 series additionally included the term value of the 4s1/2 state (0 cm−1)

    for lower values of n. The fit to the term values of the s1/2 series additionally included the term value of the 4s1/2 state (0 cm−1). The quantum-defect parame- ters were then obtained from separate, weighted fits of Eq. (2) (with EI fixed to the value determined from the p series) and Eq. (4) to the three sets of term values. The weights for the term value...

  2. [2]

    and crystals [54, 55]. The polarizabilities of free ions can be determined from spectra of atoms as proposed by Born and Heisenberg [56], Freeman and Kleppner [1], Mayer and Mayer [57] and Sansonetti et al. [58]. In the analysis of our data we follow the procedure used by San- sonetti et al. [58]. We assume that the energy of a given Rydberg state E(n,l )...

  3. [3]

    Penetration, exchange and relativistic effects Penetration, exchange and hydrogenic relativistic ef- fects were calculated as described in Ref. [58]. The one- electron wave functions of the valence electron and the core electrons used in the analysis were obtained from the atomic-structure code by Cowan [60]. This code performs a relativistically modified H...

  4. [4]

    Polarization When treating the polarization of the ion core in a multipole expansion up to quadrupole contributions, the energy shift caused by the polarizability of the ion core ∆Epol(n,l ) is given in perturbation theory as ∆Epol(n,l ) =hcRKa0 ( α′ d ⟨ R−4(n,l ) ⟩ +α′ q ⟨ R−6(n,l ) ⟩) , (6) whereα′ d andα′ q are the effective dipole and quadrupole polari...

    1994

  5. [5]

    R. R. Freeman and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. A 14, 1614 (1976)

    1976

  6. [6]

    Aldridge, P

    L. Aldridge, P. L. Gould, and E. E. Eyler, Phys. Rev. A 84, 034501 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Beyer, N

    M. Beyer, N. H¨ olsch, J. A. Agner, J. Deiglmayr, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012501 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    L. G. Marcassa and J. P. Shaffer, in Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , Vol. Volume 63, edited by E. Arimondo, P. R. Berman, and C. C. Lin (Academic Press, 2014) pp. 47–133

    2014

  9. [9]

    Deiglmayr, Phys

    J. Deiglmayr, Phys. Scr. 91, 104007 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firstenberg, H. P. B¨ uchler, and S. Hofferberth, J. Phys. B50, 133001 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    ˇSibali´ c, J

    N. ˇSibali´ c, J. D. Pritchard, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220, 319 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Deiglmayr, H

    J. Deiglmayr, H. Herburger, H. Saßmannshausen, P. Jansen, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Phys. Rev. A 93, 013424 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    Sprecher, C

    D. Sprecher, C. Jungen, W. Ubachs, and F. Merkt, Fara- day Discuss. 150, 51 (2011)

    2011

  14. [14]

    Fowler, Report on series in line spectra (Fleetway press, London, 1922)

    A. Fowler, Report on series in line spectra (Fleetway press, London, 1922)

    1922

  15. [15]

    Paschen and R

    F. Paschen and R. G¨ otze,Seriengesetze der Linienspek- tren (Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin, 1922)

    1922

  16. [16]

    Edl´ en, Z

    B. Edl´ en, Z. Phys.98, 445 (1936)

    1936

  17. [17]

    H. R. Kratz, Phys. Rev. 75, 1844 (1949)

    1949

  18. [18]

    Risberg, Ark

    P. Risberg, Ark. Fys. 10, 583 (1956)

    1956

  19. [19]

    Lorenzen, K

    C.-J. Lorenzen, K. Niemax, and L. Pendrill, Opt. Com- mun. 39, 370 (1981)

    1981

  20. [20]

    Lorenzen and K

    C.-J. Lorenzen and K. Niemax, Phys. Scr. 27, 300 (1983)

    1983

  21. [21]

    T. F. Gallagher and W. E. Cooke, Phys. Rev. A 18, 2510 (1978)

    1978

  22. [22]

    L. R. Pendrill and K. Niemax, J. Phys. B15, L147 (1982)

    1982

  23. [23]

    Saßmannshausen, F

    H. Saßmannshausen, F. Merkt, and J. Deiglmayr, Phys. Rev. A 87, 032519 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    C. A. Stan and W. Ketterle, Rev. Sci. Instr. 76, 063113 (2005)

    2005

  25. [25]

    Gokhroo, G

    V. Gokhroo, G. Rajalakshmi, R. K. Easwaran, and C. S. Unnikrishnan, J. Phys. B 44, 115307 (2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    Landini, S

    M. Landini, S. Roy, L. Carcagn´ ı, D. Trypogeorgos, M. Fattori, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Phys. Rev. A 84, 043432 (2011). 13

    2011

  27. [27]

    Merkt and H

    F. Merkt and H. Schmutz, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 10033 (1998)

    1998

  28. [28]

    Hollberg and J

    L. Hollberg and J. L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 230 (1984)

    1984

  29. [29]

    Amaldi and E

    E. Amaldi and E. Segr` e, Il Nuovo Cimento 11, 145 (1934)

    1934

  30. [30]

    F¨ uchtbauer, G

    C. F¨ uchtbauer, G. Joos, and O. Dinkelacker, Ann. Phys. 376, 204 (1923)

    1923

  31. [31]

    Fermi, Il Nuovo Cimento 11, 157 (1934)

    E. Fermi, Il Nuovo Cimento 11, 157 (1934)

    1934

  32. [32]

    I. I. Fabrikant, J. Phys. B 19, 1527 (1986)

    1986

  33. [33]

    J. L. Hall, C. J. Bord´ e, and K. Uehara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1339 (1976)

    1976

  34. [34]

    A. P. Kol’chenko, S. G. Rautian, and R. I. Sokolovski˘ ı, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 55, 1864 (1969), [Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 986 (1969)]

    1969

  35. [35]

    P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035009 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    J. S. Coursey, D. J. Schwab, J. J. Tsai, and R. A. Dragoset, Atomic Weights and Isotopic Compositions (version 4.1), National Institute of Standards and Tech- nology, Gaithersburg, MD (2015), [Online] Available at http://physics.nist.gov/Comp [2019, 01, 29]

    2015

  37. [37]

    G. W. F. Drake and R. A. Swainson, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5448 (1991)

    1991

  38. [38]

    Falke, E

    S. Falke, E. Tiemann, C. Lisdat, H. Schnatz, and G. Grosche, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032503 (2006)

    2006

  39. [39]

    Johansson and N

    I. Johansson and N. Svendenius, Phys. Scr. 5, 129 (1972)

    1972

  40. [40]

    J. E. Stalnaker, H. M. G. Ayer, J. H. Baron, A. Nu˜ nez, and M. E. Rowan, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012504 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    T. F. Gallagher, Rydberg Atoms, Cambridge Monographs on Atomic, Molecular and Chemical Physics No. 3 (Cam- bridge University Press, 1994)

    1994

  42. [42]

    N. C. Pyper and P. Marketos, J. Phys. B14, 4469 (1981)

    1981

  43. [43]

    Truppe, R

    S. Truppe, R. J. Hendricks, S. K. Tokunaga, H. J. Lewandowski, M. G. Kozlov, C. Henkel, E. A. Hinds, and M. R. Tarbutt, Nat. Commun. 4, 2600 (2013)

    2013

  44. [44]

    A. L. Bloom and J. B. Carr, Phys. Rev. 119, 1946 (1960)

    1946

  45. [45]

    Dahmen and S

    H. Dahmen and S. Penselin, Z. Phys. 200, 456 (1967)

    1967

  46. [46]

    Beckmann, K

    A. Beckmann, K. D. B¨ oklen, and D. Elke, Z. Phys.270, 173 (1974)

    1974

  47. [47]

    Y. W. Chan, V. W. Cohen, and H. B. Silsbee, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15, 1521 (1970)

    1970

  48. [48]

    Arias, G

    A. Arias, G. Lochead, T. M. Wintermantel, S. Helmrich, and S. Whitlock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 053601 (2019)

    2019

  49. [49]

    Antoni-Micollier, B

    L. Antoni-Micollier, B. Barrett, L. Chichet, G. Condon, B. Battelier, A. Landragin, and P. Bouyer, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023608 (2017)

    2017

  50. [50]

    Arimondo, M

    E. Arimondo, M. Inguscio, and P. Violino, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 31 (1977)

    1977

  51. [51]

    Mitroy, M

    J. Mitroy, M. S. Safronova, and C. W. Clark, J. Phys. B 43, 202001 (2010)

    2010

  52. [52]

    Marinescu, H

    M. Marinescu, H. R. Sadeghpour, and A. Dalgarno, Phys. Rev. A 49, 982 (1994)

    1994

  53. [53]

    Allmendinger, J

    P. Allmendinger, J. Deiglmayr, K. H¨ oveler, O. Schullian, and F. Merkt, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 244316 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    B. J. Bloom, T. L. Nicholson, J. R. Williams, S. L. Camp- bell, M. Bishof, X. Zhang, W. Zhang, S. L. Bromley, and J. Ye, Nature 506, 71 (2014)

    2014

  55. [55]

    Rosenband, D

    T. Rosenband, D. B. Hume, P. O. Schmidt, C. W. Chou, A. Brusch, L. Lorini, W. H. Oskay, R. E. Drullinger, T. M. Fortier, J. E. Stalnaker, S. A. Diddams, W. C. Swann, N. R. Newbury, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and J. C. Bergquist, Science 319, 1808 (2008)

    2008

  56. [56]

    Ramos, K

    A. Ramos, K. Moore, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. A 96, 032513 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Fajans and G

    K. Fajans and G. Joos, Z. Phys. 23, 1 (1924)

    1924

  58. [58]

    J. N. Wilson and R. M. Curtis, J. Phys. Chem. 74, 187 (1970)

    1970

  59. [59]

    J. R. Tessman, A. H. Kahn, and W. Shockley, Phys. Rev. 92, 890 (1953)

    1953

  60. [60]

    Born and W

    M. Born and W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 23, 388 (1924)

    1924

  61. [61]

    J. E. Mayer and M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 43, 605 (1933)

    1933

  62. [62]

    C. J. Sansonetti, K. L. Andrew, and J. Verges, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 423 (1981)

    1981

  63. [63]

    J. S. M. Ginges and J. C. Berengut, Phys. Rev. A 93, 052509 (2016)

    2016

  64. [64]

    R. D. Cowan, The theory of atomic structure and spectra, Los Alamos Series in Basic and Applied Sciences No. 3 (Univ of California Press, 1981)

    1981

  65. [65]

    Bockasten, Phys

    K. Bockasten, Phys. Rev. A 9, 1087 (1974)

    1974

  66. [66]

    Eissa and U

    H. Eissa and U. ¨Opik, Proc. Phys. Soc. 92, 556 (1967)

    1967

  67. [67]

    G. D. Mahan, Phys. Rev. A 22, 1780 (1980)

    1980

  68. [68]

    I. S. Lim, J. K. Laerdahl, and P. Schwerdtfeger, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 172 (2002)

    2002

  69. [69]

    ¨Opik, Proc

    U. ¨Opik, Proc. Phys. Soc. 92, 566 (1967)

    1967

  70. [70]

    H¨ olsch, M

    N. H¨ olsch, M. Beyer, E. J. Salumbides, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, C. Jungen, and F. Merkt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 103002 (2019)

    2019

  71. [71]

    Puchalski, J

    M. Puchalski, J. Komasa, P. Czachorowski, and K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 103003 (2019)

    2019

  72. [72]

    M´ atyus, J

    E. M´ atyus, J. Chem. Phys.149, 194112 (2018)

    2018

  73. [73]

    W.-C. Tung, M. Pavanello, and L. Adamowicz, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 104309 (2012)

    2012

  74. [74]

    C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2458 (2000)

    2000

  75. [75]

    P. Goy, J. Liang, M. Gross, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. A 34, 2889 (1986)

    1986