Charge disproportionation as a possible mechanism towards polar antiferromagnetic metal in molecular orbital crystal

Gang Li; Guang-Ming Zhang; Pu Yu; Shuai Qu; Yang Shen

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Charge disproportionation as a possible mechanism towards polar antiferromagnetic metal in molecular orbital crystal

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Charge disproportionation explains how Sr3Co2O7 is simultaneously polar, antiferromagnetic, and metallic.

desk verdict A plausible but unproven orbital-selective mechanism for Sr3Co2O7; the causal arrow from charge disproportionation to polarity needs a nonpolar reference calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.02048 v1 pith:ECJUBGS5 submitted 2026-01-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Yang Shen , Shuai Qu , Gang Li , Pu Yu , Guang-Ming Zhang This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

keywords chargedisproportionationpolarmetalantiferromagneticHund'scouplingmolecularorbitalRuddlesden-PopperSr3Co2O7selectivity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Sr3Co2O7 exhibits three properties that usually exclude one another: it is metallic, antiferromagnetically ordered, and electrically polarized. This paper argues that all three arise from a single orbital-selective electronic mechanism. In the negative charge-transfer regime, Co dz2 and dxz/dyz orbitals hybridize through apical oxygens into localized interlayer molecular orbitals that carry A-type antiferromagnetism. Hund's coupling then drives charge disproportionation between the residual dxy and dx2-y2 orbitals on the two cobalt sites, creating an occupation imbalance that breaks inversion symmetry and makes the material a polar metal. The paper supports the scenario with first-principles calculations, a cluster study, and an effective double-exchange model.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Co-O-Co bilayer motif treated as a molecular orbital unit: σ-bonding and π-bonding interlayer molecular orbitals formed from Co dz2 (with apical O pz) and Co dxz/dyz (with apical O px/py) that localize and order antiferromagnetically; and the remaining dxy and dx2-y2 orbitals, which remain itinerant and undergo Hund's-driven charge disproportionation. The load-bearing identity is the energy balance: charge disproportionation 2Co^4+(3d^6L) -> Co^4+(3d^5) + Co^4+(3d^7L2) gains Hund's energy without costing Hubbard U, provided the Hund's gain exceeds the elastic cost of the polar lattice distortion.

What would settle it

A specific test: compute the total energy of the A-type antiferromagnetic structure with the Co 3d occupations constrained to be equal between the two sites in the bilayer. If the structure remains polar at lower symmetry and the energy minimum persists, charge disproportionation is not required for polarity. Conversely, if the constrained non-disproportionated state is centrosymmetric and the unconstrained state is polar, the mechanism is supported. Experimentally, measuring the Co 3d occupation difference by resonant X-ray scattering in the polar phase—and showing it vanishes while polarity

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that charge disproportionation—a spontaneous imbalance in the occupation of the conducting dxy and dx2-y2 orbitals between the two Co atoms of each bilayer unit—is the microscopic origin of polar metallicity in Sr3Co2O7. Because the material sits in the negative charge-transfer regime, the formal Co^4+ configuration is better described as 3d^6L, and strong interlayer coupling drives the dz2 and dxz/dyz orbitals into localized molecular bonds with the apical O 2p states; these half-filled molecular orbitals order antiferromagnetically via superexchange. In the remaining dxy and dx2-y2 orbitals, the authors show that Hund's coupling favors a charge-disproportionate

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that charge disproportionation causes the polar off-centering rather than being caused by it, since the calculations begin from the already polar structure and do not explicitly compute the elastic energy penalty.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The polar off-centering in Sr3Co2O7 is electronically driven: raising Hund's coupling deepens the polar double well, so the lattice distortion is a consequence of charge disproportionation rather than its prerequisite.
The localized interlayer molecular orbitals carry A-type antiferromagnetism, while the delocalized dxy/dx2-y2 orbitals carry metallic conductivity, making the material an orbital-selective system with coexisting localized and delocalized electrons.
The effective Hamiltonian combining interlayer Heisenberg superexchange with in-plane double-exchange predicts a phase diagram in which the polar antiferromagnetic metal sits between an A-type antiferromagnet and an in-plane ferromagnetic metal, so controlling the ratio of these couplings should access neighboring phases.
The same charge-disproportionation scenario may apply to other double-layer Ruddlesden-Popper oxides with negative charge-transfer gaps, offering a unified framework for designing polar antiferromagnetic metals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If charge disproportionation is the cause, then the two Co sites should show measurably different 3d occupations in the polar phase; resonant X-ray scattering or X-ray absorption spectroscopy could test this directly, and the magnitude of the occupation difference should track the anomalous Hall conductivity.
A sharp test would be to suppress the charge disproportionation—by constraining equal Co occupations or by tuning Hund's coupling chemically—and check whether the polar distortion disappears while antiferromagnetism remains; the paper's λ-method suggests this, but an explicit elastic energy calculation would settle the causal order.
The mechanism implies a new route to altermagnetism: the joint breaking of parity and time-reversal arises from an electronic charge-order instability, not from lattice geometry, so materials with a negative charge-transfer gap and bilayer molecular orbitals are natural altermagnet candidates beyond the cobaltate studied here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Chen, quick take on arXiv:2601.02048. The paper proposes that Hund's-driven charge disproportionation in the dxy/dx2-y2 orbitals of Sr3Co2O7 breaks inversion symmetry and produces polar metallicity, while interlayer molecular orbitals from dz2/dxz/dyz give A-type AFM. That's a new mechanism for this material and a sensible application of the molecular-orbital framework from nickelates. The DFT+U band structure nicely shows the negative charge-transfer character, the localization of the out-of-plane orbitals, and the itinerant in-plane orbitals. The lambda-method calculation, which varies JH at fixed U, shows the polar double well deepens and the Co1/Co2 occupation asymmetry grows with JH. That trend is consistent with the charge-disproportionation picture and is the strongest evidence in the paper. The effective Hamiltonian combining interlayer superexchange and double-exchange is a reasonable starting point, though it is not solved.

The soft spot is the causal arrow. All the DFT+U runs start from the experimental polar I4mm structure, so the Co1/Co2 occupation imbalance is observed in an environment where the polar crystal field already distinguishes the two sites. That makes the asymmetry a possible response to the distortion rather than its cause. The paper never computes a nonpolar centrosymmetric reference, never evaluates the elastic energy cost of the off-centering against the Hund's gain, and the DMRG cluster details are in inaccessible supplementary sections. The text itself concedes the state sits in a crossover regime of the effective model. So while the mechanism is plausible, it is not demonstrated.

That said, this is not a fatal flaw for a theory proposal. The title says 'possible mechanism,' and the paper is honest about the competition with elastic cost. It is a substantive contribution to the polar-metal and altermagnet discussion, and it gives a concrete orbital-selective scenario that experiments can test, e.g. by probing orbital occupations in nonpolar or weakly distorted variants. The citation pattern is fine: the experimental state is Ref. [18], and the nickelate molecular-orbital work is properly credited.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee. A good referee should ask for the missing reference calculation and the supplementary details, and should judge it as a proposal, not a proof. I'd bring it up in a reading group focused on polar metals, but I wouldn't cite it as the established mechanism yet.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a microscopic mechanism for the polar antiferromagnetic metallic state observed in the bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper cobaltate Sr3Co2O7. Using DFT+U electronic structure calculations and molecular-orbital analysis, the authors argue that interlayer hybridization of Co dz2/dxz/dyz with apical O 2p orbitals produces localized molecular orbitals that order antiferromagnetically, while Hund's-coupling-driven charge disproportionation between the remaining dxy and dx2-y2 orbitals on the two Co sites breaks inversion symmetry and gives rise to polar metallicity. A λ-method study of the potential energy surface shows that increasing Hund's coupling JH deepens a double-well profile in the already polar structure, and an effective J_AF-J_H double-exchange Hamiltonian is proposed, with the target state placed in a crossover regime. A DMRG calculation on a Co-O-Co cluster is cited as corroboration, but no DMRG results appear in the main text.

Significance. If established, the orbital-selective charge-disproportionation mechanism would provide a valuable unifying explanation for the unusual coexistence of polarity, metallicity, and A-type antiferromagnetism in Sr3Co2O7, with potential applicability to other bilayer RP oxides. The paper's strengths are the orbital-resolved DFT+U band structures showing negative charge-transfer character and interlayer hybridization, the molecular Wannier functions that illustrate σ/π bonding, and the λ-method response to JH as a suggestive diagnostic. The effective Hamiltonian is a reasonable starting point for future work. However, the central causal claim—that charge disproportionation drives the polar distortion—is not demonstrated: the calculations are performed on the already polar experimental structure, no elastic energy cost is computed, and several key numerical supports are relegated to inaccessible supplementary sections. The manuscript is promising but needs substantial additions before the mechanism can be accepted.

major comments (4)

[Section 'Molecular orbital with charge disproportionation', Fig. 3, Table I] The DFT+U calculations are performed on the experimental polar I4mm A-type AFM structure of Ref. [18], in which the two Co sites already have inequivalent off-center displacements (5.4 pm and -0.3 pm). The occupation imbalance between dxy and dx2-y2 on Co1 and Co2, read out from Fig. 3(c,d) and Table I, could therefore be a response to the polar crystal field rather than the cause of the polarity. The statement that 'the charge-disproportionation driven polarity ultimately depends on the competition between the energy gain from Hund's coupling JH and elastic energy cost' is never made quantitative: no centrosymmetric (λ=0) reference total energy is reported, no elastic energy of the Co off-centering is computed, and the λ-method profiles show only relative deepening as JH increases. To substantiate the causal arrow, the authors should report an energy-versus-λ curve that includes the und
[Section 'Effective model Hamiltonian', Eq. (4), Fig. 5] The central claim that the polar antiferromagnetic metal lies in the crossover regime between J_AF ≫ J_H and J_H ≫ J_AF is not supported by any solution of the effective model. The paper explicitly states 'Without solving the ground state of the model Hamiltonian, we can discuss some limits in the parameter space' and then only analyzes two asymptotic limits. No mean-field, exact diagonalization, or DMRG result for the coupled H_AF + H_DE model is presented, so the existence of a stable phase with simultaneous A-type AFM, in-plane ferromagnetic correlations, and polar order in the crossover region is asserted, not demonstrated. Since this model is presented as the unified framework for the material, a controlled calculation—even on a small cluster or within a mean-field approximation—is needed to verify that the crossover region actually hosts the claimed coexisting order.
[Supplementary Materials (Sections B, E, F)] The main text relies heavily on supplementary sections that are not included for review: Section B contains the DMRG study of the Co-O-Co cluster and the construction of molecular Wannier functions, Section E describes the λ-method, and Section F provides a 'mathematical proof' for in-plane ferromagnetism. In particular, the claimed DMRG corroboration of the charge-disproportionate 3d6L state in the negative charge-transfer regime is a central piece of evidence, but no DMRG observables, cluster geometry, or model parameters appear in the main text. Without these details, the key numerical results cannot be checked. The authors must provide the full supplementary material or summarize the essential DMRG findings (e.g., occupation numbers, spin correlations, ground-state energy as a function of JH) in the main text.
[Table I] Table I, which is supposed to list 'the change of electron occupations of relevant 3d orbitals of two inequivalent Co atoms, with Hund's coupling JH from first-principles calculation,' contains no numerical entries in the submitted manuscript. The text after Fig. 3 claims that trapezoidal integration shows 'a growing difference in total 3d electron count as JH rises,' but the actual data are absent. This table is the direct quantitative support for the charge-disproportionation trend and must be populated with the computed occupational numbers for the two Co atoms at the stated JH values.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and throughout] Typographical errors: 'meterials' in the abstract, 'metallity' on pages 2 and elsewhere, and 'DFT+Uelectronic' (missing space) in the introduction. The plural 'octahedrons' should be 'octahedra'.
[Fig. 3] The λ-method is introduced only by reference to Section E of the Supplementary Materials. The main text should define λ explicitly (the normalized displacive mode) and state the total-energy reference used for the potential profiles, since the reader cannot otherwise interpret the depth or the position of the minima.
[Eq. (3)] The hopping integrals t and t' are not defined precisely; the comment 'we take electron hopping integral for dxy and dx2-y2 orbitals as equal' is inconsistent with the later statement that the dxy bandwidth is much smaller than that of dx2-y2. Please clarify whether the equal-hopping assumption is a simplification for the Hamiltonian or a fitted choice.
[Fig. 2] The energy labels in the orbital-level diagrams are difficult to parse (e.g., 'E = 2U − JH + ΔCF' versus 'E = U − 6JH + 2ΔCF' for the dimer configurations). The reference point for these atomic energies and the counting of electron-electron interactions should be stated explicitly.
[Discussion of epitaxial stress] The text states that the Jahn-Teller instability in the t2g^5 eg^1 configuration is 'heavily suppressed by the epitaxial stress in thin films' (page 3), but the experiments of Ref. [18] are on bulk single crystals. Please clarify whether this statement applies to the bulk crystal or to an epitaxial film geometry, and if so, how the thin-film result is relevant.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Central causal claim partially circular: the dxy/dx2-y2 occupation imbalance is extracted from the already polar A-type AFM structure and then invoked as the origin of that polarity.

fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Section 'Molecular orbital with charge disproportionation', Fig. 3(c,d) and Table I; DFT+U setup on experimental polar structure (Fig. 1 caption, Intro)]
"Charge disproportionation driven by Hund's physics, makes an occupation imbalance with broken inversion symmetry in the remaining dxy and dx2-y2 orbitals from distinct Co atoms within the bilayer unit, resulting in the polar metallicity."

The DFT+U band structure and projected DOS that reveal the Co1/Co2 dxy/dx2-y2 occupation imbalance are computed on the experimental polar A-type AFM structure (I4mm), in which the two Co sites already have inequivalent off-centering (5.4 pm vs -0.3 pm, Ref. [18]). In that symmetry-broken crystal field, an occupation asymmetry is a response to the imposed polar distortion, not an independent prediction. The paper then uses this same asymmetry as evidence that charge disproportionation 'result[s] in the polar metallicity', i.e., explains the polar structure by a quantity measured in the polar structure. The λ-method shows only that the polar double well deepens with JH and that the asymmetry grows with JH; it does not exhibit spontaneous charge disproportionation from the centrosymmetric λ=0

full rationale

The derivation is not wholly circular: the negative-charge-transfer valence configuration, the molecular-orbital Wannier functions, and the JH-dependence of the polar well are independent DFT outputs, and the DMRG cluster study is intended as external corroboration (though not available for review). No uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation chain is used. However, the central causal claim — that charge disproportionation drives the polar off-centering rather than responding to it — rests on occupation asymmetries read from the already polar experimental structure. The paper never reports a calculation starting from the centrosymmetric bilayer showing that the dxy/dx2-y2 occupations spontaneously disproportionate and thereby induce the Co displacements; it only correlates the magnitude of the asymmetry with JH in the polar state. That is enough to make the central explanation partially circular: the predicted effect (polarity) is an input to the calculation that produces the proposed cause (occupation imbalance). Score 6 reflects this partial, construction-level circularity; the independent JH-energy correlation prevents a higher score.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The mechanism rests on material-specific assumptions: negative charge-transfer valence, dimer molecular orbitals, S=3/2 local spins, and the untested premise that Hund's coupling beats the elastic cost of the distortion. Several model parameters (ΔCF, Δμ, t, JAF) are unquantified, and Ueff/JH are inherited from cRPA or scanned. No new particles or mediators are introduced.

free parameters (6)

U_eff (Dudarev Hubbard U in DFT+U) = 4 eV
Adopted as 'close to estimated values U_cRPA=4.4 eV'; the negative-charge-transfer and CD results are computed at this U.
JH (Hund coupling) = 0.85 eV cRPA estimate; scanned 0–1 eV
Main tuning parameter; the strengthening of polarity with JH is the key evidence for the CD mechanism.
ΔCF (octahedral crystal-field splitting) = not given
Appears in Eq. (1) for the t2g^5 eg^1 vs t2g^4 eg^2 energy comparison; no first-principles value is tabulated.
Δμ = ε_dxy − ε_dx2−y2 = not given
Introduced in Eq. (3) to 'mimic' charge disproportionation; not derived from the DFT occupations.
t, t′ (inter-dimer hopping integrals) = taken equal; values not given
Set equal for brevity although the text notes the dxy bandwidth is much smaller; no values are fit.
JAF (interlayer superexchange) = not given
Energy scale in Eq. (2); no value extracted from DFT; the phase diagram in Fig. 5 is schematic.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Co4+ in Sr3Co2O7 is in the negative charge-transfer regime, so 3d6L with a ligand hole is the relevant valence configuration.
Established from ZSA classification and the DFT+U result that O 2p sits above Co dz2/dxz/dyz. If this fails, the molecular-orbital/CD picture does not apply.
domain assumption Strong interlayer coupling makes dz2, dxz, dyz form molecular orbitals through the apical oxygen 2p orbitals.
Carried over from bilayer nickelate models (Refs [19,20]) and asserted for Sr3Co2O7 due to quantum confinement; central to the localized-spin part.
ad hoc to paper Hund's-coupling energy gain from charge disproportionation can overcome the elastic energy cost of the polar distortion.
Stated as a competition but the elastic cost is never computed; the λ-method only shows the double well deepens with JH.
domain assumption Out-of-plane polarity is protected because charge transport is restricted to the in-plane direction.
Used to argue CD-driven polarity survives in a metal; no explicit calculation of screening is provided.
domain assumption The localized d electrons form S=3/2 molecular spins on each Co site.
Assumed in HAF (Eq. (2)) from three singly occupied dz2/dxz/dyz orbitals; the actual spin state is not verified.
standard math Half-filled molecular orbitals develop antiferromagnetic superexchange in the strong-coupling limit.
Standard Goodenough-Kanamori argument; used to justify A-AFM from localized molecular orbitals.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge disproportionation as a possible mechanism towards polar antiferromagnetic metal in molecular orbital crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ECJUBGS5

@misc{pith2026260102048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge disproportionation as a possible mechanism towards polar antiferromagnetic metal in molecular orbital crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ECJUBGS5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.02048}
}

abstract

Polar antiferromagnetic metals have recently garnered increasing interests due to their combined traits of both ferromagnets and antiferromagnets for spintronic applications. However, the inherently incompatible nature of antiferromagnet, metallicity and polarity pose a significant challenge. We propose that charge disproportionation can lead to this novel state in negative charge transfer gap regime in molecular orbital crystal by molecular orbital analyses of first-principles DFT+$U$ electronic band structure for representative Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer perovskite oxides Sr$_3$Co$_2$O$_7$, corroborated by Density Matrix Renormalization Group calculation. Due to the negative charge transfer nature of Co$^{4+}$ and imposed by strong interlayer coupling, localized molecular orbitals stemming from the hybridization of Co $d_{z^2}$ and $d_{xz/yz}$ orbitals through the apical oxygen $p$ orbitals are preferably emergent within each bilayer unit, which develop antiferromagnetic ordering by invoking Hubbard repulsion. Charge disproportionation driven by Hund's physics, makes an occupation imbalance with broken inversion symmetry in the remaining $d_{xy}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbitals from distinct Co atoms within the bilayer unit, resulting in the polar metallicity. Meanwhile, this charge disproportionation scenario allows consequent conducting carriers to couple with interlayer local spins via Hund's coupling, giving rise to in-plane double-exchange ferromagnetism. Our molecular orbital formulation further provides a guide towards an effective Hamiltonian for modelling the unconventional synergy of metallicity, polarity and antiferromagnetism in Sr$_3$Co$_2$O$_7$, which may be a unified framework widely applicable to double-layer Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite oxides.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.02048 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Schematic electronic level diagram of 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. The interplay between polar lattice distortion and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Energy diagram of the adjacent bilayer CoO oc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic phase diagram of the effective model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[18]

Y. Zhou, X. Shu, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, L. Liu, K. Xiao, S. Shen, S. Wu, C. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Lyu, Y. Wu, H. Sabri, M. Wang, D. Yi, T. Nan, G.-M. Zhang, Q. He, J. Zang, L. Yang, S. Zhou, H. Chen, and P. Yu, Geometry-driven polar antiferromagnetic metallicity in a double-layered perovskite cobaltate, Nature Materials 10.1038/s41563- 025-02392-7 (2025)

doi:10.1038/s41563- 2025
[1]

A. J. Princep, H. L. Feng, Y. F. Guo, F. Lang, H. M. Weng, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, A. Senyshyn, M. C. Rahn, Y. H. Yuan, Y. Matsushita, S. J. Blundell, K. Ya- maura, and A. T. Boothroyd, Magnetically driven loss of centrosymmetry in metallicPb 2CoOsO6, Phys. Rev. B 102, 104410 (2020)

2020
[2]

S. Lei, M. Gu, D. Puggioni, G. Stone, J. Peng, J. Ge, Y. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Yuan, K. Wang, Z. Mao, J. M. Rondinelli, and V. Gopalan, Observation of quasi-two- dimensional polar domains and ferroelastic switching in a metal,Ca 3Ru2O7, Nano Letters18, 3088–3095 (2018)

2018
[3]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[4]

Q. Song, S. Doyle, G. A. Pan, I. El Baggari, D. Fer- enc Segedin, D. Córdova Carrizales, J. Nordlander, C. Tzschaschel, J. R. Ehrets, Z. Hasan, H. El-Sherif, J. Krishna, C. Hanson, H. LaBollita, A. Bostwick, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, S.-Y. Xu, A. Lanzara, A. T. N’Diaye, C. A. Heikes, Y. Liu, H. Paik, C. M. Brooks, B. Pamuk, J. T. Heron, P. Shafer, W. D. R...

2023
[5]

G. Cao, S. McCall, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, Obser- vation of a metallic antiferromagnetic phase and metal to nonmetal transition inCa 3Ru2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1751 (1997)

1997
[6]

ferroelectric

P. W. Anderson and E. Blount, Symmetry considerations on martensitic transformations:" ferroelectric" metals?, Physical Review Letters14, 217 (1965)

1965
[7]

T. Kim, D. Puggioni, Y. Yuan, L. Xie, H. Zhou, N. Campbell, P. Ryan, Y. Choi, J.-W. Kim, J. Patzner, S. Ryu, J. Podkaminer, J. Irwin, Y. Ma, C. Fennie, M. Rzchowski, X. Pan, V. Gopalan, J. M. Rondinelli, and C. Eom, Polar metals by geometric design, Nature 533, 68 (2016). 7

2016

Show all 31 references

[8]

Bhowal and N

S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Polar metals: principles and prospects, Annual Review of Materials Research53, 53 (2023)

2023
[9]

M. B. Salamon and M. Jaime, The physics of manganites: Structureandtransport,Rev.Mod.Phys.73,583(2001)

2001
[10]

N. A. Benedek and C. J. Fennie, Hybrid improper fer- roelectricity: A mechanism for controllable polarization- magnetization coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 107204 (2011)

2011
[11]

M. J. Pitcher, P. Mandal, M. S. Dyer, J. Alaria, P. Borisov, H. Niu, J. B. Claridge, and M. J. Rosseinsky, Tilt engineering of spontaneous polarization and magne- tization above 300 k in a bulk layered perovskite, Science 347, 420 (2015)

2015
[12]

K. A. Smith, E. A. Nowadnick, S. Fan, O. Khatib, S. J. Lim, B. Gao, N. C. Harms, S. N. Neal, J. K. Kirk- land, M. C. Martin, C. J. Won, M. B. Raschke, S.-W. Cheong, C. J. Fennie, G. L. Carr, H. A. Bechtel, and J. L. Musfeldt, Infrared nano-spectroscopy of ferroelastic domain w...

2019 doi
[13]

C.-H. Lee, N. D. Orloff, T. Birol, Y. Zhu, V. Goian, E. Rocas, R. Haislmaier, E. Vlahos, J. A. Mundy, L. F. Kourkoutis, Y. Nie, M. D. Biegalski, J. Zhang, M. Bern- hagen, N. A. Benedek, Y. Kim, J. D. Brock, R. Uecker, X. X. Xi, V. Gopalan, D. Nuzhnyy, S. Kamba, D. A. Muller, I...

2013
[14]

H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 k in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493–498 (2023)

2023
[15]

and Muller, David A

Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin filmLa 3Ni2O7, volume = 638, issn = 1476-4687, url = http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08525-3, doi = 10.1038/s41586-024-08525-3, number = 8052, journal = Nature, publisher=SpringerScienceandBusinessMedia LLC, author ...

2024 doi
[16]

N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y. Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Uwa- toko, and J....

2024
[17]

G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Huang, W. Chen, Y. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Ambient-pressure superconductivity on- set above 40 k in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films 10.48550/arxiv.2412.16622 (2024)

2024 doi arXiv
[19]

Y. Shen, M. Qin, and G.-M. Zhang, Effective bi- layer model hamiltonian and density-matrix renormal- ization group study for the high-t c superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Chinese Physics Letters 40, 127401 (2023)

2023
[20]

Yang, G.-M

Y.-f. Yang, G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-Tc su- perconductivity ofLa 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B108, L201108 (2023)

2023
[21]

D. A. Sokolov, N. Kikugawa, T. Helm, H. Borrmann, U. Burkhardt, R. Cubitt, J. S. White, E. Ressouche, M. Bleuel, K. Kummer, A. P. Mackenzie, and U. K. Rößler, Metamagnetic texture in a polar antiferromag- net, Nature Physics15, 671–677 (2019)

2019
[22]

Marković, M

I. Marković, M. D. Watson, O. J. Clark, F. Mazzola, E. A. Morales, C. A. Hooley, H. Rosner, C. M. Polley, T. Balasubramanian, S. Mukherjee, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, A. P. Mackenzie, and P. D. C. King, Electronically driven spin-reorientation transition of the correlated pol...

2020 doi
[23]

W. Peng, S. Y. Park, C. J. Roh, J. Mun, H. Ju, J. Kim, E. K. Ko, Z. Liang, S. Hahn, J. Zhang, A. M. Sanchez, D. Walker, S. Hindmarsh, L. Si, Y. J. Jo, Y. Jo, T. H. Kim, C. Kim, L. Wang, M. Kim, J. S. Lee, T. W. Noh, and D. Lee, Flexoelectric polarizing and control of a fer- ro...

2024
[24]

Z.Gui, C.Gu, H.Cheng, J.Zhu, X.Yu, E.-j.Guo, L.Wu, J. Mei, J. Sheng, J. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Bel- laiche, L. Huang, and S. Wang, Improper multiferroiclike transition in a metal, Phys. Rev. B105, L180101 (2022)

2022
[25]

D. I. Khomskii,Transition metal compounds(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

2014
[26]

Zaanen, G

J. Zaanen, G. Sawatzky, and J. Allen, Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds, Physical review letters55, 418 (1985)

1985
[27]

Y. Wang, Q. He, W. Ming, M.-H. Du, N. Lu, C. Cafolla, J. Fujioka, Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, S. Shen, Y. Lyu, A. T. N’Diaye, E. Arenholz, L. Gu, C. Nan, Y. Tokura, S. Okamoto, and P. Yu, Robust ferromagnetism in highly strainedSrCoO 3 thin films, Phys. Rev. X10, 021030 (2020)

2020
[28]

Johnston, A

S. Johnston, A. Mukherjee, I. Elfimov, M. Berciu, and G. A. Sawatzky, Charge disproportionation with- out charge transfer in the rare-earth-element nickelates as a possible mechanism for the metal-insulator transi- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 106404 (2014)

2014
[29]

Zhang, Y.-f

G.-M. Zhang, Y.-f. Yang, and F.-C. Zhang, Self-doped mott insulator for parent compounds of nickelate super- conductors, Physical Review B101, 020501 (2020)

2020
[30]

Nomura and R

Y. Nomura and R. Arita, Superconductivity in infinite- layer nickelates, Reports on Progress in Physics85, 052501 (2022)

2022
[31]

A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Or- bital ordering in mott-hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467 (1995)

1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [18]

Y. Zhou, X. Shu, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, L. Liu, K. Xiao, S. Shen, S. Wu, C. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Lyu, Y. Wu, H. Sabri, M. Wang, D. Yi, T. Nan, G.-M. Zhang, Q. He, J. Zang, L. Yang, S. Zhou, H. Chen, and P. Yu, Geometry-driven polar antiferromagnetic metallicity in a double-layered perovskite cobaltate, Nature Materials 10.1038/s41563- 025-02392-7 (2025)

doi:10.1038/s41563- 2025

[2] [1]

A. J. Princep, H. L. Feng, Y. F. Guo, F. Lang, H. M. Weng, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, A. Senyshyn, M. C. Rahn, Y. H. Yuan, Y. Matsushita, S. J. Blundell, K. Ya- maura, and A. T. Boothroyd, Magnetically driven loss of centrosymmetry in metallicPb 2CoOsO6, Phys. Rev. B 102, 104410 (2020)

2020

[3] [2]

S. Lei, M. Gu, D. Puggioni, G. Stone, J. Peng, J. Ge, Y. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Yuan, K. Wang, Z. Mao, J. M. Rondinelli, and V. Gopalan, Observation of quasi-two- dimensional polar domains and ferroelastic switching in a metal,Ca 3Ru2O7, Nano Letters18, 3088–3095 (2018)

2018

[4] [3]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

2022

[5] [4]

Q. Song, S. Doyle, G. A. Pan, I. El Baggari, D. Fer- enc Segedin, D. Córdova Carrizales, J. Nordlander, C. Tzschaschel, J. R. Ehrets, Z. Hasan, H. El-Sherif, J. Krishna, C. Hanson, H. LaBollita, A. Bostwick, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, S.-Y. Xu, A. Lanzara, A. T. N’Diaye, C. A. Heikes, Y. Liu, H. Paik, C. M. Brooks, B. Pamuk, J. T. Heron, P. Shafer, W. D. R...

2023

[6] [5]

G. Cao, S. McCall, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, Obser- vation of a metallic antiferromagnetic phase and metal to nonmetal transition inCa 3Ru2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1751 (1997)

1997

[7] [6]

ferroelectric

P. W. Anderson and E. Blount, Symmetry considerations on martensitic transformations:" ferroelectric" metals?, Physical Review Letters14, 217 (1965)

1965

[8] [7]

T. Kim, D. Puggioni, Y. Yuan, L. Xie, H. Zhou, N. Campbell, P. Ryan, Y. Choi, J.-W. Kim, J. Patzner, S. Ryu, J. Podkaminer, J. Irwin, Y. Ma, C. Fennie, M. Rzchowski, X. Pan, V. Gopalan, J. M. Rondinelli, and C. Eom, Polar metals by geometric design, Nature 533, 68 (2016). 7

2016