Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Deconfounded Recommender: A Causal Inference Approach to Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.06581 v2 pith:ECLMMB2F submitted 2018-08-20 cs.IR cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.IRcs.LGstat.ML
keywords recommendationcausalconfoundersmodelsmovieuserapproachdeconfounded
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The goal of recommendation is to show users items that they will like. Though usually framed as a prediction, the spirit of recommendation is to answer an interventional question---for each user and movie, what would the rating be if we "forced" the user to watch the movie? To this end, we develop a causal approach to recommendation, one where watching a movie is a "treatment" and a user's rating is an "outcome." The problem is there may be unobserved confounders, variables that affect both which movies the users watch and how they rate them; unobserved confounders impede causal predictions with observational data. To solve this problem, we develop the deconfounded recommender, a way to use classical recommendation models for causal recommendation. Following Wang & Blei [23], the deconfounded recommender involves two probabilistic models. The first models which movies the users watch; it provides a substitute for the unobserved confounders. The second one models how each user rates each movie; it employs the substitute to help account for confounders. This two-stage approach removes bias due to confounding. It improves recommendation and enjoys stable performance against interventions on test sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MCLMR: A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Multi-Behavior Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A model-agnostic causal plug-in improves multi-behavior recommenders via backdoor adjustment on user/item bias proxies, MoE aggregation of auxiliaries, and bias-aware contrastive alignment.

  2. PEARL: Unbiased Percentile Estimation via Contrastive Learning for Industrial-Scale Livestream Recommendation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    PEARL approximates unbiased percentile-based preference signals via nonparametric contrastive pairwise comparisons and bootstrapping, yielding gains in watch duration, consumption, and interaction rate on a large live...

  3. Taming Recommendation Bias with Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CausalEPP adds a user-side time-varying popularity preference to causal debiasing for recommenders, gaining a few percent in recall over prior debiasing baselines.

Pith tools