REVIEW 2 cited by
Contextual Confidence and Generative AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Generative AI models perturb the foundations of effective human communication. They present new challenges to contextual confidence, disrupting participants' ability to identify the authentic context of communication and their ability to protect communication from reuse and recombination outside its intended context. In this paper, we describe strategies--tools, technologies and policies--that aim to stabilize communication in the face of these challenges. The strategies we discuss fall into two broad categories. Containment strategies aim to reassert context in environments where it is currently threatened--a reaction to the context-free expectations and norms established by the internet. Mobilization strategies, by contrast, view the rise of generative AI as an opportunity to proactively set new and higher expectations around privacy and authenticity in mediated communication.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Trustworthiness in Stochastic Systems: Towards Opening the Black Box
The authors define trust-relevant stochasticity as variability at or above a user's valued level of description, and propose latent value modeling to assess user-system value alignment.
-
"It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models
Writers define authenticity in human-AI co-writing through their internal experiences and creative process, and personalized AI should target writer growth beyond text production; readers respond positively and largel...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.