Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On determinant representation and integrability of Nekrasov functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.02443 v2 pith:EE3G73GF submitted 2017-07-08 hep-th

classification hep-th
keywords conformaldeterminantmatrixblocksdescribeddifferentdimensionsfourier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conformal blocks and their AGT relations to LMNS integrals and Nekrasov functions are best described by "conformal" (or Dotsenko-Fateev) matrix models, but in non-Gaussian Dijkgraaf-Vafa phases, where different eigenvalues are integrated along different contours. In such matrix models, the determinant representations and integrability are restored only after a peculiar Fourier transform in the numbers of integrations. From the point of view of conformal blocks, this is Fourier transform w.r.t. the intermediate dimensions and this explains why such quantities are expressed through tau-functions in Miwa parametrization, with external dimensions playing the role of multiplicities. In particular, these determinant representations provide solutions to the Painlev\'e VI equation. We also explain how this pattern looks in the pure gauge limit, which is described by the Brezin-Gross-Witten matrix model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools