Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AUTO-DISCERN: Autonomous Driving Using Common Sense Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.13606 v1 pith:EGRBFXQZ submitted 2021-10-17 cs.AI cs.LO

classification cs.AIcs.LO
keywords drivingsystemautonomousreasoningtechnologyautomatedlearningmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Driving an automobile involves the tasks of observing surroundings, then making a driving decision based on these observations (steer, brake, coast, etc.). In autonomous driving, all these tasks have to be automated. Autonomous driving technology thus far has relied primarily on machine learning techniques. We argue that appropriate technology should be used for the appropriate task. That is, while machine learning technology is good for observing and automatically understanding the surroundings of an automobile, driving decisions are better automated via commonsense reasoning rather than machine learning. In this paper, we discuss (i) how commonsense reasoning can be automated using answer set programming (ASP) and the goal-directed s(CASP) ASP system, and (ii) develop the AUTO-DISCERN system using this technology for automating decision-making in driving. The goal of our research, described in this paper, is to develop an autonomous driving system that works by simulating the mind of a human driver. Since driving decisions are based on human-style reasoning, they are explainable, their ethics can be ensured, and they will always be correct, provided the system modeling and system inputs are correct.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Goal-Oriented Logic-based Semantic Communication for Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning with Applications onto Autonomous Driving

    cs.IT 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A logical evidence-selection rule for car-to-infrastructure communication avoids all collisions in ten simulated driving scenarios under a 25-message budget.

  2. Chain-of-Thought for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey and Future Prospects

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies chain-of-thought methods for autonomous driving into modular, logical, and reflective pipelines, and proposes three evolutionary stages from direct prompting to reinforcement learning.

  3. Commonsense Reasoning-Aided Autonomous Vehicle Systems

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Prolog commonsense layer that uses nearby vehicles' behavior can correct deep learning misclassifications of traffic lights and obstacles in an autonomous driving simulator.

Pith tools