Quantum Airy Structures and Matrix Models: a supercurrent approach

Leszek Hadasz; Mykhailo Hontarenko

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Quantum Airy Structures and Matrix Models: a supercurrent approach

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Building a super-Miwa transformation from one free super-current, the paper proves an exact similarity transformation that identifies the NS-NS and R-R super-Virasoro constraints on the Miwa locus and fixes the fermionic kernel of any…

desk verdict A careful sector-by-sector construction of super-Virasoro constraints whose central intertwining identity rests on one large unshown computation; worth refereeing if that algebra is supplied. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12247 v1 pith:EHEVM4GO submitted 2026-08-12 hep-th

Leszek Hadasz , Mykhailo Hontarenko This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th MSC 81T4081T60 PACS 11.25.Hf11.30.Pb

keywords super-VirasoroconstraintsMiwatransformationQuantumAirystructuresKontsevichmodelRamondsectorNeveu-Schwarzfermionicpropagatorsexternal-sourcematrixmodels

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a super-current formulation of $\mathcal{N}=1$ super-Virasoro constraints for external-source models, treating the four monodromy assignments (NS-NS, NS-R, R-NS, R-R) from a single object $J=\theta j+\psi$. Its principal result is an exact similarity transformation on the Miwa locus $l_i=\lambda_i^2$: conjugating the projected NS-NS differential operator by the super-Kontsevich prefactor $F$ reproduces the R-R operator, so the two constraint systems are equivalent there. The prefactor's bosonic part is a determinant times a cubic Airy weight, and its Grassmann exponential kernel is precisely the difference of the Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond fermionic two-point functions evaluated at the Miwa points. If correct, this supplies the concrete Ward identities that a supersymmetric extension of the Kontsevich model would have to satisfy, including the measure and fermionic kernel required for a matrix-model realization.

What carries the argument

The engine is the sector-dependent super-Miwa transformation, defined by the requirement $J_>(l_i,\theta_i)=-D_i$, so the positive-mode part of the super-current becomes minus the covariant superderivative in the spectral variables. This single condition fixes the bosonic times $g_m$ and fermionic times $q_k$ and converts the residue construction of $T(x,\theta)=:DJ(x,\theta)J(x,\theta):$ into explicit differential operators for each of the four sectors. The intertwining prefactor $F_0$, a bosonic determinant times the Grassmann exponential of the NS-minus-R fermionic propagator difference, performs the change of sector; the cubic factor $\exp(-\frac{\mu}{3}\sum_i\lambda_i^3)$ implements the Airy shift. Their product $F=F_0\exp(-\frac{\mu}{3}\sum_i\lambda_i^3)$ makes the NS-NS and R-R Airy constraints conjugate to each other.

What would settle it

Take $N=2$ in the Miwa-locus identity, keep all odd variables $\theta_1,\theta_2$, and compute both sides of the conjugated equation as explicit polynomials in the $\theta_i$; a mismatch in any cubic odd term would refute the claimed similarity transformation. Independently, apply the finite-$N$ formula $\partial_{q_0}=-\sum_j c_j\lambda_j\partial_{\theta_j}$ to a higher Miwa time $q_m$ with $m\ge N$ and check whether the nonzero result is really discarded only in the formal limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the free super-current $J(x,\theta)=\theta j(x)+\psi(x)$, the paper assigns bosonic and fermionic monodromies independently and imposes $J_>(l_i,\theta_i)=-D_i$ with $D_i=\partial_{\theta_i}+\theta_i\partial_{l_i}$. This super-Miwa condition fixes the bosonic and fermionic times and turns the projected super energy-momentum tensor into explicit differential operators in the spectral variables. The central discovery is the exact intertwining identity $$$F^{{-1}}$\left[$4T^{{\geq -1/2}}$_{NN}(\$lambda_i^{2}$,\theta_i)-\mu\,2\theta_i\$lambda_i^{2}$+\mu q_0-2\mu\nabla_{q_0}\right]F=$4T^{{\geq -1/2}}$_{RR,\mathrm{Airy}}(\$lambda_i^{2}$,\theta_i),$$ with $F=F_0\exp(-\frac{\mu}{3}\sum_i\lambda_i^3)$ and $$F_0=\prod_i\$lambda_i^{{-1}}$\prod_{i<j}(\lambda_i+\lambda_j)^{-2}\exp\left[-\frac12\sum_{i<j}\theta_i\theta_j\frac{\lambda_i-\lambda_j}{\lambda_i\lambda_j(\lambda_i+\lambda_j)}\right].$$ Here $\nabla_{q_0}$ is the covariant Ramond zero-mode operator. A direct corollary is that $Z_{RR}=F_0^{-1}Z_{NN}$ maps NS-NS solutions to R-R solutions on the Miwa locus. The paper states explicitly that this is a Miwa-locus equivalence, not an isomorphism of the abstract super-Virasoro representations: $q_0$, $\psi_0$, and $\nabla_{q_0}$ are Ramond objects, and $F_0$ and $F$ need not be formal power series in the full times.

Load-bearing premise

The identity holds only if an algebraic cancellation among products of three anticommuting (odd) variables, which the paper states without displaying, contains no sign error; the extension to infinitely many spectral variables also treats the Ramond zero mode as a formal limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

On the Miwa locus, every solution $Z_{NN}$ of the NS-NS constraints gives a solution $Z_{RR}=F_0^{-1}Z_{NN}$ of the R-R constraints, so the two differential constraint systems are equivalent there.
The Grassmann kernel of the prefactor is fixed to be the difference of the NS and R fermionic two-point functions at the Miwa points; any super-Kontsevich-like matrix model must reproduce this kernel in its measure.
The R-R Airy structure has one additional odd coordinate $q_0$, and the exact intertwining requires the covariant zero-mode operator $\nabla_{q_0}$ rather than the bare derivative $\partial_{q_0}$.
The four monodromy sectors remain distinct at the abstract super-Virasoro level; the similarity transformation is a statement on the Miwa locus only.
In the purely bosonic limit the construction reduces to the standard Kontsevich matrix differential equation, giving a consistency check on the operators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One could test the identity numerically for small $N$ before relying on the $N\to\infty$ formal limit; the paper does not provide such a check.
If the identity holds, the R-R Airy recursion should be obtainable by conjugating the NS-NS one, providing an explicit dictionary between bosonic and fermionic correlators that the paper leaves implicit.
The same zero-mode technology might extend to the NS-R sector, where the paper finds two possible Airy realizations; a geometric criterion selecting between them is not given.
Dressing the prefactor with nonzero polarization coefficients $\varphi_{mn}$, $\chi_{rs}$ would produce the global spectral-curve version of the intertwiner; the paper only formulates that deformation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is genuine, honest formal work, and I suspect the main identity is right, but the paper's central claim sits on a step it labels “tedious, but straightforward” and does not display. I would not desk-reject it; I would send it out with a request to show or machine-check that step.

What is actually new: the unified super-current treatment with independent bosonic and fermionic monodromies across all four NS/R sector combinations, the sector-dependent super-Miwa realisations, the Ramond zero-mode handling, and the explicit prefactor whose Grassmann kernel is the difference of the NS and R fermionic propagators. The bosonic limit reproducing the Itzykson–Zuber result is a real independent check. The authors also repeatedly flag the Miwa-locus restriction and the absence of a matrix-model realisation; that is good epistemic hygiene, not a defect.

The soft spot is precisely where the stress test points. Equation (5.53) is the principal result, but the three-theta reduction from (5.45)–(5.46) to (5.52) is compressed: the diagonal supplementation and anti-symmetrisation are asserted, and the conjugation of the off-diagonal sums in (5.37) is not exhibited. A sign error there would invalidate the sector equivalence, and this is load-bearing, not cosmetic. The printed identity also carries an ambiguous factor between (1.5) and (5.57) that should be fixed. The finite-N caveats around q0 and the vector field representing ∂/∂q0 are explicitly acknowledged and do not bother me; the missing algebra does.

For anyone working on super-Virasoro constraints, super-Airy structures, or a prospective super-Kontsevich model, the paper is directly relevant and useful. It deserves a serious referee, with a request to expand the omitted computation or add an ancillary file. If the computation checks out, this is a solid contribution; my own verdict is conditional acceptance.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper develops an N=1 supercurrent formalism for external-source models. The authors assign independent monodromies to the bosonic and fermionic components of a free super-current J(x,θ)=θj(x)+ψ(x), producing NS-NS, NS-R, R-NS and R-R sectors. For each sector a super-Miwa transformation is defined by requiring the annihilation part of the super-current to become the superderivative -D_i; this yields explicit differential operators for the projected super energy-momentum tensor. Dilaton shifts lead to super-quantum-Airy operators, with an additional odd coordinate in the sectors containing a Ramond fermion. The principal result is the similarity transformation (5.53), F0^{-1} T_NN F0 = T_RR on the locus l_i=λ_i^2, with F0 given in (1.2), and its Airy version (5.64) after including the cubic weight. The Grassmann part of F0 is identified with the difference of NS and R fermionic two-point functions at the Miwa points. The paper is careful to state that the equivalence is on the Miwa locus only, that away from it no relation of abstract partition functions is asserted, and that no underlying supermatrix integral is constructed.

Significance. If the principal identity is correct, the paper provides a systematic and explicit treatment of super-Virasoro constraints in all four monodromy sectors, a concrete super-Miwa realization, and a candidate system of Ward identities for a future supersymmetric Kontsevich model. The bosonic limit reproduces the known Itzykson-Zuber/Kontsevich differential equations, and the check of the R-R sector against the bosonic Ramond Airy structure is a useful independent test. The paper is also commendably explicit about its limitations: the Miwa-locus restriction, the finite-N character of the Ramond zero-mode representation, and the absence of a matrix-integral realization. However, the central similarity transformation is not fully proven in the text, and the significance of the result depends on completing that computation.

major comments (3)

[§5.2, Eqs. (5.45)-(5.53)] The headline identity (5.53) is not established by the displayed computation. After verifying the derivative terms in (5.40), the paper states that the non-derivative computation is 'tedious, but straightforward' and then reduces the three-theta contributions (5.45)-(5.46) to (5.49)-(5.52) by a diagonal-supplementation and anti-symmetrization step that is not shown; the conjugation of the off-diagonal sums in (5.37) by F0 is also not displayed. Because any sign error or missed diagonal term would produce a nonzero difference F0^{-1}T_NN F0 - T_RR and invalidate (5.53), this issue is load-bearing for the central claim. Please provide the complete computation, preferably in an appendix, or an independent verification of the final identity.
[§5.2, Eqs. (5.57)-(5.64)] The derivation of the Airy intertwining identity from the unshifted one is also compressed. Equation (5.57) is asserted after 'direct conjugation' by the cubic weight, and the step from (5.57)-(5.62) to (5.63)-(5.64) involves the nontrivial computation of ∂_{q0} log F and the definition of S(λ,θ). Since Eqs. (5.63)-(5.64) are presented as exact identities, the same request for a complete derivation applies here.
[§5.2, Eq. (5.60)] The finite-N Ramond zero-mode representation is carefully caveated, but the headline identity (5.64) is stated as exact on the Miwa locus while using this representation. Equation (5.60) holds only for λ_j≠0 and λ_j^2 distinct, and the vector field -Σ c_j λ_j ∂/∂θ_j fixes q_m only for 1≤m≤N-1; its N→∞ extension is formal. Please state the precise space of functions on which (5.64) is asserted, and clarify how the formal N→∞ limit interacts with the claim that the identity is exact.

minor comments (5)

[§4, Eq. (4.22) and following bullets] The text calls the Miwa-locus operators Super Quantum Airy Structures, but the defining graded-Lie-algebra condition is not checked for the finite-N families. If the Airy structure is defined at the level of the mode/times variables and only restricted to the Miwa locus, this should be stated explicitly.
[§5.2, Eq. (5.39)] The sentence 'Conjugating 4T_NN by the factor of the form2 F0' contains a stray '2' that appears to be a footnote marker or typesetting artifact; please fix.
[§5.2, Eq. (5.42)] Equation (5.42) uses sums over j,k without explicitly stating their ranges; please specify that the sums run over all Miwa labels and indicate when diagonal terms are included after the supplementation step.
[§5.2, final paragraph] The sentence 'The relations derived above are therefore intertwining identities between the NS-NS and R-R differential constraints on the Miwa locus' appears twice in the same paragraph; the duplicate should be removed.
[References] References [23] and [41] are cited as bare arXiv identifiers ('2604.26038' and '2511.17320'); please format them consistently with the other references.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NS-NS/R-R intertwining identity is verified by direct computation, and the self-citations to Super Quantum Airy Structures are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The sector-dependent super-Miwa transformations are fixed by the defining condition J_>(l_i, theta_i) = -D_i (eq. 3.17), and both T_NN (3.25) and T_RR (3.42)-(3.43) are then computed from the same free-field OPEs and residue calculus; the difference delta-T is an explicit computed operator, not an ansatz. The prefactor F0 in (1.2)/(5.39) is an explicit closed form (bosonic determinant times difference of NS/R fermionic two-point kernels), and the claimed identity (5.53) is verified by direct conjugation: derivative terms are reproduced in (5.40), linear-in-theta terms in (5.41)-(5.44), and cubic terms in (5.45)-(5.52). The paper labels the remaining algebra 'tedious, but straightforward' (p. 36); an omitted computation is a correctness and verification risk, not a circular reduction, since no target result is inserted as an input. The self-citations to [32] (Super Quantum Airy Structures, co-authored by Hadasz) supply the definition of 'additional odd coordinate' and Theorem 2.10 on existence/uniqueness, but the paper also gives a self-contained recursion sketch (Section 4, RR bullet), and the central intertwining identity does not rely on those citations. The claimed Miwa-locus equivalence (5.54) is a corollary of (5.53), and the Ramond zero-mode representation (5.60) is presented with explicit finite-N caveats. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard free-field CFT machinery (OPEs, normal ordering, residue calculus) and on domain assumptions the authors state explicitly: the super-Miwa defining condition J>(l_i,theta_i) = -D_i that fixes the variable transformation, the existence and uniqueness theorem for Super Quantum Airy Structures imported from ref. [32], and the representation of the Ramond zero mode psi_0 = q_0/2 + d/dq_0 with its on-Miwa-locus vector field. The only free data are the dilaton parameter mu, the polarisation coefficients (set to zero), and an arbitrary constant in one NS-R realisation. No new physical entities are postulated; q_0 is the additional odd coordinate of ref. [32], and F_0 is an intertwining prefactor, not a new object of nature.

free parameters (3)

dilaton parameter mu (mu_k = mu delta_{k,1} in NS-NS/NS-R, mu delta_{k,3/2} in R-R/R-NS) = arbitrary complex, chosen not fitted
Background parameter of the dilaton shift that converts quadratic constraints into Airy operators (Section 4). Standard Airy-structure coupling; no data involved.
polarisation coefficients phi_mn and chi_rs = 0 (trivial polarisation)
The general deformation of the state at infinity is formulated (eq. 4.33) but not used; the explicit operators correspond to phi_mn = chi_rs = 0.
constant C in the first NS-R realisation = undetermined
When G_0 is excluded from the NS-R Airy structure, the constraint (L_0 - C)Z = 0 with arbitrary C defines a one-parameter family of Airy structures (Section 4).

assumptions (5)

standard math Free-field OPEs and creation-annihilation normal ordering for boson and fermion (Secs. 2.1-2.2)
The starting point of all sector computations; conventions stated explicitly in (2.7), (2.48), (2.71).
domain assumption Super-Miwa defining condition J>(l_i, theta_i) = -D_i, D_i = d/dtheta_i + theta_i d/dl_i (eq. 3.17)
Fixes the super-Miwa transformation (3.18) and hence every projected operator in Section 3; a modeling choice, not a derived fact.
domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of partition functions of Super Quantum Airy Structures (Theorem 2.10 of ref. [32])
Invoked in Section 4 to claim a recursively determined free energy for the constructed operator families; cited, not reproved.
domain assumption Formal-series residue manipulations, including expansion of 1/(l_i - l_j - theta_i theta_j) and the N to infinity formal Miwa limit
Underlies all projected tensors and the similarity transformation (Sections 3 and 5).
domain assumption Ramond zero-mode representation psi_0 = q_0/2 + d/dq_0, and on-Miwa-locus vector field for d/dq_0 (eqs. 5.60-5.61)
The R-R and NS-R treatments depend on this; valid only on the Miwa locus for finite N with nonzero, distinct lambda_j, and the field does not annihilate q_m for m >= N.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Airy Structures and Matrix Models: a supercurrent approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EHEVM4GO

@misc{pith2026260812247,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Airy Structures and Matrix Models: a supercurrent approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EHEVM4GO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12247}
}

abstract

We develop a super-current formulation of $\mathcal{N}=1$ super-Virasoro constraints for external-source models. By assigning bosonic and fermionic monodromies independently, we unify the NS-NS, NS-R, R-NS, and R-R sectors. For each, a super-Miwa transformation represents the projected super energy-momentum tensor as a differential operator in spectral variables. Dilaton shifts yield Super Quantum Airy Structures in the NS-NS and R-NS sectors, whereas the R-R and NS-R sectors require an additional odd coordinate. Our principal result is an exact similarity transformation relating the NS-NS and R-R differential constraints. The intertwining prefactor combines a bosonic determinant, a cubic Airy weight, and a Grassmann exponential kernel defined by the difference of Neveu--Schwarz and Ramond fermionic propagators. These results establish a concrete candidate system of Ward identities for a supersymmetric extension of the Kontsevich model, delineating the precise algebraic and analytic properties of the measure and fermionic kernel required for its potential matrix-model realization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Witten,Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space,Surveys Diff

E. Witten,Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space,Surveys Diff. Geom.1 (1991) 243

work page 1991
[2]

Witten,On the structure of the topological phase of two-dimensional gravity,Nuclear Physics, B 340(1990) 281

E. Witten,On the structure of the topological phase of two-dimensional gravity,Nuclear Physics, B 340(1990) 281

work page 1990
[3]

Kontsevich,Intersection Theory on the Moduli Space of Curves and the Matrix Airy Function, Communications in Mathematical Physics147(1992) 1

M. Kontsevich,Intersection Theory on the Moduli Space of Curves and the Matrix Airy Function, Communications in Mathematical Physics147(1992) 1

work page 1992
[4]

Zvonkine,Strebel differentials on stable curves and Kontsevich’s proof of Witten’s conjecture, 2004

D. Zvonkine,Strebel differentials on stable curves and Kontsevich’s proof of Witten’s conjecture, 2004

work page 2004
[5]

Zvonkine,An introduction to moduli spaces of curves and their intersection theory,Handbook of Teichmüller Theory3(2012) 667

D. Zvonkine,An introduction to moduli spaces of curves and their intersection theory,Handbook of Teichmüller Theory3(2012) 667

work page 2012
[6]

Giacchetto and D

A. Giacchetto and D. Lewański,Les Houches lecture notes on moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes111(2026) [2410.13273]

arXiv 2026
[7]

Eynard and N

B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1(2007) 347 [math-ph/0702045]

arXiv 2007
[8]

Andersen, G

J.E. Andersen, G. Borot, L.O. Chekhov and N. Orantin,The abcd of topological recursion,Advances in Mathematics439(2024) 109473

work page 2024

Show all 54 references

[9]

Aganagic, R

M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Mariño and C. Vafa,Topological strings and integrable hierarchies,Commun. Math. Phys.261(2006) 451 [hep-th/0312085]

2006 arXiv
[10]

Dijkgraaf and C

R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa,Matrix models, topological strings, and supersymmetric gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B644(2002) 3 [hep-th/0206255]

2002 arXiv
[11]

Cachazo, K

F. Cachazo, K. Intriligator and C. Vafa,A largen duality via a geometric transition,Nucl. Phys. B 603(2001) 3 [hep-th/0103067]

2001 arXiv
[12]

Gaiotto and L

D. Gaiotto and L. Rastelli,A paradigm of open/closed duality: Liouville d-branes and the kontsevich model,JHEP07(2005) 053 [hep-th/0312196]

2005 arXiv
[13]

Miwa,On Hirota’s Difference Equations,Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A58(1982) 9

T. Miwa,On Hirota’s Difference Equations,Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A58(1982) 9

1982
[14]

Mikhailov,Ward identities andw-constraints in generalized kontsevich model,Int

A. Mikhailov,Ward identities andw-constraints in generalized kontsevich model,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 873 [hep-th/9303129]

1994 arXiv
[15]

Mironov, V

A. Mironov, V. Mishnyakov, A. Morozov and R. Rashkov,Matrix model partition function by a single constraint,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 1140 [2105.09920]

2021 arXiv
[16]

Aganagic and C

M. Aganagic and C. Vafa,Mirror symmetry and supermanifolds,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8(2004) 939 [hep-th/0403192]

2004 arXiv
[17]

Alvarez-Gaumé and J.L

L. Alvarez-Gaumé and J.L. Mañes,Supermatrix Models,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 2039

1991
[18]

Takama,Matrix model with superconformal symmetry,Phys

M. Takama,Matrix model with superconformal symmetry,Phys. Lett. B284(1992) 248 [hep-th/9202081]

1992 arXiv
[19]

Becker and M

K. Becker and M. Becker,Nonperturbative Solution of the Super-Virasoro Constraints,Mod. Phys. Lett. A8(1993) 1205 [hep-th/9301017]. – 42 –

1993 arXiv
[20]

Alvarez-Gaume, H

L. Alvarez-Gaume, H. Itoyama, J.L. Manes and A. Zadra,Superloop equations and two-dimensional supergravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7(1992) 5337 [hep-th/9112018]

1992 arXiv
[21]

Yost,Supermatrix Models,International Journal of Modern Physics A7(1992) 6105 [hep-th/9111033]

S.A. Yost,Supermatrix Models,International Journal of Modern Physics A7(1992) 6105 [hep-th/9111033]

1992 arXiv
[22]

Plefka,Supersymmetric Generalizations of Matrix Models, dissertation, Universität Hannover, December, 1995.hep-th/9601041

J.C. Plefka,Supersymmetric Generalizations of Matrix Models, dissertation, Universität Hannover, December, 1995.hep-th/9601041

1995 arXiv
[23]

Eberhardt,The Super Virasoro Minimal String from 3d Supergravity,2604.26038

L. Eberhardt,The Super Virasoro Minimal String from 3d Supergravity,2604.26038

arXiv
[24]

Witten,The Super Period Matrix With Ramond Punctures,J

E. Witten,The Super Period Matrix With Ramond Punctures,J. Geom. Phys.92(2015) 210 [1501.02499]

2015 arXiv
[25]

Witten,Notes On Super Riemann Surfaces And Their Moduli,Pure Appl

E. Witten,Notes On Super Riemann Surfaces And Their Moduli,Pure Appl. Math. Quart.15 (2019) 57 [1209.2459]

2019 arXiv
[26]

Donagi and E

R. Donagi and E. Witten,Supermoduli Space Is Not Projected,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.90(2015) 19 [1304.7798]

2015 arXiv
[27]

Norbury,A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves,Geometry & Topology27(2023) 2695

P. Norbury,A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves,Geometry & Topology27(2023) 2695

2023
[28]

Norbury,Enumerative geometry via the moduli space of super Riemann surfaces, 2025

P. Norbury,Enumerative geometry via the moduli space of super Riemann surfaces, 2025

2025
[29]

Kontsevich and Y

M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Airy structures and symplectic geometry of topological recursion, (2018), DOI [1701.09137]

2018 arXiv
[30]

Bouchard, T

V. Bouchard, T. Creutzig and A. Joshi,Airy Ideals, Transvections, andW(sp2N)-Algebras,Annales Henri Poincare25(2024) 2669 [2207.04336]

2024 arXiv
[31]

Bouchard,Les Houches lecture notes on topological recursion,SciPost Phys

V. Bouchard,Les Houches lecture notes on topological recursion,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes115 (2026) [2409.06657]

2026
[32]

Bouchard, P

V. Bouchard, P. Ciosmak, L. Hadasz, K. Osuga, B. Ruba and P. Sułkowski,Super Quantum Airy Structures,Commun. Math. Phys.380(2020) 449 [1907.08913]

2020 arXiv
[33]

Kostov,Matrix models as CFT: Genus expansion,Nucl

I. Kostov,Matrix models as CFT: Genus expansion,Nucl. Phys. B837(2010) 221 [0912.2137]

2010 arXiv
[34]

Kostov and N

I. Kostov and N. Orantin,CFT and topological recursion,Journal of High Energy Physics2010 (2010) 056 [1006.2028]

2010 arXiv
[35]

Bouchard and K

V. Bouchard and K. Osuga,Supereigenvalue Models and Topological Recursion,JHEP04(2018) 138 [1802.03536]

2018 arXiv
[36]

Bouchard and K

V. Bouchard and K. Osuga,N= 1super topological recursion,Lett. Math. Phys.111(2021) 144 [2007.13186]

2021 arXiv
[37]

Osuga,Topological Recursion in the Ramond Sector,JHEP10(2019) 286 [1909.08551]

K. Osuga,Topological Recursion in the Ramond Sector,JHEP10(2019) 286 [1909.08551]

2019 arXiv
[38]

Osuga,Super topological recursion and Gaiotto vectors for superconformal blocks,Lett

K. Osuga,Super topological recursion and Gaiotto vectors for superconformal blocks,Lett. Math. Phys.112(2022) 48 [2107.04588]

2022 arXiv
[39]

McArthur,The Partition Function for the Supersymmetric Eigenvalue Model,Modern Physics Letters A8(1993) 3355

I.N. McArthur,The Partition Function for the Supersymmetric Eigenvalue Model,Modern Physics Letters A8(1993) 3355

1993
[40]

Alvarez-Gaume, K

L. Alvarez-Gaume, K. Becker, M. Becker, R. Emparan and J. Manes,Double scaling limit of the superVirasoro constraints,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8(1993) 2297 [hep-th/9207096]

1993 arXiv
[41]

Aghaei, R

N. Aghaei, R. Kramer, N. Orantin and K. Osuga,Superconformal topological recursion,2511.17320
[42]

D’Hoker and D.H

E. D’Hoker and D.H. Phong,The Super Period Matrix with Ramond Punctures in the supergravity formulation,Nucl. Phys. B899(2015) 772 [1501.02675]. – 43 –

2015 arXiv
[43]

Chekhov and Y

L. Chekhov and Y. Makeenko,A Hint on the external field problem for matrix models,Phys. Lett. B 278(1992) 271 [hep-th/9202006]

1992 arXiv
[44]

Miranda,Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society (1995)

R. Miranda,Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society (1995)

1995
[45]

Itzykson and J.B

C. Itzykson and J.B. Zuber,Combinatorics of the modular group. 2. The Kontsevich integrals,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7(1992) 5661 [hep-th/9201001]

1992 arXiv
[46]

Bessis, C

D. Bessis, C. Itzykson and J.B. Zuber,Quantum field theory techniques in graphical enumeration, Adv. Appl. Math.1(1980) 109

1980
[47]

Itzykson and J.B

C. Itzykson and J.B. Zuber,The Planar Approximation. 2.,J. Math. Phys.21(1980) 411

1980
[48]

Strebel,Quadratic Differentials, vol

K. Strebel,Quadratic Differentials, vol. 5 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1984)

1984
[49]

Itoyama,Loop Equation, Matrix Model and Supersymmetry, inProceedings of the Workshop on Superstrings and Partition Functions, World Scientific, 1991, DOI

H. Itoyama,Loop Equation, Matrix Model and Supersymmetry, inProceedings of the Workshop on Superstrings and Partition Functions, World Scientific, 1991, DOI

1991
[50]

Ciosmak, L

P. Ciosmak, L. Hadasz, M. Manabe and P. Sułkowski,Super-quantum curves from super-eigenvalue models,JHEP10(2016) 044 [1608.02596]

2016 arXiv
[51]

Ciosmak, L

P. Ciosmak, L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskólski, M. Manabe and P. Sulkowski,From CFT to Ramond super-quantum curves,JHEP05(2018) 133 [1712.07354]

2018 arXiv
[52]

Kimura,Duality and integrability of a supermatrix model with an external source,PTEP2014 (2014) 123A01 [1410.0680]

T. Kimura,Duality and integrability of a supermatrix model with an external source,PTEP2014 (2014) 123A01 [1410.0680]

2014 arXiv
[53]

Kimura,Aspects of supergroup gauge theory,Int

T. Kimura,Aspects of supergroup gauge theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A38(2023) 2330001 [2301.05927]

2023 arXiv
[54]

Applications of Supersymmetric Matrix Models

Y. Makeenko, “Applications of Supersymmetric Matrix Models.” Preprint ITEP-TH-39/96, hep-th/9608172, August, 1996. – 44 –

1996 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Witten,Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space,Surveys Diff

E. Witten,Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space,Surveys Diff. Geom.1 (1991) 243

work page 1991

[2] [2]

Witten,On the structure of the topological phase of two-dimensional gravity,Nuclear Physics, B 340(1990) 281

E. Witten,On the structure of the topological phase of two-dimensional gravity,Nuclear Physics, B 340(1990) 281

work page 1990

[3] [3]

Kontsevich,Intersection Theory on the Moduli Space of Curves and the Matrix Airy Function, Communications in Mathematical Physics147(1992) 1

M. Kontsevich,Intersection Theory on the Moduli Space of Curves and the Matrix Airy Function, Communications in Mathematical Physics147(1992) 1

work page 1992

[4] [4]

Zvonkine,Strebel differentials on stable curves and Kontsevich’s proof of Witten’s conjecture, 2004

D. Zvonkine,Strebel differentials on stable curves and Kontsevich’s proof of Witten’s conjecture, 2004

work page 2004

[5] [5]

Zvonkine,An introduction to moduli spaces of curves and their intersection theory,Handbook of Teichmüller Theory3(2012) 667

D. Zvonkine,An introduction to moduli spaces of curves and their intersection theory,Handbook of Teichmüller Theory3(2012) 667

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Giacchetto and D

A. Giacchetto and D. Lewański,Les Houches lecture notes on moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes111(2026) [2410.13273]

arXiv 2026

[7] [7]

Eynard and N

B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1(2007) 347 [math-ph/0702045]

arXiv 2007

[8] [8]

Andersen, G

J.E. Andersen, G. Borot, L.O. Chekhov and N. Orantin,The abcd of topological recursion,Advances in Mathematics439(2024) 109473

work page 2024