REVIEW 2 cited by
CQSumDP: A ChatGPT-Annotated Resource for Query-Focused Abstractive Summarization Based on Debatepedia
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Debatepedia is a publicly available dataset consisting of arguments and counter-arguments on controversial topics that has been widely used for the single-document query-focused abstractive summarization task in recent years. However, it has been recently found that this dataset is limited by noise and even most queries in this dataset do not have any relevance to the respective document. In this paper, we present a methodology for cleaning the Debatepedia dataset by leveraging the generative power of large language models to make it suitable for query-focused abstractive summarization. More specifically, we harness the language generation capabilities of ChatGPT to regenerate its queries. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed ChatGPT annotated version of the Debatepedia dataset using several benchmark summarization models and demonstrate that the newly annotated version of Debatepedia outperforms the original dataset in terms of both query relevance as well as summary generation quality. We will make this annotated and cleaned version of the dataset publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MSRS: Evaluating Multi-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation
MSRS provides two multi-source retrieval and synthesis benchmarks and shows generation quality depends heavily on retrieval, with reasoning models best at oracle synthesis.
-
Synthetic Artifact Auditing: Tracing LLM-Generated Synthetic Data Usage in Downstream Applications
A three-method auditing framework detects with roughly 87 to 97 percent accuracy whether classifiers, generators, and t-SNE plots were trained on or derived from LLM-generated synthetic data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.