Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dropout in Training Neural Networks: Flatness of Solution and Noise Structure

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.01022 v2 pith:EJB3B6LZ submitted 2021-11-01 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords dropoutnetworkstrainingneuralnoisecovariancefindhessian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is important to understand how the popular regularization method dropout helps the neural network training find a good generalization solution. In this work, we show that the training with dropout finds the neural network with a flatter minimum compared with standard gradient descent training. We further find that the variance of a noise induced by the dropout is larger at the sharper direction of the loss landscape and the Hessian of the loss landscape at the found minima aligns with the noise covariance matrix by experiments on various datasets, i.e., MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Multi30k, and various structures, i.e., fully-connected networks, large residual convolutional networks and transformer. For networks with piece-wise linear activation function and the dropout is only at the last hidden layer, we then theoretically derive the Hessian and the covariance of dropout randomness, where these two quantities are very similar. This similarity may be a key reason accounting for the goodness of dropout.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Mathematical Impossibility of Safe Universal Approximators

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    This preprint argues that useful universal approximators must have dense catastrophic failures, but the proof rests on unproven measure convergence and circular use of adversarial examples.

Pith tools