Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Advancing Antiferromagnetic Nitrides via Metal Alloy Nitridation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ammonia annealing of Mn3Ga alloy films yields single-crystal antiferromagnetic Mn1-xGaxN films with zero net magnetic moment.

desk verdict A solid synthesis paper with strong structural characterization, but the antiferromagnetic claim is underdetermined and the abstract overstates it. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04636 v1 pith:EJUNL4XK submitted 2025-05-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Qianying Wang , Zexu He , Lele Zhang , Qian Li , Haitao Hong , Ting Cui , Dongke Rong , Songhee Choi
show 9 more authors
Qiao Jin Chen Ge Can Wang Qinghua Zhang Liang Cheng Jingbo Qi Kui-juan Jin Gang-Qin Liu Er-Jia Guo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords metallicalloysmagneticphasetransitionammonianitridingantiferromagneticmaterialsmanganesegalliumnitrideNVcentermagnetometryX-raylineardichroismpulsedlaserdeposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ammonia annealing of pulsed-laser-deposited $\mathrm{Mn}_3\mathrm{Ga}$ alloy films converts them into single-crystal, single-phase rock-salt $\mathrm{Mn}_{1-x}\mathrm{Ga}_x\mathrm{N}$ films with $x \approx 0.25$. The paper argues that this alloy-nitridation route solves a persistent problem: growing multicomponent nitride films with high crystallinity and precise nitrogen content usually requires reactive sputtering, molecular beam epitaxy, or pulsed laser deposition with nitride targets, each with drawbacks. The authors report that the nitridated films have a zero net magnetic moment, no stray fields in NV-center scanning magnetometry, and field-dependent X-ray linear dichroism consistent with antiferromagnetic order. If these results hold, the work supplies a simple two-step route to epitaxial antiferromagnetic nitrides for spintronics.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is alloy nitridation through rapid thermal annealing in pure ammonia: nitrogen atoms enter the metallic lattice and drive a structural transformation while preserving epitaxy. The key structural object is the rock-salt $\theta$-MnN-type lattice, a NaCl-type manganese nitride with a face-centered tetragonal distortion at room temperature, here with random Mn/Ga site occupation; it is identified by an XRD peak at 43.53° (out-of-plane spacing 4.15 Å), STEM images matching the $\theta$-MnN atomic structure, and N K-edge XAS containing both GaN and $\theta$-Mn$_6$N$_{5+y}$ fingerprints. The magnetic characterization rests on zero-field ODMR from diamond NV centers, which show no Zeeman splitting from stray fields, and on X-ray linear dichroism at the Mn L-edges, where a magnetic field flips the orbital occupancy between $d_{3z^2-r^2}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$. Transport measurements confirm the loss of ferromagnetic anomalies, showing near-zero magnetoresistance and no anomalous Hall loop after nitridation.

What would settle it

An atomic-scale elemental map of the film using EELS or EDX in STEM, or atom-probe tomography, could reveal whether Mn and Ga are randomly mixed or clustered into GaN and Mn-N domains; observing Ga-rich clusters or a separate GaN phase would refute the single-phase solid-solution claim and change the meaning of the magnetic data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that nitrogen from ammonia integrates into the metallic lattice of a $\mathrm{Mn}_3\mathrm{Ga}$ film during annealing, transforming a polycrystalline mixture of $\mathrm{D0}_{19}$ and $\mathrm{D0}_{22}$ phases into a single-phase rock-salt crystal in which Ga randomly substitutes for Mn with $x \approx 0.25$. This structural transformation is accompanied by the suppression of ferromagnetism: the film exhibits a zero net magnetic moment, measured by NV-center magnetometry, and the butterfly magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall hysteresis of the parent alloy vanish. The X-ray linear dichroism changes sign under a 0.4 T magnetic field, which the authors interpret as a magnetic-field-driven rearrangement of Mn $3d$ orbital occupancy inside an antiferromagnetic state. The paper presents this as a new application of alloy nitridation: a straightforward, reproducible route to stable single-crystal nitride thin films.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the annealed film is a single-phase random solid solution of Mn1-xGaxN in the rock-salt θ-MnN structure, rather than a phase-separated mixture of GaN and manganese-nitride phases; the antiferromagnetic and zero-moment interpretations depend on this single-phase picture.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nitridation of Mn3Ga alloy films produces single-phase rock-salt Mn1-xGaxN with a rocking-curve FWHM of about 0.06 degrees, evidence of epitaxial single-crystal quality.
  • The ferromagnetic order of the parent alloy is suppressed, and the nitride film shows a zero net magnetic moment with no stray-field signature in NV-center magnetometry.
  • Transport measurements show the disappearance of butterfly magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall hysteresis after annealing, while the carrier density rises to roughly $10^{23}$ cm$^{-3}$.
  • Under a 0.4 T out-of-plane magnetic field, the Mn 3d orbital occupancy shifts from $d_{3z^2-r^2}$ to $d_{x^2-y^2}$, which the authors read as a signature of the antiferromagnetic state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-step nitridation could likely extend to other metal alloy families, turning any ammonia-reactive metallic film into a nitride single crystal and widening the palette of spintronic materials beyond manganese gallium nitride.
  • Because the zero-moment evidence is indirect, direct probes such as neutron diffraction or muon spin rotation would be needed to prove long-range antiferromagnetic order in these films.
  • The N K-edge XAS showing both GaN and $\theta$-Mn$_6$N$_{5+y}$ fingerprints leaves open a phase-separated interpretation; a single-phase reading would be strengthened by spatially resolved elemental mapping of Mn and Ga.
  • Varying the Ga content x systematically and measuring the antiferromagnetic transition temperature would test whether the magnetic state is tunable by alloy composition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a two-step synthesis of epitaxial Mn1-xGaxN (x~0.25) thin films: PLD growth of Mn3Ga alloy films on MgO(001), followed by ammonia annealing at 700°C. Structural characterization (XRD θ-2θ, rocking curves, RSM, HAADF-STEM, and SHG) is used to argue that the alloy transforms into a single-crystal, single-phase rock-salt nitride with high crystallinity. The magnetic claim is that the films are antiferromagnetic, based on a zero net magnetic moment observed by NV-center magnetometry, the absence of anomalous Hall effect and butterfly magnetoresistance, and field-dependent X-ray linear dichroism at the Mn L-edges. The paper concludes that metal alloy nitridation is a reproducible route to antiferromagnetic nitride films for spintronic applications.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work offers a technically simple and potentially generalizable route to epitaxial antiferromagnetic nitride films, which are of genuine interest for spintronics. The structural evidence is a notable strength: the 0.06° rocking-curve FWHM, coherent RSM, atomically sharp STEM interface, and consistent SHG symmetry change are mutually supportive and indicate high-quality epitaxial growth. The magnetic conclusion is, however, less solid than the abstract suggests. The paper does not directly measure antiferromagnetic order; it infers it from zero net moment and field-dependent XLD. A direct probe such as neutron diffraction, resonant magnetic X-ray scattering, or a properly executed XMLD protocol at fields above the expected spin-flop scale would be needed to substantiate the 'robust antiferromagnetic character' claim. The result is therefore plausible but not yet load-bearing in its current form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Magnetic transitions probed by diamond NV-based magnetometry; Figure 3] The central claim that the films are antiferromagnetic is underdetermined. The zero-field XLD in Figure 3d is a crystal-field orbital-occupancy effect and does not by itself establish magnetic order. The field-induced dichroism in Figure 3g is computed as I(0°)-I(60°) at ±0.4 T, but the standard XMLD protocol requires comparing absorption with controlled polarization and/or magnetization geometries at fields strong enough to reorient or align an antiferromagnetic order parameter; 0.4 T is far below the spin-flop or reorientation scale expected for θ-MnN-based films. The NV and anomalous-Hall measurements rule out a strong ferromagnetic moment but cannot distinguish an antiferromagnet from a simple paramagnet or a weakly canted state. The abstract's word 'confirm' therefore overstates what the data show. I recommend either adding direct magnetic-order evidence (e.g., neutron diffraction or XMLD at much higher fields with full polarization/field geometry control) or explicitly revising the claim to 'consistent with antiferromagnetic character' throughout.
  2. [Electronic states of high-quality Mn1-xGaxN films; Figure 3a] The single-phase random-alloy assignment is not fully established. The N K-edge spectrum in Figure 3a shows features attributed both to GaN and to θ-Mn6N5+y references. If the film were a single-phase solid solution, one would expect a single set of N-bond fingerprints, not simultaneous matches to two distinct reference compounds. The statement in the STEM section that Mn and Ga are indistinguishable in HAADF removes the most direct atomic-scale check of cation ordering. The XRD peak at 43.53° and the coherent RSM are consistent with an epitaxial rock-salt phase, but they do not exclude nanoscale phase separation or cation clustering with a common average lattice. The authors should provide quantitative elemental mapping (EDS/EELS) or another composition-sensitive measurement, and should discuss how the N K-edge line shape is compatible with a random alloy rather than a physical mixture.
  3. [Electronic states of high-quality Mn1-xGaxN films; XPS paragraph] The stoichiometry determination is presented without essential quantitative details. The Mn:Ga ratio of 2.9:1 from XPS peak deconvolution is given without error bars, sensitivity factors, or calibration standards, and the nitrogen content is not quantified. Since the interpretation of the lattice parameter, electronic structure, and magnetic behavior depends on the actual Ga content and N stoichiometry, the paper should report the fitting procedure, uncertainties, and any reproducibility checks across samples. This is a load-bearing point for the claimed composition x~0.25 in Mn1-xGaxN.
  4. [Changes in transport behavior; Figure 5] The transport data are used to support the antiferromagnetic assignment, but they only demonstrate the suppression of ferromagnetism. The vanishing butterfly-shaped MR and the absence of an anomalous Hall effect in the nitridated films are consistent with a zero net moment, yet they are equally consistent with a paramagnet or a compensated ferrimagnet with negligible net moment. The sentence in the conclusions that transport 'confirmed' the antiferromagnetic character should be weakened to state that transport confirms the disappearance of the ferromagnetic response, not the establishment of antiferromagnetic order.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Experimental Section, Spectroscopic measurements] The text reads 'All measurements were performed were performed on independent home-developed systems'; the duplicated phrase should be removed.
  2. [Experimental Section, Spectroscopic measurements] The experimental section states that XAS was collected at 'N K-edges and Cr L-edges', but Figure 3 and the surrounding text concern Mn L-edges. This appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  3. [Figure 3 caption] The caption labels the zero-field spectrum as 'XMLD', but under zero magnetic field there is no magnetic linear dichroism; the zero-field quantity is XLD only. The field-dependent spectra should be described with the field magnitude and geometry explicitly, and the term XMLD should be reserved for the field-dependent difference.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract says the measurements 'confirm' robust antiferromagnetic character, while the conclusions say the results are 'consistent with' antiferromagnetic character. These formulations should be harmonized, with the more cautious wording used unless direct magnetic-order evidence is added.
  5. [References] Reference [24] is missing journal title and reference [41] contains a raw PII string; both should be completed according to journal style. In addition, the subscripts in D0₂₂ and θ-Mn6N5+y are inconsistent in places and should be typeset uniformly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the structural, magnetic, and transport claims are supported by direct measurements and external prior work, not by fitted inputs or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental: ammonia nitridation of PLD-grown Mn3Ga alloy films yields single-crystal rock-salt Mn1-xGaxN (x~0.25) with high crystallinity, a zero net magnetic moment, and antiferromagnetic character. The derivation chain is not circular. The structural assignment rests on direct measurements: the XRD θ–2θ peak at 43.53°, rocking-curve FWHM ≈0.06°, reciprocal space mapping, HAADF-STEM imaging, and a single N 1s XPS peak, interpreted against externally reported θ-MnN lattice parameters and reference spectra. The zero-net-moment and ferromagnetism-suppression claims are supported directly by NV ODMR maps showing no stray-field splitting, negligible magnetic response in M-H/M-T curves, and the absence of anomalous Hall hysteresis after nitridation. The antiferromagnetic label is an inference from the phase identification as θ-MnN, whose antiferromagnetism is cited from independent prior literature [42–44], together with a measured field-induced XLD change; no parameter is fitted to one subset of data and then renamed as a prediction. The XLD signal is defined operationally as I0°−I60°, and the nominal x~0.25 comes from an XPS-derived Mn:Ga ratio of 2.9:1, not from a fitted quantity. Self-citations [12,13,27] appear only as background for nitride film growth methods and do not carry the load of the AFM conclusion. Thus no specific reduction of a prediction to its inputs by construction can be exhibited, and the paper is not circular even though the AFM identification may be debatable as a matter of experimental proof.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on prior theta-MnN magnetic knowledge, an assumed stoichiometry from the deposition target, and a single-phase solid-solution assumption that reconciles XAS and STEM observations. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption theta-MnN (NaCl-type, tetragonally distorted) is an antiferromagnet.
    Used to assign AFM character to Mn1-xGaxN from zero net moment and field-dependent XLD; no direct AFM order parameter is measured in this paper.
  • domain assumption The PLD-grown film is stoichiometric Mn3Ga with the expected D019/D022 phases.
    Composition is assumed from the nominal target; the film is not chemically quantified before annealing.
  • ad hoc to paper Ga substitutes randomly for Mn in the rock-salt MnN lattice while preserving the NaCl structure and magnetic order.
    STEM cannot distinguish Mn from Ga, and XAS shows GaN-like N K-edge features; the paper assumes a single-phase solid solution despite these fingerprints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advancing Antiferromagnetic Nitrides via Metal Alloy Nitridation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EJUNL4XK

@misc{pith2026250504636,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advancing Antiferromagnetic Nitrides via Metal Alloy Nitridation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EJUNL4XK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04636}
}
read the original abstract

Nitride materials, valued for their structural stability and exceptional physical properties, have garnered significant interest in both fundamental research and technological applications. The fabrication of high-quality nitride thin films is essential for advancing their use in microelectronics and spintronics. Yet, achieving single-crystal nitride thin films with excellent structural integrity remains a challenge. Here, we introduce a straightforward yet innovative metallic alloy nitridation technique for the synthesis of stable single-crystal nitride thin films. By subjecting metal alloy thin films to a controlled nitridation process, nitrogen atoms integrate into the lattice, driving structural transformations while preserving high epitaxial quality. Combining nanoscale magnetic imaging with a diamond nitrogen-vacancy (NV) probe, X-ray magnetic linear dichroism, and comprehensive transport measurements, we confirm that the nitridated films exhibit a robust antiferromagnetic character with a zero net magnetic moment. This work not only provides a refined and reproducible strategy for the fabrication of nitride thin films but also lays a robust foundation for exploring their burgeoning device applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04636 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Synthesis of Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Structural transition induced by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Nanoscale magnetic probing via scanning NV magnetometry. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dieny, I

    B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas, R. Lehndorff, W. Raberg, U. Ebels, S. O. Demokritov, J. Akerman, A. Deac, P. Pirro, C. Adelmann, A. Anane, A. V . Chumak, A. Hirohata, S. Mangin, S. O. Valenzuela, M. C. Onbasli, M. D'Aquino, G. Prenat, G. Finocchio, L. Lopez -Diaz, R. Chantrell, O. Chubykalo -Fesenko, P. Bortolotti, Natur...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Hirohata, K

    A. Hirohata, K. Yamada, Y . Nakatani, I.-L. Prejbeanu, B. Dieny, P. Pirro, B. Hillebrands, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2020, 509, 166711

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Zutic, J

    I. Zutic, J. Fabian, S. Das Sarma, Reviews of Modern Physics 2004, 76, 323. 14

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Molnár, M. L. Roukes, A. Y . Chtchelkanova, D. M. Treger, Science 2001, 294, 1488

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Hirohata, D

    A. Hirohata, D. C. Lloyd, T. Kubota, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, H. Sukegawa, Z. Wen, S. Mitani, H. Koizumi, IEEE Access 2023, 11, 117443

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, J. Wunderlich, Nature Nanotechnology 2016, 11, 231

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Nemec, M

    P. Nemec, M. Fiebig, T. Kampfrath, A. V . Kimel, Nature Physics 2018, 14, 229

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    B. H. Rimmler, B. Pal, S. S. P. Parkin, Nature Reviews Materials 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Shukla, S

    A. Shukla, S. Qian, S. Rakheja, Nanoscale Horizons 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    L. M. Corliss, N. Elliott, J. M. Hastings, Physical Review 1960, 117, 929

    1960

  3. [11]

    W. J. Feng, D. Li, Y . F. Deng, Q. Zhang, H. H. Zhang, Z. D. Zhang, Journal of Materials Science 2010, 45, 2770. [12]Q. Jin, H. Cheng, Z. Wang, Q. Zhang, S. Lin, M. A. Roldan, J. Zhao, J. O. Wang, S. Chen, M. He, C. Ge, C. Wang, H. B. Lu, H. Guo, L. Gu, X. Tong, T. Zhu, S. Wan...

    2010

  4. [13]

    Q. Jin, Z. Wang, Q. Zhang, Y . Yu, S. Lin, S. Chen, M. Qi, H. Bai, A. Huon, Q. Li, L. Wang, X. Yin, C. S. Tang, A. T. S. Wee, F. Meng, J. Zhao, J. o. Wang, H. Guo, C. Ge, C. Wang, W. Yan, T. Zhu, L. Gu, S. A. Chambers, S. Das, T. Charlton, M. R. Fitzsimmons, G. Q. Liu, S. Wang...

    2022

  5. [14]

    M. Meng, S. W. Li, M. Saghayezhian, E. W. Plummer, R. Y . Jin, Applied Physics Letters 2018, 112, 132402

    2018

  6. [15]

    R. Usui, Y . Yamada, Y . Kobayashi, Hyperfine Interactions 2012, 205, 13

    2012

  7. [16]

    Meinert, B

    M. Meinert, B. Büker, D. Graulich, M. Dunz, Physical Review B 2015, 92, 144408

    2015

  8. [17]

    R. S. Ningthoujam, N. S. Gajbhiye, Progress in Materials Science 2015, 70, 50

    2015

  9. [18]

    Serghiou, G

    G. Serghiou, G. Ji, N. Odling, H. J. Reichmann, D. J. Frost, J. P. Wright, High Pressure Research 2015, 35, 28

    2015

  10. [19]

    C. X. Quintela, K. Song, D. F. Shao, L. Xie, T. X. Nan, T. R. Paudel, N. Campbell, X. Q. Pan, T. Tybell, M. S. Rzchowski, E. Y . Tsymbal, S. Y . Choi, C. B. Eom, Science Advances 2020, 6, eaba4017

    2020

  11. [20]

    T. Nan, C. X. Quintela, J. Irwin, G. Gurung, D. F. Shao, J. Gibbons, N. Campbell, K. 15 Song, S. Y . Choi, L. Guo, R. D. Johnson, P. Manuel, R. V . Chopdekar, I. Hallsteinsen, T. Tybell, P. J. Ryan, J. W. Kim, Y . Choi, P. G. Radaelli, D. C. Ralph, E. Y . Tsymbal, M. S. Rzchow...

    2020

  12. [21]

    Azizi, M

    A. Azizi, M. R. Gadinski, Q. Li, M. A. AlSaud, J. Wang, Y . Wang, B. Wang, F. Liu, L. Q. Chen, N. Alem, Q. Wang, Advanced Materials 2017, 29

    2017

  13. [22]

    L. Z. Sun, G. W. Yuan, L. B. Gao, J. Yang, M. Chhowalla, M. H. Gharahcheshmeh, K. K. Gleason, Y . S. Choi, B. H. Hong, Z. F. Liu, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2021, 1, 5

    2021

  14. [23]

    D. H. Lee, Y . Sim, J. Wang, S. Y . Kwon, Apl Materials 2020, 8, 030901

    2020

  15. [24]

    K. E. Elers, T. Blomberg, M. Peussa, B. Aitchison, S. Haukka, S. Marcus, 2006, 12, 13

    2006

  16. [25]

    Isogami, Y

    S. Isogami, Y . K. Takahashi, Advanced Electronic Materials 2022, 9

    2022

  17. [26]

    J. Lee, Z. Zhang, H. Xing, D. Jena, F. Rana, Physical Review Applied 2022, 18

    2022

  18. [27]

    Q. Jin, Q. Zhang, H. Bai, A. Huon, T. Charlton, S. Chen, S. Lin, H. Hong, T. Cui, C. Wang, H. Guo, L. Gu, T. Zhu, M. R. Fitzsimmons, K. j. Jin, S. Wang, E. J. Guo, Advanced Materials 2022, 35

    2022

  19. [28]

    H. Yang, H. Al Brithen, E. Trifan, D. C. Ingram, A. R. Smith, Journal of Applied Physics 2002, 91, 1053

    2002

  20. [29]

    H. Lee, H. Sukegawa, J. Liu, T. Ohkubo, S. Kasai, S. Mitani, K. Hono, Applied Physics Letters 2015, 107

    2015

  21. [30]

    Z. Chen, C. J. Jensen, C. Liu, X. Zhang, K. Liu, Applied Physics Letters 2023, 123

    2023

  22. [31]

    Z. H. Liu, Y . J. Zhang, G. D. Liu, B. Ding, E. K. Liu, H. M. Jafri, Z. P. Hou, W. H. Wang, X. Q. Ma, G. H. Wu, Scientific Reports 2017, 7

    2017

  23. [32]

    L. Song, B. Ding, H. Li, S. Lv, Y . Yao, D. Zhao, J. He, W. Wang, Applied Physics Letters 2021, 119

    2021

  24. [33]

    H. W. Bang, W. Yoo, K. Lee, Y . H. Lee, M. H. Jung, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2021, 869

    2021

  25. [34]

    H. W. Bang, W. Yoo, C. Kim, S. Lee, J. Gu, Y . Park, K. Lee, M. H. Jung, Applied Physics Letters 2019, 115

    2019

  26. [35]

    Balke, G

    B. Balke, G. H. Fecher, J. Winterlik, C. Felser, Applied Physics Letters 2007, 90

    2007

  27. [36]

    X. Zhou, J. P. Hanke, W. Feng, F. Li, G. Y . Guo, Y . Yao, S. Blügel, Y . Mokrousov, 16 Physical Review B 2019, 99

    2019

  28. [37]

    H. Lu, Y . Sun, K. Shi, J. Cui, H. Han, C. Wang, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2020, 514

    2020

  29. [38]

    Hajiri, K

    T. Hajiri, K. Matsuura, K. Sonoda, E. Tanaka, K. Ueda, H. Asano, Physical Review Applied 2021, 16

    2021

  30. [39]

    R. Yang, M. B. Haider, H. Yang, H. Al. Brithen, A. R. Smith, Applied Physics A 2005, 81, 695

    2005

  31. [40]

    Takeuchi, Y

    T. Takeuchi, Y . Harada, T. Tokushima, Y . Takata, A. Chainani, J. J. Kim, P. P. Chen, H. Makino, T. Hanada, T. Yao, T. Yamamoto, T. Tsukamoto, K. Kobayashi, S. Shin, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 2005, 144-147, 707

    2005

  32. [41]

    Niewa, Z

    R. Niewa, Z. Hu, C. Grazioli, U. Rössler, M. S. Golden, M. Knupfer, J. Fink, H. Giefers, G. Wortmann, F. M. F. de Groot, F. J. DiSalvo, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2002, 346, 129, Pii s0925-8388(02)00519-4

    2002

  33. [42]

    J. C. Moreno, R. Ponce -Pérez, G. H. Cocoletzi, N. Takeuchi, Applied Surface Science 2022, 573, 151451

    2022

  34. [43]

    Vallejo Fernandez, M

    G. Vallejo Fernandez, M. Meinert, Magnetochemistry 2021, 7, 116

    2021

  35. [44]

    J. C. Moreno Hernández, R. Ponce Pérez, G. H. Cocoletzi, N. Takeuchi, Advanced Theory and Simulations 2024, 7. 17 Figure 1 Figure 1. Synthesis of Mn 1-xGaxN (x~0.25) thin films. (a) Schematic of the fabrication process. Mn 3Ga alloy thin films were first ly deposited on (001) ...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.