pith. sign in

arxiv: 1706.05599 · v3 · pith:ELHAZQXZnew · submitted 2017-06-18 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Sample, computation vs storage tradeoffs for classification using tensor subspace models

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords subspacesdatakroneckerstructuretradeoffsclassificationcomputationdimensions
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we exhibit the tradeoffs between the (training) sample, computation and storage complexity for the problem of supervised classification using signal subspace estimation. Our main tool is the use of tensor subspaces, i.e. subspaces with a Kronecker structure, for embedding the data into lower dimensions. Among the subspaces with a Kronecker structure, we show that using subspaces with a hierarchical structure for representing data leads to improved tradeoffs. One of the main reasons for the improvement is that embedding data into these hierarchical Kronecker structured subspaces prevents overfitting at higher latent dimensions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.