pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.27249 · v2 · pith:ELUQOQG7new · submitted 2026-03-28 · 💻 cs.SE

"An Endless Stream of AI Slop": How Developers Discuss the Burden of AI-Assisted Software Development

Sebastian Baltes , Marc Cheong , Christoph Treude This is my paper
classification 💻 cs.SE
keywords developersslopdevelopmentdiscussreviewerssoftwareadoptionaffecting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

"AI slop", that is, low-quality AI-generated content, is increasingly affecting software development, from generated code and pull requests to documentation and bug reports. However, there is limited empirical research on how developers perceive and respond to this phenomenon. We qualitatively analyzed how developers discuss AI slop in 1{,}154 Reddit and Hacker News posts, developing a codebook of 15 codes organized into three thematic clusters: Review Friction (how AI slop burdens reviewers, erodes trust, and prompts countermeasures), Quality Degradation (damage to codebases, knowledge resources, and developer competence), and Forces and Consequences (systemic incentives, mandated adoption, craft erosion, and workforce disruption). Our findings frame AI slop as a tragedy of the commons, where individual productivity gains externalize costs onto reviewers, maintainers, and the broader community. We report the concerns developers raise and the mitigation strategies they propose, with implications for tool developers, team leads, and educators.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI Policy, Disclosure, and Human in the Loop: How Are Contribution Guidelines Adapting to GenAI?

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An empirical analysis of 1,000 GitHub repositories finds 118 AI policies where 78% allow GenAI contributions, 51% require disclosure, and 74% mandate human oversight.

  2. AI Slop and the Software Commons

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AI slop in software externalizes review and integrity costs onto the commons, requiring institutional responses drawn from Ostrom's design principles.

  3. To Copilot and Beyond: 22 AI Systems Developers Want Built

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Survey of 860 developers reveals 22 desired AI systems for non-coding tasks with explicit constraints on authority, provenance, and quality signals, framed as bounded delegation where AI handles assembly work but not ...