Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.11774 v3 pith:EMEQVEL4 submitted 2023-01-27 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningrewardhumandiverselabelsmethodpreferencepreference-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The complexity of designing reward functions has been a major obstacle to the wide application of deep reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. Describing an agent's desired behaviors and properties can be difficult, even for experts. A new paradigm called reinforcement learning from human preferences (or preference-based RL) has emerged as a promising solution, in which reward functions are learned from human preference labels among behavior trajectories. However, existing methods for preference-based RL are limited by the need for accurate oracle preference labels. This paper addresses this limitation by developing a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The key idea is to stabilize reward learning through regularization and correction in a latent space. To ensure temporal consistency, a strong constraint is imposed on the reward model that forces its latent space to be close to the prior distribution. Additionally, a confidence-based reward model ensembling method is designed to generate more stable and reliable predictions. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world and has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback, paving the way for real-world applications of RL methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CLARIFY: Contrastive Preference Reinforcement Learning for Untangling Ambiguous Queries

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLARIFY uses contrastive learning on preference data to embed trajectories, then rejection-samples queries that humans can distinguish clearly, improving offline preference-based RL.

Pith tools