pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13085 · v1 · pith:EMLDK4IZnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Reservoir-controlled electromagnetically induced gratings in a weakly driven two-level medium

Amjad Hussain , Hamid Arian Zad , Amjad Sohail , Hazrat Ali , Michal Michal Ja\v{s}\v{c}ur , Saeed Haddadi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph
keywords electromagnetically induced gratingtwo-level mediumquantum reservoirsqueezed vacuumthermal reservoirdiffraction patternsoptical Bloch equationsprobe susceptibility
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reservoir statistics alter the amplitude and phase of induced gratings to reshape diffraction in a weakly driven two-level medium.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a weakly driven two-level medium forming an electromagnetically induced grating and shows that its diffraction response depends on the statistics of the coupled quantum reservoir. A perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations reveals that thermal reservoirs strengthen transmission modulation and raise intensities in main diffraction orders, while broadband squeezed-vacuum reservoirs introduce phase-sensitive shifts that move optical power between channels. Detuning the squeezed reservoir from the drive further allows directional control, and two-dimensional geometries produce anisotropic patterns. A reader would care because the result indicates that reservoir choice alone can tune transmission, efficiency, and angular selectivity in the simplest atomic system without stronger fields or added complexity.

Core claim

In a weakly driven two-level medium coupled to engineered reservoirs, the probe susceptibility is modified by reservoir statistics, which in turn alters the amplitude and phase profile of the induced grating. Thermal reservoirs enhance transmission modulation and increase the intensity of dominant diffraction orders. Broadband squeezed-vacuum reservoirs generate phase-sensitive modifications that selectively redistribute power among diffraction channels, with the detuning between reservoir and driving field providing directional control. In two-dimensional geometries the squeezed-vacuum correlations produce structured phase landscapes and strongly anisotropic patterns that amplify selected c

What carries the argument

The perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations for the spatially modulated probe susceptibility under normal-vacuum, thermal, and broadband squeezed-vacuum reservoir couplings, which determines the transmission function and far-field diffraction.

If this is right

  • Thermal reservoirs increase the intensity of the dominant diffraction orders.
  • Squeezed-vacuum reservoirs produce phase-sensitive modifications that redistribute optical power among channels.
  • Detuning between the squeezed reservoir and the driving field controls diffraction directionality and amplifies selected angular orders.
  • In two-dimensional geometries, squeezed-vacuum correlations yield anisotropic diffraction patterns that enhance some channels while suppressing others.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reservoir-controlled susceptibility could be tested in single-atom or quantum-dot realizations to check whether the predicted redistribution persists at the few-photon level.
  • Varying the squeezing bandwidth or temperature in experiment would map the boundary between amplitude-dominated and phase-dominated diffraction regimes.
  • The directional control via detuning suggests a route to reservoir-tuned beam steering that could be combined with existing slow-light techniques in the same medium.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations remains valid and sufficient to capture the full spatial transmission function and far-field diffraction when the driving field is weak.

What would settle it

Measuring the far-field diffraction intensities for a squeezed-vacuum reservoir at a fixed detuning and finding no selective redistribution of power into higher orders compared with the thermal-reservoir case would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13085 by Amjad Hussain, Amjad Sohail, Hamid Arian Zad, Hazrat Ali, Michal Michal Ja\v{s}\v{c}ur, Saeed Haddadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Effective two-level atomic system driven by a standing-wave control field with Rabi frequency Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Transmission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Diffraction intensity for the SV reservoir with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a), (b), (c) Two-dimensional diffraction intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a), (b), (c) Two-dimensional diffraction intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically investigate the transmission and diffraction of a weak probe field from an electromagnetically induced grating formed in a weakly driven two-level medium coupled to engineered quantum reservoirs. Using a perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations in the weak-driving regime, we analyze how normal-vacuum, thermal, and broadband squeezed-vacuum environments modify the probe susceptibility and consequently reshape both the spatial transmission function and the far-field diffraction patterns. We show that reservoir statistics have a pronounced impact on the diffraction response by altering the amplitude and phase of the induced grating. Thermal reservoirs enhance the transmission modulation and increase the intensity of the dominant diffraction orders, whereas squeezed-vacuum reservoirs generate strongly phase-sensitive modifications that selectively redistribute optical power among diffraction channels. We further demonstrate that the detuning between the squeezed reservoir and the driving field provides an efficient mechanism for controlling diffraction directionality, leading to substantial amplification of selected angular orders. In two-dimensional geometries, squeezed-vacuum correlations produce highly structured phase landscapes and strongly anisotropic diffraction patterns, enabling directional enhancement of specific diffraction channels while suppressing others. These results establish reservoir engineering as a versatile approach for controlling transmission, diffraction efficiency, and angular selectivity in minimal two-level systems, with potential applications in programmable photonic devices, beam steering, and quantum optical platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations for a weakly driven two-level atom coupled to normal-vacuum, thermal, or broadband squeezed-vacuum reservoirs shows that reservoir statistics strongly modify the amplitude and phase of an electromagnetically induced grating. This in turn controls the spatial transmission function and far-field diffraction, with thermal reservoirs enhancing modulation and squeezed-vacuum reservoirs producing phase-sensitive power redistribution among orders; detuning in the squeezed case further enables directional control, and 2D geometries yield anisotropic patterns.

Significance. If the perturbative treatment remains valid across the parameter ranges examined, the work demonstrates that reservoir engineering can be used to control diffraction efficiency and angular selectivity in a minimal two-level system without additional atomic levels or strong driving fields. This would be of interest for programmable photonic elements and beam-steering applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations (weak-driving regime)] The central claim that the first-order perturbative solution fully determines the spatially modulated susceptibility and far-field diffraction for the squeezed-vacuum reservoir rests on an unverified assumption. The manuscript provides no error estimates, comparison to non-perturbative integration of the master equation, or checks against limiting cases when the squeezing parameter r and detuning are varied; phase-dependent two-photon correlations introduced by the broadband squeezed vacuum may generate additional coherences outside the linear-in-probe regime.
  2. [two-dimensional geometries] In the two-dimensional geometry analysis, the reported highly structured phase landscapes and anisotropic diffraction patterns are obtained from the same first-order susceptibility; without explicit verification that higher-order terms remain negligible under squeezed-vacuum correlations, the directional enhancement and suppression of specific channels cannot be taken as robust predictions.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and main text would benefit from an explicit statement of the range of validity (e.g., maximum squeezing parameter and detuning values) for which the perturbative solution is asserted to hold.
  2. Notation for the reservoir correlation functions and the definition of the squeezing parameter r should be introduced with a brief reminder of the standard master-equation terms they enter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments regarding the perturbative treatment. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations (weak-driving regime)] The central claim that the first-order perturbative solution fully determines the spatially modulated susceptibility and far-field diffraction for the squeezed-vacuum reservoir rests on an unverified assumption. The manuscript provides no error estimates, comparison to non-perturbative integration of the master equation, or checks against limiting cases when the squeezing parameter r and detuning are varied; phase-dependent two-photon correlations introduced by the broadband squeezed vacuum may generate additional coherences outside the linear-in-probe regime.

    Authors: The solution is obtained by expanding the atomic density-matrix elements to first order in the weak probe Rabi frequency within the optical Bloch equations. This is the standard linear-response regime for electromagnetically induced gratings. The broadband squeezed-vacuum reservoir modifies the zeroth-order steady-state populations and coherences through its phase-dependent decay rates, but the first-order probe response remains a closed linear system. Higher-order coherences generated by two-photon correlations would appear only at second order in the probe amplitude and are therefore excluded consistently with the weak-driving assumption used throughout the work. The formalism reduces to established results for normal and thermal reservoirs when the squeezing parameter vanishes. While explicit numerical benchmarks against full master-equation integration are not presented, the analytic structure of the linear equations guarantees that the neglected terms are O(Ω_p²). We are prepared to add a clarifying paragraph on the range of validity if requested. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [two-dimensional geometries] In the two-dimensional geometry analysis, the reported highly structured phase landscapes and anisotropic diffraction patterns are obtained from the same first-order susceptibility; without explicit verification that higher-order terms remain negligible under squeezed-vacuum correlations, the directional enhancement and suppression of specific channels cannot be taken as robust predictions.

    Authors: The two-dimensional diffraction patterns are computed from the identical first-order susceptibility derived for the one-dimensional case. Because the perturbative expansion is justified solely by the weak-probe limit and does not depend on spatial dimensionality, the same linear-response argument applies directly. The anisotropic features originate from the spatially modulated phase of the linear susceptibility under squeezed-vacuum driving, which is fully captured at this order. We therefore regard the directional predictions as robust within the stated regime. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results follow from explicit perturbative solution of Bloch equations

full rationale

The manuscript derives transmission and diffraction from a first-order perturbative solution of the optical Bloch equations under weak driving, applied to three reservoir types. No equations reduce to input parameters by construction, no fitted quantities are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing claims rest on self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The reported effects on amplitude, phase, and angular selectivity are direct consequences of the solved susceptibility, not tautological redefinitions. The derivation is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard quantum-optical modeling of a two-level atom plus three reservoir types; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are named in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The optical Bloch equations for a weakly driven two-level atom remain perturbatively solvable when coupled to normal, thermal, or broadband squeezed-vacuum reservoirs.
    Invoked by the statement that a perturbative solution is used to obtain the probe susceptibility.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5776 in / 1334 out tokens · 18166 ms · 2026-06-27T06:09:10.875661+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy.Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511813993

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813993 2012

  2. [2]

    C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight.Introductory Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791239

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791239 2012

  3. [3]

    Stern, B

    L. Stern, B. Desiatov, I. Goykhman, and U. Levy. Nanoscale light–matter interactions in atomic cladding 12 waveguides.Nat. Commun., 4:1548, 2013. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2554

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms2554 2013

  4. [4]

    S. E. Harris. Electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Today, 50:36, 1997. doi:10.1063/1.881806

    work page doi:10.1063/1.881806 1997

  5. [5]

    Fleischhauer and M

    M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin. Quantum memory for photons: Dark-state polaritons.Phys. Rev. A, 65:022314,

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.022314

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.022314

  7. [7]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos. Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media.Rev. Mod. Phys., 77:633–673, 2005. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.633

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.633 2005

  8. [8]

    Mitsunaga and N

    M. Mitsunaga and N. Imoto. Observation of an electromagnetically induced grating in cold sodium atoms.Phys. Rev. A, 59:4773–4776, 1999. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4773

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.59.4773 1999

  9. [9]

    Deng and M

    L. Deng and M. G. Payne. Inhibiting the onset of the three-photon destructive interference in ultraslow propagation-enhanced four-wave mixing with dual in- duced transparency.Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:243902, 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.243902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.243902 2003

  10. [10]

    J. Wen, S. Du, H. Chen, and M. Xiao. Electromagneti- cally induced talbot effect.Appl. Phys. Lett., 98:081108,

  11. [11]

    doi:10.1063/1.3559610

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3559610

  12. [12]

    Ba, X.-Y

    N. Ba, X.-Y. Wu, X.-J. Liu, S.-Q. Zhang, and J. Wang. Electromagnetically induced grating in an atomic system with a static magnetic field.Opt. Commun., 285:3792– 3797, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2012.05.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2012.05.015 2012

  13. [13]

    A. W. Brown and M. Xiao. All-optical switching and routing based on an electromagnetically induced ab- sorption grating.Opt. Lett., 30:699–701, 2005. doi: 10.1364/OL.30.000699

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.30.000699 2005

  14. [14]

    Zhai, X.-M

    P.-W. Zhai, X.-M. Su, and J.-Y. Gao. Optical bistability in electromagnetically induced grating.Phys. Lett. A, 289:27–32, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(01)00576-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00576-x 2001

  15. [15]

    Chen, Z.-Z

    Y.-Y. Chen, Z.-Z. Liu, and R.-G. Wan. Beam splitter and router via an incoherent pump-assisted electromagneti- cally induced blazed grating.Appl. Opt., 56:5736–5742,

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1364/AO.56.005736

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.56.005736

  17. [17]

    Cheng, L

    G.-L. Cheng, L. Cong, and A.-X. Chen. Two-dimensional electromagnetically induced grating via gain and phase modulation in a two-level system.J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 49(8):085501, 2016. doi:10.1088/0953- 4075/49/8/085501

    work page doi:10.1088/0953- 2016

  18. [18]

    B. Wang, D. Yan, Y. Liu, and J. Wu. Two- dimension asymmetric electromagnetically induced grat- ing in rydberg atoms.Photonics, 9(10):674, 2022. doi: 10.3390/photonics9100674

    work page doi:10.3390/photonics9100674 2022

  19. [19]

    S. H. Asadpour, T. Kirova, J. Qian, H. R. Hamedi, G. Juzeli=unas, and E. Paspalakis. Azimuthal mod- ulation of electromagnetically induced grating using structured light.Sci. Rep., 11:20721, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00141-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-00141-9 2021

  20. [20]

    L. Deng, E. W. Hagley, and M. Payne. Elec- tromagnetically induced gratings in rubidium va- por.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:5409–5412, 2001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5409 2001

  21. [21]

    H. Kang, G. Hernandez, and Y. Zhu. Electromagnetically induced grating: Efficient diffraction of weak probe light in a rubidium vapor.Phys. Rev. A, 67:053824, 2003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.053824

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.67.053824 2003

  22. [22]

    M. Yan, H. Kang, and Y. Zhu. High-order diffrac- tion in electromagnetically induced gratings with ru- bidium vapor.Phys. Rev. A, 68:023812, 2003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.023812

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.68.023812 2003

  23. [23]

    M. Yan, E. G. Rickey, and Y. Zhu. Observa- tion of absorptive photon switching by quantum in- terference.Phys. Rev. A, 64:041801, 2001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.041801

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.041801 2001

  24. [24]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Liu, D. Zhang, J. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and M. Xiao. Observation of elec- tromagnetically induced talbot effect in an atomic system.Phys. Rev. A, 97:013603, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.013603

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.013603 2018

  25. [25]

    C. Xu, L. Zhang, S. Huang, T. Ma, and M. Xiao. Sensing and tracking enhanced by quantum squeezing.Photon. Res., 7:A14–A19, 2019. doi:10.1364/PRJ.7.000A14

    work page doi:10.1364/prj.7.000a14 2019

  26. [26]

    M. R. Grace, C. N. Gagatsos, Q. Zhuang, and S. Guha. Quantum-enhanced fiber-optic gyroscopes us- ing quadrature squeezing and continuous-variable entan- glement.Phys. Rev. Applied, 14:034065, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.034065

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034065 2020

  27. [27]

    Malitesta, A

    M. Malitesta, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz‘e. Distributed quantum sensing with squeezed-vacuum light in a config- urable array of mach–zehnder interferometers.Phys. Rev. A, 108:032621, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.032621

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.032621 2023

  28. [28]

    Zhang, S ¸

    S.-D. Zhang, S ¸. K. ”Ozdemir, C.-W. Qiu, F. Nori, and H. Jing. Squeezing-enhanced quantum sensing with quadratic optomechanics.Optica, 9:345–352, 2022. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.9.000345

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.9.000345 2022

  29. [29]

    C. M. Caves. Quantum-mechanical noise in an inter- ferometer.Phys. Rev. D, 23:1693–1708, 1981. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1693

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 1981

  30. [30]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schn- abel. Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:110801, 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.110801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.110801 2016

  31. [31]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock. Quantum information with continuous variables.Rev. Mod. Phys., 77:513–577,

  32. [32]

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513

  33. [33]

    Gisin and R

    N. Gisin and R. Thew. Quantum communica- tion.Nat. Photonics, 1:165–171, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.22

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.22 2007

  34. [34]

    Schnabel

    R. Schnabel. Squeezed states of light and their applica- tions in laser interferometers.Phys. Rep., 684:1–51, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001 2017

  35. [35]

    2004 , month =

    R. Loudon.The Quantum Theory of Light. Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 3 edition, 2000. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198501763.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198501763.001.0001 2000

  36. [37]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn.Quantum Optics. Springer, Berlin, 2 edition, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540- 28574-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540- 2008

  37. [38]

    L.-A. Wu, H. J. Kimble, J. L. Hall, and H. Wu. Gen- eration of squeezed states by parametric down con- version.Phys. Rev. Lett., 57:2520–2523, 1986. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2520

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.2520 1986

  38. [39]

    Serikawa, J

    T. Serikawa, J. Yoshikawa, K. Makino, and A. Furusawa. Creation and measurement of broadband squeezed vac- uum from a ring optical parametric oscillator.Opt. Ex- press, 25:28357, 2017. doi:10.1364/OE.25.028357

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.25.028357 2017

  39. [40]

    Chelkowski, H

    S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel. Coherent control of broadband vac- uum squeezing.Phys. Rev. A, 75:043814, 2007. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.043814

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.75.043814 2007

  40. [41]

    M. E. Anderson, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, and J. D. Bier- 13 lein. Quadrature squeezing with ultrashort-pulse optical parametric oscillators.Opt. Lett., 20:620–622, 1995. doi: 10.1364/OL.20.000620

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.20.000620 1995

  41. [42]

    Silberhorn, P

    C. Silberhorn, P. K. Lam, O. Weiß, F. K”onig, N. Ko- rolkova, and G. Leuchs. Generation of continuous vari- able einstein–podolsky–rosen entanglement via the kerr nonlinearity in an optical fiber.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86: 4267–4270, 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4267

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4267 2001

  42. [43]

    C. M. Caves and B. L. Schumaker. New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. i. quadrature phases and squeezed states.Phys. Rev. A, 31:3068–3092, 1985. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.3068

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.31.3068 1985

  43. [44]

    B. L. Schumaker and C. M. Caves. New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. ii. mathematical foundation and compact notation.Phys. Rev. A, 31:3093–3111, 1985. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.31.3093

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.31.3093 1985

  44. [45]

    Y. J. Lu and Z. Y. Ou. Observation of nonclassi- cal quantum interference between independent squeezed vacua.Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:1857–1860, 1998. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1857

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1857 1998

  45. [46]

    Christ, K

    A. Christ, K. Laiho, A. Eckstein, K. N. Cassemiro, and C. Silberhorn. Probing multimode squeezing with cor- relation functions.New J. Phys., 13:033027, 2011. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/3/033027

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/3/033027 2011

  46. [47]

    Roslund, R

    J. Roslund, R. M. de Ara´ ujo, S. Jiang, C. Fabre, and N. Treps. Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs.Nat. Photonics, 8:109– 112, 2014. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.340

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.340 2014

  47. [48]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller.Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics. Springer, Berlin, 2004. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05328-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05328-3 2004

  48. [49]

    M. J. Collett and C. W. Gardiner. Squeezing of intra- cavity and traveling-wave light fields produced in para- metric amplification.Phys. Rev. A, 30:1386–1391, 1984. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1386

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.30.1386 1984

  49. [50]

    C. W. Gardiner. Inhibition of atomic phase de- cays by squeezed light: A direct effect of squeez- ing.Phys. Rev. Lett., 56:1917–1920, 1986. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1917

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.1917 1917

  50. [51]

    E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble. Spectroscopy with squeezed light.Phys. Rev. Lett., 68:3020–3023,

  51. [52]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.3020

  52. [53]

    Zhu and T

    Y. Zhu and T. N. Dey. Modified resonance fluorescence of a two-level atom in a squeezed vacuum.Phys. Rev. A, 41:254–263, 1990. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.41.254

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.41.254 1990

  53. [54]

    Jin and S.-H

    R.-B. Jin and S.-H. Tang. Resonance fluorescence spec- trum of a two-level atom in a finite-bandwidth squeezed vacuum.Phys. Rev. A, 42:3277–3285, 1990. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.3277

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.42.3277 1990

  54. [55]

    S. S. Hassan and R. A. Alharbey. Nonlinear optical pro- cesses in multi-level atomic systems.Nonlinear Optics and Quantum Optics, 45:171–186, 2013

    2013

  55. [56]

    N. Lu. Frequency-dependent effects of squeezed vacuum on resonance fluorescence.Phys. Rev. A, 57:2445–2452,

  56. [57]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2445

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.57.2445

  57. [58]

    A. S. Parkins, P. Marte, P. Zoller, and H. J. Carmichael. Squeezed-light-induced two-photon transitions in atom– cavity systems.Phys. Rev. A, 48:758–765, 1993. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.758

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.48.758 1993

  58. [59]

    F. X. Kaertner and P. Russer. Generation of squeezed microwave states by a dc-pumped degenerate paramet- ric josephson junction oscillator.Phys. Rev. A, 42:5601– 5612, 1990. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.42.5601

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.42.5601 1990

  59. [60]

    Qiu.Broadband Squeezed Microwave States in Joseph- son Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifiers

    J. Qiu.Broadband Squeezed Microwave States in Joseph- son Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifiers. PhD the- sis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2022. URL https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/150037

    2022

  60. [61]

    Haider, J

    M. Haider, J. A. Russer, J. A. Patino, C. Jirauschek, and P. Russer. A josephson traveling wave para- metric amplifier for quantum coherent signal pro- cessing. In2019 IEEE MTT-S International Mi- crowave Symposium (IMS), pages 956–958, 2019. doi: 10.1109/MWSYM.2019.8700884

    work page doi:10.1109/mwsym.2019.8700884 2019

  61. [62]

    A. D. Corcoles, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, C. Rigetti, J. R. Rozen, G. A. Keefe, M. B. Ketchen, and M. Steffen. Protecting superconducting qubits from external sources of loss and heat.Appl. Phys. Lett., 99:181906, 2011. doi: 10.1063/1.3658630

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3658630 2011

  62. [63]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Hein- soo, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff. Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale super- conducting circuit systems.EPJ Quantum Technol., 6:2,

  63. [64]

    doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-3

  64. [65]

    Smith et al

    T. Smith et al. Cryogenic thermal modeling of microwave high density signaling.EPJ Quantum Technol., 12:124,

  65. [66]

    doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00427-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00427-1