Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Ten-dimensional localization

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Any minimally supersymmetric type II background admits universal equivariantly closed polyforms for the Page fluxes and on-shell action, so localization computes both without solving the equations of motion or needing a consistent truncatio

desk verdict Clean 10D equivariant polyforms that let you compute on-shell actions and fluxes without truncations; the only soft spot is a flagged, data-checked conjecture on the democratic action. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05529 v1 pith:EMLSAFV6 submitted 2026-07-06 hep-th

Christopher Couzens , Alice Lüscher , James Sparks This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords equivariantlocalizationtypeIIsupergravityPagefluxeson-shellactionmassiveIIASasaki-EinsteinRomansAdS/CFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that the supersymmetry conditions of ten-dimensional type II supergravity already supply everything needed to complete the Page fluxes and the partially on-shell action into equivariantly closed polyforms with respect to the natural Killing vector built from spinor bilinears. Once those polyforms exist, the Berline–Vergne–Atiyah–Bott theorem reduces every flux integral and the on-shell action to data on the fixed-point sets of that vector. The authors write the polyforms explicitly, then apply them to two large classes of massive type IIA geometries (hemisphere bundles over six-manifolds and suspensions of Sasaki–Einstein five-manifolds over four-manifolds). In both classes they obtain master formulae that recover every previously known free energy or partition function and immediately extend to topologies for which no consistent truncation is known. The same formulae match large-N field-theory results wherever those results exist. The construction therefore turns a hard ten-dimensional PDE problem into a finite algebraic extremization over equivariant weights and topology.

What carries the argument

The equivariantly closed polyforms Ψ_F (eqs. 2.19–2.20) and the action polyform Ψ (eq. 2.27). They are built from the supersymmetry conditions d_H(e^{-ϕ}Φ̂) = -(eK + K)F_RR and deK = K⌟H by a single descent that uses only the local function Υ defined by eK + K⌟B = dΥ.

What would settle it

Compute the Euclidean on-shell action for a new supersymmetric type IIA or IIB background whose free energy is independently known from field theory or from a consistent truncation, then check whether the localized master formula reproduces that free energy (including the correct ensemble signs).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For any background of (massive) type IIA or type IIB that preserves minimal supersymmetry, the Page fluxes admit the universal equivariant completion Ψ_F = F + Σ_m Ψ_m with Ψ_m = (-1)^m/m! (Υ^m F + m Υ^{m-1} Φ), and the partially on-shell action is simply the appropriate wedge product of these polyforms; localization of the resulting top form therefore yields both the quantized fluxes and the on-shell action for arbitrary topology.

Load-bearing premise

The partially on-shell action is obtained from the democratic pseudo-action by a conjectural choice of electric/magnetic polarization that keeps only half the RR terms and by discarding all boundary terms after the dilaton equation is used.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs equivariantly closed polyforms for the Page fluxes of (massive) type IIA and type IIB supergravity, and for the partially on-shell action, working directly in ten dimensions. Starting from the supersymmetry conditions of Tomasiello et al. (eqs. 2.9, 2.12, 2.13), the authors obtain the universal completion Ψ_F = F + Σ_m Ψ_m with Ψ_m = (−1)^m/m! (Υ^m F + m Υ^{m−1} Φ) (eqs. 2.19–2.20). The partially on-shell action is then written as a wedge product of these polyforms (eq. 2.27), with ensemble signs s_i. Two large classes of massive IIA solutions are treated in detail: HS^4 fibrations over six-dimensional bases (master formula 3.4) and suspensions of toric Sasaki–Einstein five-manifolds over four-dimensional bases (master formula 4.3). In both cases the on-shell action is expressed solely in terms of equivariant weights and topological data of the fixed-point sets, without requiring a consistent truncation. Known lower-dimensional supergravity and large-N field-theory free energies are recovered and extended.

Significance. If the construction holds, it supplies a uniform ten-dimensional localization framework that bypasses consistent truncations and applies to arbitrary minimally supersymmetric type-II backgrounds. The explicit polyforms (2.19)–(2.20) and the master formulae (3.4), (4.3) are concrete, reusable results. The paper recovers every previously known on-shell action in the two classes (spindle free energies, black-brane actions, product-of-Riemann-surface free energies, etc.) and matches the corresponding large-N field-theory partition functions, while extending them to topologies for which no consistent truncation is available. The derivation of the polyforms themselves is first-principles and does not rely on lower-dimensional truncations; that is a genuine technical advance for holographic computations that require the full ten-dimensional geometry (probe branes, punctures, resolutions).

major comments (2)
  1. Section 2.3 and appendix A.2: the passage from the democratic pseudo-action (2.24) to the partially on-shell expressions (2.25)–(2.26) rests on a conjectural electric/magnetic polarization that retains only half the RR terms (with signs s_i) and discards all boundary terms after the dilaton equation. The authors correctly flag this as a conjecture and validate it a posteriori by matching known results. Because the central claim is that the polyforms compute the on-shell action, a short additional paragraph clarifying the status of the conjecture (and, if possible, a sketch of how a PST-style or democratic-action analysis would fix the signs) would strengthen the paper. The polyform construction itself is not affected.
  2. Eq. (3.33) and the surrounding discussion of fixed B_4: the N^{3/2} correction involving the F_2 flux k_α is retained in the formula but is then set aside as sub-leading. The paper notes that it is “not obvious a priori that the formalism should compute such terms.” Either a brief argument that these terms are consistently sub-leading under the large-N scaling assumed throughout, or an explicit statement that they lie outside the present scope, would remove an ambiguity in the master formula (3.4).
minor comments (4)
  1. The Euclidean continuation (end of §2.3) is sketched only briefly; a sentence pointing to the precise holomorphic-slice conventions of Bergshoeff et al. or D’Hoker–Gutperle–Uhlemann would help readers who wish to reproduce the i-factors.
  2. Appendix D.1: the choice to set the baryonic flux B through the resolution CP^1 to zero is stated without much motivation. A short remark that a non-zero B would correspond to a magnetic baryonic flux (and that the critical-point equations become substantially harder) would clarify the scope of the T^{1,1} calculation.
  3. Notation for the ensemble signs s_i is introduced in (2.25)–(2.26) but the concrete choices used for the two classes appear only later; a forward reference would improve readability.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., “Brandhüber–Oz”, occasional missing spaces around equation numbers). These are easily fixed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: polyforms follow from SUSY bilinears; action polarization is flagged as conjecture and validated against independent lower-dimensional and field-theory results.

full rationale

The load-bearing construction of the equivariantly closed Page-flux polyforms (2.19)–(2.20) is obtained directly from the supersymmetry conditions (2.9), (2.12), (2.13) of Tomasiello et al. [5,38] together with the gauge choice (2.16); the derivation is self-contained in §2.2 and App. A.1 and does not presuppose the on-shell action. The partially on-shell action (2.25)–(2.27) is obtained from the democratic pseudo-action by a conjectural electric/magnetic polarization (retaining half the RR terms with signs s_i) and by discarding boundary terms after the dilaton EOM; the authors explicitly label this a conjecture and validate it a posteriori by exact recovery of free energies previously computed by independent methods (consistent truncations, holographic renormalization, large-N field theory). Master formulae (3.4) and (4.3) are then evaluated on concrete topologies and match external benchmarks (e.g. [49,50] field-theory results, spindle free energies). Self-citations to the authors’ earlier localization papers supply comparison data or method, not the derivation of the 10d polyforms themselves. No step reduces by construction to its own input; the single soft point is already flagged by the authors and does not force the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard supersymmetry conditions of type-II generalized geometry, the Berline–Vergne–Atiyah–Bott theorem, and a conjectural but checked prescription for the democratic on-shell action. No free parameters are fitted; the only ad-hoc element is the electric/magnetic polarization choice.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Necessary and sufficient supersymmetry conditions of Tomasiello et al. (in particular d_H(e^{-ϕ} Φ̂) = -(ẽK + ι_K)F^{RR}, deK = ι_K H, and (ẽK + ι_K)Φ̂ = 0) hold for any minimally supersymmetric type-II background.
    Invoked throughout section 2 and appendix A.1 as the sole input needed to construct the polyforms.
  • standard math The Berline–Vergne–Atiyah–Bott localization theorem applies to the equivariantly closed polyforms with respect to the Killing vector K built from spinor bilinears.
    Used to reduce all integrals of fluxes and the action to fixed-point contributions.
  • ad hoc to paper The partially on-shell democratic action may be replaced by a sum of wedge products of Page fluxes with ensemble signs s_i, discarding boundary terms after the dilaton equation.
    Explicitly labeled a conjecture in section 2.3; justified only by a-posteriori agreement with known results.
  • domain assumption After Wick rotation the Killing vector becomes complex and the Euclidean action is I = -i S; spinors are treated on a holomorphic slice without a Majorana condition.
    Stated in section 2.3 following Bergshoeff et al. and D’Hoker et al.; required to compare with Euclidean field-theory free energies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ten-dimensional localization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EMLSAFV6

@misc{pith2026260705529,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ten-dimensional localization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EMLSAFV6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05529}
}
read the original abstract

We construct equivariantly closed polyforms for the fluxes and the action of (massive) type IIA and type IIB supergravity directly in ten dimensions. We illustrate applications of our formalism to two distinct classes of solutions in massive type IIA. Our analysis straightforwardly reproduces and vastly generalizes all known results for on-shell actions in these classes, with no need for a consistent truncation. Where known, we match the corresponding field theory partition functions at leading order, and our results extend easily to other solutions of type II supergravity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Odd-Dimensional Localization in Supergravity

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The on-shell action of odd-dimensional supergravity with Chern-Simons terms localizes to fixed points via relative equivariant cohomology, yielding a universal formula matching M5-brane and black ring physics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 52 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, S. Pakis and D. Waldram,G structures and wrapped NS5-branes, Commun. Math. Phys.247(2004) 421–445, [hep-th/0205050]

    arXiv 2004

  2. [2]

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and D. Waldram,Superstrings with intrinsic torsion,Phys. Rev. D 69(2004) 086002, [hep-th/0302158]

    arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    J. P. Gauntlett and S. Pakis,The Geometry of D = 11 killing spinors,JHEP04(2003) 039, [hep-th/0212008]

    arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Grana, R

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello,Supersymmetric backgrounds from generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds,JHEP08(2004) 046, [hep-th/0406137]. 41

    arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    Tomasiello,Generalized structures of ten-dimensional supersymmetric solutions,JHEP03 (2012) 073, [1109.2603]

    A. Tomasiello,Generalized structures of ten-dimensional supersymmetric solutions,JHEP03 (2012) 073, [1109.2603]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Aharony, F

    O. Aharony, F. Benini, O. Mamroud and E. Milan,A gravity interpretation for the Bethe Ansatz expansion of theN= 4SYM index,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 086026, [2104.13932]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Y. Chen, M. Heydeman, Y. Wang and M. Zhang,Probing supersymmetric black holes with surface defects,JHEP10(2023) 136, [2306.05463]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Cabo-Bizet, M

    A. Cabo-Bizet, M. David and A. Gonz´ alez Lezcano,Thermodynamics of black holes with probe D-branes,JHEP06(2024) 193, [2312.12533]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Benetti Genolini, C

    P. Benetti Genolini, C. Couzens and A. L¨ uscher,Probing black holes with equivariant localization,2604.26786

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    G. B. De Luca, A. Gnecchi, G. Lo Monaco and A. Tomasiello,Holographic duals of 6d RG flows,JHEP03(2019) 035, [1810.10013]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bobev, D

    N. Bobev, D. Cassani and H. Triendl,Holographic RG Flows for Four-dimensionalN= 2 SCFTs,JHEP06(2018) 086, [1804.03276]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks,Equivariant Localization in Supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 121602, [2306.03868]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks,Localizing wrapped M5-branes and gravitational blocks,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L101903, [2308.10933]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks,Equivariant localization for AdS/CFT, JHEP02(2024) 015, [2308.11701]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks,Localization and attraction,JHEP05(2024) 152, [2401.10977]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks,Localization of the Free Energy in Supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 141601, [2407.02554]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Cassani, A

    D. Cassani, A. Ruip´ erez and E. Turetta,Localization of the 5D supergravity action and Euclidean saddles for the black hole index,JHEP12(2024) 086, [2409.01332]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Colombo, F

    E. Colombo, F. Faedo, D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni,Equivariant volume extremization and holography,JHEP01(2024) 095, [2309.04425]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Couzens and A

    C. Couzens and A. L¨ uscher,A geometric dual of F-maximization in massive type IIA,JHEP08 (2024) 218, [2406.15547]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Martelli and A

    D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni,Equivariant localization and holography,Lett. Math. Phys.114 (2024) 15, [2306.03891]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Suh,Equivariant localization for wrapped M5-branes and D4-branes,2404.01386

    M. Suh,Equivariant localization for wrapped M5-branes and D4-branes,2404.01386

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hristov,Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4dN= 2higher derivative supergravity, 6, 2024.2406.18648

    K. Hristov,Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4dN= 2higher derivative supergravity, 6, 2024.2406.18648

    2024

  15. [23]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks,Toric gravitational instantons in gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 046024, [2410.19036]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks,Equivariant localization for D = 4 gauged supergravity,JHEP08(2025) 211, [2412.07828]. 42

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Couzens, C

    C. Couzens, C. M. Gregory, D. Muniz, T. Sieper and J. Sparks,Localizing Romans supergravity, JHEP09(2025) 103, [2504.07168]

    2025

  18. [26]

    Colombo, V

    E. Colombo, V. Dimitrov, D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni,Equivariant localization in supergravity in odd dimensions,2502.15624

  19. [27]

    Cassia and K

    L. Cassia and K. Hristov,M2-brane partition functions and HD supergravity from equivariant topological strings,2508.21619

  20. [28]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, J. Park and J. Sparks,Equivariant localization for D= 5gauged supergravity,2508.08207

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Couzens, A

    C. Couzens, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks,Localizing punctures in M-theory,JHEP02(2026) 180, [2511.03397]

    2026

  22. [30]

    Colombo, V

    E. Colombo, V. Dimitrov, D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni,Patch-wise localization with Chern-Simons forms in five dimensional supergravity,2511.13824

  23. [31]

    Park,Localizing AlAdS 5 black holes and the SUSY index on S 1×M 3,JHEP06(2026) 107, [2511.15666]

    J. Park,Localizing AlAdS 5 black holes and the SUSY index on S 1×M 3,JHEP06(2026) 107, [2511.15666]

    2026 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hristov, S

    K. Hristov, S. Khandelwal, Y. Pang and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Holographic origin of a-maximization and higher-derivative AdS 5/CFT4,2511.22546

  25. [33]

    Hristov,Indices of M5 and M2 branes at finiteNfrom equivariant volumes, and a new duality,2604.06343

    K. Hristov,Indices of M5 and M2 branes at finiteNfrom equivariant volumes, and a new duality,2604.06343

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Benetti Genolini, F

    P. Benetti Genolini, F. Gaar, J. P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks,Equivariant localization for higher derivative supergravity,2604.08656

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    F. Gaar, J. P. Gauntlett, J. Park and J. Sparks,The superconformal index and localizing higher derivative supergravity,2604.09490

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Galli, C

    M. Galli, C. Kennedy, P. Raina and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Superform Approach to Equivariant Localization in Supergravity,2605.17919

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cassani and E

    D. Cassani and E. Turetta,The black hole at the end of the cone: localizing the anomaly polynomial on toric geometries,2606.16986

  30. [38]

    Legramandi, L

    A. Legramandi, L. Martucci and A. Tomasiello,Timelike structures of ten-dimensional supersymmetry,JHEP04(2019) 109, [1810.08625]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Martucci,Electrified branes,JHEP02(2012) 097, [1110.0627]

    L. Martucci,Electrified branes,JHEP02(2012) 097, [1110.0627]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bergshoeff, R

    E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest and A. Van Proeyen,New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 3359–3382, [hep-th/0103233]

    2001 arXiv

  33. [41]

    S. A. Kurlyand and A. A. Tseytlin,Type IIB supergravity action on M5×X5 solutions,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 086017, [2206.14522]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Pasti, D

    P. Pasti, D. P. Sorokin and M. Tonin,On Lorentz invariant actions for chiral p forms,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6292–6298, [hep-th/9611100]

    1997 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Mkrtchyan and F

    K. Mkrtchyan and F. Valach,Democratic actions for type II supergravities,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 066027, [2207.00626]. 43

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    S. W. Hawking and S. F. Ross,Duality between electric and magnetic black holes,Phys. Rev. D 52(1995) 5865–5876, [hep-th/9504019]

    1995 arXiv

  37. [45]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Hartong, A. Ploegh, J. Rosseel and D. Van den Bleeken, Pseudo-supersymmetry and a tale of alternate realities,JHEP07(2007) 067, [0704.3559]

    2007 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D’Hoker, M

    E. D’Hoker, M. Gutperle and C. F. Uhlemann,Exact solutions to complex Type IIB supergravity for complex superalgebraF(4)and its real forms,2508.14959

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Passias,A note on supersymmetric AdS 6 solutions of massive type IIA supergravity,JHEP 01(2013) 113, [1209.3267]

    A. Passias,A note on supersymmetric AdS 6 solutions of massive type IIA supergravity,JHEP 01(2013) 113, [1209.3267]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Brandhuber and Y

    A. Brandhuber and Y. Oz,The D-4 - D-8 brane system and five-dimensional fixed points,Phys. Lett. B460(1999) 307–312, [hep-th/9905148]

    1999 arXiv

  41. [49]

    S. M. Hosseini, I. Yaakov and A. Zaffaroni,The joy of factorization at large N: five-dimensional indices and AdS black holes,JHEP02(2022) 097, [2111.03069]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S. M. Hosseini, I. Yaakov and A. Zaffaroni,Topologically twisted indices in five dimensions and holography,JHEP11(2018) 119, [1808.06626]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Fluder and J

    M. Fluder and J. Sparks,D2-brane Chern-Simons theories: F-maximization = a-maximization, JHEP01(2016) 048, [1507.05817]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Tomasiello and A

    A. Tomasiello and A. Zaffaroni,Parameter spaces of massive IIA solutions,JHEP04(2011) 067, [1010.4648]

    2011 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Couzens and K

    C. Couzens and K. Stemerdink,Universal spindles: D2’s onΣand M5’s onΣ×H 3, 2207.06449

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Benini, H

    F. Benini, H. Khachatryan and E. Milan,Black hole entropy in massive Type IIA,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 035004, [1707.06886]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Azzurli, N

    F. Azzurli, N. Bobev, P. M. Crichigno, V. S. Min and A. Zaffaroni,A universal counting of black hole microstates in AdS 4,JHEP02(2018) 054, [1707.04257]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov and A. Passias,Holographic microstate counting for AdS 4 black holes in massive IIA supergravity,JHEP10(2017) 190, [1707.06884]

    2017 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Couzens, A

    C. Couzens, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks,IIB an equivariantly localized puncture,2601.07598

  50. [58]

    Choi and C

    S. Choi and C. Hwang,Universal 3d Cardy Block and Black Hole Entropy,JHEP03(2020) 068, [1911.01448]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Legramandi, N

    A. Legramandi, N. T. Macpherson and A. Passias,G-structures for black hole near-horizon geometries,JHEP06(2024) 056, [2309.01714]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Martelli, J

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks and S.-T. Yau,Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation, Commun. Math. Phys.280(2008) 611–673, [hep-th/0603021]

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and J. Sparks,Toric geometry and the dual ofI-extremization, JHEP06(2019) 140, [1904.04282]. 44

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.