Spin-polarized currents in corrugated graphene nanoribbons

A. Latg\'e; Hern\'an Santos; L. Brey; Leonor Chico

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Spin-polarized currents in corrugated graphene nanoribbons

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Splitting one Rashba zone into several boosts spin polarization in graphene nanoribbons.

desk verdict Solid symmetry analysis and a plausible enhancement effect, but the corrugation-to-Rashba mapping is a load-bearing assumption that needs more support. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07629 v2 pith:EMZXWV3L submitted 2019-08-20 cond-mat.mes-hall

Hernán Santos , A. Latgé , L. Brey , Leonor Chico This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 72.25.-b71.70.Ej73.63.-b

keywords graphenenanoribbonsRashbaspin-orbitinteractionspin-polarizedcurrentcorrugatedtight-bindingtransportLandauerconductancesymmetryanalysisspintronics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a corrugated graphene nanoribbon can act as a spin filter without magnets: bends and folds are modeled as regions of Rashba spin-orbit coupling, with opposite signs for convex and concave curvature, and an unpolarized current entering from one lead comes out partially spin-polarized. The central quantitative claim is that splitting the same total area of Rashba interaction into several separate regions produces a larger spin-polarized current than one contiguous Rashba region, and the largest enhancement occurs when all Rashba regions have the same sign, as in a set of same-direction bubbles. The proposed mechanism is multiple scattering at the interfaces between Rashba and no-Rashba stretches, not simply spin precession inside the folded regions. The paper also derives symmetry relations for spin-resolved conductances: left-right symmetric sequences produce polarization from spin-conserved conductance differences, while left-right antisymmetric sequences produce it from spin-flip differences and require separate spatial and spin-space symmetry operations. If these claims hold, they provide design rules for all-electrical or mechanically tunable spintronic devices in graphene and other two-dimensional conductors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Rashba spin-orbit Hamiltonian $H_R = i\lambda_R/a_{cc}\, \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle,\alpha,\beta} c_{i\alpha}^\dagger[(\boldsymbol{\sigma}\times\mathbf{d}_{ij})\cdot\mathbf{e}_p]_{\alpha\beta} c_{j\beta}$ added on selected regions of a nearest-neighbor tight-binding ribbon; the sign of $\lambda_R$ distinguishes convex from concave curvature, and its strength can be tuned by gates or proximity effects. Transport is computed with the Landauer-Green-function formula for spin-resolved conductances $G^{LR}_{\sigma\sigma'}$, and the figure of merit is the current spin polarization $P_s = G_{\uparrow\uparrow}+G_{\downarrow\uparrow}-G_{\downarrow\downarrow}-G_{\uparrow\downarrow}$. The argument is carried by a sequence classification: systems whose Rashba-sign sequence reads the same from left and right are L-R symmetric, needing only combined real-space/spin-space operations; systems with an even number of alternating-sign regions are L-R antisymmetric, where a real-space symmetry plus a different spin-space rotation, illustrated by $M_x^{(r)}\otimes C_{2y}^{(s)}$, restores invariance of $H_R$. These operations translate into conductance equalities that decide whether spin-conserved or spin-flip differences produce the polarization.

What would settle it

A transport calculation on a genuinely curved ribbon, with displaced atomic coordinates, strain, and orbital rehybridization, that shows the integrated spin polarization of a multiple-bump ribbon is not larger than that of a single-bump ribbon of the same total curved area would refute the central enhancement claim. Equivalently, a two-gate experiment in which splitting one Rashba area into several same-sign gate regions fails to increase the measured spin polarization at the same bias and total gate area would falsify the enhancement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that introducing several Rashba spin-orbit regions into a graphene nanoribbon, separated by no-Rashba spacers, yields a spin polarization of the transmitted current that is generally larger than the polarization produced by a single Rashba region of the same total length. Numerical tight-binding Landauer calculations for 11-armchair and 11-zigzag ribbons show that the integrated polarization grows with the number of repeated Rashba regions and saturates with spacer size, and that same-sign configurations such as $(+R,+R)$ or $(+R,+R,+R)$ give larger effects than alternating-sign ones. The enhancement is attributed to scattering of electrons at Rashba/no-Rashba interfaces. The paper classifies the conductance equalities by symmetry: L-R symmetric sequences can be analyzed with combined real-space and spin-space operations such as $M_x^{(r)}\otimes C_{2x}^{(s)}$, whereas L-R antisymmetric sequences, e.g., $(+R,-R)$, require separate operations such as $M_x^{(r)}\otimes C_{2y}^{(s)}$. A consequence of the relations in Tables I and II is that for the optimal transverse spin direction, the polarization of $(+R,-R)$ stems from spin-flip conductances, while same-sign sequences produce spin-conserved polarization.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing modeling premise, stated in Section II around Eq. (1), is that concave and convex curvature can be represented by Rashba terms of opposite sign on an otherwise planar tight-binding ribbon with abrupt interfaces; the abrupt-interface choice is checked in the Supplementary Material for only one geometry, so if real strain, rehybridization, or gradual interfaces reshape the effective spin-orbit landscape, the predicted enhancement and the L-R antisymmetric conductance relations may not transfer to fabricated corrugations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Several same-sign Rashba regions separated by short no-Rashba spacers outperform a single Rashba region of the same total area; the integrated spin polarization rises with the number of regions and then saturates, so there is an optimal repetition count.
For the transverse spin direction, left-right antisymmetric sequences such as $(+R,-R)$ generate spin polarization from spin-flip conductance differences, while left-right symmetric sequences generate it from spin-conserved differences, as dictated by the Tables I and II symmetries.
Changing the number of corrugations or gate voltages can switch a device between L-R symmetric and L-R antisymmetric regimes, flipping the sign of the spin current and selecting whether spin-conserved or spin-flip processes dominate, so a single structure can act as a mechanical or electrical spin switch.
Because the symmetry relations are derived for planar quasi-one-dimensional systems with multiple Rashba regions, they apply beyond graphene to other two-dimensional materials with stronger spin-orbit coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's mechanism suggests a concrete device direction it does not pursue: a single gate split into multiple fingers of the same polarity should produce the same enhancement as same-sign corrugations, and measuring the output polarization while varying gate polarity could isolate the interfacial-scattering contribution from spin precession.
The abrupt-interface approximation is checked for only one geometry in the Supplementary Material; a natural test is to repeat the integrated-polarization calculation with a gradual Rashba profile or with an explicitly corrugated geometry that includes strain and orbital rehybridization, to see whether the enhancement and the L-R antisymmetric conductance relations survive.
If the enhancement is indeed caused by Rashba/no-Rashba interfaces rather than by precession length, then maximizing the number of sharp spin-orbit boundaries should also boost spin polarization in other spin-orbit-coupled nanowires and two-dimensional channels where the same Landauer symmetry analysis would apply.
The saturation of integrated polarization with spacer size implies a practical bound: beyond roughly two unit cells of spacer, adding more separation does not help, so device optimization should focus on interface count and repetition number rather than spacer length.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a solid, incremental follow-up to the authors' earlier work on Rashba-region graphene nanoribbons. The genuinely new pieces are the multiple-Rashba geometry and the L-R antisymmetric symmetry classification; the numerical claim that same-sign Rashba segments separated by spacers give larger integrated spin polarization than one continuous Rashba region of equal total area is also new. The symmetry tables are the strongest part: they are internally consistent, checked numerically, and they correctly predict whether the polarization appears in spin-conserved or spin-flip conductances. The tight-binding Landauer calculations are straightforward and clearly described, and the integrated-polarization metric is a reasonable way to compare configurations.

The soft spot is the corrugation mapping. The device story for corrugated ribbons rests on replacing convex and concave curvature by planar regions with opposite-sign Rashba terms, with abrupt interfaces. That is a load-bearing assumption, not a cosmetic one: the symmetry classification and the same-sign-versus-alternating ordering are statements about the sign pattern of λ_R. Real corrugations bring strain, pseudomagnetic fields, orbital rehybridization, and a smooth variation of the local normal, none of which is in the model. The authors acknowledge that the abrupt-interface choice needs checking and say the Supplementary Material does it for one geometry; they also use λ_R = 0.1t, well above intrinsic curvature-induced values. So the corrugated-ribbon application is suggestive but not closed. The multiple-gate realization is on much firmer ground, since there the sign pattern is set by gate voltages, not geometry.

None of this kills the paper. The symmetry analysis stands on its own, and the enhancement effect is visible in the tight-binding data with a plausible scattering-based explanation. I do not see circular reasoning: the earlier framework is legitimate prior work being extended, not a closed loop. What is missing is code or data for independent checks, and a more honest framing of the curvature-to-Rashba mapping as a proposal rather than a derivation.

Who is this for: people working on all-electrical spin devices in carbon nanostructures, and anyone using symmetry arguments for Rashba transport. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. I would send it out with a request to either soften the corrugation claims or provide substantially more validation of the mapping, and to make the computational data available.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies spin-polarized transport through graphene nanoribbons containing multiple regions with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, as a model for corrugated ribbons or multiple-gated planar ribbons. Using a nearest-neighbor tight-binding model and Landauer-Green function calculations, the authors report that several separated Rashba regions of fixed total length produce larger integrated current polarization than one continuous region, and that same-sign regions outperform alternating-sign regions. They also derive symmetry relations for the spin-resolved conductances, classifying devices as L-R symmetric or antisymmetric and showing in which cases the polarization arises from spin-conserved versus spin-flip conductance differences. Numerical examples for 11-AGNR and 11-ZGNR systems support the classification.

Significance. The symmetry classification is the paper's strongest contribution: Tables I and II together with Figs. 6 and 7 give a compact, testable set of conductance equalities that go beyond Ref. [40] and apply to any quasi-one-dimensional multi-Rashba device. The multiple-gate planar realization is a plausible all-electrical spin polarizer, and the enhancement claim, if confirmed against a more realistic corrugation model, would also establish a mechanical tuning route. The numerical checks are consistent with the symmetry derivations. However, the significance for actual corrugated graphene is currently limited by the unquantified mapping from curvature to planar opposite-sign Rashba regions and by the use of lambda_R = 0.1t, which is far above curvature-only estimates.

major comments (3)

[II, after Eq. (1)] The load-bearing modeling step is the replacement of a corrugated ribbon by a planar tight-binding ribbon in which convex and concave regions appear only as opposite-sign Rashba terms. The manuscript itself states that the abrupt-interface choice 'should be also checked for the geometries explored here' and that the Supplementary Material does this for only one case. Since the predicted enhancement ordering and the L-R symmetric/antisymmetric conductance relations depend directly on the sign pattern of lambda_R, the corrugated-ribbon version of the central claim is not yet validated. The authors should present the interface-profile check for all geometry classes used, or give a general argument explaining why the planar mapping holds for the relevant curvature radii, and should quantify the curvature-induced lambda_R for the corrugation geometries of Fig. 1, including the possible role of strain, pseudomagnetic fields, and orbital rehybridization.
[III, Fig. 4 (top-left)] The paper justifies lambda_R = 0.1t by proximity-effect experiments, but then claims that the conclusions also apply to smaller SOI. The only supporting calculation sweeps lambda_R from 0.1t to 0.025t, while the curvature-only estimate cited in Ref. [28] (about 0.2 K for 100-nm radii) is orders of magnitude smaller. Thus the numerical enhancement is not connected to the actual corrugation mechanism; it is strictly an enhancement in a model with proximity-enhanced or gate-induced Rashba coupling. Please add calculations at more realistic lambda_R for the corrugated case, or explicitly restrict the corrugation claims to proximity-enhanced setups.
[III, Eq. (4)] The main quantitative statement ('enhancement') is based on the integrated polarization SumP_y = Integral |P_y(E)| dE over the window [-t,0]. This choice is not neutral: because P_y(E) oscillates in sign, the absolute value can make a multi-region device look better even if the polarization at any fixed bias is not enhanced. The manuscript would be strengthened by presenting a finite-bias estimate (Fermi-window averaged P_y at low temperature) for a representative device, or by clearly stating that the enhancement claim refers only to the integrated figure of merit.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 5 caption] The caption says integrated polarization values are taken from -1 eV to 0 eV, while Eq. (4) and the text define the window in units of t (-t to 0). Since t is approximately 2.7 eV, the units should be made consistent.
[IV, continuum derivation] In the derivation after Table II, the expression for M_x H_R contains repeated sigma_x factors (for example, '+k_x^(1) sigma_x + k_y^(1) sigma_x'); the second term should involve sigma_y. This typo makes the symmetry argument harder to follow.
[Figs. 6-7] Some entries in the summary figures, such as 'C(r)_2z tensor (s)', omit the specific spin operation; the notation should be completed for all entries.
[General] No code or data availability statement is provided. Given that the numerical results are central to the claims, deposition of the tight-binding transport code, or at least a full table of numerical parameters, would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the enhancement and symmetry predictions follow from explicit tight-binding Hamiltonians and are verified numerically, not from fitted inputs or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are (i) that multiple Rashba regions can enhance spin-polarized current relative to a single Rashba region of the same total area, (ii) that same-sign regions give larger integrated polarization, and (iii) that conductance relations are governed by L-R symmetric versus L-R antisymmetric combinations of real-space and spin-space symmetries. None of these is obtained by fitting a parameter to the quantity being predicted. The conductance is computed from the Landauer-Green function expression (Eq. 2) for a stated nearest-neighbor tight-binding Hamiltonian with a Rashba term (Eq. 1); the symmetry relations in Tables I and II are derived by applying spatial and spin operations to the Rashba Hamiltonian, with the derivation explicitly shown for M_x(r) and the resulting C_2x(s) or C_2y(s) rotations. The numerical calculations then check these relations. The modeling step that replaces corrugation by planar regions with Rashba terms of opposite sign is an explicit assumption, not a result derived from the target claim; the paper also acknowledges that the abrupt-interface approximation should be checked and reports such a check in the Supplementary Material for one geometry. Self-citations to Refs. 40-42 are used to motivate the framework and to refer to prior single-Rashba-region results, but the new multi-region conductances and symmetries are computed and derived within the present paper, so these citations are not load-bearing in a circular sense. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force the choice of model. The main risks identified by a skeptical reading (transferability of the curvature-to-Rashba mapping to real corrugations, validity for gradual interfaces, magnitude of lambda_R) are assumptions and scope limitations, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The central claim rests on the curvature-to-Rashba mapping, the abrupt-interface approximation, the tight-binding Landauer model, and a set of chosen length scales; all are modeling choices rather than entities with independent falsifiable handles.

free parameters (4)

Rashba coupling strength lambda_R = 0.1t
Chosen as a large but proximity-enhanced value, justified by experiments with Au or Ni decoration; not fitted to the target result.
Rashba region length = 4 unit cells in main examples
Chosen for the numerical demonstrations; the enhancement trend is checked across repetitions and spacer sizes.
Spacer length x = 1, 2, and 4 unit cells
Scanned to show the effect of no-Rashba spacers on integrated polarization.
Energy window for integrated polarization = 0 to -t
An arbitrary integration range used to define Sigma P_y and to quantify enhancement.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Concave and convex curvature is represented by Rashba terms with opposite signs while keeping atoms in a perfect planar geometry.
Section II, after Eq. (1); this is the central modeling device that connects corrugation to a flat-atomic-coordinate calculation.
domain assumption Abrupt interfaces between Rashba and no-Rashba regions are sufficient.
Section II states that an inhomogeneous profile gave similar results in prior carbon nanotube work and that one GNR case is checked in the Supplementary Material, but the assumption is not validated for all studied geometries.
domain assumption Nearest-neighbor single-orbital tight-binding captures transport near the Fermi level.
Section II says only nearest-neighbor hopping is considered and four-orbital tight-binding gives similar results in carbon nanotubes, but no four-orbital comparison is shown for these GNR geometries.
standard math Landauer-Buttiker Green function formalism with spin-dependent self-energies gives the conductance.
Used in Section II, Eq. (2), following Refs. 48-50; a standard coherent transport method.
standard math Time-reversal and electron-hole symmetries hold and are used to relate spin conductances.
Invoked in Sections III and IV to derive P_s(E) = -P_s(-E) and the conductance equalities in Tables I and II.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-polarized currents in corrugated graphene nanoribbons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EMZXWV3L

@misc{pith2026190807629,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-polarized currents in corrugated graphene nanoribbons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EMZXWV3L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07629}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the production of spin-polarized currents in corrugated graphene nanoribbons. Such corrugations are modeled as multiple regions with Rashba spin-orbit interactions, where concave and convex curvatures are treated as Rashba regions with opposite signs. Numerical examples for different separated Rashba-zone geometries calculated within the tight-binding approximation are provided. Remarkably, the spin-polarized current in a system with several Rashba areas can be enhanced with respect to the case with a single Rashba part of the same total area. The enhancement is larger for configurations with multiple regions with the same Rashba sign. This indicates that the increase of the spin polarization is due to the scattering of the electrons traversing regions with and without Rashba interaction. Additionally, we relate the appearance of the spin-polarized currents to novel symmetry relations between the spin-dependent conductances. These symmetries turn out to be a combination of different symmetry operations in real and spin spaces, as those occurring in non-planar systems like carbon nanotubes. Our results show that two-dimensional devices with Rashba spin-orbit interaction can be used as excellent spintronic devices in an all-electrical or mechanical setup.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07629 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (Color online) Schematic view of different corrugated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (Color online) Left panels: spin-dependent conductances projected on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Integrated polarization values from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

[40]

Sym- metries of quantum transport with Rashba spin-orbit: graphene spintronics,

Leonor Chico, Andrea Latg´ e, and Luis Brey, “Sym- metries of quantum transport with Rashba spin-orbit: graphene spintronics,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 16469–16475 (2015)

work page 2015
[28]

Spin-orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nan- otubes, and nanotube caps,

Daniel Huertas-Hernando, F. Guinea, and Arne Brataas, “Spin-orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nan- otubes, and nanotube caps,” Phys. Rev. B 74, 155426 (2006)

work page 2006
[1]

Electronic superlattices in corrugated graphene,

A. Isacsson, L. M. Jonsson, J. M. Kinaret, and M. Jon- son, “Electronic superlattices in corrugated graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 035423 (2008)

work page 2008
[2]

Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mecha- nism, electronic properties, and applications,

Shikai Deng and Vikas Berry, “Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mecha- nism, electronic properties, and applications,” Materials Today 19, 197 – 212 (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

Creating one-dimensional nanoscale periodic ripples in a continu- ous mosaic graphene monolayer,

Ke-Ke Bai, Yu Zhou, Hong Zheng, Lan Meng, Hailin Peng, Zhongfan Liu, Jia-Cai Nie, and Lin He, “Creating one-dimensional nanoscale periodic ripples in a continu- ous mosaic graphene monolayer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 086102 (2014)

work page 2014
[4]

Wrinkled few-layer graphene as highly eﬃcient load bearer,

Charalampos Androulidakis, Emmanuel N. Koukaras, Jaroslava Rahova, Krishna Sampathkumar, John Parthe- nios, Konstantinos Papagelis, Otakar Frank, and Costas Galiotis, “Wrinkled few-layer graphene as highly eﬃcient load bearer,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9, 26593–26601 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Spec- tral gap induced by structural corrugation in armchair graphene nanoribbons,

S. Costamagna, O. Hernandez, and A. Dobry, “Spec- tral gap induced by structural corrugation in armchair graphene nanoribbons,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 115421 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

Structurally driven one-dimensional elec- tron conﬁnement in sub-5-nm graphene nanowrinkles,

Hyunseob Lim, Jaehoon Jung, Rodney S. Ruoﬀ, and Yousoo Kim, “Structurally driven one-dimensional elec- tron conﬁnement in sub-5-nm graphene nanowrinkles,” Nature Communications 6, 8601 (2015)

work page 2015

Show all 60 references

[7]

Strain-induced pseudo–magnetic ﬁelds greater than 300 tesla in graphene nanobubbles,

N. Levy, S. A. Burke, K. L. Meaker, M. Panlasigui, A. Zettl, F. Guinea, A. H. Castro Neto, and M. F. Crom- mie, “Strain-induced pseudo–magnetic ﬁelds greater than 300 tesla in graphene nanobubbles,” Science 329, 544– 547 (2010)

2010
[8]

Transforming moir´ e blisters into geometric graphene nano-bubbles,

Jiong Lu, A. H. Castro Neto, and Kian Ping Loh, “Transforming moir´ e blisters into geometric graphene nano-bubbles,” Nature Communications 3, 823 (2012)

2012
[9]

Gaussian deformations in graphene ribbons: Flowers and conﬁnement,

R. Carrillo-Bastos, D. Faria, A. Latg´ e, F. Mireles, and N. Sandler, “Gaussian deformations in graphene ribbons: Flowers and conﬁnement,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 041411 (2014)

2014
[10]

Tuning transport properties of graphene three-terminal structures by me- chanical deformation,

V. Torres, D. Faria, and A. Latg´ e, “Tuning transport properties of graphene three-terminal structures by me- chanical deformation,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 165429 (2018)

2018
[11]

Electronic transport in a two- dimensional superlattice engineered via self-assembled nanostructures,

Yingjie Zhang, Youngseok Kim, Matthew J. Gilbert, and Nadya Mason, “Electronic transport in a two- dimensional superlattice engineered via self-assembled nanostructures,” npj 2D Materials and Applications 2, 31 (2018)

2018
[12]

Flat bands in buckled graphene superlattices,

Yuhang Jiang, Miˇ sa Andjelkovi´ c, Slaviˇ sa P. Milovanovi´ c, Lucian Covaci, Xinyuan Lai, Yang Cao, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Francois M. Peeters, and Andre K. Geim, “Flat bands in buckled graphene superlattices,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1904.10147 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[13]

Strong modulation of optical properties in black phosphorus through strain-engineered rippling,

Jorge Quereda, Pablo San-Jose, Vincenzo Parente, Luis Vaquero-Garzon, Aday J. Molina-Mendoza, Nicol´ as Agra¨ ıt, Gabino Rubio-Bollinger, Francisco Guinea, Rafael Rold´ an, and Andres Castellanos- Gomez, “Strong modulation of optical properties in black phosphorus through stra...

2016 doi
[14]

Strong modulation of optical proper- ties in rippled 2D GaSe via strain engineering,

David Maeso, Sahar Pakdel, Hern´ an Santos, Nicol´ as Agra¨ ıt, Juan Jos´ e Palacios, Elsa Prada, and Gabino Rubio-Bollinger, “Strong modulation of optical proper- ties in rippled 2D GaSe via strain engineering,” Nan- otechnology 30, 24LT01 (2019)

2019
[15]

Mosaic pattern formation in exfoliated graphene by mechanical deformation,

Maria Giovanna Pastore Carbone, Anastasios C. Manikas, Ioanna Souli, Christos Pavlou, and Costas Galiotis, “Mosaic pattern formation in exfoliated graphene by mechanical deformation,” Nature Commu- 12 nications 10, 1572 (2019)

2019
[16]

Zero Landau level in folded graphene nanoribbons,

E. Prada, P. San-Jose, and L. Brey, “Zero Landau level in folded graphene nanoribbons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 106802 (2010)

2010
[17]

Electronic transport of folded graphene nanoribbons,

Jhon W. Gonz´ alez, M´ onica Pacheco, Pedro Orellana, Luis Brey, and Leonor Chico, “Electronic transport of folded graphene nanoribbons,” Solid State Communica- tions 152, 1400 – 1403 (2012), exploring Graphene, Re- cent Research Advances

2012
[18]

Origami-based spintron- ics in graphene,

A. T. Costa, A. T. Ferreira, Toby Hallam, Georg S. Dues- berg, and A. H. Castro Neto, “Origami-based spintron- ics in graphene,” EPL (Europhysics Letters) 104, 47001 (2013)

2013
[19]

Spin splitting induced by spin-orbit interaction in chiral nan- otubes,

L. Chico, M. P. L´ opez-Sancho, and M. C. Mu˜ noz, “Spin splitting induced by spin-orbit interaction in chiral nan- otubes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 176402 (2004)

2004
[20]

Curvature-induced anisotropic spin-orbit splitting in carbon nanotubes,

L. Chico, M. P. L´ opez-Sancho, and M. C. Mu˜ noz, “Curvature-induced anisotropic spin-orbit splitting in carbon nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 235423 (2009)

2009
[21]

Intrinsic spin-orbit interaction in carbon nanotubes and curved nanoribbons,

Leonor Chico, Hern´ an Santos, M. Carmen Mu˜ noz, and M. Pilar L´ opez-Sancho, “Intrinsic spin-orbit interaction in carbon nanotubes and curved nanoribbons,” Solid State Communications 152, 1477 – 1482 (2012), explor- ing Graphene, Recent Research Advances

2012
[22]

Interplay between symmetry and spin- orbit coupling on graphene nanoribbons,

Hern´ an Santos, M. C. Mu˜ noz, M. P. L´ opez-Sancho, and Leonor Chico, “Interplay between symmetry and spin- orbit coupling on graphene nanoribbons,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 235402 (2013)

2013
[23]

Full valley and spin polariza- tions in strained graphene with Rashba spin orbit cou- pling and magnetic barrier,

Qing-Ping Wu, Zheng-Fang Liu, Ai-Xi Chen, Xian-Bo Xiao, and Zhi-Min Liu, “Full valley and spin polariza- tions in strained graphene with Rashba spin orbit cou- pling and magnetic barrier,” Scientiﬁc Reports 6, 21590 (2016)

2016
[24]

GrapheneMoS 2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photoresponsive memory devices,

Kallol Roy, Medini Padmanabhan, Srijit Goswami, T. Phanindra Sai, Gopalakrishnan Ramalingam, Srini- vasan Raghavan, and Arindam Ghosh, “GrapheneMoS 2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photoresponsive memory devices,” Nature Nanotechnology 8, 826 (2013)

2013
[25]

Towards epitaxial graphene p-n junctions as electrically programmable quantum resistance standards,

Jiuning Hu, Albert F. Rigosi, Mattias Kruskopf, Yan- fei Yang, Bi-Yi Wu, Jifa Tian, Alireza R. Panna, Hsin- Yen Lee, Shamith U. Payagala, George R. Jones, Mar- lin E. Kraft, Dean G. Jarrett, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Randolph E. Elmquist, and David B. Newell, “Towards...

2018
[26]

Twisted graphene nanoribbons as nonlinear nano- electronic devices,

M. Sa´ ız-Breton, F. Dom´ ınguez-Adame, and A.V. Maly- shev, “Twisted graphene nanoribbons as nonlinear nano- electronic devices,” Carbon 149, 587 – 593 (2019)

2019
[27]

Gate-controlled conductance through bilayer graphene ribbons,

J. W. Gonz´ alez, H. Santos, E. Prada, L. Brey, and L. Chico, “Gate-controlled conductance through bilayer graphene ribbons,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 205402 (2011)

2011
[29]

Intrinsic and Rashba spin-orbit interactions in graphene sheets,

Hongki Min, J. E. Hill, N. A. Sinitsyn, B. R. Sahu, Leonard Kleinman, and A. H. MacDonald, “Intrinsic and Rashba spin-orbit interactions in graphene sheets,” Phys. Rev. B 74, 165310 (2006)

2006
[30]

Giant spin lifetime anisotropy in graphene induced by proximity eﬀects,

Aron W. Cummings, Jose H. Garcia, Jaroslav Fabian, and Stephan Roche, “Giant spin lifetime anisotropy in graphene induced by proximity eﬀects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206601 (2017)

2017
[31]

Proximity eﬀects in bilayer graphene on monolayer WSe 2: Field-eﬀect spin valley locking, spin-orbit valve, and spin transistor,

Martin Gmitra and Jaroslav Fabian, “Proximity eﬀects in bilayer graphene on monolayer WSe 2: Field-eﬀect spin valley locking, spin-orbit valve, and spin transistor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 146401 (2017)

2017
[32]

Strong anisotropic spin- orbit interaction induced in graphene by monolayer WS2,

T. Wakamura, F. Reale, P. Palczynski, S. Gu´ eron, C. Mattevi, and H. Bouchiat, “Strong anisotropic spin- orbit interaction induced in graphene by monolayer WS2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 106802 (2018)

2018
[33]

Strongly anisotropic spin relaxation in graphene–transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures at room temperature,

L. Antonio Ben´ ıtez, Juan F. Sierra, Williams Savero Tor- res, Alo¨ ıs Arrighi, Fr´ ed´ eric Bonell, Marius V. Costache, and Sergio O. Valenzuela, “Strongly anisotropic spin relaxation in graphene–transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures at room temperature,” Nature P...

2018
[34]

Giant spin Hall eﬀect in graphene grown by chemical vapour deposition,

Jayakumar Balakrishnan, Gavin Kok Wai Koon, Ahmet Avsar, Yuda Ho, Jong Hak Lee, Manu Jaiswal, Seung- Jae Baeck, Jong-Hyun Ahn, Aires Ferreira, Miguel A. Cazalilla, Antonio H. Castro Neto, and Barbaros ¨Ozyilmaz, “Giant spin Hall eﬀect in graphene grown by chemical vapour depos...

2014
[35]

Giant Rashba splitting in graphene due to hybridization with gold,

D. Marchenko, A. Varykhalov, M. R. Scholz, G. Bihlmayer, E. I. Rashba, A. Rybkin, A. M. Shikin, and O. Rader, “Giant Rashba splitting in graphene due to hybridization with gold,” Nature Communications 3, 1232 (2012)

2012
[36]

Spatial variation of a giant spin–orbit eﬀect in- duces electron conﬁnement in graphene on Pb islands,

Fabian Calleja, H´ ector Ochoa, Manuela Garnica, Sara Barja, Juan Jes´ us Navarro, Andr´ es Black, Mikhail M. Otrokov, Evgueni V. Chulkov, Andr´ es Arnau, Amadeo L. V´ azquez de Parga, Francisco Guinea, and Rodolfo Mi- randa, “Spatial variation of a giant spin–orbit eﬀect in- ...

2015
[37]

Electronic and magnetic properties of quasifreestanding graphene on Ni,

A. Varykhalov, J. S´ anchez-Barriga, A. M. Shikin, C. Biswas, E. Vescovo, A. Rybkin, D. Marchenko, and O. Rader, “Electronic and magnetic properties of quasifreestanding graphene on Ni,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 157601 (2008)

2008
[38]

Rashba eﬀect in the graphene/Ni(111) system,

Yu. S. Dedkov, M. Fonin, U. R¨ udiger, and C. Laubschat, “Rashba eﬀect in the graphene/Ni(111) system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 107602 (2008)

2008
[39]

Spin splitting of Dirac fermions in graphene on Ni intercalated with alloy of Bi and Au,

E.V. Zhizhin, A. Varykhalov, A.G. Rybkin, A.A. Ry- bkina, D.A. Pudikov, D. Marchenko, J. Snchez-Barriga, I.I. Klimovskikh, G.G. Vladimirov, O. Rader, and A.M. Shikin, “Spin splitting of Dirac fermions in graphene on Ni intercalated with alloy of Bi and Au,” Carbon 93, 984 – 996 (2015)

2015
[41]

All-electrical production of spin-polarized cur- rents in carbon nanotubes: Rashba spin-orbit interac- tion,

Hern´ an Santos, A. Latg´ e, J. E. Alvarellos, and Leonor Chico, “All-electrical production of spin-polarized cur- rents in carbon nanotubes: Rashba spin-orbit interac- tion,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 165424 (2016)

2016
[42]

Defect-enhanced Rashba spin-polarized cur- rents in carbon nanotubes,

Hern´ an Santos, Leonor Chico, J. E. Alvarellos, and A. Latg´ e, “Defect-enhanced Rashba spin-polarized cur- rents in carbon nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 165401 (2017)

2017
[43]

Spin-orbit coupling and electron spin reso- nance theory for carbon nanotubes,

A. De Martino, R. Egger, K. Hallberg, and C. A. Balseiro, “Spin-orbit coupling and electron spin reso- nance theory for carbon nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 206402 (2002). 13

2002
[44]

Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in graphene from Rashba and exchange eﬀects,

Zhenhua Qiao, Shengyuan A. Yang, Wanxiang Feng, Wang-Kong Tse, Jun Ding, Yugui Yao, Jian Wang, and Qian Niu, “Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in graphene from Rashba and exchange eﬀects,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 161414 (2010)

2010
[45]

Rashba spin-orbit interaction in graphene armchair nanoribbons,

Lucia Lenz, Daniel F. Urban, and Dario Bercioux, “Rashba spin-orbit interaction in graphene armchair nanoribbons,” The European Physical Journal B 86, 502 (2013)

2013
[46]

Strongly modulated transmission of a spin-split quan- tum wire with local Rashba interaction,

David S´ anchez, Lloren¸ c Serra, and Mahn-Soo Choi, “Strongly modulated transmission of a spin-split quan- tum wire with local Rashba interaction,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 035315 (2008)

2008
[47]

Transport in graphene nanoribbon- based systems,

Leonor Chico, Jhon W Gonz´ alez, Marta Pelc, and Hern´ an Santos, “Transport in graphene nanoribbon- based systems,” in Graphene Nanoribbons , 2053-2563, edited by Luis Brey, Pierre Seneor, and Antonio Tejeda (IOP Publishing, 2019) pp. 5–1 to 5–23

2019
[48]

Quantum conductance of carbon nan- otubes with defects,

Leonor Chico, Lorin X. Benedict, Steven G. Louie, and Marvin L. Cohen, “Quantum conductance of carbon nan- otubes with defects,” Phys. Rev. B54, 2600–2606 (1996)

1996
[49]

Spin- orbit coupling eﬀects on transport in carbon nanotubes with adatoms,

Fufang Xu, Baolei Li, Hui Pan, and Jia-Lin Zhu, “Spin- orbit coupling eﬀects on transport in carbon nanotubes with adatoms,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 085431 (2007)

2007
[50]

Helicoidal ﬁelds and spin polarized currents in carbon nanotube–DNA hy- brids,

G. S. Diniz, A. Latg´ e, and S. E. Ulloa, “Helicoidal ﬁelds and spin polarized currents in carbon nanotube–DNA hy- brids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 126601 (2012)

2012
[51]

Symmetry of spin transport in two-terminal waveguides with a spin-orbital interaction and magnetic ﬁeld modulations,

Feng Zhai and H. Q. Xu, “Symmetry of spin transport in two-terminal waveguides with a spin-orbital interaction and magnetic ﬁeld modulations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 246601 (2005)

2005
[52]

Strong spin orbit splitting in graphene with adsorbed Au atoms,

Dongwei Ma, Zhongyao Li, and Zhongqin Yang, “Strong spin orbit splitting in graphene with adsorbed Au atoms,” Carbon 50, 297 – 305 (2012)

2012
[53]

Synthesis of large-area graphene layers on poly-nickel substrate by chemical vapor deposition: Wrinkle forma- tion,

Seung Jin Chae, Fethullah G¨ une¸ s, Ki Kang Kim, Eun Sung Kim, Gang Hee Han, Soo Min Kim, Hyeon- Jin Shin, Seon-Mi Yoon, Jae-Young Choi, Min Ho Park, Cheol Woong Yang, Didier Pribat, and Young Hee Lee, “Synthesis of large-area graphene layers on poly-nickel substrate by chemi...

2009
[54]

Hierarchy of graphene wrinkles induced by thermal strain engineer- ing,

Lan Meng, Ying Su, Dechao Geng, Gui Yu, Yunqi Liu, Rui-Fen Dou, Jia-Cai Nie, and Lin He, “Hierarchy of graphene wrinkles induced by thermal strain engineer- ing,” Applied Physics Letters 103, 251610 (2013)

2013
[55]

Quantum spin Hall eﬀect in silicene and two- dimensional germanium,

Cheng-Cheng Liu, Wanxiang Feng, and Yugui Yao, “Quantum spin Hall eﬀect in silicene and two- dimensional germanium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 076802 (2011)

2011
[56]

Elec- tron spin inversion in gated silicene nanoribbons,

Bart lomiej Rzeszotarski and Bart lomiej Szafran, “Elec- tron spin inversion in gated silicene nanoribbons,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 075417 (2018)

2018
[57]

Edge state in graphene ribbons: Nanometer size eﬀect and edge shape dependence,

Kyoko Nakada, Mitsutaka Fujita, Gene Dresselhaus, and Mildred S. Dresselhaus, “Edge state in graphene ribbons: Nanometer size eﬀect and edge shape dependence,” Phys. Rev. B 54, 17954–17961 (1996)

1996
[58]

Electronic analog of the electrooptic modulator,

Supriyo Datta and Biswajit Das, “Electronic analog of the electrooptic modulator,” Applied Physics Letters 56, 665–667 (1990)

1990
[59]

Ballistic spin- polarized transport and Rashba spin precession in semi- conductor nanowires,

Francisco Mireles and George Kirczenow, “Ballistic spin- polarized transport and Rashba spin precession in semi- conductor nanowires,” Phys. Rev. B 64, 024426 (2001)

2001
[60]

Winkler, Spin-Orbit Coupling Eﬀects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2003)

R. Winkler, Spin-Orbit Coupling Eﬀects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2003)

2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [40]

Sym- metries of quantum transport with Rashba spin-orbit: graphene spintronics,

Leonor Chico, Andrea Latg´ e, and Luis Brey, “Sym- metries of quantum transport with Rashba spin-orbit: graphene spintronics,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 16469–16475 (2015)

work page 2015

[2] [28]

Spin-orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nan- otubes, and nanotube caps,

Daniel Huertas-Hernando, F. Guinea, and Arne Brataas, “Spin-orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nan- otubes, and nanotube caps,” Phys. Rev. B 74, 155426 (2006)

work page 2006

[3] [1]

Electronic superlattices in corrugated graphene,

A. Isacsson, L. M. Jonsson, J. M. Kinaret, and M. Jon- son, “Electronic superlattices in corrugated graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 035423 (2008)

work page 2008

[4] [2]

Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mecha- nism, electronic properties, and applications,

Shikai Deng and Vikas Berry, “Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mecha- nism, electronic properties, and applications,” Materials Today 19, 197 – 212 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [3]

Creating one-dimensional nanoscale periodic ripples in a continu- ous mosaic graphene monolayer,

Ke-Ke Bai, Yu Zhou, Hong Zheng, Lan Meng, Hailin Peng, Zhongfan Liu, Jia-Cai Nie, and Lin He, “Creating one-dimensional nanoscale periodic ripples in a continu- ous mosaic graphene monolayer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 086102 (2014)

work page 2014

[6] [4]

Wrinkled few-layer graphene as highly eﬃcient load bearer,

Charalampos Androulidakis, Emmanuel N. Koukaras, Jaroslava Rahova, Krishna Sampathkumar, John Parthe- nios, Konstantinos Papagelis, Otakar Frank, and Costas Galiotis, “Wrinkled few-layer graphene as highly eﬃcient load bearer,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9, 26593–26601 (2017)

work page 2017

[7] [5]

Spec- tral gap induced by structural corrugation in armchair graphene nanoribbons,

S. Costamagna, O. Hernandez, and A. Dobry, “Spec- tral gap induced by structural corrugation in armchair graphene nanoribbons,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 115421 (2010)

work page 2010

[8] [6]

Structurally driven one-dimensional elec- tron conﬁnement in sub-5-nm graphene nanowrinkles,

Hyunseob Lim, Jaehoon Jung, Rodney S. Ruoﬀ, and Yousoo Kim, “Structurally driven one-dimensional elec- tron conﬁnement in sub-5-nm graphene nanowrinkles,” Nature Communications 6, 8601 (2015)

work page 2015