Deriving the $\text{AdS}_3\times\text{S}^3\times \text{T}^4$ Quantum Spectral Curve I: Y-system and discontinuity relations

Alessandro Sfondrini; Andrea Cavagli\`a; Davide Polvara; Nicol\`o Primi; Roberto Tateo

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Deriving the $\text{AdS}_3\times\text{S}^3\times \text{T}^4$ Quantum Spectral Curve I: Y-system and discontinuity relations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the mirror TBA for pure-RR AdS3×S3×T4 is fully captured by an extended Y-system—two PSU(1,1|2) Y-systems plus local discontinuity relations—and proves this by reconstructing all TBA equations from that data.

desk verdict Solid, technically heavy derivation of the extended Y-system for pure-RR AdS3; the ground-state equivalence is credible, but the excited-state universality is assumed, not proven, and that is the load-bearing step for the QSC follow-up. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13673 v1 pith:EOG6PEVX submitted 2026-07-15 hep-th nlin.SI

Andrea Cavaglià , Nicolò Primi , Davide Polvara , Alessandro Sfondrini , Roberto Tateo This is my paper

classification hep-thnlin.SI

keywords AdS3/CFT2mirrorTBAY-systemdiscontinuityrelationsquantumspectralcurvemasslessmodesPSU(11|2)Ramond-Ramondflux

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to close the gap between two approaches to the spectrum of string theory on AdS3×S3×T4 with pure Ramond-Ramond flux: the mirror Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz, which is exact but unwieldy, and the Quantum Spectral Curve, which is compact but so far conjectural. Its central claim is that the TBA can be compressed into an extended Y-system: two independent copies of a PSU(1,1|2) Y-system joined only by local, state-independent discontinuity relations across branch cuts in the rapidity plane. The compression is shown to be lossless—starting from the Y-system and the discontinuities alone, the paper reconstructs every TBA equation, including the massless sector. If correct, this supplies the analyticity data needed to derive the Quantum Spectral Curve from first principles in the companion paper, and it explains how massless modes, which are not manifest in the QSC, are encoded through discontinuities.

What carries the argument

The extended Y-system: functional finite-difference equations assembled from two PSU(1,1|2) Y-systems (drawn on two T-hook diagrams), supplemented by discontinuity relations specifying how Y functions behave across their branch cuts in the mirror rapidity plane. The load-bearing data are the local, state-independent expressions for the discontinuities of the lowest massive Y functions, expressed through Y0, the auxiliary Y functions, and a fixed constant c defined by a product of auxiliary Y functions; these data drive the inversion procedure that reconstructs the TBA.

What would settle it

Compute an excited-state (e.g., one-particle) Y function at finite coupling—numerically from the original mirror TBA or from a large-volume expansion—and verify that its discontinuity across the cut at Im(u)=1/h equals the universal local expression (3.16) with c defined by (3.19). A violation, or the appearance of branch cuts not listed in table 1, would settle that the extended Y-system does not describe the full spectrum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the pure-RR AdS3×S3×T4 ground-state mirror TBA is completely equivalent to an extended Y-system: two PSU(1,1|2) T-hooks (left and right) that interact only through discontinuity relations, together with a single massless Y0 that sits on neither hook but appears in the discontinuities of the auxiliary and massive Y functions. The paper proves a Z2 chiral symmetry exchanging the two hooks, derives remarkably local expressions for the key massive discontinuities Δ1 and Δ̄1, and shows that removing a problematic factor from the massless-massless dressing phase is both necessary and consistent. It then inverts the extended Y-system to recover all TBA equations, estab

Load-bearing premise

The discontinuity relations are derived from the twisted ground-state TBA and then assumed to hold unchanged for all excited states in the μ→0 limit; if excited-state Y functions develop additional or non-logarithmic branch cuts, the extended Y-system is incomplete and the QSC derivation built on it fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The mirror TBA equations for pure-RR AdS3×S3×T4 can be replaced by a local set of functional equations plus branch-cut data without loss of information.
Massless excitations enter the formalism only through discontinuity relations, so a future QSC can account for them without adding new nodes to the Y-system.
The chiral Z2 symmetry of the TBA is a symmetry of the whole construction and matches the interchangeability of the two PSU(1,1|2) halves in the proposed QSC.
The problematic factor in the massless-massless dressing phase must be dropped for a standard analytic Y-system; the successful reconstruction of the TBA is a consistency check of that removal.
The work lays the foundation for deriving the T-system and QSC in the follow-up, completing the AdS3 analogue of earlier AdS5 derivations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test of the central assumption would be to compute an excited-state (e.g., one-particle) Y function at finite coupling—numerically from the original mirror TBA or via a large-volume expansion—and check that its discontinuity across the cut at Im(u)=1/h still equals the universal local expression with the same constant c; any state-dependence of c would invalidate the QSC step.
The result implies that the massless degrees of freedom should be encoded in the QSC's analytic continuation data rather than in new Q-functions, predicting the form the AdS3 QSC must take and how its branch points emerge from the discontinuities.
The authors note that the h→0 tensionless limit and the Y-system derivation do not commute; if the discontinuity relations develop extra cuts at small tension, the extended Y-system would need modification in that regime, a case not addressed here.
Because the same PSU(1,1|2)^2 Y-system appears in a pair of decoupled integrable lattice models, the specific physics of AdS3 lies entirely in the discontinuity relations—which sharpens where mixed-flux and other deformations should enter.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does what it says: it derives the full extended Y-system for pure-RR AdS3×S3×T4 from the mirror TBA, including complete local discontinuity relations for auxiliary, massless and massive Y functions, proves the chiral Z2 symmetry, and reconstructs the TBA via inversion. The genuinely new pieces are the massless and auxiliary discontinuity relations and the inversion of those sectors; the massive Y-system was partially known from [12]. The algebraic work is long but explicit—appendices D–H are the real content, and the checks I did hold. Citation practice is clean; the debt to [12] is clearly stated.

The ground-state equivalence claim is credible. The inversion of log Y0 is a genuine technical achievement: each term is matched to the corresponding TBA kernel, and the vertical cut from the massless dispersion is handled carefully.

Where it gets soft. First, the state-independence of the discontinuity relations—and the promotion of c in (3.19) to a universal relation—is assumed, not proven. The paper says so in §3.2 and §2.2. That assumption is load-bearing for the companion QSC paper, because the μ→0 limit has a singular vacuum and the small-twist derivation does not control excited states there. If excited Y functions acquire new branch cuts, or if (3.19) fails, the QSC derivation has no foundation. This is a real gap between what is proven and what the program needs. The stress-test note is right about this.

Second, the massive TBA reconstruction is only summarized in §4.3. Given the length of the massless inversion, the reader is asked to trust that standard [34] arguments plus the local Δ1, \barΔ1 expressions suffice. Probably true, but it is asserted, not shown.

Third, the removal of the dressing factor (B.15) is an input, not a consequence. Reasonable and consistent with earlier work, but everything downstream depends on it. The authors are transparent about the choice.

None of this undermines the ground-state result. The paper is honest and the central derivation is sound. The right referee will ask for proof, or at least a serious argument, for excited-state universality, and for the massive inversion to be written out.

This is a paper for the AdS3 integrability community and a necessary prerequisite for the QSC follow-up. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send to peer review, expect major revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives an extended Y-system for the pure-RR AdS3×S3×T4 mirror theory: two PSU(1,1|2) Y-systems plus a set of local, state-independent discontinuity relations for auxiliary, massless, and massive Y functions, including a universal constant c in the discontinuities of the first massive nodes. The discontinuity relations are derived from the twisted ground-state TBA of [12], after two modifications: removal of the dressing-phase factor a(γ) in (B.15) and use of a single massless Y0. The paper proves a Z2 chiral symmetry of the TBA equations and reconstructs the auxiliary and massless TBA equations from the Y-system and discontinuity relations by contour inversion; the massive reconstruction is only summarized. The stated goal is to provide the analyticity data needed for the companion Quantum Spectral Curve derivation.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a substantial step toward deriving the AdS3 QSC from the mirror TBA, analogous to what was done for AdS5 and AdS4. The paper contains long, explicit computations (Appendices D–H), the chiral-symmetry proof is a useful new structural result, and the local formulas (3.16) for Δ1 and ¯Δ1 are remarkably simple and likely important. No parameters are fitted and the inversion procedure is non-circular for the sectors that are worked out. However, the claim as stated is broader than what is proven: the state-independence of the discontinuity relations and the μ→0 validity are assumed, and the massive TBA reconstruction is not actually carried out in the text. These are gaps in the argument, not merely presentational issues.

major comments (2)

[Section 3.4.3, Eqs. (3.16)–(3.19); §2.2 and §3.2] The local expressions for Δ1, ¯Δ1 and the constant c are derived from the twisted ground-state TBA (Appendix F) and then 'promoted' to a universal, state-independent relation. The manuscript explicitly states: 'This relies on the assumption that the Y-system and the discontinuity relations established here remain valid throughout the entire spectrum in the μ→0 limit' (§2.2) and 'we assume is valid for excited states as well' (§3.2). No argument shows that excited-state Y functions have the same logarithmic branch-point structure as in Table 1, or that no additional non-logarithmic cuts appear. The derivation in Appendix D also assumes a left-right symmetric ground state (see the discussion after (D.6)). This is load-bearing because the companion QSC derivation is intended to use (3.16) for all states. Please either provide a derivation, or state the universality as a precise conjecture w
[Section 4.3] The paper claims 'the TBA equations can be fully reconstructed from the Y-system and the discontinuity relations' (Section 1 and Conclusion), but the massive-particle reconstruction is not carried out in the text. Section 4.3 only gives a summary, stating 'without going into the full details' and appealing to 'standard arguments of [34]'. Since the massive TBA equations (2.10)–(2.11) are part of the claimed equivalence, this is an omitted proof of a central assertion. The inversion of the auxiliary and massless sectors is detailed, but the massive sector needs a real derivation or an explicit appendix; alternatively, the equivalence claim should be restricted to what is actually demonstrated.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and §1] The phrase 'valid for any state' overstates the proven content. It should be qualified as 'for the twisted ground state, and conjecturally for excited states', pending the missing derivation.
[§1 and B.15] The equivalence statement is not literally to the TBA of [12]: the S-matrix is modified by removing a(γ), and the massless sector is reduced to a single Y0. This is a deliberate and potentially correct modification, but the main theorem should state explicitly that it applies to this modified TBA, not to [12] verbatim.
[§3.3, Eqs. (3.3)–(3.5)] The two notions of discontinuity, [f]_N and {f}_N, are easy to confuse. A short summary table or a remark distinguishing the 'signed' and 'symmetrised' discontinuities would improve readability.
[Reference [25]] The argument rests substantially on the companion paper [25], which is listed only as 'in preparation'. If possible, include a version of the companion's main results or at least a more precise statement of which equations from [25] are being used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the TBA/Y-system equivalence is a genuine two-way derivation; the state-independence assumptions are gaps, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an equivalence proof: from the mirror TBA of [12] it derives a Y-system plus discontinuity relations (Appendices D-G), and in Section 4 it reconstructs the TBA equations from those data by Cauchy inversion. This is not circular because the reconstructed TBA is not fed back into the derivation of the Y-system/discontinuities; the inversion uses only the functional equations and discontinuity data as hypotheses. In Sec. 4.2.2 the paper substitutes the already-derived auxiliary TBA equation (from Sec. 4.1) into a rewritten discontinuity of logY0; that equation was obtained from the Y-system without assuming the massless TBA equation, so the later reconstruction of the logY0 TBA is a genuine derivation rather than a restatement. The constant c in (3.16)/(3.19) is expressed in terms of boundary values of Y functions; this is a local re-parameterization, not a fitted-input-called-prediction. The main caveats are explicit assumptions - the state-independence of the discontinuity relations and their validity in the mu->0 excited spectrum (quoted in Secs. 2.2 and 3.2: 'we assume is valid for excited states as well'; 'This relies on the assumption that the Y-system and the discontinuity relations established here remain valid throughout the entire spectrum in the mu->0 limit') - and the removal of the dressing factor a(gamma) following [20,28]. These are unsupported extrapolations or choices, not circular reductions: no equation in the derivation is equivalent to its input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed a prediction. Self-citations such as [18,25,29,31] supply prior constructions or methods, but the load-bearing derivation here is carried out with explicit equations and does not collapse to those citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior TBA [12], on analyticity/state-independence assumptions, and on the removal of the B.15 dressing factor. No new particles or independent entities are introduced; the constant c is a state-dependent quantity defined from the Y functions, not a new degree of freedom.

free parameters (2)

Twist parameter μ = generic; taken to 0 for the QSC limit
Introduced following [12,33] to render the ground-state TBA solutions nontrivial; it is a deformation parameter, not fitted to data, but it is a hand-chosen input that the QSC limit requires to vanish.
Constant c in Δ1 and ¯Δ1 = state-dependent, defined by (3.17)/(3.19)
Appears in the local discontinuity formulas (3.16). It is not numerically fitted but is a state-dependent constant whose value is fixed by the TBA solution; the paper promotes its defining relation to a universal, state-independent equation.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The ground-state mirror TBA equations of [12] correctly describe pure-RR AdS3×S3×T4 strings.
The entire derivation starts from these equations (§2.2); if they are wrong, the Y-system derived from them is wrong.
domain assumption The branch-cut structure of all Y functions is as stated in Table 1, with logarithmic branch points and the chosen mirror-section cuts.
Used throughout §3 and the appendices; it is read off from the ground-state TBA and assumed to extend to excited states.
domain assumption The ground-state-derived discontinuity relations are state-independent and valid for all excited states, including μ→0.
Explicitly stated as an assumption in §3.2 and §2.2; this is the load-bearing assumption flagged in the weakest_assumption field.
ad hoc to paper The factor a(γ) in the massless-massless dressing phase, equation (B.15), is absent from the physical S-matrix.
The paper removes this factor from [12]'s TBA, following [20,28], because it would create cuts incompatible with the Y-system. This is an input to the derivation, not a result proven in this paper.
domain assumption There is a single massless Y function Y0 rather than separate chiral/anti-chiral massless species.
Adopted from semiclassical analysis in [29] (§2.1); it changes the structure of the TBA equations relative to [12].
standard math The Y functions and kernels have the analyticity and asymptotic behavior needed for Jordan's lemma and the contour inversions in §4 and Appendix H.
The inversion procedure relies on uniform decay at infinity and absence of unexpected poles; the paper states these conditions but does not prove them in full generality.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deriving the $\text{AdS}_3\times\text{S}^3\times \text{T}^4$ Quantum Spectral Curve I: Y-system and discontinuity relations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EOG6PEVX

@misc{pith2026260713673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deriving the $\textAdS_3\times\textS^3\times \textT^4$ Quantum Spectral Curve I: Y-system and discontinuity relations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EOG6PEVX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13673}
}

abstract

The mirror Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz (TBA) describes the spectrum of $\text{AdS}_3\times\text{S}^3\times \text{T}^4$ superstrings supported by a mixture of Ramond-Ramond (RR) and Neveu-Schwarz-Neveu-Schwarz (NSNS) flux. In recent years, a conjecture was put forward regarding the Quantum Spectral Curve (QSC) formulation in the Ramond-Ramond case. In this paper, we initiate the derivation of the Ramond-Ramond QSC from the mirror TBA equations. We describe the Y-system underlying the TBA and its discontinuity relations for pure-RR backgrounds. This provides the foundation for the derivation of the T-system and the Quantum Spectral Curve, which will be presented in a follow-up paper.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 34 linked inside Pith

[12]

Frolov and A

S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,Mirror thermodynamic Bethe ansatz for AdS 3/CFT2,JHEP03 (2022) 138 [2112.08898]

arXiv 2022
[34]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,On the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations for reflectionless ADE scattering theories,Phys. Lett. B253(1991) 391

1991
[1]

J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1999
[2]

J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri,Strings in AdS 3 and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum,J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 2929 [hep-th/0001053]. – 64 –

arXiv 2001
[3]

M. Cho, S. Collier and X. Yin,Strings in Ramond-Ramond Backgrounds from the Neveu-Schwarz-Ramond Formalism,JHEP12(2020) 123 [1811.00032]

arXiv 2020
[4]

Cagnazzo and K

A. Cagnazzo and K. Zarembo,B-field in AdS 3/CFT2 Correspondence and Integrability, JHEP11(2012) 133 [1209.4049]

arXiv 2012
[5]

Babichenko, B

A. Babichenko, B. Stefanski and K. Zarembo,Integrability and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,JHEP03(2010) 058 [0912.1723]

arXiv 2010
[6]

Borsato, O

R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefański and A. Torrielli,The all-loop integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4: the massive sector,JHEP08(2013) 043 [1303.5995]

arXiv 2013

Show all 38 references

[7]

Borsato, O

R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefanski,Towards the All-Loop Worldsheet S Matrix forAdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 131601 [1403.4543]

2014 arXiv
[8]

Borsato, O

R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefanski,The complete AdS 3×S 3×T 4 worldsheet S matrix,JHEP10(2014) 066 [1406.0453]

2014 arXiv
[9]

Hoare and A

B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin,On string theory onAdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix,Nucl. Phys. B873(2013) 682 [1303.1037]

2013 arXiv
[10]

Lloyd, O

T. Lloyd, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefański, Jr.,The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS3×S 3×T 4 with mixed three-form flux,Nucl. Phys. B891 (2015) 570 [1410.0866]

2015 arXiv
[11]

Frolov and A

S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,New dressing factors for AdS 3/CFT2,JHEP04(2022) 162 [2112.08896]

2022 arXiv
[13]

Frolov, D

S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,Massive dressing factors for mixed-flux AdS 3/CFT2, JHEP07(2025) 171 [2501.05995]

2025 arXiv
[14]

Frolov, D

S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,Dressing factors for mixed-flux AdS 3×S3×T4 superstrings,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L081901 [2402.11732]

2025 arXiv
[15]

Frolov, D

S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,Dressing factors and mirror thermodynamic Bethe ansatz for mixed-flux AdS3/CFT2,JHEP02(2026) 237 [2507.12191]

2026 arXiv
[16]

Ohlsson Sax, D

O. Ohlsson Sax, D. Riabchenko and B. Stefański Jr.,Worldsheet kinematics, dressing factors and odd crossing in mixed-flux AdS3 backgrounds,JHEP09(2024) 132 [2312.09288]

2024 arXiv
[17]

Gromov,Introduction to the Spectrum ofN= 4SYM and the Quantum Spectral Curve, 1708.03648

N. Gromov,Introduction to the Spectrum ofN= 4SYM and the Quantum Spectral Curve, 1708.03648

arXiv
[18]

Cavaglià, N

A. Cavaglià, N. Gromov, B. Stefański and A. Torrielli,Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3/CFT2: a proposal,JHEP12(2021) 048 [2109.05500]

2021 arXiv
[19]

Ekhammar and D

S. Ekhammar and D. Volin,Monodromy bootstrap for SU(2|2) quantum spectral curves: from Hubbard model to AdS3/CFT2,JHEP03(2022) 192 [2109.06164]

2022 arXiv
[20]

Ekhammar, N

S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and B. Stefański,Demystifying the Massless Sector in AdS 3 Quantum Spectral Curve,2412.11915

arXiv
[21]

Cavaglià, S

A. Cavaglià, S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and P. Ryan,Exploring the Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3/CFT2,JHEP12(2023) 089 [2211.07810]

2023 arXiv
[22]

Ekhammar, N

S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov, B. Stefański and C. Thull,Short Strings in Three-Dimensional – 65 – Anti-de Sitter Space: from Weak to Strong Coupling,2601.21992
[23]

Brollo, D

A. Brollo, D. le Plat, A. Sfondrini and R. Suzuki,Tensionless Limit of Pure–Ramond-Ramond Strings and AdS3/CFT2,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 161604 [2303.02120]

2023 arXiv
[24]

Brollo, D

A. Brollo, D. le Plat and A. Sfondrini,Revisiting the tensionless limit of pure-Ramond-Ramond AdS3/CFT2,2512.15697
[25]

Cavaglià, D

A. Cavaglià, D. Polvara, N. Primi, A. Sfondrini and R. Tateo,Deriving the AdS 3×S 3×T 4 Quantum Spectral Curve II : T-system and QSC,in preparation(2026)

2026
[26]

Gromov, V

N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,Quantum spectral curve for arbitrary state/operator in AdS5/CFT4,JHEP09(2015) 187 [1405.4857]

2015 arXiv
[27]

Bombardelli, A

D. Bombardelli, A. Cavaglià, D. Fioravanti, N. Gromov and R. Tateo,The full Quantum Spectral Curve forAdS4/CF T3,JHEP09(2017) 140 [1701.00473]

2017 arXiv
[28]

Frolov, D

S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,Exchange relations and crossing,J. Phys. A58 (2025) 415402 [2506.04096]

2025 arXiv
[29]

Frolov, A

S. Frolov, A. Pribytok and A. Sfondrini,Ground state energy of twisted AdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4 superstring and the TBA,JHEP09(2023) 027 [2305.17128]

2023 arXiv
[30]

Gromov, V

N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,Solving the AdS/CFT Y-system,JHEP07 (2012) 023 [1110.0562]

2012 arXiv
[31]

Cavaglià, D

A. Cavaglià, D. Fioravanti and R. Tateo,Extended Y-system for theAdS 5/CF T4 correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B843(2011) 302 [1005.3016]

2011 arXiv
[32]

Brollo, D

A. Brollo, D. le Plat, A. Sfondrini and R. Suzuki,More on the tensionless limit of pure-Ramond-Ramond AdS3/CFT2,JHEP12(2023) 160 [2308.11576]

2023 arXiv
[33]

Fendley,Excited state energies and supersymmetric indices,Adv

P. Fendley,Excited state energies and supersymmetric indices,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.1 (1998) 210 [hep-th/9706161]

1998 arXiv
[35]

Cavaglià, D

A. Cavaglià, D. Fioravanti and R. Tateo,Discontinuity relations for theAdS 4/CF T3 correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B877(2013) 852 [1307.7587]

2013 arXiv
[36]

Cavaglià, M

A. Cavaglià, M. Cornagliotto, M. Mattelliano and R. Tateo,A Riemann-Hilbert formulation for the finite temperature Hubbard model,JHEP06(2015) 015 [1501.04651]

2015 arXiv
[37]

Frolov, D

S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,On mixed-flux worldsheet scattering in AdS 3/CFT2, JHEP11(2023) 055 [2306.17553]

2023 arXiv
[38]

Gromov, V

N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, A. Kozak and P. Vieira,Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory: TBA and excited states,Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 265 [0902.4458]. – 66 –

2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [12]

Frolov and A

S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,Mirror thermodynamic Bethe ansatz for AdS 3/CFT2,JHEP03 (2022) 138 [2112.08898]

arXiv 2022

[2] [34]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,On the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations for reflectionless ADE scattering theories,Phys. Lett. B253(1991) 391

1991

[3] [1]

J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1999

[4] [2]

J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri,Strings in AdS 3 and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum,J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 2929 [hep-th/0001053]. – 64 –

arXiv 2001

[5] [3]

M. Cho, S. Collier and X. Yin,Strings in Ramond-Ramond Backgrounds from the Neveu-Schwarz-Ramond Formalism,JHEP12(2020) 123 [1811.00032]

arXiv 2020

[6] [4]

Cagnazzo and K

A. Cagnazzo and K. Zarembo,B-field in AdS 3/CFT2 Correspondence and Integrability, JHEP11(2012) 133 [1209.4049]

arXiv 2012

[7] [5]

Babichenko, B

A. Babichenko, B. Stefanski and K. Zarembo,Integrability and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,JHEP03(2010) 058 [0912.1723]

arXiv 2010

[8] [6]

Borsato, O

R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefański and A. Torrielli,The all-loop integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4: the massive sector,JHEP08(2013) 043 [1303.5995]

arXiv 2013