Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Hamiltonian Flow Equations in Daubechies Wavelet Basis

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read With the right generator, wavelet-basis flow equations drive a truncated quantum Hamiltonian into blocks labelled by resolution, and the coarsest block reproduces the low-lying normal mode frequencies.

desk verdict A careful, honest extension of the wavelet-SRG program to one higher resolution and to a two-field quadratic model; the numerics are internally consistent, but the load-bearing no-momentum-mixing assumption is delegated to [1] rather than checked here. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13618 v1 pith:EP5MCYX4 submitted 2025-01-23 hep-th hep-lat

Mrinmoy Basak , Raghunath Ratabole This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-lat
keywords HamiltonianflowequationsSimilarityRenormalizationGroupDaubechieswaveletbasisscalarfieldtheorynormalmodefrequenciesresolutiontruncationquadraticinteractionblockdiagonalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the flow equations of the similarity renormalization group, implemented in a Daubechies wavelet basis, separate the length scales of a quantum field theory without losing the physics at any scale. The demonstration covers a free real scalar field in 1+1 dimensions at one resolution higher than an earlier study, and a model of two scalar fields coupled by a generally quadratic mass-mixing interaction. In both cases the chosen generator flows the truncated Hamiltonian into a block diagonal form, with each diagonal block belonging to a fixed resolution. The effective Hamiltonian of the coarsest block is shown to reproduce the low-lying normal mode frequencies of the full truncated theory, with the agreement improving as the flow parameter grows.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the flow equation $d\Omega^2(\lambda)/d\lambda = [K(\lambda),\Omega^2(\lambda)]$ with the anti-Hermitian generator $K(\lambda)=[G(\lambda),\Omega^2(\lambda)]$, where $G(\lambda)$ is the block-diagonal part of $\Omega^2(\lambda)$ containing only same-resolution couplings. This choice makes cross-resolution matrix elements decay exponentially in the flow parameter while the diagonal blocks are renormalized, turning the coarsest block into an effective Hamiltonian that carries the high-resolution effects. The underlying basis is the Daubechies wavelet basis, an orthonormal, compactly supported family in which each function is labelled by a location and a resolution index; the entries of $\Omega^2$ are overlap integrals of derivatives of these functions.

What would settle it

Track the full unitary flow on both $\phi$ and $\pi$ operators for the two-field model and compute the size of any generated $\phi\pi$ terms; if they are not negligible compared with the reported eigenvalue accuracy, then diagonalizing only the $\Omega^2_{ss}$ block misses part of the effective low-resolution dynamics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the resolution-truncated coupling matrix $\Omega^2(\lambda)$ evolves under the flow so that the off-diagonal blocks representing couplings between different resolutions decay to zero, while the diagonal blocks saturate to nontrivial matrices that encode the influence of the eliminated sectors. For the interacting two-field model, the interaction couples the two fields only within the same resolution, so the flow preserves those same-resolution couplings while suppressing cross-resolution couplings. As a result, diagonalizing just the coarsest-resolution block $\Omega^2_{ss}(\lambda)$ yields normal mode frequencies that converge to the exact eigenvalues of the truncated theory; for the lowest eigenvalue the discrepancy falls from about $10^{-3}$ at $\lambda=0$ to $10^{-12}$ at $\lambda=20$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the unitary flow rotates fields and momenta by the same orthogonal matrix, so the Hamiltonian keeps the form of a kinetic term plus a quadratic potential and no $\phi\pi$ mixing terms are generated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The flow provides a concrete numerical route from a resolution-truncated Hamiltonian to an effective low-resolution Hamiltonian whose spectrum tracks the full truncated spectrum to high precision.
  • The quadratic interaction between the two fields survives inside each resolution block after the flow, so scale separation does not erase the coupling that defines the model.
  • The free-field calculation at one resolution higher than the earlier study shows that the block-diagonal structure persists when additional resolution sectors are included.
  • If the no-mixing assumption holds, the same generator can be applied to larger truncations while avoiding the cost of evolving the momentum sector along with the configuration sector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the same generator would need to be tested on anharmonic interactions, where the Hamiltonian gains higher-order terms; whether the resolution-block diagonal form survives beyond quadratic couplings is left open by the paper.
  • We infer that the band widening observed in the effective $\Omega^2_{ss}$ block is the mechanism by which high-resolution physics is encoded locally into the coarsest sector, a feature that could be probed by tracking how the band width grows with $\lambda$.
  • We infer that a direct check of the no-mixing assumption, by evolving both fields and momenta under the full unitary rather than only the coupling matrix, would settle whether the quoted normal-mode frequencies exhaust the effective low-resolution dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies similarity renormalization group (SRG) flow equations to scalar field theories represented in a Daubechies wavelet basis. It first extends the single free-field analysis of Michlin and Polyzou to one higher resolution (k=2), presenting numerical evidence that the double-commutator flow drives the coefficient matrix Ω² to a block-diagonal form with blocks labelled by resolution, and that the eigenvalues of the coarsest block converge to the eigenvalues of the full truncated matrix as the flow parameter λ increases. It then introduces a model of two real scalar fields coupled by a mass-mixing term, formulates it in the wavelet basis, and applies the same matrix flow. Tables and figures show the off-diagonal Hilbert-Schmidt norms decaying and the coarse-block eigenvalues approaching the exact truncated eigenvalues. The central claim is that the specifically chosen generator produces a block-diagonal effective Hamiltonian whose coarsest-resolution block reproduces the normal-mode frequencies of the truncated model.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a concrete multiresolution truncation scheme for low-energy effective Hamiltonians in wavelet-based field theory, extending the prior single-field result to one higher resolution and to a two-field model. The numerical evidence is internally consistent: the matrix-flow plots, Hilbert-Schmidt norms, and eigenvalue tables behave as expected, and the exact normal-mode frequencies are obtained from closed-form expressions that are independent of the flow. The eigenvalue comparisons are clear and the HS-norm diagnostics are appropriate. The main caveat is that the physical interpretation of the Ω²_ss block as an effective Hamiltonian rests on an assumption about the allowed form of the unitary flow that is asserted but not proven in this manuscript. The work is an incremental but useful step; its significance would be substantially strengthened by a proof or explicit numerical verification of that assumption.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (74)-(79); Sec. VIII] The reduction of the full Hamiltonian flow to a matrix flow on Ω² relies on the assumption that the unitary transformation acts as an identical orthogonal rotation on the fields and their conjugate momenta, so that no φπ mixing terms or changes to the momentum terms are generated. This is stated as an assumption and justified only by reference to [1], which treats a different system (a single free field at lower resolution). Since the two-field model and the resolution-2 extension are new to this paper, the transfer of the [1] result to these settings is not automatic. Because the central claim — that the Ω²_ss block after the flow is the effective Hamiltonian of the coarsest-resolution sector — depends on this assumption, the claim is not secured by the manuscript alone. Please provide a proof that the chosen generator leaves the class H(λ) = (1/2)(πᵀπ + φᵀΩ²(λ)φ) invariant, or alternatively add a numerical diagnostic for the truncated models that directly computes the φπ and π-only components of the flowed Hamiltonian and shows they vanish or are negligible.
  2. [Abstract; Sec. VII; Tables III and V] The paper states that the flow 'drives the Hamiltonian into a block diagonal form' and that the effective Hamiltonian 'correctly reproduces the normal mode frequencies.' As presented, the numerical evidence demonstrates block-diagonalization of the matrix Ω² and the preservation of its spectrum by the double-commutator flow. Since the spectrum of Ω² is unitarily invariant under this matrix flow, the agreement between the Ω²_ss eigenvalues and the full-matrix eigenvalues is primarily a consistency check of the numerical integration of the flow, not a falsifiable physical prediction. The stronger physical claim — that the coarse-block eigenvalues are the actual low-lying normal-mode frequencies of the full truncated field theory — requires the no-φπ-mixing assumption discussed above. The text should state this distinction explicitly and temper the abstract and conclusion accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. II, VI] The statement 'There is no coupling between oscillators across locations and resolutions' is contradicted by the banded structure of the kinetic matrices D^k_ss,mn and D^kq_sw,mn, which couple neighbouring locations, and by the presence of the H_sw cross-resolution blocks. Please rephrase to describe the actual coupling structure, e.g., 'the interaction term couples only same-location, same-resolution modes, while the kinetic terms have limited inter-location couplings within each resolution.'
  2. [Sec. III, Eqs. (45)-(46)] The exponential solutions as written are incorrect: the right-hand sides should involve H_bmn(0) and H_cmn(0), not H_bmn(λ) and H_cmn(λ), and the derivation assumes that the eigenbases of H_c and H_b are λ-independent, which is generally false. Since the numerical method in Sec. IV uses the full commutator flow, this pedagogical section would benefit from a clarifying remark that Eqs. (45)-(46) are only schematic.
  3. [Sec. II, Eq. (24)] The last term in Eq. (24) appears to have a typo: it should likely be G^t_nm w^{k-1}_m rather than w^{k-1}_n, to match the index structure of the preceding terms.
  4. [Sec. II, Fig. 3] The caption of Fig. 3 lists 's0_1(x)' twice; the third curve is presumably s0_2(x) or another resolution-0 scaling function.
  5. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (58)-(60)] Several summation indices are inconsistent; for example, in H_ss the term X_n ϕs,k_m ϕs,k_n D^k_ss,mn should be summed over m and n, and similar index fixes are needed in Eqs. (59) and (60).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the flow output is benchmarked against independently computed normal-mode frequencies, and the one explicit assumption is a delegated correctness caveat rather than a fitted or definitional input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the wavelet-basis flow equation drives the truncated coupling matrix Omega^2(lambda) to a resolution-block-diagonal form, and that diagonalizing the coarsest Omega^2_ss block reproduces the low-lying normal-mode frequencies. This is not circular. The target frequencies are computed independently: for the free field the exact truncated values come from the full Omega^2 matrix and ultimately from the closed-form Fourier dispersion relation, while for the two-field model the exact values come from Eqs. (92)-(93), which are derived before the flow is introduced. No eigenvalue from the exact diagonalization is used to fit or set any flow parameter. The flow is a unitary similarity transformation, Omega^2(lambda) = O^T(lambda) Omega^2 O(lambda), so the full spectrum is preserved by construction; the numerical demonstration that the Omega^2_ss block eigenvalues approach the exact values verifies the block-diagonalization and the numerical integration of dOmega^2/dlambda = [K, Omega^2], rather than providing a fitted prediction. The only load-bearing assumption is that the flow does not generate phi-pi cross terms or momentum-only terms, so the Hamiltonian stays in the form (1/2)(pi^T pi + phi^T Omega^2(lambda) phi). This is explicitly acknowledged in Secs. IV and VIII and justified by citation to the external prior work [1]; it is not an equation-level reduction to the paper's own outputs and it is not a self-citation. The only self-citation, [59], appears in a list of general wavelet references and is not load-bearing for the central derivation. The paper is therefore self-contained against its benchmarks, and any concern about the no-mixing assumption is a correctness or robustness caveat, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central numerical demonstration depends on chosen model parameters and truncation levels, plus one load-bearing assumption about the structure of the SRG generator. No parameters are fitted to data; the main reproducibility risk is the unspecified wavelet order and flow implementation details.

free parameters (5)
  • Mass parameters µ, ν, g = 1
    Set to 1 for all numerical demonstrations; physical inputs, not fitted to data.
  • Interval length L = 20
    Volume truncation chosen for numerics; not fitted.
  • Daubechies order K = unstated; figures show K=3, DOF counts suggest K=1
    Order of the wavelet basis is a key truncation parameter but is not specified in the numerical sections, hampering reproducibility.
  • Resolution truncation k = k=2 for free field, k=1 for two-field model
    Truncation levels chosen to demonstrate the method; the central claim depends on these choices.
  • Flow parameter λ values = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 20
    Displayed flow times; not fitted, but the convergence demonstration depends on them.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Daubechies scaling and wavelet functions form an orthonormal multiresolution basis of L2(R) with compact support.
    Invoked throughout Sec. II and used for canonical quantization in Secs. IV and VI.
  • domain assumption Equal-time canonical commutation relations [φ(x), π(y)] = i δ(x-y) define the quantum theory.
    Standard quantum field theory input used to derive commutators of wavelet mode coefficients in Secs. IV and VI.
  • ad hoc to paper The SRG flow can be restricted to orthogonal rotations O(λ) acting identically on fields and conjugate momenta, so no φπ mixing terms are generated and the Hamiltonian retains the form (1/2)(π² + φ Ω²(λ) φ).
    Load-bearing assumption stated in Sec. IV (Eqs. 74-75) and Sec. VIII, justified only by citation to [1], not derived in this paper. If false, diagonalizing the Ω²_ss block would not give the true low-energy spectrum.
  • domain assumption The truncated matrix Ω² has no degeneracies or level crossings that would halt the exponential decay of off-diagonal blocks.
    The formal solution of the flow, Eqs. (45)-(46), requires non-degenerate eigenvalues; no spectral analysis of the truncated matrices is provided.
  • domain assumption Basis functions can be made to vanish at hard boundaries x=0 and x=L by constraining translation indices.
    Used to define finite matrices in Secs. IV and VII; the implementation details are not specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hamiltonian Flow Equations in Daubechies Wavelet Basis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EP5MCYX4

@misc{pith2026250113618,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hamiltonian Flow Equations in Daubechies Wavelet Basis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EP5MCYX4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13618}
}
abstract

We study the low energy dynamics of a system of two coupled real scalar fields in 1+1 dimensions using the flow equation approach of Similarity Renormalization Group (SRG) in a wavelet basis. This paper presents an extension of the work by Michlin and Polyzou \cite{PhysRevD.95.094501} at one resolution higher. We also present the analysis of a model of two scalar fields coupled through a generally quadratic interaction in $1+1$ dimensions using wavelet-based flow equations. We demonstrate that the specifically chosen generator flows the Hamiltonian into a block diagonal form with each diagonal block being associated with a fixed resolution. The wavelet basis is known to transform the scalar field theory into a model of coupled localized oscillators, each of which is labelled by location and resolution indices. The chosen interaction represents the coupling between two types of oscillators at the same location and resolution index. There is no coupling between oscillators across locations and resolutions. We show that wavelet-based flow equations carry out scale separation while maintaining the interactions between the two scalar fields at each resolution. The effective Hamiltonian associated with the coarsest resolution is shown to correctly reproduce the normal mode frequencies of the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13618 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the graphical view of the action of Dˆ and Tˆ. In terms of operators, D and T, the form of the refinement equation, s(x) = 2 X K−1 n=0 hnDˆTˆn s(x), (5) shows that the mother scaling function of order K is generated through a specific linear combination of 2K number of translated and dyadically scaled replicas of itself. Eq. (5) only determines the relative values of the mother scaling at different points on t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Order, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. Order, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Euler diagram of forming the space of square integrable functions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The plot of scaling and wavelet function for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The schematic diagram shows the volume and resolution truncated Hamiltonian divided into four components. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The schematic diagram of total Hamiltonian, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Each matrix plot is organised by increasing resolution as shown in Fig. The diagonal blocks, Ω 2 ss, ω 2 ww and FIG. 11. The evaluation of the matrix Ω 2 (λ) for different values of λ. 1 20 40 68 1 20 40 68 1 20 40 68 1 20 40 68 λ=0 -10 0 50 100 140 1 20 40 68 1 20 40…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The schematic diagram of the scale coupling matrix, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The Hilbert-Schmidt norm for six types of different quadratic expressions corresponds to six unique blocks present in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tracie Michlin, W. N. Polyzou, and Fatih Bulut. Multiresolution decomposition of quantum field theories using wavelet bases. Phys. Rev. D, 95:094501, May 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Kenneth G. Wilson. Model hamiltonians for local quantum field theory.Phys. Rev., 140:B445–B457, Oct 1965

    1965

  3. [3]

    Wilson, Timothy S

    Kenneth G. Wilson, Timothy S. Walhout, Avaroth Harindranath, Wei-Min Zhang, Robert J. Perry, and Stanisław D. Głazek. Nonperturbative qcd: A weak-coupling treatment on the light front.Phys. Rev. D, 49:6720–6766, Jun 1994

    1994

  4. [4]

    Głazek and Kenneth G

    Stanisław D. Głazek and Kenneth G. Wilson. Renormalization of hamiltonians.Phys. Rev. D, 48:5863–5872, Dec 1993

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Glazek and Kenneth G

    Stanislaw D. Glazek and Kenneth G. Wilson. Perturbative renormalization group for hamiltonians.Phys. Rev. D, 49:4214– 4218, Apr 1994

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    Flow-equations for hamiltonians.Annalen der Physik, 506(2):77–91, 1994

    Franz Wegner. Flow-equations for hamiltonians.Annalen der Physik, 506(2):77–91, 1994

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    Stanisław D. Głazek. Renormalization group procedure for effective particles: Elementary example of an exact solution with finite mass corrections and no involvement of vacuum.Phys. Rev. D, 85:125018, Jun 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    W. N. Polyzou. Wavelet representation of light-front quantum field theory.Phys. Rev. D, 101:096004, May 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Morlet, G

    J. Morlet, G. Arens, E. Fourgeau, and D. Glard. Wave propagation and sampling theory—part i: Complex signal and scattering in multilayered media.GEOPHYSICS, 47(2):203–221, 1982

    1982

  2. [10]

    S.G. Mallat. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(7):674–693, 1989

    1989

  3. [11]

    Orthogonal pyramid transforms for image coding

    Edward H Adelson, Eero Simoncelli, and Rajesh Hingorani. Orthogonal pyramid transforms for image coding. InVisual Communications and image processing II, volume 845, pages 50–58. SPIE, 1987

    1987

  4. [12]

    Wavelets and signal processing.IEEE signal processing magazine, 8(4):14–38, 1991

    Olivier Rioul and Martin Vetterli. Wavelets and signal processing.IEEE signal processing magazine, 8(4):14–38, 1991

    1991

  5. [13]

    SIAM, 1997

    Charles K Chui.Wavelets: a mathematical tool for signal analysis. SIAM, 1997

    1997

  6. [14]

    Fourier and wavelet signal processing.Fourier Wavelets

    Jelena Kovacevic, Vivek K Goyal, and Martin Vetterli. Fourier and wavelet signal processing.Fourier Wavelets. org, pages 1–294, 2013

    2013

  7. [15]

    Polynomial splines and wavelets—a signal processing perspective.Wavelets: a tutorial in theory and applications, pages 91–122, 1992

    Michael Unser and Akram Aldroubi. Polynomial splines and wavelets—a signal processing perspective.Wavelets: a tutorial in theory and applications, pages 91–122, 1992

    1992

  8. [16]

    A wavelet tour of signal processing, 1999

    Mallat Stephane. A wavelet tour of signal processing, 1999

    1999

  9. [17]

    Agostino Abbate, Jeff Koay, Julius Frankel, Stephan C Schroeder, and Pankaj Das. Signal detection and noise suppression using a wavelet transform signal processor: application to ultrasonic flaw detection.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control,...

    1997

  10. [18]

    Multiwavelet analysis and signal processing

    Mariantonia Cotronei, Laura B Montefusco, and Luigia Puccio. Multiwavelet analysis and signal processing. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 45(8):970–987, 1998

    1998

  11. [19]

    Wavelet transforms in image processing, 1998

    Nick Kingsbury and Julian Magarey. Wavelet transforms in image processing, 1998

    1998

  12. [20]

    Discrete wavelet transform: a signal processing approach

    D Sundararajan. Discrete wavelet transform: a signal processing approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Wavelets: Theory and applications for manufacturing

    Robert X Gao and Ruqiang Yan. Wavelets: Theory and applications for manufacturing. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Aldroubi and M

    A. Aldroubi and M. Unser.Wavelets in Medicine and Biology. Taylor & Francis, 1996

    1996

  15. [23]

    Ludwig Streit.Mathematics + Physics: Lectures on Recent Results(Volume 1). 04 2013

    2013

  16. [24]

    Morlet, G

    J. Morlet, G. Arens, E. Fourgeau, and D. Giard. Wave propagation and sampling theory; Part I, Complex signal and scattering in multilayered media.Geophysics, 47(2):203–221, 02 1982

    1982

  17. [25]

    Precursors of stall and surge processes in gas turbines revealed by wavelet analysis.Control Engineering Practice, 10(6):599–604, 2002

    I.M Dremin, V.I Furletov, O.V Ivanov, V.A Nechitailo, and V.G Terziev. Precursors of stall and surge processes in gas turbines revealed by wavelet analysis.Control Engineering Practice, 10(6):599–604, 2002

    2002

  18. [26]

    Feurstein, and Malvin C

    Stefan Thurner, Markus C. Feurstein, and Malvin C. Teich. Multiresolution wavelet analysis of heartbeat intervals discriminates healthy patients from those with cardiac pathology.Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:1544–1547, Feb 1998. 25

    1998

  19. [27]

    Nunes Amaral, Ary L

    Luís A. Nunes Amaral, Ary L. Goldberger, Plamen Ch. Ivanov, and H. Eugene Stanley. Scale-independent measures and pathologic cardiac dynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:2388–2391, Sep 1998

    1998

  20. [28]

    B. M. Kessler, G. L. Payne, and W. N. Polyzou. Wavelet notes, 2003

    2003

  21. [29]

    W. N. Polyzou, Tracie Michlin, and Fatih Bulut. Multi-scale methods in quantum field theory.Few-Body Systems, 59(3), March 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Michlin.Using wavelet bases to separate scales in quantum field theory

    Tracie L. Michlin.Using wavelet bases to separate scales in quantum field theory. PhD thesis, University of Iowa, 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    Federbush

    P. Federbush. A new formulation and regularization of gauge theories using a non-linear wavelet expansion.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 94(6):1135–1146, dec 1995

    1995

  24. [32]

    C. Best. Wavelet-induced renormalization group for the landau-ginzburg model. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, 83-84:848–850, 2000. Proceedings of the XVIIth International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory

    2000

  25. [33]

    Glen Evenbly and Steven R. White. Entanglement renormalization and wavelets.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:140403, Apr 2016

    2016

  26. [34]

    E. T. Tomboulis. Wavelet field decomposition and uv ‘opaqueness’.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021:77, Jun 2016

    2021

  27. [35]

    George, Yuval R

    Daniel J. George, Yuval R. Sanders, Mohsen Bagherimehrab, Barry C. Sanders, and Gavin K. Brennen. Entanglement in quantum field theory via wavelet representations.Phys. Rev. D, 106:036025, Aug 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Thiemann

    T. Thiemann. Renormalisation, wavelets and the dirichlet-shannon kernels, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Variational description of statistical field theories using daubechies’ wavelets, 1994

    Christoph Best and Andreas Schaefer. Variational description of statistical field theories using daubechies’ wavelets, 1994

    1994

  30. [38]

    Halliday and P

    I.G. Halliday and P. Suranyi. Simulation of field theories in wavelet representation.Nuclear Physics B, 436(1):414–427, 1995

    1995

  31. [39]

    Ismail, George Stephanopoulos, and Gregory C

    Ahmed E. Ismail, George Stephanopoulos, and Gregory C. Rutledge. Multiresolution analysis in statistical mechanics. II. The wavelet transform as a basis for Monte Carlo simulations on lattices.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 118(10):4424– 4431, 03 2003

    2003

  32. [40]

    Path integrals, complex probabilities and the discrete weyl representation

    W N Polyzou. Path integrals, complex probabilities and the discrete weyl representation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 57(27):275201, jun 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Wavelet methods in field theory.Few-Body Systems, 55(5):561–566, jun 2014

    Wayne Polyzou. Wavelet methods in field theory.Few-Body Systems, 55(5):561–566, jun 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Fatih Bulut and W. N. Polyzou. Wavelets in field theory.Phys. Rev. D, 87:116011, Jun 2013

    2013

  35. [43]

    Wavelets and lattice field theory

    Herbert Neuberger. Wavelets and lattice field theory. 35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017), 175, Mar 2018

    2017

  36. [44]

    Altaisky

    Mikhail V. Altaisky. Wavelet-based quantum field theory. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications, November 2007

    2007

  37. [45]

    Albeverio and M

    S. Albeverio and M. V. Altaisky. A remark on gauge invariance in wavelet-based quantum field theory, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    M. V. Altaisky. Wavelets and renormalization group in quantum field theory problems.Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 81:786– 791, nov 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    M. V. Altaisky and N. E. Kaputkina. Continuous wavelet transform in quantum field theory.Phys. Rev. D, 88:025015, Jul 2013

    2013

  40. [48]

    M. V. Altaiskii and N. E. Kaputkina. On the wavelet decomposition in light cone variables.Russian Physics Journal, 55:1177–1182, Mar 2013

    2013

  41. [49]

    M. V. Altaisky and N. E. Kaputkina. On quantization in light-cone variables compatible with wavelet transform.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 55(6):2805–2812, 2016

    2016

  42. [50]

    Wayne N. Polyzou. Light-front quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets

    Ingrid Daubechies. Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 41(7):909–996, 1988

    1988

  44. [52]

    Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1992

    Ingrid Daubechies.Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1992

    1992

  45. [53]

    Wavelet-based numerical analysis: A review and classification.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 81:14–31, 2014

    Bing Li and Xuefeng Chen. Wavelet-based numerical analysis: A review and classification.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 81:14–31, 2014

    2014

  46. [54]

    Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry, 2013

    Xiao-Liang Qi. Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry, 2013

    2013

  47. [55]

    Brennen, Peter Rohde, Barry C

    Gavin K. Brennen, Peter Rohde, Barry C. Sanders, and Sukhwinder Singh. Multiscale quantum simulation of quantum field theory using wavelets.Phys. Rev. A, 92:032315, Sep 2015

    2015

  48. [56]

    W. N. Polyzou, Tracie Michlin, and Fatih Bulut. Multi-scale methods in quantum field theory.Few-Body Systems, 59, Mar 2018

    2018

  49. [57]

    Operator-algebraic renormalization and wavelets.Phys

    Alexander Stottmeister, Vincenzo Morinelli, Gerardo Morsella, and Yoh Tanimoto. Operator-algebraic renormalization and wavelets.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:230601, Dec 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    Daniele S. M. Alves. Entanglement renormalization for quantum field theories with discrete wavelet transforms.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024:81, july 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Renormalization in a wavelet basis.Phys

    Mrinmoy Basak and Raghunath Ratabole. Renormalization in a wavelet basis.Phys. Rev. D, 107:036015, Feb 2023

    2023

  52. [60]

    A. Graps. An introduction to wavelets.IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 2(2):50–61, 1995

    1995

  53. [61]

    Hagedorn

    George A. Hagedorn. Scattering theory by the enss method (peter a. perry) (b. simon, ed.).SIAM Review, 27(2):274–275, 1985

    1985

  54. [62]

    G. Beylkin. On the representation of operators in bases of compactly supported wavelets.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 29(6):1716–1740, 1992

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.