Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Isomorph invariance of dynamics of sheared glassy systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that isomorphs generated from potential-energy and virial fluctuations remain valid inside the glassy state: state points along a glassy isomorph have identical reduced-unit structure and steady-state shearing dynamics…

desk verdict First finite-temperature sheared-glass isomorph test: real empirical result, honest paper, but the aging assumption in generating the glass isomorphs is the load-bearing weakness. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06722 v1 pith:EQ3S54IO submitted 2019-08-19 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.soft

Yonglun Jiang , Eric R. Weeks , Nicholas P. Bailey This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.soft
keywords isomorphtheoryhiddenscaleinvarianceglassydynamicssheardeformationavalanchestatisticsstressfluctuationsbinaryLennard-Jonesglassreducedunits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that isomorph theory — the idea that certain density–temperature pairs have identical structure and dynamics once lengths, times, and energies are expressed in reduced units — continues to hold inside the glassy state, not just in equilibrium liquids. Using the Kob-Andersen binary Lennard-Jones model below its glass transition, the authors generate two glassy isomorphs from potential-energy and virial fluctuations, then shear the glasses with the SLLOD algorithm and Lees-Edwards boundary conditions. They find that the steady-state flow stress, stress fluctuations, stress-change histograms, transverse mean-squared displacement, and intermediate scattering function all collapse along the isomorphs when the reduced strain rate is held fixed. The clearest signature of avalanches, an exponential tail on the negative side of the stress-change distribution at low temperature and low strain rate, is also isomorph invariant. If correct, this means glassy plasticity depends on density and temperature only through the isomorph coordinate, simplifying the phase diagram for out-of-equilibrium amorphous solids.

What carries the argument

The central object is the isomorph: a curve in the density–temperature plane along which reduced-unit structure and dynamics are invariant. Isomorphs are identified through hidden scale invariance, quantified by the correlation coefficient R between potential energy U and virial W fluctuations; the slope gamma = <$\Delta$ U $\Delta$ W> / <($\Delta$ U)^2> gives the configurational adiabat d ln T / d ln rho = gamma, integrated numerically to step between state points. Dynamics are probed by Couette shear via the SLLOD algorithm with Lees-Edwards boundary conditions, with the reduced strain rate gamma_dot_tilde = gamma_dot (T/m)^-1/2 $rho^{-1}$/3 held fixed along each isomorph. The avalanche analysis rests on histograms of reduced stress changes $\Delta$ $\sigma$ / (rho k_B T) over strain intervals, whose negative exponential tail marks correlated plastic events.

What would settle it

Generate the same glassy isomorph two ways — from the NVT potential-energy/virial fluctuations used here and from fluctuations measured during steady-state shearing at the same reduced strain rate — and compare the density–temperature pairs; systematic disagreement would show the equilibrium-based isomorphs are history-dependent. As a second check, run the shearing at each state point for several times more total strain and see whether the characteristic stress-decay strain continues to drift monotonically with density; a persistent drift beyond statistical error would mark a genuine limit of isomorph invariance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that isomorphs generated in the glassy phase from equilibrium fluctuation formulas carry the dynamics of steady-state shearing: state points connected by the integration of d ln T / d ln rho = gamma, with gamma from potential-energy–virial correlations, have the same reduced-unit structure and the same statistical dynamics under shear, including the avalanche signature. The authors demonstrate this for two glassy isomorphs, one just below the glass transition and one deep in the glass, at nominal strain rates from $10^{-2}$ down to $10^{-5}$. The collapse holds for the mean flow stress, its standard deviation, the distribution of stress changes over strain intervals, and the transverse particle dynamics; the stress autocorrelation shows the poorest collapse, with a systematic decrease of the characteristic decay strain along the isomorph. The paper also identifies a hierarchy of strain scales — thermal/vibrational, avalanche, maximum-skewness, and correlation-decay — and shows that this structure is invariant along the isomorph.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that isomorphs can be generated inside the glass by ordinary NVT fluctuation formulas: the paper assumes aging is negligible during those runs, a point it explicitly flags in the section on future improvements, and if aging biases the potential-energy and virial fluctuations the resulting density–temperature pairs are not true isomorphs and the observed collapse could be approximate or coincidental.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Steady-state shearing of a glass is controlled by two variables, the isomorph coordinate and the reduced strain rate, rather than by density and temperature separately.
  • Flow stress and its fluctuations are isomorph invariant in reduced units, so theories of glassy plasticity that treat temperature and density separately are incomplete.
  • Avalanche statistics, read from the negative exponential tail of stress-change distributions, are unchanged along an isomorph at fixed reduced strain rate.
  • Density dependence in existing flow-stress formulas can be absorbed into isomorph-invariant forms using the density-scaling function, and an alternative reduced-unit choice gives a well-behaved zero-temperature limit.
  • Transverse particle diffusion is largely strain-rate controlled at low temperature, with thermal activation entering only on high-temperature isomorphs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to apply the same protocol to glass formers with weaker potential-energy/virial correlations: the quality of the stress-drop collapse would then serve as a quantitative predictor of how much density dependence a plasticity theory must contain.
  • The hierarchy of strain scales the paper identifies — thermal/vibrational, avalanche, maximum-skewness, and correlation-decay — suggests that avalanche initiation and stress relaxation are governed by separate strain intervals roughly an order of magnitude apart, a separation that mesoscale plasticity models could target.
  • Because the reduced flow stress differs by almost a factor of ten between the two isomorphs, the choice of reduced units is not neutral for comparing different isomorphs; the paper's alternative h(rho)-based units may be the more physical ones near zero temperature, a point worth testing on the same data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper tests whether isomorph theory, developed for equilibrium liquids, applies to a sheared Kob-Andersen binary Lennard-Jones glass below the glass transition. The authors generate two glassy isomorphs by numerically integrating the configurational-adiabat equation, Eq. (4), using the potential-energy/virial fluctuation slope gamma from NVT simulations, starting from configurations cooled at constant pressure to T=0.55 and T=0.10. They then shear the glasses with SLLOD and Lees-Edwards boundary conditions at fixed reduced strain rates and compare, in reduced units, the radial distribution function, steady-state flow stress, stress fluctuations and their autocorrelation, stress-change histograms, transverse intermediate scattering functions, and mean-squared displacements. They report good collapse of most observables along each isomorph, including an exponential negative tail in the stress-change distribution that is interpreted as an avalanche signature and is claimed to be isomorph invariant. The paper also discusses how isomorph invariance constrains expressions for flow stress and proposes an alternative zero-temperature compatible reduced-unit system based on a density-scaling function h(rho).

Significance. If the main claim holds, the paper provides a nontrivial extension of isomorph theory into the non-equilibrium glassy regime, with practical consequences: structure and sheared dynamics, including avalanche statistics, would depend on density and temperature only through the isomorph and reduced strain rate, not separately. The test is genuinely predictive: the isomorphs are constructed from unsheared NVT fluctuations, while the tested observables come from independent sheared simulations, and the main collapse is not a fit. The paper is also refreshingly explicit about its limitations, flagging the aging assumption and the imperfect collapse of the stress autocorrelation. However, the evidence for the central claim is weakened by an unverified assumption in the construction of the high-temperature isomorph, a systematic unexplained drift in one key fit parameter, and the absence of any quantitative measure of collapse. With those points addressed, the result would be a solid contribution to the glassy-dynamics and isomorph-theory literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (5); Sec. VII C(1); Conclusion]
  2. [Sec. V, Fig. 6]
  3. [Secs. V and VI, Figs. 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II A]
  2. [Sec. VII A, Eq. (9)]
  3. [Sec. III, Fig. 1 and Sec. IV]
  4. [Sec. V, Fig. 4 caption]
  5. [References]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the isomorphs are constructed from NVT potential-energy and virial fluctuations, while the tested sheared dynamics are independent predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that steady-state sheared dynamics are invariant along isomorphs in the glassy state. The isomorphs themselves are generated from Eq. (4) and Eq. (5) using the fluctuation-determined slope γ from NVT simulations of U and W; no sheared-dynamics observable enters this construction. The subsequent collapses of the radial distribution function, flow stress, stress-drop histograms, skewness, intermediate scattering function, and mean squared displacement are therefore genuine predictions rather than fits. The compressed-exponential and skewness analyses are auxiliary characterizations and do not define the isomorphs. The paper's reliance on prior isomorph theory by the same authors supplies the theoretical framework, but the framework is tested on new, previously unstudied glassy shear data, so it is not load-bearing circularity. The manuscript explicitly flags the assumption that aging is negligible when using equilibrium fluctuation formulas in the glass (Sec. IV and Sec. VII C(1)); this is an acknowledged limitation and a potential correctness risk, especially for the higher-temperature isomorph, but it is not a circular step because the tested quantities are not used to define the isomorphs. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the claimed invariance prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard isomorph theory plus a set of simulation-protocol assumptions about the glassy state. No new physical entities are introduced. The measured gamma is a fluctuation average, not a free parameter; the only fitted numbers are auxiliary fit parameters for correlation functions.

free parameters (2)
  • epsilon_c (characteristic strain in compressed exponential fit) = 0.01 to 0.035
    Fit parameter in Eq. (6) for stress autocorrelation. Used to quantify decay of stress correlations and to expose a systematic density variation along isomorphs; not used to define the isomorphs.
  • beta (compression exponent) = 1.3 to 1.5 for stress autocorrelation; about 0.85 to 1.0 for ISF fits
    Second fit parameter in Eq. (6). Auxiliary characterization, not load-bearing for the central collapse claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Isomorphs are curves of constant excess entropy; Eq. (4) d ln T/d ln rho = gamma(rho,T) remains valid in the glassy state.
    Invoked in Sec. IV when integrating Eq. (4) below Tg to generate glassy isomorphs.
  • domain assumption Aging is negligible during the NVT runs used to measure U and W fluctuations.
    Stated in Sec. IV and flagged as a limitation in Sec. VII C(1). If false, the generated state points are not true isomorphs.
  • domain assumption The Kob-Andersen system has good hidden scale invariance in the glassy phase despite R values as low as 0.82.
    Table I shows R between 0.82 and 0.98; the lower-temperature isomorph falls below the usual R about 0.9 threshold, yet the analysis assumes isomorphs are still meaningful.
  • domain assumption After 50% strain, the sheared system reaches a steady state depending only on rho, T, and reduced strain rate.
    Assumed in Sec. V to define the steady-state window and to justify comparing state points on an isomorph.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Isomorph invariance of dynamics of sheared glassy systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQ3S54IO

@misc{pith2026190806722,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Isomorph invariance of dynamics of sheared glassy systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQ3S54IO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06722}
}
read the original abstract

We study hidden scale invariance in the glassy phase of the Kob-Andersen binary Lennard-Jones system. After cooling below the glass transition, we generate a so-called isomorph from the fluctuations of potential energy and virial in the NVT ensemble -- a set of density, temperature pairs for which structure and dynamics are identical when expressed in appropriate reduced units. To access dynamical features we shear the system using the SLLOD algorithm coupled with Lees-Edwards boundary conditions, and study the statistics of stress fluctuations and the particle displacements transverse to the shearing direction. We find good collapse of the statistical data showing that isomorph theory works well in this regime. The analysis of stress fluctuations, in particular the distribution of stress changes over a given strain interval, allows us to identify a clear signature of avalanche behavior in the form of an exponential tail on the negative side. This feature is also isomorph invariant. The implications of isomorphs for theories of plasticity are discussed briefly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06722 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The black symbols indicate an isomorph in the supercooled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Radial distribution function for the large (A) particles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Section of stress-strain curve for lowest-density state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Flow stress and standard deviation during steady-state regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Fits of shear stress autocorrelation to Eq. (6) shown as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Normalized shear stress autocorrelation functions along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Histograms of stress changes of intervals as indicated for the high-temperature isomorph for different strain rates. The distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Histograms of stress changes of intervals as indicated for the low-temperature isomorph for different strain rates. They are Gaussian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Fisher-Pearson skewness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Histograms of (reduced) stress changes over strain inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Self-part of the intermediate scattering function for larger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The MSD curves from Fig. 12 (a) and (b) plotted together, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Mean squared transverse displacement plotted in reduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The smallest strain scales where stress fluctuations are purely thermal/vibrational

    work page

  2. [2]

    avalanche

    The “avalanche” strain εa over which stress changes show signs of correlated, avalanche-type behavior, of order 5×10−4

    work page

  3. [3]

    Here the exponential tails of the avalanches, and the changes due elastic loading be- tween them, merge to make a broader distribution, but signs of correlation remain

    The strain over which stress change distributions de- viate most from Gaussianity, εs, an order of magni- tude larger than εa. Here the exponential tails of the avalanches, and the changes due elastic loading be- tween them, merge to make a broader distribution, but signs of correlation remain

    work page

  4. [4]

    The characteristic strain εc identified via the stress au- tocorrelation function.εc is of order 2× 10−2 which is a small factor (2-3) larger thanεs

    work page

  5. [5]

    high temperature

    Finally there the strain interval around 5× 10−2 be- yond which all correlation has vanished (though this is not physically independent fromεc; rather it represents where the autocorrelation function is small compared to 1/e). VI. PARTICLE DYNAMICS UNDER SHEAR: TRANSVERSE DIFFUSIVITY As an alternative probe of dynamical processes under steady state sheari...

    work page

  6. [6]

    N. P. Bailey, T. Christensen, B. Jakobsen, K. Niss, N. B. Olsen, U. R. Pedersen, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter 20, 244113 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    N. P. Bailey, U. R. Pedersen, N. Gnan, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 184507 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    N. P. Bailey, U. R. Pedersen, N. Gnan, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 184508 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    T. B. Schrøder, N. P. Bailey, U. R. Pedersen, N. Gnan, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 234503 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    N. Gnan, T. B. Schrøder, U. R. Pedersen, N. P. Bailey, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 234504 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    T. B. Schrøder, N. Gnan, U. R. Pedersen, N. P. Bailey, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 164505 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    T. S. Ingebrigtsen, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, Phys. Rev. X 2, 011011 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    T. S. Ingebrigtsen, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 1018 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Bøhling, T

    L. Bøhling, T. S. Ingebrigtsen, A. Grzybowski, M. Paluch, J. C. Dyre, and T. B. Schrøder, New J. Phys.14, 113035 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    A. A. Veldhorst, J. C. Dyre, and T. B. Schrøder, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 054904 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Separdar, N

    L. Separdar, N. P. Bailey, T. B. Schrøder, S. Davatolhagh, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 138, 154505 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    N. Gnan, C. Maggi, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 125902 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    J. C. Dyre, J. chem. Phys. 148, 154502 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Lerner, N

    E. Lerner, N. P. Bailey, and J. C. Dyre, Phys. Rev. E90, 052304 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    J. C. Dyre, J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 10007 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    J. C. Dyre, J. Phys.: Condens. Mat. 28, 323001 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Lerner and I

    E. Lerner and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. E 80, 026128 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Kob and H

    W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1376 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    Kob and H

    W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. E 51, 4626 (1995)

    1995

  17. [25]

    Kob and H

    W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. E 52, 4134 (1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    Toxvaerd, U

    S. Toxvaerd, U. R. Pedersen, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 224501 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    T. S. Ingebrigtsen, J. C. Dyre, T. B. Schrøder, and C. P. Royall (2018), arxiv/1804.01378

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    T. B. Schrøder and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 204502 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley,Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford University Press, 1987)

    1987

  22. [30]

    U. R. Pedersen, N. P. Bailey, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 015701 (2008). 14

    2008

  23. [31]

    Hummel, G

    F. Hummel, G. Kresse, J. C. Dyre, and U. R. Pedersen, Phys. Rev. B 92, 174116 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Toxvaerd and J

    S. Toxvaerd and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys.134, 081102 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    N. P. Bailey, J. S. Ingebrigtsen, T. S. amd Hansen, A. A. Veld- horst, L. Bøhling, C. A. Lemarchand, A. E. Olsen, L. Bacher, A. K. Costigliola, H. Pedersen, U. R. Larsen, J. C. Dyre, and T. B. Schrøder, SciPost Phys. 3, 038 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    (2018), RUMD software, version 3.3, is freely available at http://rumd.org

    2018

  27. [35]

    Chattoraj, C

    J. Chattoraj, C. Caroli, and A. Lema ˆıtre, Phys. Rev. E 84, 011501 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    Kob and J.-L

    W. Kob and J.-L. Barrat, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 319 (2000)

    2000

  29. [37]

    D. J. Evans and G. P. Morriss, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1528 (1984)

    1984

  30. [38]

    A. J. C. Ladd, Mol. Phys. 53, 459 (1984)

    1984

  31. [39]

    D. L. Malandro and D. J. Lacks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5576 (1998)

    1998

  32. [40]

    Maloney and A

    C. Maloney and A. Lema ˆıtre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 016001 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    C. E. Maloney and A. Lema ˆıtre, Phys. Rev. E 74, 016118 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    N. P. Bailey, J. Schiøtz, A. Lemaˆıtre, and K. W. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 095501 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    Berthier and J.-L

    L. Berthier and J.-L. Barrat, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6228 (2002)

    2002

  36. [44]

    V oigtmann, Curr

    T. V oigtmann, Curr. Opin. Colloid In.19, 549 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    Lerner and I

    E. Lerner and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. E 79, 066109 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    Lerner and I

    E. Lerner and I. Procaccia (2009), arXiv:1004.3193

    2009 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Chattoraj, C

    J. Chattoraj, C. Caroli, and A. Lema ˆıtre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 266001 (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    Rottler and M

    J. Rottler and M. O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. E. 68, 011507 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    Lema ˆıtre and C

    A. Lema ˆıtre and C. Caroli, Phys. Rev. E76, 036104 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    Lemaˆıtre and C

    A. Lemaˆıtre and C. Caroli, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 065501 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    Karmakar, E

    S. Karmakar, E. Lerner, I. Procaccia, and J. Zylberg, Phys. Rev. E 82, 031301 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    H. G. E. Hentschel, S. Karmakar, E. Lerner, and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 025501 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    T. S. Ingebrigtsen, L. Bøhling, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 061102 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Bøhling, N

    L. Bøhling, N. P. Bailey, T. B. Schrøder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 124510 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    T. B. Schrøder, private communication (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Note that this would presumably also happen even without any deformation by waiting long enough for liquid dynamics to be- come relevant — in that case time, rather than strain, becomes the relevant parameter

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.