Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Dynamical behaviour of soliton train in holographic superfluids at zero temperature

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A soliton train in a zero-temperature holographic superfluid is stable under alternative quantization but destabilizes beyond a critical chemical potential under standard quantization.

desk verdict The standard-quantization stability analysis is plausible and new, but the alternative-quantization claim likely rests on the wrong perturbation boundary conditions and should not be trusted as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13007 v3 pith:EQEHB7QM submitted 2024-11-20 hep-th

Meng Gao , Xin Li , Yu Tian , Peng Yang , Hongbao Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords holographicsuperfluidssolitontrainAdSBlochwavesquasinormalmodesstandardquantizationalternativeBCS-BECcrossover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a periodic array of dark solitons—localized dips in the superfluid density—in a zero-temperature holographic superfluid, modeled by an Abelian-Higgs system on an AdS soliton background. It asks whether this soliton train is dynamically stable under small perturbations and how the answer depends on the two holographic quantization schemes. The central claim is that the train's linear dynamics is governed by three collective modes—a gapless phonon mode and two elastic modes—and that under standard quantization the large elastic mode becomes unstable above the critical chemical potential $\mu_{cl}\simeq 2.63882$ at $k=0$ for lattice spacing $L=6$, while the small elastic mode turns unstable at $k\neq 0$ beyond its own critical value ($\mu_{cs}\simeq 2.6146$). Under alternative quantization no unstable modes are found in the explored regime. The paper interprets the standard-quantization instability as a dynamical phase transition in which adjacent solitons annihilate and the train evolves toward a uniform superfluid, which is why the quantization scheme makes a tangible physical difference.

What carries the argument

The central object is the static soliton-train solution of the Abelian-Higgs equations on the AdS soliton background, obtained numerically as a periodic configuration in the spatial direction $x$ with lattice spacing $L$. Stability is decided by linearizing the equations of motion, writing every perturbation as a Bloch wave $\delta\psi = p_1(z,x)e^{-i\omega t+ikx} + p_2^*(z,x)e^{i\omega^* t-ikx}$ (and likewise for the gauge field and conjugate momenta), and solving a generalized eigenvalue problem for the frequency $\omega$; the sign of $\mathrm{Im}\,\omega$ determines stability and $k$ labels the Bloch momentum. The two quantization schemes enter through which asymptotic mode of the scalar field is held as the source—$\Psi_-$ for standard quantization and $\Psi_+$ for alternative quantization—which the authors map to BCS-like and BEC-like superfluids. The full mode spectrum, as a function of chemical potential $\mu$ and wave number $k$, is the mechanism that carries the phase-diagram argument.

What would settle it

Re-run the linear stability calculation with equation (31) included as a constraint, or evolve the full nonlinear equations from a soliton train at $\mu=3$, $L=6$, $k=0$ and check whether the perturbation grows at the predicted rate and drives the train into a uniform superfluid; disagreement between the truncated and constrained spectra, or the absence of that growth, would falsify the central instability claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The author's claim is that a periodically spaced soliton train in a zero-temperature holographic superfluid supports exactly three low-energy collective modes when perturbed, and that the stability of the train depends qualitatively on which boundary quantization is chosen. With standard quantization, the gapped large elastic mode becomes purely imaginary above $\mu_{cl}\simeq 2.63882$ at $k=0$ for $L=6$, meaning exponential growth that brings neighboring solitons together until they annihilate into a homogeneous superfluid; for $k\neq 0$ the gapless small elastic mode also becomes unstable above $\mu_{cs}\simeq 2.6146$. With alternative quantization, the computed spectrum contains no unstable modes, so the soliton train is predicted to remain stable and no dynamical transition occurs. The paper also reports that at large chemical potential the phonon velocity and the gapless elastic-mode velocity saturate at the conformal-fluid values $1/\sqrt{2}$ and $1/\sqrt{3}$ under standard and alternative quantization respectively, and that the small elastic mode produces grayness oscillation, a periodic excursion of the order parameter into the complex plane at the soliton cores.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the linear-stability section's claim that perturbation equation (31) can be discarded because boundary charge conservation makes it redundant; if the truncated system (26)–(30) does not automatically preserve that constraint, the computed mode spectrum and the quoted critical chemical potentials could be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A BCS-like holographic superfluid prepared as a zero-temperature soliton train at $\mu$ above the critical value (about $2.64$ at $k=0$, and a slightly lower threshold at $k\neq 0$, for $L=6$) is dynamically driven to a uniform superfluid phase.
  • At $k=0$ only the large elastic mode drives the transition; the small elastic mode stays stable at these parameters, so the collapse is triggered by the mode that compresses adjacent solitons toward each other.
  • At nonzero Bloch momentum both elastic modes can become unstable, and the two modes degenerate at the first Brillouin-zone boundary ($k=0.5$ for the displayed parameters), where pairwise-degenerate modes appear.
  • Under alternative quantization, the soliton train remains stable across the explored range, giving a clear dynamic distinction between the BEC-like and BCS-like descriptions.
  • The phonon and gapless elastic-mode speeds approach conformal values ($1/\sqrt{2}$ and $1/\sqrt{3}$ for standard and alternative quantization, respectively) at large chemical potential, providing a quantitative prediction that could be checked in time evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication left implicit is that the stability contrast itself is a diagnostic for the BEC-BCS crossover: a holographic parameter interpolating between standard and alternative quantization should shift the instability threshold continuously, and the grayness-oscillation amplitude could serve as the order parameter for the crossover.
  • The truncated perturbation system drops equation (31) by appeal to boundary charge conservation; a direct test of whether the remaining equations preserve that constraint would either confirm the quoted thresholds or reveal that the QNM spectrum is incomplete.
  • The predicted chemical-potential window in which the small elastic mode's velocity vanishes could be searched for in ultracold-atom soliton-train experiments, where similar collective-mode signatures are accessible.
  • The Brillouin-zone-boundary degeneracies and the hydrodynamic character of the small elastic mode suggest that the soliton train behaves as an effective one-dimensional lattice; extracting its tight-binding parameters from the QNM dispersion could connect the holographic result to standard soliton-lattice dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs static soliton-train solutions in the probe-limit Abelian-Higgs model on an AdS soliton background with m^2 = -2, under both standard and alternative quantization, and then studies their linear stability using Bloch-wave quasi-normal modes. The authors report three low-lying collective modes (large elastic, small elastic, and phonon), characterize their effects on the soliton train, and find that under standard quantization the large elastic mode becomes unstable above a critical chemical potential mu_cl ~ 2.63882 at k=0, while the small elastic mode becomes unstable for k != 0 above mu_cs ~ 2.6146. They also claim that under alternative quantization no unstable modes are found, and that phonon and elastic velocities approach constant values consistent with conformal-fluid expectations.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper would be a useful extension of zero-temperature holographic superfluids to spatially periodic soliton trains, and it connects the standard/alternative quantization duality to BCS-like/BEC-like superfluid regimes. The model and numerical method are standard, the static solutions are computed from the equations of motion rather than fitted to data, and the predicted critical chemical potentials are falsifiable within the holographic model. However, the central stability conclusions rest on two fragile technical steps: a perturbation equation is discarded with a one-sentence justification, and the perturbation boundary conditions do not appear to implement alternative quantization correctly. These issues must be resolved before the claimed phase diagram and the 'no unstable modes under alternative quantization' statement can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV, perturbation boundary conditions after Eq. (43)] The boundary conditions for the perturbation are stated as 'Dirichlet conditions for p1, p2, a, b, c, q1, q2 at z=0', without distinguishing the two quantization schemes. For the static background, alternative quantization is implemented as ∂z ψ|z=0 = 0, i.e. the coefficient of z^2 in Ψ = z ψ is fixed to zero. Therefore the homogeneous perturbation should satisfy ∂z (δψ)|z=0 = 0, which translates to ∂z p1|z=0 = ∂z p2|z=0 = 0. Imposing Dirichlet conditions on p1 and p2 instead fixes δψ|z=0 = 0, which is the standard-quantization scalar source condition. If the alternative-quantization runs in Fig. 13 and the associated stability claim used Dirichlet conditions, then the computed spectrum is not the alternative-quantization spectrum; it is a standard-quantization perturbation on an alternative-quantization background. This directly undermines the conclusion that 'there are no unstable modes under alternative quantization.' The authors must either recompute with ∂z p1 = ∂z p2 = 0 or explain why the Dirichlet conditions are nevertheless the correct alternative-quantization conditions.
  2. [§IV, Eq. (31) and the paragraph following it] The statement 'Considering that there is no black hole in the AdS-soliton background, the bulk charge does not enter the black hole. Since the bulk charge is equivalent to the boundary charge, the conservation of boundary charge is ensured... Consequently, we can ignore the perturbation equation (31)' is not a derivation. Equation (31) is a first-order constraint relating ∂t∂zδAt to perturbations of ψ and Ax. Dropping it from the generalized eigenvalue problem is only valid if the remaining equations (26)-(30) automatically preserve (31) for all times and for all solutions of the linearized system. The paper provides no such proof, no check of the residual of (31), and no discussion of how gauge freedom or the constraint (30) interacts with the discarded equation. Since the eigenvalue spectrum and the critical chemical potentials are obtained from the reduced system, a spurious or missing mode could change the instability thresholds. This issue must be addressed, for example by including (31) in the system or by explicitly demonstrating that it follows from (26)-(30) and the background equations.
  3. [§IV, Figs. 10, 11, 12, 13] The paper reports critical chemical potentials to five significant figures (μ_cl ≃ 2.63882, μ_cs = 2.6146), mode degeneracies at the Brillouin zone boundary, and velocities that converge to constants, but it provides no convergence tests, no error estimates, and no statement of the numerical resolution (numbers of Chebyshev and Fourier modes, Newton tolerances, or eigenvalue-solver accuracy). Pseudo-spectral methods can give very accurate results, but without any resolution study the claimed precision of the thresholds and the identification of degeneracies are not verifiable. The authors should report the numerical parameters and show at least one convergence test for a representative case, ideally with the resulting uncertainty in μ_cl and μ_cs.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Captions of Figs. 10, 13] The caption of Fig. 10 contains the typo 'dymamics'; please correct it to 'dynamics'. In Fig. 13, the caption refers to '(upper)' and '(lower)' but the text does not clearly state that the upper panel is standard quantization and the lower panel is alternative quantization.
  2. [§III, static solutions] The parameters used for the static solutions are not collected in one place: standard quantization uses μ=4, L=10, while alternative quantization uses μ=1.7, L=8π, and later QNM calculations use L=6, 12, 20, 2π, and 40. Please define lattice spacing consistently and state the relation of L to the soliton period; this will help readers compare figures.
  3. [§II, radial gauge and Ax=0] The text says 'we set Ax = 0, resulting in φ being constant' after deriving jx = jz = 0 from the static equations. This gauge choice should be stated more carefully, since Ax = 0 is a gauge condition for static configurations and not an additional physical restriction.
  4. [References] References [3] and [5] are identical (Dutton et al., Science 293 (2001)); one duplicate should be removed or replaced with a distinct relevant reference.
  5. [§V, Summary and Discussion] The statement 'The contents mentioned above can be realized through experiments' is too strong given that the paper is a zero-temperature holographic model; please soften it or provide a concrete experimental observable that maps to the computed quantities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: critical chemical potentials and mode spectra are numerical outputs, not fitted inputs; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claims—static soliton train profiles, the three-mode QNM spectrum, the critical chemical potentials μcl≈2.63882 and μcs≈2.6146, and the absence of unstable modes under alternative quantization—are obtained by numerically solving the bulk equations of motion (18)-(19) and the linearized eigenvalue system (37)-(43). No target mode frequency or critical value is used as an input, and no parameter is fitted to the mode data. Self-citations to Refs. [15], [16] and [27] supply the standard holographic superfluid action, the BEC/BCS interpretation of the two quantizations, and the pseudo-spectral/Newton method; these are contextual and methodological, and the paper's conclusions do not reduce to them. External consistency checks (phonon velocities tending to 1/sqrt(2) and 1/sqrt(3)) anchor the calculation independently. The most fragile step is not circular: dropping Eq. (31) via a boundary-charge-conservation argument is a constraint-preservation assumption whose failure would affect completeness of the QNM spectrum, and the possible misapplication of Dirichlet conditions on p1,p2 in the alternative-quantization runs (if real) is an internal-consistency/correctness concern, not a reduction of predictions to inputs. These caveats lower confidence in the robustness of the no-instability claim but do not amount to circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and fits no external data. Its central claims rest on standard holographic model assumptions plus a chosen scalar mass and the Bloch-wave truncation.

free parameters (1)
  • scalar mass squared m^2 = -2
    Chosen by hand so that Δ−=1 and Δ+=2, enabling both standard and alternative quantization; it is a model input, not fitted to external data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence applies to this Abelian-Higgs model, so the boundary theory is a strongly coupled superfluid.
    The holographic dictionary in Eqs. (5)-(6) is the basis for interpreting bulk fields as boundary operators and the condensate.
  • domain assumption Probe limit e→∞: matter fields do not backreact on the AdS soliton geometry.
    Justified in Sec. II as a simplification; instability thresholds could shift with backreaction.
  • domain assumption The AdS soliton metric (Eq. 3) with z0=1 and ξ-periodicity 4π/3 is the correct zero-temperature background.
    Used as the gravitational dual of a zero-temperature superfluid; this is standard in the cited literature.
  • domain assumption The static soliton train is periodic in x with period L and the perturbation Ansatz obeys Bloch's theorem (Eqs. 32-36).
    This is the key structural assumption for reducing the perturbation problem to a generalized eigenvalue problem in the first Brillouin zone.
  • domain assumption Boundary conditions for perturbations: Dirichlet at z=0 for p1, p2, a, b, c, q1, q2; regular at z=1; periodic in x.
    Stated in Sec. IV; if the correct boundary conditions differ, the QNM spectrum would change.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical behaviour of soliton train in holographic superfluids at zero temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQEHB7QM

@misc{pith2026241113007,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical behaviour of soliton train in holographic superfluids at zero temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQEHB7QM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13007}
}
read the original abstract

We construct a soliton train configuration with holographic superfluid model under AdS soliton background. We investigate the stability of a soliton train using Bloch waves under two distinct quantization schemes. Upon imposing a minor perturbation on the soliton train system, it has been observed that there exist two elastic modes and one phonon mode. Most importantly, we find, under soliton train background, that there is a rich phase diagram concerning the chemical potential under standard quantization. Nevertheless, there are no unstable modes under alternative quantization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13007 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The order parameter (upper) and normalized particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The order parameter (upper) and normalized particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. The phase argument of the small elastic mode (up [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Effect of three kinds of modes on soliton train at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Real part and imaginary part together for small elas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The comparison between phonon mode (a) and elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The dymamics phase transition for large elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The large elastic mode and small elastic mode for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The relationship between chemical potential and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Vortex shedding patterns in holographic superfluids at finite temperature

    hep-th 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    In simulations of a finite-temperature superfluid, a moving obstacle sheds vortex dipoles either periodically or in a steady train, with frequencies that fit the same Strouhal-Reynolds curve as classical and zero-temp...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Williams and R.E

    G.A. Williams and R.E. Packard, Photographs of quantized vortex lines in rotating He II , Physical Review Letters 33 (1974) 280283

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Yarmchuk, M.J

    E.J. Yarmchuk, M.J. Gordon and R.E. Packard, Observation of Stationary Vortex Arrays in Rotating Superfluid Helium, Physical Review Letters 43 (1979) 214217

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    Dutton, M

    Z. Dutton, M. Budde, C. Slowe and L.V. Hau, Observation of Quantum Shock Waves Created with Ultra- Compressed Slow Light Pulses in a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Science 293 (2001) 663668. 11

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Donadello, S

    S. Donadello, S. Serafini, M. Tylutki, L.P. Pitaevskii, F. Dalfovo, G. Lamporesi et al., Observation of Solitonic Vortices in Bose-Einstein Condensates , Physical Review Letters 113 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Dutton, M

    Z. Dutton, M. Budde, C. Slowe and L.V. Hau, Observation of Quantum Shock Waves Created with Ultra- Compressed Slow Light Pulses in a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Science 293 (2001) 663668

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Yefsah, A.T

    T. Yefsah, A.T. Sommer, M.J.H. Ku, L.W. Cheuk, W. Ji, W.S. Bakr et al., Heavy solitons in a fermionic superfluid, Nature 499 (2013) 426430

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    M.J.H. Ku, B. Mukherjee, T. Yefsah and M.W. Zwierlein, Cascade of Solitonic Excitations in a Superfluid Fermi gas: From Planar Solitons to Vortex Rings and Lines , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 045304

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Susskind, The world as a hologram , Journal of Mathematical Physics 36 (1995) 63776396

    L. Susskind, The world as a hologram , Journal of Mathematical Physics 36 (1995) 63776396

    work page 1995

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity , International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38 (1999) 11131133

    J. Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity , International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38 (1999) 11131133

    1999

  2. [10]

    Gubser, I

    S. Gubser, I. Klebanov and A. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory , Physics Letters B 428 (1998) 105114

    1998

  3. [11]

    X. Li, Y. Tian and H. Zhang, Generation of vortices and stabilization of vortex lattices in holographic superfluids , Journal of High Energy Physics 2020 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    P. Yang, X. Li and Y. Tian, Instability of holographic superfluids in optical lattice , Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Y.-K. Yan, S. Lan, Y. Tian, P. Yang, S. Yao and H. Zhang, Holographic dissipation prefers the Landau over the Keldysh form , 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Wittmer, C.-M

    P. Wittmer, C.-M. Schmied, T. Gasenzer and C. Ewerz, Vortex Motion Quantifies Strong Dissipation in a Holographic Superfluid, Physical Review Letters 127 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    M. Guo, S. Lan, C. Niu, Y. Tian and H. Zhang, Note on zero temperature holographic superfluids, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33 (2016) 127001

    2016

  8. [16]

    M. Gao, Y. Jiao, X. Li, Y. Tian and H. Zhang, Black and gray solitons in holographic superfluids at zero temperature, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Takahashi, Bogoliubov–de Gennes soliton dynamics in unconventional Fermi superfluids , Phys

    D.A. Takahashi, Bogoliubov–de Gennes soliton dynamics in unconventional Fermi superfluids , Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 024512

    2016

  10. [18]

    Rothenberg and H.K

    J.E. Rothenberg and H.K. Heinrich, Observation of the formation of dark-soliton trains in optical fibers , Opt. Lett. 17 (1992) 261263

    1992

  11. [19]

    Strecker, G.B

    K.E. Strecker, G.B. Partridge, A.G. Truscott and R.G. Hulet, Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains, Nature 417 (2002) 150153

    2002

  12. [20]

    Nguyen, D

    J.H.V. Nguyen, D. Luo and R.G. Hulet, Formation of matter-wave soliton trains by modulational instability , Science 356 (2017) 422426

    2017

  13. [21]

    Nishioka, S

    T. Nishioka, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic superconductor/insulator transition at zero temperature, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Randeria, In Bose-Einstein Condensation , Cambridge University Press (1995)

    M. Randeria, In Bose-Einstein Condensation , Cambridge University Press (1995)

    1995

  15. [23]

    Timmermans, K

    E. Timmermans, K. Furuya, P.W. Milonni and A.K. Kerman, Prospect of creating a composite Fermi–Bose superfluid, Physics Letters A 285 (2010) 228233

    2010

  16. [24]

    Dutta and E.J

    S. Dutta and E.J. Mueller, Collective Modes of a Soliton Train in a Fermi Superfluid , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 260402

    2017

  17. [25]

    Hartnoll, C.P

    S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz, Building a Holographic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 031601

    2008

  18. [26]

    Hartnoll, C.P

    S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz, Holographic superconductors, Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 (2008) 015015

    2008

  19. [27]

    M. Guo, C. Niu, Y. Tian and H. Zhang, Modave Lectures on Applied AdS/CFT with Numerics , 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Herzog, P.K

    C.P. Herzog, P.K. Kovtun and D.T. Son, Holographic model of superfluidity , Physical Review D 79 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Ads/CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking , Nuclear Physics B 556 (1999) 89–114

    1999

  22. [30]

    Breitenlohner and D.Z

    P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman, Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Backgrounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity, Physics Letters B 115 (1982) 197201

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.