Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Long Range Graph Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.08164 v4 pith:EQROS6ZS submitted 2022-06-16 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords graphbenchmarkcapturenetworksarchitecturesbetterdatasetsgiven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that are based on the message passing (MP) paradigm generally exchange information between 1-hop neighbors to build node representations at each layer. In principle, such networks are not able to capture long-range interactions (LRI) that may be desired or necessary for learning a given task on graphs. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in development of Transformer-based methods for graphs that can consider full node connectivity beyond the original sparse structure, thus enabling the modeling of LRI. However, MP-GNNs that simply rely on 1-hop message passing often fare better in several existing graph benchmarks when combined with positional feature representations, among other innovations, hence limiting the perceived utility and ranking of Transformer-like architectures. Here, we present the Long Range Graph Benchmark (LRGB) with 5 graph learning datasets: PascalVOC-SP, COCO-SP, PCQM-Contact, Peptides-func and Peptides-struct that arguably require LRI reasoning to achieve strong performance in a given task. We benchmark both baseline GNNs and Graph Transformer networks to verify that the models which capture long-range dependencies perform significantly better on these tasks. Therefore, these datasets are suitable for benchmarking and exploration of MP-GNNs and Graph Transformer architectures that are intended to capture LRI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 31 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Sheaf Neural Networks for Inductive Tasks

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On 14 inductive graph benchmarks, sheaf neural networks underperform strong GNN baselines, and their performance is driven more by the surrounding architecture than by the sheaf diffusion mechanism.

  2. CTS-Bench: Benchmarking Graph Coarsening Trade-offs for GNNs in Clock Tree Synthesis

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generic graph coarsening of gate-level netlists cuts GNN memory by about 17x and training time by about 3x, but makes clock-skew prediction R^2 negative on unseen designs.

Pith tools