Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Subsample Size of Quantile-Based Randomized Kaczmarz

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.15185 v1 pith:ERG5B353 submitted 2025-07-21 math.NA cs.NA

On Subsample Size of Quantile-Based Randomized Kaczmarz

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords mathbfsubsamplesizebetaconstantsomeepsilonerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Quantile-based randomized Kaczmarz (QRK) was recently introduced to efficiently solve sparsely corrupted linear systems $\mathbf{A} \mathbf{x}^*+\mathbf{\epsilon} = \mathbf{b}$ [SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 43(2), 605-637], where $\mathbf{A}\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$ and $\mathbf{\epsilon}$ is an arbitrary $(\beta m)$-sparse corruption. However, all existing theoretical guarantees for QRK require quantiles to be computed using all $m$ samples (or a subsample of the same order), thus negating the computational advantage of Kaczmarz-type methods. This paper overcomes the bottleneck. We analyze a subsampling QRK, which computes quantiles from $D$ uniformly chosen samples at each iteration. Under some standard scaling assumptions on the coefficient matrix, we show that QRK with subsample size $D\ge\frac{C\log (T)}{\log(1/\beta)}$ linearly converges over the first $T$ iterations with high probability, where $C$ is some absolute constant. This subsample size is a substantial reduction from $O(m)$ in prior results. For instance, it translates into $O(\log(n))$ even if an approximation error of $\exp(-n^2)$ is desired. Intriguingly, our subsample size is also tight up to a multiplicative constant: if $D\le \frac{c\log(T)}{\log(1/\beta)}$ for some constant $c$, the error of the $T$-th iterate could be arbitrarily large with high probability. Numerical results are provided to corroborate our theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.