REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 93 references
Weak lensing trispectrum is an independent probe of cosmological parity violation.
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash
2026-08-01 00:44 UTC pith:ERMEZLF4
load-bearing objection A genuinely new projection formalism for parity-odd weak-lensing trispectra, with the numerical forecasts compromised by a possible Bessel-order error. the 3 major comments →
Probing Parity Violation with Weak Lensing Trispectrum
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The central claim is that a parity-odd component of the late-time matter distribution, seeded by parity-violating physics during inflation, leaves a measurable imprint in the angular trispectrum of weak lensing convergence. The authors show that the reduced angular trispectrum, constructed from harmonic coefficients of the convergence field via Wigner 3-j symbols, captures the handedness of three-dimensional tetrahedral configurations projected onto the sky. For both a squeezed-type template and a collapsed-type template, they compute the projected signal and its signal-to-noise ratio, finding that the signal is dominated by configurations containing at least one low multipole. They also fin
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the reduced angular trispectrum Q(l1l2|l3l4)(L), a rotationally invariant harmonic-space four-point statistic obtained by contracting four convergence coefficients with Wigner 3-j symbols; its imaginary part is odd under parity and isolates the parity-violating signal. The projection formalism expands the three-dimensional primordial trispectrum into spherical harmonics, with Wigner 6-j and 9-j couplings separating a geometric angular term from a line-of-sight radial integral. The radial integral is evaluated with an exact factorized numerical integration, avoiding the Limber approximation. Two phenomenological templates supply the primordial input: a squeezed temp
Load-bearing premise
The forecasts assume the measurement noise is dominated by simple Gaussian fluctuations and that the parity-breaking amplitudes are as large as theory allows; if real noise is more complicated or the amplitudes are smaller, the quoted detectability weakens.
What would settle it
Compute the full non-Gaussian covariance of the weak lensing convergence trispectrum from simulations or analytic perturbation theory and re-evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio; if off-diagonal covariance substantially exceeds the diagonal Gaussian estimate, the central detectability claim is weakened. Alternatively, run a suite of simulations seeded with the two parity-odd primordial templates and check whether the proposed estimator recovers the injected amplitudes at the predicted SNR.
If this is right
- Upcoming wide-field weak lensing surveys can search for a parity-odd trispectrum signal without modeling galaxy bias, because convergence directly traces the matter distribution.
- A detected parity-odd signal would constitute evidence for primordial parity violation, since standard gravitational evolution conserves parity and parity-odd scalar information first appears at the four-point level.
- Shallow single-bin auto-correlations, not deep or mixed-redshift cross-correlations, are the optimal survey strategy; mixed tomographic bins suppress the signal through noise-only line-of-sight accumulation.
- Observational analyses of these statistics should not rely on the Limber approximation; exact line-of-sight integration is required in the low-multipole regime where the signal dominates.
- The distinct shape sensitivity of the two templates — squeezed dominated by small external multipoles, collapsed dominated by small diagonal multipoles — offers a geometric way to distinguish inflationary production mechanisms.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Editorial inference: if the diagonal Gaussian covariance assumption is relaxed to include non-Gaussian trispectrum covariance, the quoted signal-to-noise ratios could shift downward, so the detectability should be read as an optimistic ceiling.
- Editorial inference: the same projection formalism could be adapted to intrinsic-alignment or combined galaxy-clustering-plus-lensing four-point analyses, potentially increasing statistical power by correlating multiple tracers of the same matter field.
- Editorial inference: a direct simulation test — seeding N-body initial conditions with the two parity-odd templates and checking that the pipeline recovers the injected amplitude — would validate the estimator before application to survey data.
- Editorial inference: a null detection would still yield competitive upper bounds on the template amplitudes that complement constraints from CMB polarization and galaxy four-point correlation functions.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript develops a full-sky projection formalism for the weak lensing convergence trispectrum, isolating the parity-odd (imaginary) component. It applies this formalism to two phenomenological primordial trispectrum templates—one peaked in the squeezed limit and one in the collapsed limit—and computes the projected angular trispectrum through a factorized FFTLog pipeline. The authors then forecast cumulative signal-to-noise ratios for idealized Dirac-delta source planes and for realistic DES Y3 and LSST-like Y10 tomographic bin configurations, with and without shape noise. They also assess the Limber approximation for these higher-order statistics and argue that exact line-of-sight integration is necessary because the parity-odd signal is dominated by low-multipole configurations where Limber fails. The central claim is that the weak lensing trispectrum constitutes an independent, theoretically detectable probe of cosmological parity violation, serving as a proof of principle for future surveys.
Significance. If the numerical results are correct, this is a timely contribution. It extends the parity-odd trispectrum program from the CMB and 3D galaxy clustering to a projected, late-time weak lensing observable, and it provides explicit Wigner-symbol expressions that could be reused by the community. The systematic comparison between Limber and exact integration, and the identification of tomographic and geometric configuration effects, are valuable. The paper also benefits from using established external templates and from a Fisher-forecast appendix that makes the amplitude dependence explicit. However, the proof-of-principle character of the SNR forecasts is weakened by at least one load-bearing numerical issue, and by the strong simplifying assumptions used for the covariance and fiducial amplitudes.
major comments (3)
- [Appendix D.1, Eqs. (D.1)–(D.4)] The text states j_ℓ(x) = sqrt(π/2x) J_ν(x) and then says 'when performing the actual computation, we set ν=ℓ to maintain a fair and direct comparison with the standard Limber approximation.' For spherical Bessel functions the exact relation has ν = ℓ + 1/2. Since the kernels S_{ℓ,n}(x), W_ℓ(k), and hence all projected trispectra (Eqs. 3.18 and 3.26) and all cumulative SNR curves (Figs. 12–18) are constructed from these objects, and since the parity-odd signal is concentrated at low ℓ (Sec. 4.4), the advertised 'exact FFTLog integration' is not the exact spherical-Bessel projection. The Mathematica cross-check in Fig. 21 does not resolve this as reported: the lower panel shows the Limber relative error, not an FFTLog-vs-Mathematica residual. Please rerun the pipeline with ν = ℓ + 1/2, or explicitly demonstrate that the code uses the correct order despite the statement in D.1, and quantify
- [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.2)] The cumulative SNR estimator adopts a diagonal Gaussian covariance, with the paper noting that 'a more realistic covariance treatment will be left for future work.' Because the detectability claim rests on the SNR values in Figs. 12–18, this approximation is load-bearing. For a weak lensing trispectrum at low ℓ, the covariance can receive non-Gaussian contributions from the connected parity-even trispectrum, super-sample variance, and survey geometry effects; these are not obviously negligible relative to the diagonal Gaussian term. The authors should either justify this approximation quantitatively (e.g., with a simulation-based comparison or an order-of-magnitude estimate of the non-Gaussian term) or explicitly restate the detectability conclusion as conditional on this untested covariance model.
- [Sec. 3.3.1, Sec. 3.3.2, Figs. 12–18] The forecasts fix the template amplitudes to their maximum perturbatively allowed values: |g_-| = 2×10^7 and |d1^odd| = 9×10^5. The SNR is linear in these amplitudes, so the quoted values represent an upper envelope rather than a generic prediction. Although Appendix A gives Fisher forecasts for the amplitudes, the abstract and conclusion do not state this linear scaling or the conditional nature of the detectability statement. Please add an explicit caveat in the abstract and conclusion that the quoted SNR scales linearly with the fiducial amplitudes and that smaller amplitudes reduce detectability proportionally.
minor comments (6)
- [Fig. 1 caption] Typo: 'redshifit' should be 'redshift'.
- [Appendix C.1, Eq. (C.6)] The squeezed-limit Limber expression is labeled with superscript (c) and uses τ^(c); this should be (s) to match the section. Please check the notation throughout the appendices.
- [Fig. 21] The caption says Mathematica is included as an independent cross-check, but the lower panel only shows the Limber relative error. Please show the FFTLog-vs-Mathematica residual explicitly, since this is the only direct validation of the FFTLog implementation.
- [Sec. 2.2, footnote 1] Linear matter evolution is assumed throughout, but the SNR forecasts include multipoles up to ℓ_max = 100. Nonlinear corrections to C_ℓ can be non-negligible at these scales and would enter the covariance denominator. A brief justification or quantitative estimate would be helpful.
- [Figs. 12–13] The 'CMB potential lensing' case is used as a reference but the corresponding lensing kernel is not defined in the text. Please provide the kernel or the reference used.
- [General] For a numerical pipeline that underpins the central forecasts, releasing the code or providing a reproducible workflow would greatly increase confidence. At minimum, specify the truncation ranges used for the angular-momentum sums in Eqs. (3.15) and (3.24).
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the projection formalism is self-contained; adopted template amplitudes are fiducial inputs, and the SNR forecasts are explicitly linear in them.
full rationale
The derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The paper takes two external primordial templates—Eq. (3.12) from Ref. [85] and Eq. (3.21) from Ref. [14]—and projects them through the lensing kernel q(chi) into the reduced trispectrum via Eqs. (3.15)/(3.18) and (3.24)/(3.26). No parameter is fitted to any weak-lensing data set; the DES/LSST n(z) profiles are survey inputs. The parity-odd condition l1+l2+l3+l4 odd and the Wigner-symbol algebra are not equivalent to the claimed SNR. The SNR formula (4.2) is an explicit function of the template amplitudes, which the paper states are fiducial: 'Since the trispectrum is linear in g-, the fiducial choice serves only as the reference amplitude for the forecast.' Appendix A likewise shows sigma(A) = 1/sqrt(F_AA), so the detectability claim is conditional and not a disguised fit. There is a minor self-citation: 'Following Refs. [9, 64], we adopt the fiducial value |g-|=2e7,' and Refs. [9,64] include a coauthor, but this only sets the normalization of a forecast that is linear in the input; it is not load-bearing. The Appendix D.1 statement 'when performing the actual computation, we set nu=ell to maintain a fair and direct comparison with the standard Limber approximation' is a numerical-accuracy concern for the 'exact FFTLog' label, but a numerical bug or approximation is a correctness risk, not circularity: it does not make the output equal to an input. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and the templates are adopted from external prior work. Overall score 2 reflects the single minor self-citation, not circularity in the core projection.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (3)
- g_- (squeezed template amplitude) =
2 × 10^7
- d1^odd (collapsed template amplitude) =
9 × 10^5
- (alpha, beta, gamma) squeezed-template power indices =
(-2, -1, 0)
axioms (7)
- domain assumption Standard gravitational evolution is parity-conserving, so a detected parity-odd WL trispectrum would trace primordial parity violation.
- domain assumption Statistical isotropy and homogeneity of the convergence field allow extraction of the reduced trispectrum using Wigner 3j symbols.
- domain assumption Linear matter evolution for the density field and trispectrum.
- ad hoc to paper Diagonal Gaussian covariance for the trispectrum estimator.
- domain assumption The squeezed and collapsed templates from Refs. [85] and [14] faithfully represent possible primordial parity-violating trispectra.
- domain assumption Flat Lambda-CDM cosmology with Planck 2018 parameters.
- standard math Standard angular-momentum identities: plane-wave expansion, Gaunt integrals, and Wigner 3j/6j/9j recoupling.
read the original abstract
We establish the weak gravitational lensing convergence trispectrum as an independent probe of cosmological parity violation in the late-time Large-Scale Structure (LSS). To map three-dimensional primordial symmetries into two-dimensional observables, we derive a generalized, compact projection formalism for the reduced angular trispectrum applicable to two classes of factorizable primordial curvature trispectra considered in this work. Applying this framework, we compute the parity-odd signal and forecast the expected Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) using two phenomenological parity-violating trispectrum templates. These two templates encode the initial conditions for the late-time weak lensing observables. One template peaks at the squeezed limit, and the other template peaks at the collapsed limit. Our analysis evaluates idealized Dirac-delta source redshift distributions alongside actual tomographic profiles from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) and forecasted profiles for the Legacy Survey of Space and Time Year 10 (LSST Y10). We map the geometric sensitivity of these templates, providing physical intuition into how the resulting SNR is strongly modulated by the specific source galaxy redshift distributions and the underlying geometry of the configurations. Furthermore, we rigorously test the validity of the Limber approximation for higher-order angular statistics, demonstrating the necessity of exact line-of-sight numerical integration to capture the parity-violating signal accurately. By demonstrating the theoretical detectability of parity-breaking signatures through weak lensing, this work serves as a proof of principle, showing how upcoming weak lensing surveys can be leveraged to probe the fundamental symmetries of the early universe.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Lee and C.-N
T.D. Lee and C.-N. Yang,Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions,Phys. Rev. 104(1956) 254
1956
-
[2]
C.S. Wu, E. Ambler, R.W. Hayward, D.D. Hoppes and R.P. Hudson,Experimental Test of Parity Conservation inβDecay,Phys. Rev.105(1957) 1413
1957
-
[3]
Garwin, L.M
R.L. Garwin, L.M. Lederman and M. Weinrich,Observations of the Failure of Conservation of Parity and Charge Conjugation in Meson Decays: The Magnetic Moment of the Free Muon, Phys. Rev.105(1957) 1415. – 51 –
1957
-
[4]
Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background,Nature Rev
E. Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background,Nature Rev. Phys.4(2022) 452 [2202.13919]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
-
[5]
A. Lue, L.-M. Wang and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological signature of new parity violating interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 1506 [astro-ph/9812088]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
-
[6]
O.H.E. Philcox, M.J. König, S. Alexander and D.N. Spergel,What can galaxy shapes tell us about physics beyond the standard model?,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063541 [2309.08653]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[7]
J. Shim, U.-L. Pen, H.-R. Yu and T. Okumura,Probing Vector Chirality in the Early Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 141002 [2406.06080]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[8]
H.-M. Zhu and U.-L. Pen,Systematic Analysis of Parity-Violating Modes,Phys. Rev. Lett. 135(2025) 111003 [2409.11400]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[9]
J. Hou, Z. Slepian and D. Jamieson,Can Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Illuminate the Parity-Violating Galaxy 4PCF?,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 123502 [2410.05230]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[10]
M. Kamionkowski and T. Souradeep,The Odd-Parity CMB Bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 027301 [1010.4304]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[11]
M. Shiraishi, D. Nitta, S. Yokoyama, K. Ichiki and K. Takahashi,CMB Bispectrum from Primordial Scalar, Vector and Tensor non-Gaussianities,Prog. Theor. Phys.125(2011) 795 [1012.1079]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[12]
Y. Minami and E. Komatsu,New Extraction of the Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck 2018 Polarization Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 221301 [2011.11254]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[13]
N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso and M. Shiraishi,Parity-violating CMB correlators with non-decaying statistical anisotropy,JCAP07(2015) 039 [1505.02193]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[14]
Shiraishi,Parity violation in the CMB trispectrum from the scalar sector,Phys
M. Shiraishi,Parity violation in the CMB trispectrum from the scalar sector,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 083503 [1608.00368]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[15]
M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak,An all sky analysis of polarization in the microwave background,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 1830 [astro-ph/9609170]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
-
[16]
M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and A. Stebbins,Statistics of cosmic microwave background polarization,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 7368 [astro-ph/9611125]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
-
[17]
Diego-Palazuelos et al.,Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck Data Release 4,Phys
P. Diego-Palazuelos et al.,Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck Data Release 4,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 091302 [2201.07682]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
-
[18]
J.R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu,Improved constraints on cosmic birefringence from the WMAP and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization data,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063503 [2205.13962]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
-
[19]
P. Diego-Palazuelos and E. Komatsu,Cosmic birefringence from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L101302 [2509.13654]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[20]
Carroll, G.B
S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field and R. Jackiw,Limits on a Lorentz and Parity Violating Modification of Electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1231
1990
-
[21]
Carroll and G.B
S.M. Carroll and G.B. Field,The Einstein equivalence principle and the polarization of radio galaxies,Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 3789
1991
-
[22]
Harari and P
D. Harari and P. Sikivie,Effects of a Nambu-Goldstone boson on the polarization of radio galaxies and the cosmic microwave background,Phys. Lett. B289(1992) 67
1992
-
[23]
Carroll,Quintessence and the rest of the world,Phys
S.M. Carroll,Quintessence and the rest of the world,Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 3067 [astro-ph/9806099]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
-
[24]
S. Alexander and J. Martin,Birefringent gravitational waves and the consistency check of inflation,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063526 [hep-th/0410230]. – 52 –
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[25]
D.H. Lyth, C. Quimbay and Y. Rodriguez,Leptogenesis and tensor polarisation from a gravitational Chern-Simons term,JHEP03(2005) 016 [hep-th/0501153]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[26]
T. Takahashi and J. Soda,Chiral Primordial Gravitational Waves from a Lifshitz Point,Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 231301 [0904.0554]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
-
[27]
S. Alexander and N. Yunes,Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity,Phys. Rept.480 (2009) 1 [0907.2562]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
-
[28]
M. Satoh,Slow-roll Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons Corrections,JCAP 11(2010) 024 [1008.2724]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[29]
J. Soda, H. Kodama and M. Nozawa,Parity Violation in Graviton Non-gaussianity,JHEP08 (2011) 067 [1106.3228]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[30]
M. Shiraishi, D. Nitta and S. Yokoyama,Parity Violation of Gravitons in the CMB Bispectrum,Prog. Theor. Phys.126(2011) 937 [1108.0175]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[31]
S. Dyda, E.E. Flanagan and M. Kamionkowski,Vacuum Instability in Chern-Simons Gravity, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 124031 [1208.4871]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[32]
A. Wang, Q. Wu, W. Zhao and T. Zhu,Polarizing primordial gravitational waves by parity violation,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 103512 [1208.5490]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[33]
T. Zhu, W. Zhao, Y. Huang, A. Wang and Q. Wu,Effects of parity violation on non-gaussianity of primordial gravitational waves in Hořava-Lifshitz gravity,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 063508 [1305.0600]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[34]
N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations,Phys. Rept.402(2004) 103 [astro-ph/0406398]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
-
[35]
R.N. Cahn, Z. Slepian and J. Hou,Test for Cosmological Parity Violation Using the 3D Distribution of Galaxies,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 201002 [2110.12004]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[36]
D. Jeong and M. Kamionkowski,Clustering Fossils from the Early Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(2012) 251301 [1203.0302]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[37]
L. Sorbo,Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton, JCAP06(2011) 003 [1101.1525]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[38]
X. Niu, M.H. Rahat, K. Srinivasan and W. Xue,Parity-odd and even trispectrum from axion inflation,JCAP05(2023) 018 [2211.14324]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[39]
T. Fujita, T. Murata, I. Obata and M. Shiraishi,Parity-violating scalar trispectrum from a rolling axion during inflation,JCAP05(2024) 127 [2310.03551]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[40]
M. Reinhard, Z. Slepian, J. Hou and A. Greco,Full Parity-Violating Trispectrum in Axion Inflation: Reduction to Low-D Integrals,2412.16037
-
[41]
M.H.G. Lee, C. McCulloch and E. Pajer,Leading loops in cosmological correlators,JHEP11 (2023) 038 [2305.11228]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[42]
D. Stefanyszyn, X. Tong and Y. Zhu,Cosmological correlators through the looking glass: reality, parity, and factorisation,JHEP05(2024) 196 [2309.07769]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[43]
G. Cabass, M.M. Ivanov and O.H.E. Philcox,Colliders and ghosts: Constraining inflation with the parity-odd galaxy four-point function,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 023523 [2210.16320]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[44]
Thavanesan,No-go Theorem for Cosmological Parity Violation,2501.06383
A. Thavanesan,No-go Theorem for Cosmological Parity Violation,2501.06383
-
[45]
G. Cabass, S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer and D. Stefanyszyn,Parity violation in the scalar trispectrum: no-go theorems and yes-go examples,JHEP02(2023) 021 [2210.02907]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[46]
S. Jazayeri, S. Renaux-Petel, X. Tong, D. Werth and Y. Zhu,Parity violation from emergent nonlocality during inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 123523 [2308.11315]. – 53 –
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[47]
Philcox,Probing parity violation with the four-point correlation function of BOSS galaxies,Phys
O.H.E. Philcox,Probing parity violation with the four-point correlation function of BOSS galaxies,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063501 [2206.04227]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
-
[48]
J. Hou, Z. Slepian and R.N. Cahn,Measurement of parity-odd modes in the large-scale 4-point correlation function of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey twelfth data release CMASS and LOWZ galaxies,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.522(2023) 5701 [2206.03625]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[49]
A. Krolewski, S. May, K. Smith and H. Hopkins,No evidence for parity violation in BOSS, JCAP08(2024) 044 [2407.03397]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[50]
O.H.E. Philcox and J. Ereza,Could Sample Variance be Responsible for the Parity-Violating Signal Seen in the BOSS Galaxy Survey?,2401.09523
-
[51]
Z. Slepian et al.,Measurement of Parity-Violating Modes of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Year 1 Luminous Red Galaxies’ 4-Point Correlation Function, 2508.09133
- [52]
-
[53]
J. Hou et al.,Parity-odd four-point correlation function from the DESI data release 1 luminous red galaxy sample,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 103502 [2512.20132]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[54]
T. Kurita, D. Jamieson, E. Komatsu and F. Schmidt,Parity violation in galaxy shapes: Primordial non-Gaussianity,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063557 [2509.08787]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[55]
H. Aihara, N. Arimoto, R. Armstrong, S. Arnouts, N.A. Bahcall, S. Bickerton et al.,The hyper suprime-cam ssp survey: Overview and survey design,Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan70(2017) . [56]DEScollaboration,Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 022001 [1507.05552]. [57]DEScolla...
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[60]
Kuijken et al.,Gravitational Lensing Analysis of the Kilo Degree Survey,Mon
K. Kuijken et al.,Gravitational Lensing Analysis of the Kilo Degree Survey,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.454(2015) 3500 [1507.00738]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[61]
A.H. Wright et al.,The fifth data release of the Kilo Degree Survey: Multi-epoch optical/NIR imaging covering wide and legacy-calibration fields,Astron. Astrophys.686(2024) A170 [2503.19439]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[62]
Hu,Angular trispectrum of the CMB,Phys
W. Hu,Angular trispectrum of the CMB,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 083005 [astro-ph/0105117]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[63]
T. Okamoto and W. Hu,The angular trispectra of CMB temperature and polarization,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 063008 [astro-ph/0206155]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[64]
A. Greco, Z. Slepian, J. Hou and A. Krolewski,CMB Lensing Trispectrum as a Probe of Parity Violation in LSS,2505.15789
-
[65]
M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider,Weak gravitational lensing,Phys. Rept.340(2001) 291 [astro-ph/9912508]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[66]
Mandelbaum,Weak lensing for precision cosmology,Ann
R. Mandelbaum,Weak lensing for precision cosmology,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.56 (2018) 393 [1710.03235]. – 54 – [67]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[68]
R. Narayan and M. Bartelmann,Lectures on gravitational lensing, in13th Jerusalem Winter School in Theoretical Physics: Formation of Structure in the Universe, 6, 1996 [astro-ph/9606001]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
-
[69]
P. Schneider,Weak gravitational lensing, in33rd Advanced Saas Fee Course on Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak, and Micro, pp. 269–451, 2006, DOI [astro-ph/0509252]. [70]DEScollaboration,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: redshift calibration of the weak lensing source galaxies,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505(2021) 4249 [2012.08566]. [71]LSST Dark Energy ...
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[72]
Z.-M. Ma, W. Hu and D. Huterer,Effect of photometric redshift uncertainties on weak lensing tomography,Astrophys. J.636(2005) 21 [astro-ph/0506614]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[73]
T. Sinde and J. Fonseca,From photometric surveys to HI intensity mapping: Improving constraints on magnification biases while testing gravity,2603.28840
- [74]
-
[75]
D.J. Eisenstein and W. Hu,Baryonic features in the matter transfer function,Astrophys. J. 496(1998) 605 [astro-ph/9709112]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
-
[76]
D.J. Eisenstein and W. Hu,Power spectra for cold dark matter and its variants,Astrophys. J. 511(1997) 5 [astro-ph/9710252]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
-
[77]
H.A. Borges, S. Carneiro, J.C. Fabris and C. Pigozzo,Evolution of density perturbations in decaying vacuum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 043513 [0711.2689]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
-
[78]
Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,A Simple Analytic Treatment of Linear Growth of Structure with Baryon Acoustic Oscillations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.457(2016) 24 [1509.08199]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[79]
S. Dodelson and F. Schmidt,Modern Cosmology, Academic Press (2020), 10.1016/C2017-0-01943-2. [80]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
-
[81]
B. Diemer,COLOSSUS: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos,Astrophys. J. Suppl.239(2018) 35 [1712.04512]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[82]
T. Liu, X. Tong, Y. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Probing P and CP Violations on the Cosmological Collider,JHEP04(2020) 189 [1909.01819]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
-
[83]
N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena,Cosmological Collider Physics,1503.08043
-
[84]
T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi and D. Yokoyama,Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields,JHEP06(2013) 051 [1211.1624]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[85]
W.R. Coulton, O.H.E. Philcox and F. Villaescusa-Navarro,Signatures of a parity-violating universe,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023531 [2306.11782]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[86]
D. Jamieson, A. Caravano, J. Hou, Z. Slepian and E. Komatsu,Parity-odd power spectra: concise statistics for cosmological parity violation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.533(2024) 2582 [2406.15683]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[87]
Mandelstam,Determination of the pion - nucleon scattering amplitude from dispersion relations and unitarity
S. Mandelstam,Determination of the pion - nucleon scattering amplitude from dispersion relations and unitarity. General theory,Phys. Rev.112(1958) 1344
1958
-
[88]
Limber,The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field
D.N. Limber,The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II,Astrophys. J.119(1954) 655. – 55 –
1954
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.