Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Challenges in Information-Seeking QA: Unanswerable Questions and Paragraph Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.11915 v2 pith:ERYP6534 submitted 2020-10-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords challenginginformation-seekinganswerabilityansweringevidenceparagraphqueriesquestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent pretrained language models "solved" many reading comprehension benchmarks, where questions are written with access to the evidence document. However, datasets containing information-seeking queries where evidence documents are provided after the queries are written independently remain challenging. We analyze why answering information-seeking queries is more challenging and where their prevalent unanswerabilities arise, on Natural Questions and TyDi QA. Our controlled experiments suggest two headrooms -- paragraph selection and answerability prediction, i.e. whether the paired evidence document contains the answer to the query or not. When provided with a gold paragraph and knowing when to abstain from answering, existing models easily outperform a human annotator. However, predicting answerability itself remains challenging. We manually annotate 800 unanswerable examples across six languages on what makes them challenging to answer. With this new data, we conduct per-category answerability prediction, revealing issues in the current dataset collection as well as task formulation. Together, our study points to avenues for future research in information-seeking question answering, both for dataset creation and model development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. mFollowIR: a Multilingual Benchmark for Instruction Following in Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces mFollowIR, a multilingual instruction-following retrieval benchmark across Russian, Chinese, and Persian, and finds that English instruction-trained models transfer cross-lingually but struggle in...

Pith tools