Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Topological Charge-Transfer Excitons

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that charge-transfer excitons in a honeycomb moiré potential form a Kagome manifold of bond-centered orbitals whose lowest bands carry Chern numbers 1, 0, -1 under time-reversal breaking, even when the constituent electron…

desk verdict A genuinely new route to exciton topology from real-space charge-transfer embedding, but the numerical demonstration does not yet verify the strong-modulation mechanism at the parameters used. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05308 v1 pith:ESA7I4NF submitted 2026-08-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

Huiyuan Zheng , Kaijie Yang , Ting Cao , Di Xiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall MSC 81V7082D20 PACS 71.35.Cc73.22.-f
keywords charge-transferexcitontopologicalbandKagomelatticeBethe-SalpeterequationmoirésuperlatticeChernnumberquantumgeometryofexcitonsflat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that a composite bound state can carry band topology that comes from where the bound state sits in the crystal, not from the topology of its constituents. For charge-transfer excitons, whose electron and hole occupy distinct lattice sites, the exciton is centered on the bond connecting the two sites rather than on either site. In a honeycomb unit cell the three inequivalent bond-centered orbitals are related by threefold rotation, and electron-hole hopping organizes them into an effective Kagome lattice. Solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation (the standard two-body bound-state equation) for a massive-Dirac continuum model with a moiré potential, the paper finds that time-reversal breaking opens a topological gap and produces Chern numbers 1, 0, -1 for the three lowest exciton bands, with a flat band carrying nearly uniform quantum geometry, all while the electron and hole bands remain topologically trivial. If correct, this establishes a general mechanism for engineering topological bands of localized composite bosonic excitations and points to moiré semiconductors as a concrete platform.

What carries the argument

The central object is the bond-centered charge-transfer exciton orbital, a composite orbital whose center is the electron-hole displacement $\boldsymbol\delta_j$ rather than either constituent site. Three such orbitals per honeycomb unit cell, related by $C_{3z}$ and coupled by nearest-neighbor electron and hole hoppings $t_c$ and $t_v$, form an effective Kagome lattice; the combined particle-hole-inversion symmetry fixes this bond-centered embedding and protects the band touching. Time-reversal breaking makes the effective hoppings complex, generating exciton Berry curvature and a topological gap. The Bethe-Salpeter equation with a double-gated Coulomb interaction turns this picture into the concrete exciton dispersion, Chern numbers, and quantum geometry.

What would settle it

Calculate the exciton spectrum from the Bethe-Salpeter equation at finite potential depth with next-nearest-neighbor hoppings and exchange included: if the three lowest bands no longer form a separated Kagome manifold with Chern numbers 1, 0, -1, or the flat band's Berry curvature and quantum metric lose their near uniformity, the central claim fails; experimentally, a time-reversal-broken TMD moiré heterobilayer should show the predicted topological flat band in its exciton dispersion and Hall response.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the real-space embedding of a charge-transfer exciton generates an intrinsic multi-orbital manifold whose coupling is topological, independent of the constituent-band topology. In the strong-modulation limit the localized exciton is a product of a conduction Wannier orbital and a valence Wannier orbital, $X_{j,r_i}(\mathbf r_e,\mathbf r_h)=w_c(\mathbf r_e-\mathbf r_i-\boldsymbol\delta_j)w_v^*(\mathbf r_h-\mathbf r_i)$, where $\boldsymbol\delta_j$ are the three inequivalent electron-hole displacements. These three bond-centered orbitals, permuted by $C_{3z}$ and connected by nearest-neighbor electron and hole hoppings $t_c$ and $t_v$, form an effective Kagome lattice with two Dirac cones and a flat band. With equal real hoppings the spectrum is protected by a combined particle-hole-inversion (PI) symmetry; making the hoppings complex by breaking time reversal opens topologically nontrivial gaps, while breaking PI alone opens trivial ones. The Bethe-Salpeter calculation on the continuum model confirms the Kagome manifold, with Chern numbers 1, 0, -1 for the three lowest exciton bands and a flat band whose Berry curvature and quantum metric trace are nearly uniform.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the strong-modulation limit in which the moiré potential is treated as infinitely deep, so the localized charge-transfer exciton is a simple product of a conduction Wannier orbital and a valence Wannier orbital (Eq. S37), and only nearest-neighbor electron and hole hoppings are kept; if realistic moiré potentials do not localize the electron and hole enough, or if exchange and longer-range hoppings mix the three bond orbitals substantially, the Kagome manifold and its Chern numbers are not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism is correct, moiré transition-metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers with valley polarization become concrete candidates for topological exciton flat bands with no single-particle topology.
  • The nearly uniform quantum geometry on the flat band makes it a favorable setting for interaction-driven bosonic states, such as exciton fractional Chern insulators.
  • The construction is not tied to Kagome geometry: a square-lattice analog gives a depleted-Lieb exciton lattice, so a systematic topological classification of composite-particle orbital manifolds becomes possible.
  • The topological phase diagram shows the Chern flat band survives substantial particle-hole and inversion symmetry breaking (mass asymmetry beyond ten percent, potential differences beyond ten meV), so the band is robust to realistic perturbations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the emergent manifold is made of composite bosons rather than single electrons, interactions should act at markedly lower energy scales than in electronic flat bands; a natural next step is a fractional quantum Hall or exciton-condensate calculation on the flat band, which the paper does not perform.
  • The mechanism suggests a symmetry classification program: for any space group, find composite bound states whose constituents occupy distinct Wyckoff positions and enumerate the resulting orbital lattices; the paper sketches this but does not develop it.
  • The derivation drops exchange at the strong-modulation level; including exchange could shift the flat band's dispersion and quantum geometry at larger center-of-mass momenta, and its effect on the Chern number deserves a separate check.
  • If realized experimentally, the topological flat band should be observable as a quantized exciton Hall response or via circular dichroism in a time-reversal-broken moiré heterobilayer, distinguishing this mechanism from constituent-band-derived exciton topology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that charge-transfer excitons in a honeycomb moiré potential form an emergent Kagome lattice of bond-centered composite orbitals. The authors derive an effective tight-binding model for three CT orbitals, show that complex hoppings open a topological gap with Chern numbers 1, 0, and -1 while particle-hole-inversion breaking opens trivial gaps, and support this picture with Bethe-Salpeter calculations on a continuum massive-Dirac-plus-moiré-potential model. The paper also studies robustness against mass and potential asymmetries and argues that the flat band has nearly uniform quantum geometry favorable for interaction-driven bosonic states.

Significance. If the real-space embedding picture is correct, this is a conceptually new mechanism for exciton topology: topology emerges from the internal electron-hole separation rather than from the constituent band topology. The analytic mapping from CT Wannier orbitals to a Kagome model is clear, and the BSE calculation, including the Wilson-loop evaluation of exciton Berry curvature, is a nontrivial numerical test. The central claim is attractive and would be of broad interest to the moiré exciton and flat-band communities, but its validity depends on whether the strong-modulation hierarchy is actually realized in the numerical regime studied.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM §III.A and main-text Fig. 2(b)] The identification of the three lowest BSE bands with the bond-centered Kagome manifold rests on the strong-modulation Wannier-product form of Eq. (S37), but the regime of the BSE calculation is not shown to satisfy the required hierarchy. With a = 5 nm, v_F = 3.3 × 10^5 m/s, and Δ = 40 meV, the kinetic scale ℏv_F/a ≈ 43 meV is comparable to Δ, and the direct Coulomb scale e²/(4πεε0 a) ≈ 14 meV is not negligible. The paper never checks whether the three lowest BSE eigenstates are actually localized at the δ_j displacements, nor how the spectrum and Chern numbers evolve as Δ is varied. I request a concrete diagnostic: compute the overlap or real-space participation of the three lowest BSE eigenstates with the localized CT orbitals of Eq. (S37), and repeat the Chern-number calculation for Δ ranging at least from 20 to 100 meV. Without this, the apparent Kagome bands could also arise from the two-band BSE kinematics, and the central mechanism—not just the numerical implementation—is not verified.
  2. [Eq. (1) and SM §III.B] The effective Hamiltonian (1) is derived by retaining only nearest-neighbor hoppings t_c and t_v and by neglecting the exchange interaction in the strong-modulation limit, yet the BSE used to validate the model includes the exchange kernel. The manuscript should demonstrate that exchange mixing among the three δ_j CT orbitals is small compared with the inter-orbital gaps at the BSE parameters; otherwise the three-orbital manifold and the two-parameter tight-binding description are not quantitatively controlled. A direct computation of the exchange matrix elements between the three localized CT states, or a comparison of the BSE wave functions with the tight-binding eigenstates, would settle this point.
  3. [Fig. 3] The topological phase diagrams in Figs. 3(a)–3(c) are presented in terms of the flux η and asymmetry parameters δ and m_e*/m_h*, but the text does not provide a quantitative mapping between these parameters and the microscopic Hamiltonian (2) in the BSE calculation. As a result, the claimed robustness ranges (for example, mass asymmetry ≳10% and potential difference ≳10 meV) are not directly testable against the continuum model. Please specify how η and δ are computed from the band structure of H0, or state explicitly that these are independent effective-model parameters, and ideally confirm at least one point in each phase diagram by a direct BSE calculation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Main text, parameterization of mass asymmetry] In the definition m_e*/m_h* = 1/(1 + λ m*/m_e), the symbol m_e appears both as the free electron mass and inside m* ≈ Δ_g/(2 v_F^2); please clarify the notation and state the value of m* used in Fig. 3.
  2. [SM §II] The statement that 'the results from using the Keldysh form do not alter our conclusion' is reassuring but no supporting data are shown; a brief sentence quantifying the change or a small figure would be helpful.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption says the colors encode exciton Berry curvature, but no color scale or units are given; please add a colorbar or state the normalization used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Kagome tight-binding model is derived from a stated strong-modulation limit and independently reproduced by an unfitted BSE solution.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation is not circular. The three-orbital Kagome manifold is obtained in the Supplemental Material from a stated strong-modulation limit (SM Eq. S37), where the CT exciton is written as a product of conduction and valence Wannier orbitals at relative coordinates δ_j; nearest-neighbor electron and hole hopping then produce the effective Hamiltonian of Eq. (1). This is a genuine derivation from the model's geometry and localization assumptions, not a retrofitting. The central numerical result is then obtained by solving the BSE directly for the continuum Hamiltonian H0 = H_Dirac + V(r) with independently specified parameters (Δ = 40 meV, a = 5 nm, v_F = 3.3×10^5 m/s, Δ_g = 1 eV, ε = 20), and the Chern numbers 1, 0, −1 are computed from the resulting exciton wave functions. No tight-binding parameter or Berry-curvature value is fitted to force the reported topology. The self-citations that appear (e.g., Refs. [9], [11], [32]) are contextual literature or standard results on exchange-induced dispersion and do not carry the load-bearing argument. The skeptic's concern that the strong-modulation hierarchy may not hold at the BSE parameters is a validity/robustness question, not a circularity: even if the numerical regime does not fully justify Eq. (S37), the BSE result remains an independent computation rather than a restatement of its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on five stated modeling assumptions, summarized in the axioms. No parameters were fitted to reproduce the target Chern numbers; the model inputs are physical constants and scales. The main idealization is the strong-modulation limit, which makes the bond-centered manifold exact.

free parameters (7)
  • Trap potential strength Delta = 40 meV
    Model input chosen as a typical moiré potential scale; not fitted to experimental data.
  • Intrinsic gap Delta_g = 1 eV
    Model input representing a large band gap for the massive Dirac cone; not fitted.
  • Fermi velocity v_F = 3.3e5 m/s
    Model input representative of TMD band velocity; not fitted.
  • Dielectric constant epsilon = 20
    Screening parameter in the double-gated Coulomb potential; chosen, not fitted.
  • Gate distance d_g = 30 nm
    Parameter of the gate screening; chosen, not fitted.
  • Mass asymmetry parameter lambda
    Tunable parameter used to map phase diagrams for PI breaking; not fitted.
  • Potential phase phi = pi/2
    Set to the PI-symmetric value; deviations parameterize PI breaking.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Infinitely deep trapping potential in the strong-modulation limit
    Used to justify the product Wannier form of the CT exciton wavefunction (SM Eq. S37); weaker potentials would mix the three bond orbitals.
  • domain assumption Exchange interaction neglected in the strong-modulation tight-binding derivation
    Main text says 'we neglect the exchange interaction for simplicity'; the BSE later includes it, but the analytic Kagome mapping ignores it.
  • domain assumption Only nearest-neighbor electron and hole hoppings retained in the effective Hamiltonian (Eq. 1)
    Higher-order hoppings could modify the Kagome connectivity and flat band.
  • domain assumption Single-valley massive Dirac model with PI symmetry, V(-r) = -V(r)
    The continuum model Eq. (2) is a model choice realizing the CT configuration; not derived from a specific material.
  • domain assumption BSE truncation to the lowest conduction and highest valence moiré band
    Justified by isolation of the bands, but remote bands could in principle contribute to the exciton physics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Charge-Transfer Excitons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ESA7I4NF

@misc{pith2026260805308,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Charge-Transfer Excitons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ESA7I4NF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05308}
}
read the original abstract

Excitons possess internal structure absent from single-particle Bloch particles, allowing their band topology to emerge from the bound-state structure rather than being inherited from their constituents. This raises the question of how the internal structure of a bound state can provide a microscopic origin of exciton topology. Here we show that the real-space embedding of charge-transfer excitons can generate an intrinsic manifold of symmetry-related off-site composite orbitals whose coupling supports topological exciton bands. Lateral electron-hole separation embeds the localized exciton on the bond connecting its constituent sites rather than on either site. We demonstrate this mechanism in a honeycomb lattice, where three bond-centered charge-transfer exciton orbitals form a Kagome lattice. By solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation, we show that this emergent multi-orbital manifold supports a topological exciton flat band upon time-reversal symmetry breaking, even when the electron and hole bands are topologically trivial. The resulting band exhibits nearly uniformly distributed quantum geometry, favorable for interaction-driven bosonic states. Our results establish a general route toward topological bands of localized composite bound states and unconventional strongly correlated bosonic phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05308 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic electron-hole distribution, with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Single-particle dispersion from Hamiltonian ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Topological phase diagram of the lowest exciton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic depleted-Lieb lattice of CT excitons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exciton Alchemy: Chern Excitons from Trivial Bands

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A microscopic 2D model with trivial conduction and valence bands is shown to host a Chern exciton band with C=+1, generated purely by interactions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Fu, Topological Crystalline Insulators, Phys

    L. Fu, Topological Crystalline Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 106802 (2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    C. Fang, M. J. Gilbert, and B. A. Bernevig, Bulk topolog- ical invariants in noninteracting point group symmetric insulators, Phys. Rev. B86, 115112 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Haug and S

    H. Haug and S. W. Koch,Quantum Theory of the Opti- cal and Electronic Properties of Semiconductors, 5th ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Series in Monolayer WS2, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 076802 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Lozano, H.-Y

    M. Lozano, H.-Y. Xie, and B. Uchoa, Optical selection rules of topological excitons in flat bands, Phys. Rev. B 112, 235417 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Froese, T

    P. Froese, T. Neupert, and G. Wagner, Topological ex- citons in moir´ e MoTe2/WSe2 heterobilayers, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023047 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Y. H. Kwan, Y. Hu, S. H. Simon, and S. A. Parameswaran, Exciton Band Topology in Spontaneous Quantum Anomalous Hall Insulators: Applications to Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 137601 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    K. Yang, H. Zheng, X. Xu, D. Xiao, and T. Cao, Giant and Helical Exciton Dipole from Berry Curvature in Flat Chern Bands, arXiv:2604.12295

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological Ex- citon Bands in Moir´ e Heterojunctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 147401 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Zheng, C

    H. Zheng, C. Li, H. Yu, and W. Yao, F¨ orster valley-orbit coupling and topological lattice of hybrid moir´ e excitons, Commun. Phys.8, 193 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    M. Xie, M. Hafezi, and S. Das Sarma, Long-Lived Topo- logical Flatband Excitons in Semiconductor Moir´ e Het- erostructures: A Bosonic Kane-Mele Model Platform, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136403 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Zhang, W

    N. Zhang, W. Yao, and H. Yu, Engineering topologi- cal exciton structures in two-dimensional semiconductors by a periodic electrostatic potential, Phys. Rev. B112, 165406 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Davenport, J

    H. Davenport, J. Knolle, and F. Schindler, Interaction- Induced Crystalline Topology of Excitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 176601 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    W. J. Jankowski, J. J. P. Thompson, B. Monserrat, and 6 R.-J. Slager, Excitonic topology and quantum geome- try in organic semiconductors, Nat. Commun.16, 4661 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Rosati, I

    R. Rosati, I. Paradisanos, L. Huang, Z. Gan, A. George, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Lombez, P. Renucci, A. Turchanin, B. Urbaszek, and E. Malic, Interface en- gineering of charge-transfer excitons in 2D lateral het- erostructures, Nat. Commun.14, 2438 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Shradha, R

    S. Shradha, R. Rosati, H. Lamsaadi, J. Picker, I. Paradis- anos, M. T. Hossain, L. Krelle, L. F. Oswald, N. Engel, D. I. Markina, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. K. Sa- hoo, L. Lombez, X. Marie, P. Renucci, V. Paillard, J.-M. Poumirol, A. Turchanin, E. Malic, and B. Urbaszek, 2D...

    2026

  10. [18]

    S.-I. Choi, J. Jortner, S. A. Rice, and R. Silbey, Charge- Transfer Exciton States in Aromatic Molecular Crystals, J. Chem. Phys.41, 3294 (1964)

    1964

  11. [19]

    D. d. S. Pereira, C. Menelaou, A. Danos, C. Marian, and A. P. Monkman, Electroabsorption Spectroscopy as a Tool for Probing Charge Transfer and State Mixing in Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Emitters, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 3205 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    M. H. Naik, E. C. Regan, Z. Zhang, Y.-H. Chan, Z. Li, D. Wang, Y. Yoon, C. S. Ong, W. Zhao, S. Zhao, M. I. B. Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, M. Sayyad, K. Yu- migeta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, F. H. da Jornada, F. Wang, and S. G. Louie, Intralayer charge- transfer moir´ e ...

    2022

  13. [21]

    R. Wang, K. Chang, W. Duan, Y. Xu, and P. Tang, Twist-Angle-Dependent Valley Polarization of Intralayer Moir´ e Excitons in van der Waals Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 026904 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    H. Li, Z. Xiang, M. H. Naik, W. Kim, Z. Li, R. Sailus, R. Banerjee, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, F. H. da Jornada, S. G. Louie, M. F. Crom- mie, and F. Wang, Imaging moir´ e excited states with photocurrent tunnelling microscopy, Nat. Mater.23, 633 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    X. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhu, H. Park, Y. Wang, C. Wang, W. G. Holtzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, D. R. Gamelin, W. Yao, D. Xiao, T. Cao, and X. Xu, In- tercell moir´ e exciton complexes in electron lattices, Nat. Mater.22, 599 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Zeng and A

    Y. Zeng and A. H. MacDonald, Strong modulation limit of excitons and trions in moir´ e materials, Phys. Rev. B 106, 035115 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    See the Supplemental Material for (1) Material realiza- tion of the single-particle model; (2) BSE formalism in the moir´ e band basis; (3) Strong-modulation limit and CT tight binding model; (4) Particle-hole and combined particle-hole-inversion symmetry; (5) Exciton Berry co...

  18. [26]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS2 and Other Group-VI Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Maity, J

    I. Maity, J. Lischner, A. A. Mostofi, and ´A. Rubio, Ori- gin of Trapped Intralayer Wannier and Charge-Transfer Excitons in Moir´ e Materials, Nano Lett.26, 1349 (2026)

    2026

  20. [28]

    P. Zhao, C. Xiao, and W. Yao, Universal superlattice potential for 2D materials from twisted interface inside h-BN substrate, npj 2D Mater. Appl.5, 38 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    D. S. Kim, C. Xiao, R. C. Dominguez, Z. Liu, H. Abu- dayyeh, K. Lee, R. Mayorga-Luna, H. Kim, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, C.-K. Shih, Y. Miyahara, W. Yao, and X. Li, Moir´ e ferroelectricity modulates light emission from a semiconductor monolayer, Sci. Adv.11, eadt7789 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Yu, G.-B

    H. Yu, G.-B. Liu, P. Gong, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Dirac cones and Dirac saddle points of bright excitons in mono- layer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Commun.5, 3876 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Yu and M

    T. Yu and M. W. Wu, Valley depolarization due to inter- valley and intravalley electron-hole exchange interactions in monolayer MoS2, Phys. Rev. B89, 205303 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    D. Y. Qiu, T. Cao, and S. G. Louie, Nonanalyticity, Val- ley Quantum Phases, and Lightlike Exciton Dispersion in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Theory and First-Principles Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 176801 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Yao and Q

    W. Yao and Q. Niu, Berry Phase Effect on the Exciton Transport and on the Exciton Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 106401 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    Chen and R

    K. Chen and R. Shindou, Chiral topological excitons in a Chern band insulator, Phys. Rev. B96, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Blason and M

    A. Blason and M. Fabrizio, Exciton topology and con- densation in a model quantum spin Hall insulator, Phys. Rev. B102, 035146 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    H.-Y. Xie, P. Ghaemi, M. Mitrano, and B. Uchoa, The- ory of topological exciton insulators and condensates in flat Chern bands, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2401644121 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Davenport, J

    H. Davenport, J. Knolle, and F. Schindler, Exciton Berryology, Phys. Rev. B113, 045125 (2026)

    2026

  30. [38]

    Salerno, G

    G. Salerno, G. Palumbo, N. Goldman, and M. Di Liberto, Interaction-induced lattices for bound states: Designing flat bands, quantized pumps, and higher-order topolog- ical insulators for doublons, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013348 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016). 1 Supplementary Materials for ”Topological Charge-Transfer Excitons” CONTENTS References 5 I. Material Realization of the Sin...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.