Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Analysis of a two-layer energy balance model: long time behaviour and greenhouse effect

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.15430 v2 pith:ESVNX7Q4 submitted 2022-11-28 math.AP

Analysis of a two-layer energy balance model: long time behaviour and greenhouse effect

classification math.AP
keywords epsilonatmosphereeffectenergygreenhouseprovesurfacetemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a two-layer energy balance model, that allows for vertical exchanges between a surface layer and the atmosphere. The evolution equations of the surface temperature and the atmospheric temperature are coupled by the emission of infrared radiation by one level, that emission being captured by the other layer, and the effect of all non radiative vertical exchanges of energy. Therefore, an essential parameter is the absorptivity of the atmosphere, denoted $\epsilon_a$. The value of $\epsilon_a$ depends critically on greenhouse gases: increasing concentrations of $CO_2$ and $CH_4$ lead to a more opaque atmosphere with higher values of $\epsilon_a$. First we prove that global existence of solutions of the system holds if and only if $\epsilon_a \in (0, 2)$, and blow up in finite time occurs if $\epsilon_a > 2$. (Note that the physical range of values for $\epsilon_a$ is $(0, 1]$.) Next, we explain the long time dynamics for $\epsilon_a \in (0, 2)$, and we prove that all solutions converge to some equilibrium point. Finally, motivated by the physical context, we study the dependence of the equilibrium points with respect to the involved parameters, and we prove in particular that the surface temperature increases with respect to $\epsilon_a$. This is the key mathematical manifestation of the greenhouse effect.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.