Pith. sign in

REVIEW

HI, CO, and Dust in the Perseus Cloud

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1612.07696 v3 pith:EURV4EZQ submitted 2016-12-22 astro-ph.GA

HI, CO, and Dust in the Perseus Cloud

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dustdataamountcloudfoundhydrogenlinetauhi
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Comparison analyses between the gas emission data (HI 21cm line and CO 2.6 mm line) and the Planck/IRAS dust emission data (optical depth at 353 GHz tau353 and dust temperature Td) allow us to estimate the amount and distribution of the hydrogen gas more accurately, and our previous studies revealed the existence of a large amount of optically-thick HI gas in the solar neighborhood. Referring to this, we discuss the neutral hydrogen gas around the Perseus cloud in the present paper. By using the J-band extinction data, we found that tau353 increases as a function of the 1.3-th power of column number density of the total hydrogen (NH), and this implies dust evolution in high density regions. This calibrated tau353-NH relationship shows that the amount of the HI gas can be underestimated to be ~60% if the optically-thin HI method is used. Based on this relationship, we calculated optical depth of the 21 cm line (tauHI), and found that <tauHI> ~ 0.92 around the molecular cloud. The effect of tauHI is still significant even if we take into account the dust evolution. We also estimated a spatial distribution of the CO-to-H2 conversion factor (XCO), and we found its average value is <XCO> ~ 1.0x10^20 cm-2 K-1 km-1 s. Although these results are inconsistent with some previous studies, these discrepancies can be well explained by the difference of the data and analyses methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.