REVIEW 2 cited by
Iterative extraction of overtones from black hole ringdown
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Extraction of multiple quasinormal modes from ringdown gravitational waves emitted from a binary black hole coalescence is a touchstone to test whether a remnant black hole is described by the Kerr spacetime in general relativity. However, it is not straightforward to check the consistency between the ringdown signal and the quasinormal mode frequencies predicted by the linear perturbation theory. While the longest-lived mode can be extracted in a stable manner, the higher overtones damp more quickly and hence the fitting of overtones tends to end up with the overfit. To improve the extraction of overtones, we propose an iterative procedure consisting of fitting and subtraction of the longest-lived mode of the ringdown waveform in the time domain. Through the analyses of the mock waveform and numerical relativity waveform, we clarify that the iterative procedure allows us to extract the overtones in a more stable manner.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Resonance of black hole quasinormal modes in coupled systems
A new basis-invariant excitation factor for coupled black hole perturbation systems shows resonant amplification at avoided crossings between fundamental modes of different fields in the Einstein-Maxwell-axion theory.
-
Finite signal-to-noise ratio bias in parameter estimation for damped oscillations: cautionary remark about catalog-level black-hole spectroscopy
Damping-time estimates for ringdown signals carry unsuppressed O(ρ^{-2}) positive biases from priors and likelihood geometry, risking false Kerr violations after ~100 events at ρ≈10.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.