Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CRUSH4SQL: Collective Retrieval Using Schema Hallucination For Text2SQL

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.01173 v1 pith:EUZX52UU submitted 2023-11-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords schemaelementslargeretrievalactualbenchmarksdatabasesdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Existing Text-to-SQL generators require the entire schema to be encoded with the user text. This is expensive or impractical for large databases with tens of thousands of columns. Standard dense retrieval techniques are inadequate for schema subsetting of a large structured database, where the correct semantics of retrieval demands that we rank sets of schema elements rather than individual elements. In response, we propose a two-stage process for effective coverage during retrieval. First, we instruct an LLM to hallucinate a minimal DB schema deemed adequate to answer the query. We use the hallucinated schema to retrieve a subset of the actual schema, by composing the results from multiple dense retrievals. Remarkably, hallucination $\unicode{x2013}$ generally considered a nuisance $\unicode{x2013}$ turns out to be actually useful as a bridging mechanism. Since no existing benchmarks exist for schema subsetting on large databases, we introduce three benchmarks. Two semi-synthetic datasets are derived from the union of schemas in two well-known datasets, SPIDER and BIRD, resulting in 4502 and 798 schema elements respectively. A real-life benchmark called SocialDB is sourced from an actual large data warehouse comprising 17844 schema elements. We show that our method1 leads to significantly higher recall than SOTA retrieval-based augmentation methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RASL: Retrieval Augmented Schema Linking for Massive Database Text-to-SQL

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RASL retrieves relevant tables and columns for text-to-SQL by decomposing schemas into semantic entities, calibrating entity-type importance on training data, and using an LLM to rank candidates, beating baselines on ...

Pith tools