Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 65 references

Dark showers from sneaky dark matter

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An unbroken dark flavor symmetry makes a subset of dark pions stable dark matter, opening the GeV mass window and predicting mixed emerging and semi-visible jets at the LHC.

desk verdict A creative composite-DM benchmark with a real radiative-stability hole in its central mechanism; worth refereeing seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15073 v2 pith:EV2Q3IR2 submitted 2024-11-22 hep-ph hep-ex

Adrian Carmona , Fatemeh Elahi , Christiane Scherb , Pedro Schwaller This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords compositedarkmatterpionsflavorsymmetryQCDimpededemergingjetssemi-visiblelong-livedparticles
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a minimal composite dark matter model in which dark matter is a subset of the pions of a new confining gauge force, stable because of an unbroken flavor symmetry in the dark sector. The central claim is that with four or more dark quark flavors the stability of some dark pions is automatic, and the remaining unstable 'transient' pions control the relic abundance through co-annihilation that is velocity-suppressed by the degenerate pion masses. That suppression weakens indirect-detection and CMB constraints, making dark matter in the 1 to 10 GeV mass range viable where ordinary thermal WIMPs are excluded. Because dark matter is among the lightest dark-sector states, it is copiously produced in dark showers at colliders, predicting a mixture of emerging jets and semi-visible jets that the paper recasts existing LHC searches to constrain.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dark chiral Lagrangian for $SU(N_d)$ with $n_f$ dark quark flavors, with the flavor symmetry reduced by the portal coupling to a residual $G = SU(n_f-3) \times U(1)$. The dark pion multiplet transforms under this residual symmetry, and the stable pions are those with nontrivial $G$ charges (for $n_f = 4$, a complex triplet under $SU(3)$). The mechanism that carries the argument is the velocity suppression of co-annihilation: a degenerate mass spectrum causes the thermally averaged cross section to scale as $1/\sqrt{x}$, i.e. linearly with the velocity, which suppresses indirect detection and CMB signatures while still giving the correct relic density. The paper also uses an accidental $Z_2$ symmetry of the $n_f = 4$ chiral Lagrangian to show that stable pions appear only in pairs, ruling out odd-number 3-to-2 processes.

What would settle it

Measure the dark matter annihilation rate in dwarf galaxies with different velocity dispersions: the model predicts the rate scales linearly with relative velocity, so a velocity-independent rate would falsify the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that for $n_f \geq 4$ dark quark flavors, the unbroken dark flavor symmetry $G = SU(n_f-3) \times U(1)$ guarantees the stability of a subset of the dark pions, giving a dark matter candidate without imposing any additional discrete symmetry by hand. For $n_f = 4$ this yields six stable dark pions and nine transient ones. The relic abundance is set by co-annihilation of stable dark pions into transient dark pions, whose decay to Standard Model quarks is mediated by a heavy t-channel scalar portal. Because all dark pion masses are degenerate at tree level, the annihilation cross section carries a factor of the relative velocity, suppressing late-time annihilation and thereby evading gamma-ray and CMB bounds. The paper further shows that the stable pions appear only in even numbers in the chiral Lagrangian, so 3-to-2 processes do not disrupt the simple 2-to-2 freeze-out picture. The transient pions are naturally long-lived, and in the GeV dark matter mass window their decays produce a combination of semi-visible and emerging jets, which the paper uses to set limits on the mediator mass and dark pion mass.

Load-bearing premise

The entire mechanism rests on the assumption that the dark quark mass matrix is exactly proportional to the identity, so that the diagonal dark flavor symmetry is preserved and all dark pion masses remain degenerate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is correct, dark matter in the few-GeV mass range is a natural thermal candidate, and the standard indirect-detection bounds do not apply because the annihilation rate today is velocity-suppressed.
  • Dark showers produced at hadron colliders would contain a significant fraction of missing energy even when the transient pions decay promptly, since stable dark matter pions are produced in the shower.
  • The collider signatures are a combination of semi-visible jets and emerging jets, so searches that merge these strategies are more sensitive than either search alone.
  • The relic abundance and the main detection cross sections depend only on the dark-sector parameters $m_{\pi_D}$, $f_D$, $N_d$ and $n_f$, and not on the mediator mass or coupling, making the model predictive for a given dark pion mass.
  • For $n_f = 4$, the model selects a particular benchmark for future collider studies: mediator masses up to roughly 2.5 TeV are excluded by the combined searches for order-one portal couplings, and the remaining parameter space is testable at future colliders.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism may generalise to other confining dark sectors: any dark sector where a flavoured pion multiplet is split into stable and unstable parts by a residual global symmetry could exhibit the same velocity-suppressed co-annihilation and long-lived decay signatures.
  • The accidental $Z_2$ protecting the stable pions for $n_f = 4$ is absent for larger $n_f$, so exploring $n_f = 5$ or 6 would test whether the dark matter stability and the simple 2-to-2 freeze-out picture persist beyond the specific case studied.
  • If the model accounts for the full relic abundance, the same parameters predict a specific flux of gamma rays from dark matter annihilation in dwarf galaxies at low velocities; a future measurement of that flux would either confirm or falsify the velocity-suppression prediction.
  • The paper's assumption of a single common decay width for transient pions could be relaxed in a detailed study, since off-diagonal pions have a slightly different lifetime, which would affect the emerging-jet sensitivity at intermediate lifetimes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents a composite dark matter model consisting of an SU(N_d) confining dark sector with n_f dark quarks and a heavy scalar mediator X that couples the dark sector to SM quarks. For n_f >= 4, an unbroken dark flavor subgroup stabilizes a subset of dark pions, and for the n_f = 4 case (six stable pions pi_DM and nine transient pions pi_tran) the relic abundance is set by co-annihilation 2 pi_DM -> 2 pi_tran. Because the dark pions are degenerate, this cross section is claimed to be velocity suppressed, evading indirect detection and CMB bounds and opening a 1-10 GeV DM mass window. The paper derives the relic abundance, computes direct detection, indirect detection, CMB, and flavor constraints, and recasts LHC searches for four jets, jets plus missing energy, semi-visible jets, and emerging jets to set limits on the mediator mass.

Significance. If the central mechanism is sound, the model is an attractive minimal composite-DM benchmark: DM stability follows automatically from the flavor symmetry for n_f >= 4, the relic abundance depends mainly on the dark strong-sector parameters, and the p-wave suppression is a natural way to make GeV-scale thermal DM viable. The paper also has clear strengths: a group-theoretic proof of the accidental Z_2 symmetry for n_f = 4, explicit Boltzmann equations in Appendix C, detailed recast criteria in Appendix D, and a public UFO model file. However, the printed formula for the central cross section contains a sign/typographical error in the velocity scaling, the radiative stability of the mass degeneracy on which the mechanism rests is asserted but not demonstrated, and the claim that 3-to-2 processes are subdominant is not quantitatively supported. These issues are load-bearing and need to be addressed before the main conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.1); Sec. C, Eq. (C.7)] The printed Eqs. (3.1) and (C.7) place sqrt(x) in the numerator, while Eq. (C.6) and the surrounding text require 1/sqrt(x). With the printed factor the cross section increases at late times, reversing the claimed velocity suppression v proportional to 1/sqrt(x) that is the basis for evading indirect-detection and CMB bounds in the 1-10 GeV window. Please correct the factor in both equations and verify that the relic-density curve in Fig. 1 was computed with the corrected formula.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, bullet on 3-to-2 processes; Sec. C] The statement that '2-to-2 processes are more efficient than the 3-to-2 ones, for all values of m_piD, fD and x under consideration' is not supported by any quantitative comparison in the text or appendices. Since Eqs. (C.16)-(C.17) include 3-to-2 terms and the relic abundance is then computed from the simplified Eq. (3.3), please provide the comparison (for example, a plot of the ratio of the relevant rates over the parameter space, or an analytic bound) that justifies dropping 3-to-2 processes.
  3. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.2); Sec. 3.1, after Eq. (3.1)] The exact degeneracy m_Q = m delta_alpha beta, called crucial in Sec. 2, is not radiatively stable: the portal (2.2) breaks SU(4)_V to SU(3) times U(1), so loop corrections involving kappa, X, and SM quarks generate different self-energies for Q4 and Q1-Q3. The paper acknowledges in Sec. 3.1 that 'a small mass splitting will be generated' and asserts Delta/m_piD much less than 1 'is expected', but no estimate or bound is given. Because the p-wave form of Eq. (3.1) and the indirect/CMB constraints in Fig. 1 rely on near-degenerate pi_DM and pi_tran, please provide a one-loop estimate of Delta/m_piD for the benchmarks used in the collider analysis (for example, kappa = 1 and m_X = 2 TeV) and identify the parameter region where Delta/m_piD much less than 1 holds.
  4. [Sec. 4.3, emerging jet search; Appendix D] The paper states that the emerging-jet recast follows the procedure of Ref. [56] with off-diagonal lifetimes fixed by Eq. (2.17), and explicitly calls this 'a less conservative choice than used in [18]', so the emerging-jet limits in Figs. 5-7 may be over-estimated. Since these limits are part of the central collider-reach claims, please either repeat the analysis with the conservative procedure of Ref. [18] or show quantitatively how much the limits change.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4, caption of Fig. 1] The text in Sec. 3.4 states the direct detection lines correspond to c_tau = 1 cm and c_tau = 0.1 mm, while the Fig. 1 caption and Sec. 3.2 state c_tau = 10 cm and c_tau = 1 mm. These values should be made consistent.
  2. [Sec. 4.2] For f_D = 15 m_piD, the stated relation f_D approx Lambda_D/(4 pi) with Lambda_D = 40 m_piD gives f_D approx 3.2 m_piD, not 15 m_piD. Please clarify how Lambda_D is chosen for the f_D = 15 m_piD benchmarks.
  3. [Reference [55]] Reference [55], the ATLAS semi-visible jets search, is missing publication details; it should be completed before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the stability and relic-abundance predictions are derived from the stated symmetries and chiral-Lagrangian interactions, then compared with external constraints.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. DM stability is obtained in Sec. 2 from the unbroken subgroup G = SU(n_f - 3) × U(1) after the SVD of κ (Eq. (2.3)) together with the input m_Qαβ = m δαβ; the counting of stable pions follows from the adjoint decomposition (A.7), and the even-pion pairing of stable states in the chiral Lagrangian is proved in Appendix B rather than assumed. The central annihilation cross section, Eq. (3.1), is computed in Appendix C from the ChPT interactions in Eqs. (2.4), (2.9), and (2.14); its velocity suppression follows from the near-degenerate pion masses, which are an input assumption, not a quantity fitted to the constraints being tested. The relic abundance is obtained by integrating the Boltzmann equation (3.4) with f_D and m_πD as free parameters and is then compared with external Planck, Fermi-LAT, LZ/SENSEI, CMS, and ATLAS data; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper's self-citations ([17], [18], [22]-[24]) are used for recast procedures, the flavoured-portal construction, and ALP tools; they are methodological and do not carry the central claim. Two limitations are explicitly acknowledged in the text: footnote 2 and Sec. 3.1 state only that a loop-level pion mass splitting is 'expected' to satisfy Δ/m_πD ≪ 1, and Sec. 4.3 admits the emerging-jet recast is 'a less conservative choice than used in [18].' These are robustness gaps, not circular reductions: neither equates a prediction to its input by construction. Therefore no circularity step is reported.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of free parameters and on several domain assumptions about the dark sector dynamics. The most important are the exact dark quark mass degeneracy and the neglect of heavier states and 3-to-2 processes. No invented entity has independent evidence beyond the model's predicted collider signatures.

free parameters (5)
  • m_piD (dark pion mass) = 1-50 GeV (scanned)
    Sets the DM mass; scanned over the GeV range for collider studies and relic abundance relation.
  • f_D (dark pion decay constant) = m_piD or 15 m_piD
    Controls the annihilation cross section and decay widths; chosen as benchmark values.
  • m_X (mediator mass) = 2 TeV for event generation; scanned for limits
    Portal mass; chosen for collider studies.
  • kappa (portal coupling) = 1 or 0.1
    Sets production cross sections and lifetimes.
  • c_tau (transient pion lifetime) = 10^-4 to 10^4 mm (scanned)
    Effective parameter used instead of kappa/m_X for collider recasts.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Exact degeneracy of dark quark masses: m_Q = m delta_{alpha beta}.
    Stated in Sec. 2 as 'A crucial assumption'. Preserves the flavor symmetry that stabilizes DM pions and enforces degenerate pion masses.
  • domain assumption Chiral EFT is perturbative: m_pi << 4 pi f_D.
    Used throughout; ensures pNGB description and the neglect of heavier states.
  • domain assumption Heavier dark states (baryons, excited mesons) annihilate efficiently and do not contribute to the DM relic abundance.
    Footnote 3 gives a heuristic unitarity-bound argument, not a detailed calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper 2-to-2 processes dominate over 3-to-2 processes for the relic abundance.
    Sec. 3.1 states this is explicitly checked but does not show the check.
  • domain assumption Kinetic equilibrium with the SM bath at freeze-out requires Gamma(pi_tran) >> H at T = m_pi.
    Used to simplify the Boltzmann equations; the failure region is marked but not treated.
invented entities (3)
  • SU(N_d) dark gauge sector with n_f dark quarks Q_alpha
    purpose: Provides composite DM candidates and dark showers.
    No experimental evidence yet; predicted signatures are emerging and semi-visible jets.
  • Scalar mediator X (bi-fundamental of SU(N_d) and SU(3)_c)
    purpose: Portal between dark and visible sectors, enabling production and decay.
    No evidence; model-dependent.
  • Stable dark pions pi_DM
    purpose: Dark matter candidates.
    No direct detection yet; the model predicts signals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark showers from sneaky dark matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EV2Q3IR2

@misc{pith2026241115073,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark showers from sneaky dark matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EV2Q3IR2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15073}
}
abstract

We present a minimal composite dark matter model, based on a $SU(N_d)$ dark sector with $n_f$ dark quarks and a heavy t-channel mediator. For $n_f\geq 4$, the dark flavor symmetry guarantees the stability of a subset of the dark pions, which serve as our dark matter candidates. Their relic abundance is determined by co-scattering or co-annihilation with the remaining dark pions, which are unstable and decay. Due to their degenerate masses, the annihilation cross section is suppressed at low temperatures, thereby avoiding stringent constraints from indirect detection and opening up the GeV mass window. The decaying dark pions are naturally long lived. We obtain limits on the model from semi-visible or emerging jet searches and estimate the reach of future probes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    H. Mies, C. Scherb, and P. Schwaller, Collider constraints on dark mediators , JHEP 04 (2021) 049, [arXiv:2011.13990]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [56]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Search for dark QCD with emerging jets in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP 07 (2024) 142, [ arXiv:2403.01556]

    CMS Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for dark QCD with emerging jets in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP 07 (2024) 142, [ arXiv:2403.01556]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    J. Kopp, J. Liu, T. R. Slatyer, X.-P. Wang, and W. Xue, Impeded Dark Matter, JHEP 12 (2016) 033, [arXiv:1609.02147]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [2]

    Essig, P

    R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Probing Dark Forces and Light Hidden Sectors at Low-Energy e+e- Colliders , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 015003, [ arXiv:0903.3941]

    arXiv 2009

  5. [3]

    Bhattacharya, B

    S. Bhattacharya, B. Meli´ c, and J. Wudka,Pionic Dark Matter , JHEP 02 (2014) 115, [arXiv:1307.2647]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [4]

    J. M. Cline, Z. Liu, G. D. Moore, and W. Xue, Composite strongly interacting dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 1 015023, [ arXiv:1312.3325]

    arXiv 2014

  7. [5]

    Hochberg, E

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, H. Murayama, T. Volansky, and J. G. Wacker, Model for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), no. 2 021301, [arXiv:1411.3727]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [6]

    Harigaya and Y

    K. Harigaya and Y. Nomura, Light Chiral Dark Sector , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 3 035013, [arXiv:1603.03430]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 65 references
  1. [7]

    Berlin, S

    A. Berlin, S. Gori, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Dark Sectors at the Fermilab SeaQuest Experiment , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 3 035011, [ arXiv:1804.00661]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Beauchesne, E

    H. Beauchesne, E. Bertuzzo, and G. Grilli Di Cortona, Dark matter in Hidden Valley models with stable and unstable light dark mesons , JHEP 04 (2019) 118, [ arXiv:1809.10152]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Beauchesne and G

    H. Beauchesne and G. Grilli di Cortona, Classification of dark pion multiplets as dark matter candidates and collider phenomenology , JHEP 02 (2020) 196, [ arXiv:1910.10724]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Bernreuther, F

    E. Bernreuther, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Kr¨ amer, and P. Tunney,Strongly interacting dark sectors in the early Universe and at the LHC through a simplified portal , JHEP 01 (2020) 162, [arXiv:1907.04346]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Contino, A

    R. Contino, A. Podo, and F. Revello, Composite Dark Matter from Strongly-Interacting Chiral Dynamics, JHEP 02 (2021) 091, [ arXiv:2008.10607]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [12]

    X. Chu, M. Nikolic, and J. Pradler, Even SIMP miracles are possible , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024), no. 2 2, [ arXiv:2401.12283]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Garc ´ ıa-Cely, G

    C. Garc ´ ıa-Cely, G. Landini, and O. Zapata,Dark matter in QCD-like theories with a theta vacuum: cosmological and astrophysical implications, arXiv:2405.10367

    arXiv

  8. [14]

    Maleknejad and E

    A. Maleknejad and E. McDonough, Ultralight pion and superheavy baryon dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 9 095011, [ arXiv:2205.12983]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Alexander, H

    S. Alexander, H. Gilmer, T. Manton, and E. McDonough, π-axion and π-axiverse of dark QCD , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 12 123014, [ arXiv:2304.11176]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Alexander, T

    S. Alexander, T. Manton, and E. McDonough, Field theory axiverse , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 11 116019, [ arXiv:2404.11642]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Schwaller, D

    P. Schwaller, D. Stolarski, and A. Weiler, Emerging Jets, JHEP 05 (2015) 059, [ arXiv:1502.05409]

    2015 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Linthorne and D

    D. Linthorne and D. Stolarski, Triggering on emerging jets , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 3 035019, [arXiv:2103.08620]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cohen, M

    T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, and H. K. Lou, Semivisible Jets: Dark Matter Undercover at the LHC , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), no. 17 171804, [ arXiv:1503.00009]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Cohen, M

    T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, H. K. Lou, and S. Mishra-Sharma, LHC Searches for Dark Sector Showers , JHEP 11 (2017) 196, [ arXiv:1707.05326]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Renner and P

    S. Renner and P. Schwaller, A flavoured dark sector , JHEP 08 (2018) 052, [ arXiv:1803.08080]. – 27 –

    2018 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Carmona, C

    A. Carmona, C. Scherb, and P. Schwaller, Charming ALPs , JHEP 08 (2021) 121, [arXiv:2101.07803]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Carmona, F

    A. Carmona, F. Elahi, C. Scherb, and P. Schwaller, The ALPs from the Top: Searching for long lived axion-like particles from exotic top decays , arXiv:2202.09371

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities , Phys. Lett. B 37 (1971) 95–97

    1971

  19. [26]

    Witten, Global Aspects of Current Algebra , Nucl

    E. Witten, Global Aspects of Current Algebra , Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 422–432

    1983

  20. [27]

    Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status , J

    M. Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status , J. Phys. G 46 (2019), no. 10 103003, [ arXiv:1903.03026]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    R. H. Helm, Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei , Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 1466–1475

    1956

  22. [29]

    Engel, S

    J. Engel, S. Pittel, and P. Vogel, Nuclear physics of dark matter detection , Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 1 (1992) 1–37

    1992

  23. [30]

    New dark matter search results from the lux-zeplin experiment

    LZ Collaboration, A. Cottle, “New dark matter search results from the lux-zeplin experiment.” CERN, 2024. Accessed: 26-08-2024

    2024

  24. [31]

    Adari et al., SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from SENSEI at SNOLAB , arXiv:2312.13342

    SENSEI Collaboration, P. Adari et al., SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from SENSEI at SNOLAB , arXiv:2312.13342

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Charles et al., Sensitivity Projections for Dark Matter Searches with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys

    F ermi-LA TCollaboration, E. Charles et al., Sensitivity Projections for Dark Matter Searches with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rept. 636 (2016) 1–46, [ arXiv:1605.02016]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [33]

    S. Hoof, A. Geringer-Sameth, and R. Trotta, A Global Analysis of Dark Matter Signals from 27 Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies using 11 Years of Fermi-LAT Observations , JCAP 02 (2020) 012, [arXiv:1812.06986]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [34]

    J. A. Dror, E. Kuflik, and W. H. Ng, Codecaying Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 21 211801, [arXiv:1607.03110]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Okawa, M

    S. Okawa, M. Tanabashi, and M. Yamanaka, Relic Abundance in a Secluded Dark Matter Scenario with a Massive Mediator , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 2 023006, [ arXiv:1607.08520]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Jia, Study of WIMP annihilations into a pair of on-shell scalar mediators , Phys

    L.-B. Jia, Study of WIMP annihilations into a pair of on-shell scalar mediators , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 9 095028, [ arXiv:1607.00737]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [37]

    G. Elor, N. L. Rodd, T. R. Slatyer, and W. Xue, Model-Independent Indirect Detection Constraints on Hidden Sector Dark Matter , JCAP 06 (2016) 024, [ arXiv:1511.08787]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [38]

    H¨ utten and D

    M. H¨ utten and D. Kerszberg,TeV Dark Matter Searches in the Extragalactic Gamma-ray Sky , Galaxies 10 (2022), no. 5 92, [ arXiv:2208.00145]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [ arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [40]

    T. Jubb, M. Kirk, and A. Lenz, Charming Dark Matter , JHEP 12 (2017) 010, [ arXiv:1709.01930]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Blanke, and K. Gemmler, Flavored dark matter beyond Minimal Flavor Violation , JHEP 10 (2014) 072, [ arXiv:1405.6709]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Ammar et al., Search for the familon via B+- — > pi+- X0, B+- — > K+- X0, and B0 — > K0(S)X0 decays, Phys

    CLEO Collaboration, R. Ammar et al., Search for the familon via B+- — > pi+- X0, B+- — > K+- X0, and B0 — > K0(S)X0 decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 271801, [ hep-ex/0106038]

    2001 arXiv

  36. [43]

    M. J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, A taste of dark matter: Flavour constraints on pseudoscalar mediators , JHEP 03 (2015) 171, [ arXiv:1412.5174]. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 103 (2015)]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [44]

    CLEO Collaboration, T. E. Coan et al., Flavor - specific inclusive B decays to charm , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 1150–1155, [ hep-ex/9710028]. – 28 –

    1998 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Albouy et al., Theory, phenomenology, and experimental avenues for dark showers: a Snowmass 2021 report, Eur

    G. Albouy et al., Theory, phenomenology, and experimental avenues for dark showers: a Snowmass 2021 report, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022), no. 12 1132, [ arXiv:2203.09503]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [46]

    M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek, Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders , Phys. Lett. B 651 (2007) 374–379, [ hep-ph/0604261]

    2007 arXiv

  40. [47]

    T. Han, Z. Si, K. M. Zurek, and M. J. Strassler, Phenomenology of hidden valleys at hadron colliders , JHEP 07 (2008) 008, [ arXiv:0712.2041]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Butterworth, C

    J. Butterworth, C. Cazzaniga, A. Garcia-Bellido, D. Kar, S. Kulkarni, P. Schwaller, S. Sinha, D. Wilson-Edwards, and J. Zurita, MITP Colours in Darkness workshop summary report , arXiv:2311.16330

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , JHEP 0...

    2014 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, and M. Zaro, The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations, JHEP 07 (2018) 185, [ arXiv:1804.10017]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 085 (2021)]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [51]

    t-channel dark QCD model

    “ t-channel dark QCD model .” https://github.com/chscherb/t-channel_dark_QCD. accessed: August 1st 2024

    2024

  45. [52]

    Cohen, J

    T. Cohen, J. Doss, and M. Freytsis, Jet Substructure from Dark Sector Showers , JHEP 09 (2020) 118, [arXiv:2004.00631]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [53]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for new particles decaying to a jet and an emerging jet, JHEP 02 (2019) 179, [ arXiv:1810.10069]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Tumasyan et al., Search for resonant production of strongly coupled dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV , JHEP 06 (2022) 156, [ arXiv:2112.11125]

    CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for resonant production of strongly coupled dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV , JHEP 06 (2022) 156, [ arXiv:2112.11125]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [55]

    A TLASCollaboration, Search for non-resonant production of semi-visible jets using Run 2 data in ATLAS,

  49. [57]

    Carrasco and J

    J. Carrasco and J. Zurita, Emerging jet probes of strongly interacting dark sectors , JHEP 01 (2024) 034, [arXiv:2307.04847]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 139 fb −1 of √s =13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 02 (2021) 143, [ arXiv:2010.14293]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    CMS Collaboration, T. C. Collaboration et al., Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum , JHEP 10 (2019) 244, [arXiv:1908.04722]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for resonant and nonresonant production of pairs of dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , arXiv:2206.09997

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3 , SciPost Phys

    C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3 , SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 (2022) 8, [ arXiv:2203.11601]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Cohen, J

    T. Cohen, J. Roloff, and C. Scherb, Dark sector showers in the Lund jet plane , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 3 L031501, [ arXiv:2301.07732]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Aprile et al., First Measurement of Solar 8B Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT , arXiv:2408.02877

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., First Measurement of Solar 8B Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT , arXiv:2408.02877. – 29 –

  56. [64]

    H. E. Haber, Useful relations among the generators in the defining and adjoint representations of SU(N), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 21 (2021) 1, [ arXiv:1912.13302]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis , Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145–179. – 30 –

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.