Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encoder

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.01052 v1 pith:EV4P4HT5 submitted 2018-05-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords encoderparseraccuracyconstituencydifferentimprovementsinformationlead
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that replacing an LSTM encoder with a self-attentive architecture can lead to improvements to a state-of-the-art discriminative constituency parser. The use of attention makes explicit the manner in which information is propagated between different locations in the sentence, which we use to both analyze our model and propose potential improvements. For example, we find that separating positional and content information in the encoder can lead to improved parsing accuracy. Additionally, we evaluate different approaches for lexical representation. Our parser achieves new state-of-the-art results for single models trained on the Penn Treebank: 93.55 F1 without the use of any external data, and 95.13 F1 when using pre-trained word representations. Our parser also outperforms the previous best-published accuracy figures on 8 of the 9 languages in the SPMRL dataset.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DiffLens: A Visualization System to Explore Local Differences in Graph Sampling

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    DiffLens quantifies neighbor-, path-, and structure-based local sampling differences and visualizes them with interactive lenses so users can diagnose and compare graph sampling strategies.

Pith tools