REVIEW 1 cited by
Extractive and Abstractive Explanations for Fact-Checking and Evaluation of News
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we explore the construction of natural language explanations for news claims, with the goal of assisting fact-checking and news evaluation applications. We experiment with two methods: (1) an extractive method based on Biased TextRank -- a resource-effective unsupervised graph-based algorithm for content extraction; and (2) an abstractive method based on the GPT-2 language model. We perform comparative evaluations on two misinformation datasets in the political and health news domains, and find that the extractive method shows the most promise.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
TalkLess: Blending Extractive and Abstractive Speech Summarization for Editing Speech to Preserve Content and Style
TalkLess blends extractive and abstractive speech summarization through LLM candidate generation and a weighted scoring function, then converts transcript edits to audio with VoiceCraft, evaluating favorably against a...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.