Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 75 references

Neutral Atom Quantum Computing: Principles, Routes, Progress, and Challenges

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Neutral-atom arrays hit 11,000 atoms and 99.84% gate fidelity.

desk verdict A current, well-organized survey with a solid set of caveats in the body; the abstract oversells the 2:1 QEC milestone, but that is fixable and does not undercut the review's value. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05010 v1 pith:EVRNLXVX submitted 2026-08-05 quant-ph

Junchao Wang , Zeyuan Wang , Lei Li , Feng Wang , Shibo Liang , Keduo Yan This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords neutralatomquantumcomputingRydbergblockadeopticaltweezerarrayslatticeserrorcorrectionfault-toleranttoriccodereconfiguration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that neutral-atom quantum computing has matured into one of the most promising routes to fault-tolerant quantum computers. It assembles evidence that laser-trapped neutral atoms, coupled through Rydberg-state interactions, now form arrays of about 11,000 atoms, reach two-qubit gate fidelities of 99.84%, and have produced quantum error correction demonstrations including a toric-code experiment and a 2:1 memory encoding rate. The review's purpose is to give researchers a full-chain picture from the 2000 theoretical proposal of Rydberg gates through the 2026 hardware milestones, and to identify the bottlenecks that still separate these demonstrations from practical fault tolerance. A sympathetic reader would take away that the platform's scalability and reconfigurable connectivity have made it a leading candidate, with the remaining gap being error-correction computation rather than error-correction memory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is Rydberg blockade in an optical tweezer array: when one atom is excited to a Rydberg state, its strong van der Waals or dipole-dipole interaction shifts the Rydberg level of any atom within the blockade radius $R_b$, preventing a second excitation. This conditional excitation yields a two-qubit CZ gate through a $\pi$-$2\pi$-$\pi$ pulse sequence, and because tweezers can move atoms mid-computation, it also provides reconfigurable all-to-all connectivity. That dual role, gate mechanism and connectivity resource, is what lets the review connect single-atom physics (qubit encoding, laser cooling, Rydberg excitation) to system-level claims about quantum error correction and fault-tolerant architectures.

What would settle it

Re-run the three keystone measurements independently: if a metasurface tweezer experiment does not stably trap on the order of 11,000 atoms with roughly 60% filling, if a toric-code logical error rate is measured to grow rather than shrink with code size, or if the 2:1 encoding scheme loses its error suppression once logical gates are executed, then the review's central progress narrative would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the combination of optical tweezer arrays, Rydberg blockade, and dynamic atom rearrangement has moved neutral-atom quantum computing from proof of principle to a platform that can already demonstrate the key ingredients of fault tolerance. On the paper's own terms, the Rydberg blockade mechanism implements a controlled-phase gate by shifting the Rydberg level of a neighboring atom so that only the $|11\rangle$ state acquires a $\pi$ phase, and the movability of tweezers turns this into all-to-all reconfigurable connectivity. The review then reports that this architecture has reached stable trapping of roughly 11,000 atoms, two-qubit gate fidelity of 99.84%, continuous operation of a 3000-qubit system with atom replenishment, and quantum error correction milestones including logical qubit processors, a toric-code demonstration, and an encoding rate above 1/2 for memory. It explicitly notes that the 2:1 encoding rate has so far been verified only for storage, not for logical gate operations, and treats the leap from error-correction memory to error-correction computation as the core unresolved challenge.

Load-bearing premise

The review trusts the cited experimental and corporate reports, especially the 11,000-atom array, the toric-code demonstration, and the 2:1 memory encoding rate, without independent verification, so the survey's headline claims stand or fall with those sources.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two-qubit fidelity of 99.84% exceeds the roughly 99% surface-code threshold, so the platform is in principle past the error-correction threshold for physical gates; the review stresses that measurement, feedback, and decoding must also meet threshold conditions.
  • Reconfigurable all-to-all connectivity is a natural fit for high-rate LDPC codes, which is the basis for the reported 2:1 memory encoding rate rather than the hundreds-to-one overhead of surface codes.
  • Continuous atom replenishment and mid-circuit measurement have been demonstrated at engineering scale (3000 qubits, over two hours), so long-duration computation no longer needs to stop when atoms are lost.
  • The toric-code demonstration is claimed to show logical error rate decreasing as physical qubit count increases, the standard criterion for a working error-correcting code.
  • The paper's own caveat makes clear that encoding rates above 1/2 apply only to memory, so the near-term target is error-correction computation, where overhead may be 5–10 times higher.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the cited milestones hold up, the field's binding constraint shifts from qubit count to engineering: real-time decoding throughput, control electronics above ten thousand channels, and laser system integration, so progress curves for those technologies would predict when fault-tolerant operation becomes practical.
  • A testable extension of the review's fidelity analysis: since spontaneous emission, laser phase noise, and atomic thermal motion already sum close to the 99.9% gate-fidelity target, directly measuring the error budget of resonant-dipole-dipole gates would show whether that target is reachable without new physics.
  • The pattern of demonstrations, logical memory first, then magic-state distillation, then Shor's algorithm on logical qubits, suggests the first fault-tolerant advantage on neutral atoms will likely be a memory or narrow logical-algorithm task, not a general-purpose computation.
  • Because the review leans on company announcements for the toric-code and encoding-rate milestones, those results need independent replication; a university-led toric-code experiment on neutral atoms would be a natural near-term check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a broad survey of neutral-atom quantum computing, covering qubit encoding, trapping and manipulation, Rydberg interactions, gate mechanisms, technical routes (tweezer arrays, optical lattices, dipole trap arrays), research progress from 2000 to 2026, industrialization, and core bottlenecks. Its headline claims are that the field has reached roughly 11,000 stably trapped atoms, two-qubit gate fidelities of 99.84%, and quantum error correction milestones including toric-code demonstrations and a 2:1 physical-to-logical encoding rate, and that these results make neutral atoms one of the most promising routes to fault-tolerant quantum computing. The body includes several useful caveats, most notably that the 2:1 encoding rate applies only to memory, not to computation.

Significance. If the survey is taken as an accurate snapshot, it is a useful and unusually up-to-date reference: it covers the 2021-2026 period in detail, includes a quantitative comparison table, gives explicit risk commentary on company roadmaps, and repeatedly distinguishes memory from computation in quantum error correction. These are genuine strengths. The main weakness is that the abstract and Innovation Statement present the strongest QEC milestone, the 2:1 encoding rate, without the memory-only qualification that the body itself supplies, and several load-bearing milestones rest on arXiv preprints or company press releases whose status is not flagged in the comparative table. Because the central 'most promising route' conclusion leans heavily on these milestones, this is a claim-strength/evidence mismatch that should be corrected before publication, but it is correctable without changing the overall scope of the review.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §4.3(3); §6.2] The abstract and the Innovation Statement present 'encoding rates exceeding 1/2' and a '2:1 memory encoding rate breakthrough' as headline QEC milestones without the memory-only qualification that the body itself provides. Section 4.3(3) explicitly says the 2:1 rate 'was verified only for memory (storage)', and §6.2 repeats this caveat; the supporting Ref. [29] is an arXiv theory preprint rather than an experimental demonstration. The sentence in §4.3(3) that 'only slightly more than two physical qubits are needed to construct a reliable logical qubit' goes beyond the verified claim by conflating a code-theoretic construction with a demonstrated fault-tolerant memory. Because this milestone is a pillar of the 'most promising route' conclusion, the abstract and Innovation Statement should carry the memory-only caveat, and the 'once per trillion steps' figure should be identified as a simulation estimate under stated assumptions.
  2. [§4.3(2); Table 1] Table 1 lists 'Max scale ∼11,000' and 'Max 2Q fidelity 99.84%' with Ref. [63], an arXiv preprint, alongside peer-reviewed values, and §4.3(2) reports the 11,000-atom array as 'stable trapping' with a 60.5% filling fraction in 18,225 sites. The scaling claim in the abstract and conclusion is built on this number, so the table and text should distinguish (a) preprint/press-release provenance from peer-reviewed results, (b) stably trapped atoms from defect-free addressable qubits, and (c) the 99.84% fidelity measured in the 2,024-atom rearrangement experiment from the 11,000-atom trapping-only demonstration. Without these distinctions, Table 1 overstates what has been demonstrated at the ten-thousand-atom scale.
  3. [§4.3(3); §5.1] The toric-code milestone is reported as the 'industry's first complete quantum error correction demonstration' on the strength of a company press release (Ref. [30]), and the same section describes the 2:1 rate as reported by QuEra with no indication of peer review or independent replication. For a review that promises systematic coverage and quantitative comparisons, these two QEC claims should be explicitly labeled by evidence type (press release, arXiv theory preprint, simulation) and any known independent verification status. Without that labeling, readers cannot assess the confidence attached to the central fault-tolerance narrative.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] The header 'T weezer + Rydberg' contains a typo and should read 'Tweezer + Rydberg'.
  2. [§3.3] The description of the Saffman group's blue-detuned dipole trap scheme and its Rydberg-blockade CNOT/Bell-state experiments does not carry an inline citation; Ref. [74] appears to be the intended reference and should be cited at that point.
  3. [§4.3(3)] The text attributes the 2:1 theoretical work to 'Kasai's theoretical breakthrough', but Ref. [29] has authors Okada and Kasai; the attribution should be 'Okada and Kasai' or stated more generally.
  4. [§5.2] Claims such as the 'world's first neutral-atom chip-level million-tweezer verification' and the specifications of Hanyuan 2 and Taiyi Liangsheng are presented without visible source markers; for a review it is acceptable to cite company announcements, but the source type should be identified in the text or reference list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey compiles external experimental milestones with no derivation chain to reduce.

full rationale

This paper is a review, not a derivation, and its load-bearing numbers are presented as summaries of cited external experiments (e.g., the 11,000-atom metasurface array in Sec. 4.3(2) via Ref. [63], the 99.84% two-qubit fidelity via Ref. [2], the toric-code demonstration via Ref. [30], and the 2:1 encoding rate via Refs. [29] and the QuEra/Harvard/MIT announcement). The paper fits no parameters and then relabels them as predictions; its Section 2 explains standard Rydberg-blockade physics but does not use that explanation to generate the survey's milestones. The only author-overlapping citation visible is Ref. [51] (Li X, Hou J Y, Wang J C, et al., Nature Communications 2025), used in Sec. 5.2 to describe a domestic fiber-array architecture. This supports a domestic-progress paragraph but is not load-bearing for the central claim that neutral atoms are a promising route to fault tolerance, nor for any scaling or QEC number, so it does not make the survey circular. The body explicitly caveats the 2:1 encoding rate as memory-only (Sec. 4.3(3) and Sec. 6.2), while the abstract carries the unqualified phrase 'encoding rates exceeding 1/2'; that is a claim-strength mismatch, not a circularity. No equation or definition in the paper makes any stated result equal to its inputs by construction, so the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no new data or derivations. Its central claims rest on external reliability: the cited experimental results must be accurate, the numbers in Table 1 must be comparable across different experiments, and the quoted theoretical error budget must be correct. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The experimental milestones cited as facts (6100-atom array, continuous 3000-qubit operation, 11,000-atom array, toric code QEC, 2:1 memory encoding rate) are accurately reported by the cited sources.
    The review relies on these as load-bearing evidence for its narrative of progress; several are from arXiv preprints or company press releases (Refs [30], [40], [41], [63]).
  • domain assumption The quantitative figures in Table 1 (fidelities, lifetimes, scales) are comparable across sources and conditions.
    The table mixes numbers from different experimental setups, cryogenic vs room temperature, and different measurement protocols, yet presents them as a single comparison.
  • domain assumption The theoretical error budget quoted from Ref [55] (spontaneous emission, laser phase noise, thermal motion) correctly represents the physical limits to ~99.9% fidelity.
    The review uses this to argue that breaking beyond 99.9% needs new mechanisms; it does not re-derive the budget.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutral Atom Quantum Computing: Principles, Routes, Progress, and Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EVRNLXVX

@misc{pith2026260805010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutral Atom Quantum Computing: Principles, Routes, Progress, and Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EVRNLXVX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05010}
}
read the original abstract

Neutral atom quantum computing utilizes laser-trapped neutral atoms as qubits and realizes quantum logic gate operations through Rydberg-state interactions. In recent years, it has become one of the most vibrant directions in quantum computing hardware. This paper systematically reviews the working principles of neutral-atom quantum computers, including qubit encoding, atom trapping and manipulation, Rydberg states and interactions, the Rydberg blockade quantum gate mechanism, and atom rearrangement with reconfigurable architectures. The mainstream technical routes are surveyed, represented by optical tweezer arrays combined with Rydberg interactions, optical lattice schemes, and dipole trap arrays. A panoramic review is provided of domestic and international research progress from theoretical foundations in 2000 to the latest achievements in 2026, including thousand-qubit-scale systems, logical qubits, and quantum error correction experiments. Key breakthroughs are highlighted, such as the 6100-atom qubit array, continuous operation of a 3000-qubit system, quantum simulation of the Kitaev honeycomb model, toric code error correction demonstrations, encoding rates exceeding 1/2, and fault-tolerant architectures. The core bottlenecks are analyzed in depth, including the scalability--fidelity trade-off, engineering implementation of quantum error correction, atom loss and mid-circuit replenishment, laser system industrialization, control electronics scalability, and long-distance quantum interconnection. This paper aims to provide a systematic reference for academic research and technological development in this field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05010 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Qubit encoding and optical tweezer ar￾ray of neutral atoms. (a) Energy-level structure of a rubidium-87 atom. The hyperfine states F = 1 and F = 2 of the 5S1/2 ground state encode |0⟩ and |1⟩, respectively, and a two-photon transition (780 nm + 480 nm) excites the atom to a high principal￾quantum-number nS or nD Rydberg state |r⟩. (b) Schematic of an optical tweezer array. A focused laser beam is split by optical fo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rydberg blockade quantum gate mecha￾nism. (a) Blockade effect: after atom 1 is excited to the Rydberg state |r⟩, the |r⟩ energy level of atom 2 within the blockade radius Rb shifts significantly by ∆E ≫ ¯hΩ and cannot be resonantly excited (red dashed line + ×). (b) CZ gate pulse sequence: a π pulse excites the control qubit, a 2π pulse on the tar￾get qubit accumulates phase, and the control qubit is de-excited; onl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Typical experimental workflow of neutral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of optical tweezer array with Rydberg interaction. A single laser beam is split by a spatial light modulator (SLM) or acousto-optic deflector (AOD) into hundreds to thousands of fo￾cused spots, forming an independently addressable two-dimensional optical twee…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic of optical lattice scheme and computation modes. Two counterpropagating laser beams form a standing wave, creating periodic po￾tential wells at the nodes where atoms are trapped to form a large-scale uniform array (adapted from Ref. [6].) requires additional …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic of dipole trap array (microlens [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Key milestones in neutral atom quan￾tum computing (2000–2026). A serpentine time￾line showing 19 landmark events, divided into three stages: theoretical foundation (blue), technology de￾velopment (green), and explosive growth (red). Node colors indicate event categorie…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    High-girth regular quan- tum LDPC codes from affine-coset structures[J]

    Okada K, Kasai K. High-girth regular quan- tum LDPC codes from affine-coset structures[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2604.20838, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  2. [63]

    Trapping 11,000 Atoms in a Tweezer Array Generated by a Single Metasurface

    Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang T, et al. Trap- ping 11,000 atoms in a tweezer array gener- ated by a single metasurface[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2606.02715, 2026

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  3. [30]

    Atom Computing re- veals quantum error correction with toric code[EB/OL]

    Atom Computing. Atom Computing re- veals quantum error correction with toric code[EB/OL]. (2026-06-03)[2026-06-19]. https://www.atom-computing.com

    work page 2026

  4. [1]

    Log- ical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays[J].Nature, 2024, 626: 58–65

    Bluvstein D, Levine H, Semeghini G, et al. Log- ical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays[J].Nature, 2024, 626: 58–65

    work page 2024

  5. [2]

    AI-enabled paral- lel assembly of thousands of defect-free neutral atom arrays[J].Physical Review Letters, 2025, 135: 063401

    Lin R, Zhong H S, Li Y, et al. AI-enabled paral- lel assembly of thousands of defect-free neutral atom arrays[J].Physical Review Letters, 2025, 135: 063401

    work page 2025

  6. [3]

    High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer[J].Nature, 2023, 622: 268–272

    Evered S J, Bluvstein D, Kalinowski M, et al. High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer[J].Nature, 2023, 622: 268–272

    work page 2023

  7. [4]

    Low-overhead transversal fault tolerance for universal quantum computation[J].Nature, 2025, 646: 303–308

    Zhou H, Zhao C, Li S H, et al. Low-overhead transversal fault tolerance for universal quantum computation[J].Nature, 2025, 646: 303–308

    work page 2025

  8. [5]

    Microsoft and Atom Computing offer a commer- cial quantum machine with the largest number of entangled logical qubits on record[EB/OL]

    Microsoft Azure Quantum, Atom Computing. Microsoft and Atom Computing offer a commer- cial quantum machine with the largest number of entangled logical qubits on record[EB/OL]. (2024-11-19)[2026-06-19].https://azure.micr osoft.com/en-us/blog/quantum/2024/11/1 9/microsoft-and-atom-computing-offer-a -commercial-quantum-machine-with-the-l argest-number-of-en...

    work page 2024

Show all 75 references
  1. [6]

    Pasqal exceeds 1,000 atoms in quantum processor[EB/OL]

    Pasqal. Pasqal exceeds 1,000 atoms in quantum processor[EB/OL]. (2024-06)[2026-06-19].http s://www.pasqal.com

    2024

  2. [7]

    High-rate quantum LDPC codes for long-range- connected neutral atom registers[J].Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 1111

    Pecorari L, Witzel W, Goldman M, et al. High-rate quantum LDPC codes for long-range- connected neutral atom registers[J].Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 1111

    2025

  3. [8]

    LDPC-cat codes for low-overhead quantum computing in 2D[J].Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 1040

    Ruiz D, Guillaud J, Leverrier A, et al. LDPC-cat codes for low-overhead quantum computing in 2D[J].Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 1040

    2025

  4. [9]

    High- threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quan- tum memory[J].Nature, 2024, 627: 778–782

    Bravyi S, Cross A W, Yoder T J, et al. High- threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quan- tum memory[J].Nature, 2024, 627: 778–782

    2024

  5. [10]

    Fast quan- tum gates for neutral atoms[J].Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85: 2208

    Jaksch D, Cirac J I, Zoller P, et al. Fast quan- tum gates for neutral atoms[J].Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85: 2208

    2000

  6. [11]

    Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole interactions of optically trapped Rydberg atoms[J].Physical Review A, 2005, 72: 022347 22

    Saffman M, Walker T G. Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole interactions of optically trapped Rydberg atoms[J].Physical Review A, 2005, 72: 022347 22

    2005

  7. [12]

    Quantum information with Rydberg atoms[J].Reviews of Modern Physics, 2010, 82: 2313–2363

    Saffman M, Walker T G, Mølmer K. Quantum information with Rydberg atoms[J].Reviews of Modern Physics, 2010, 82: 2313–2363

    2010

  8. [13]

    Ob- servation of Rydberg blockade between two atoms[J].Nature Physics, 2009, 5: 110–114

    Urban E, Johnson T A, Henage T, et al. Ob- servation of Rydberg blockade between two atoms[J].Nature Physics, 2009, 5: 110–114

    2009

  9. [14]

    Ob- servation of collective excitation of two individ- ual atoms in the Rydberg blockade regime[J]

    Gaëtan A, Miroshnychenko Y, Wilk T, et al. Ob- servation of collective excitation of two individ- ual atoms in the Rydberg blockade regime[J]. Nature Physics, 2009, 5: 115–118

    2009

  10. [15]

    Demon- stration of a neutral atom controlled-NOT quan- tum gate[J].Physical Review Letters, 2010, 104: 010503

    Isenhower L, Urban E, Zhang X L, et al. Demon- stration of a neutral atom controlled-NOT quan- tum gate[J].Physical Review Letters, 2010, 104: 010503

    2010

  11. [16]

    Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models[J].Nature, 2016, 534: 667–670

    Labuhn H, Barredo D, Ravets S, et al. Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models[J].Nature, 2016, 534: 667–670

    2016

  12. [17]

    BarredoD,LienhardV,deLeseleucS,etal.Syn- thetic three-dimensional atomic structures as- sembledatombyatom[J].Nature, 2018, 561: 79– 82

    2018

  13. [18]

    Prob- ing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator[J].Nature, 2017, 551: 579–584

    Bernien H, Schwartz S, Keesling A, et al. Prob- ing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator[J].Nature, 2017, 551: 579–584

    2017

  14. [19]

    Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator[J].Nature, 2021, 595: 227– 232

    Ebadi S, Wang T, Levine H, et al. Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator[J].Nature, 2021, 595: 227– 232

    2021

  15. [20]

    Quan- tum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms[J].Nature, 2021, 595: 233–238

    Scholl P, Schuler M, Williams H J, et al. Quan- tum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms[J].Nature, 2021, 595: 233–238

    2021

  16. [21]

    Prob- ing topological spin liquid on a programmable quantum simulator[J].Science, 2021, 374: 1242– 1247

    Semeghini G, Levine H, Keesling A, et al. Prob- ing topological spin liquid on a programmable quantum simulator[J].Science, 2021, 374: 1242– 1247

    2021

  17. [22]

    High- fidelity control and entanglement of Rydberg- atom qubits[J].Physical Review Letters, 2018, 121: 123603

    Levine H, Keesling A, Semeghini G, et al. High- fidelity control and entanglement of Rydberg- atom qubits[J].Physical Review Letters, 2018, 121: 123603

    2018

  18. [23]

    Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer[J].Nature, 2022, 604: 457– 462

    Graham T M, Song Y, Scott J, et al. Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer[J].Nature, 2022, 604: 457– 462

    2022

  19. [24]

    Single atoms with 6,000-second trapping life- times in optical-tweezer arrays at cryogenic tem- peratures[J].Physical Review Applied, 2021, 16: 034013

    Schymik K N, Pancaldi S, Nogrette F, et al. Single atoms with 6,000-second trapping life- times in optical-tweezer arrays at cryogenic tem- peratures[J].Physical Review Applied, 2021, 16: 034013

    2021

  20. [25]

    Constant-overhead fault-tolerant quantum com- putation with reconfigurable atom arrays[J].Na- ture Physics, 2024, 20: 1084–1090

    Xu Q, Ataides-Patino J P, Brown H, et al. Constant-overhead fault-tolerant quantum com- putation with reconfigurable atom arrays[J].Na- ture Physics, 2024, 20: 1084–1090

    2024

  21. [26]

    Experimental demonstration of logical magic state distillation[J].Nature, 2025, 645: 620–625

    Rodriguez P S, Robinson J M, Jepsen P N, et al. Experimental demonstration of logical magic state distillation[J].Nature, 2025, 645: 620–625

    2025

  22. [27]

    A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for uni- versal quantum computation[J].Nature, 2026, 649: 39–46

    Bluvstein D, Evered S J, Geim A A, et al. A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for uni- versal quantum computation[J].Nature, 2026, 649: 39–46

    2026

  23. [28]

    Towards ultra-high-rate quantum error correction with reconfigurable atom arrays[J]

    Zhao C, Duckering C, Gu A, et al. Towards ultra-high-rate quantum error correction with reconfigurable atom arrays[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2604.16209, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  24. [31]

    A 10 mega- hertz spatial light modulator[J]

    Wei X, Li Z, Karve A V, et al. A 10 mega- hertz spatial light modulator[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2601.08906, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Device for MHz-rate rastering of arbitrary 2D optical potentials[J]

    Bytyqi E, Sinclair J, Ramette J, et al. Device for MHz-rate rastering of arbitrary 2D optical potentials[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2602.16025, 2026 23

    2026

  26. [33]

    Gate- based readout and cooling of neutral atoms[J]

    Tsai R B-S, Picard L R B, Sun X, et al. Gate- based readout and cooling of neutral atoms[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2603.21643, 2026

    2026

  27. [34]

    Multitarget Ry- dberg gates via spatial blockade engineering[J]

    Stein S, Liu C, Kan S, et al. Multitarget Ry- dberg gates via spatial blockade engineering[J]. Physical Review Research, 2026, 8: 013254

    2026

  28. [35]

    Optimized ancillary drive for fast Rydberg entangling gates[J].Phys- ical Review A, 2026, 113: 032614

    Li R, Zhang M H, Qian J. Optimized ancillary drive for fast Rydberg entangling gates[J].Phys- ical Review A, 2026, 113: 032614

    2026

  29. [36]

    Quantum cellular automata on a dual- species Rydberg processor[J]

    White R, Ramesh V, Impertro A, et al. Quantum cellular automata on a dual- species Rydberg processor[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2601.16257, 2026

    2026

  30. [37]

    Infleqtion strengthens neutral-atom quantum computing platform with new techni- cal breakthroughs[EB/OL]

    Infleqtion. Infleqtion strengthens neutral-atom quantum computing platform with new techni- cal breakthroughs[EB/OL]. (2026-05-20)[2026- 06-19].https://www.infleqtion.com

    2026

  31. [38]

    Sustaining high- fidelity quantum logic in neutral-atom circuits via mid-circuit operations[J]

    Lin R, Li Y, Zheng L T, et al. Sustaining high- fidelity quantum logic in neutral-atom circuits via mid-circuit operations[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2603.01612, 2026

    2026

  32. [39]

    2026 global quantum computing industry development out- look[EB/OL]

    Photon Box Research Institute. 2026 global quantum computing industry development out- look[EB/OL]. (2026-02)[2026-06-19].https:// www.photonboxonline.com

    2026

  33. [40]

    A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits[J].Nature, 2025, 647: 60–67

    Manetsch H J, Nomura G, Bataille E, et al. A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits[J].Nature, 2025, 647: 60–67

    2025

  34. [41]

    Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system[J]

    Chiu N C, Trapp E C, Guo J, et al. Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system[J]. Nature, 2025, 646: 1075–1080

    2025

  35. [42]

    Probing the Kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer[J].Nature, 2025, 645: 341–347

    Evered S J, Kalinowski M, Geim A A, et al. Probing the Kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer[J].Nature, 2025, 645: 341–347

    2025

  36. [43]

    Accelerating the assembly of defect-free atomic arrays with maximum parallelisms[J].Physical Review Ap- plied, 2023, 19: 054032

    Wang S, Zhang W, Zhang T, et al. Accelerating the assembly of defect-free atomic arrays with maximum parallelisms[J].Physical Review Ap- plied, 2023, 19: 054032

    2023

  37. [44]

    Direct gener- ation of an array with 78,400 optical tweezers using a single metasurface[J].Chinese Physics Letters, 2026, 43: 010606

    Zhang Z, Wang Y, Liao Y, et al. Direct gener- ation of an array with 78,400 optical tweezers using a single metasurface[J].Chinese Physics Letters, 2026, 43: 010606

    2026

  38. [45]

    Emergent U(1) lattice gauge theory in Rydberg atom arrays[J].Nature Re- views Physics, 2024, 6: 566–576

    Cheng Y, Zhai H. Emergent U(1) lattice gauge theory in Rydberg atom arrays[J].Nature Re- views Physics, 2024, 6: 566–576

    2024

  39. [46]

    Coherence preser- vation of a single neutral atom qubit transferred between magic-intensity optical traps[J].Physi- cal Review Letters, 2016, 117: 123201

    Yang J, He X, Guo R, et al. Coherence preser- vation of a single neutral atom qubit transferred between magic-intensity optical traps[J].Physi- cal Review Letters, 2016, 117: 123201

    2016

  40. [47]

    Entangling two in- dividual atoms of different isotopes via Rydberg blockade[J].Physical Review Letters, 2017, 119: 160502

    Zeng Y, Xu P, He X, et al. Entangling two in- dividual atoms of different isotopes via Rydberg blockade[J].Physical Review Letters, 2017, 119: 160502

    2017

  41. [48]

    Programmable quan- tum annealing architectures with Ising quantum wires[J].PRX Quantum, 2020, 1: 020311

    Qiu X, Zoller P, Li X. Programmable quan- tum annealing architectures with Ising quantum wires[J].PRX Quantum, 2020, 1: 020311

    2020

  42. [49]

    Universal quan- tum optimization with cold atoms in an opti- cal cavity[J].Physical Review Letters, 2023, 131: 103601

    Ye M, Tian Y, Lin J, et al. Universal quan- tum optimization with cold atoms in an opti- cal cavity[J].Physical Review Letters, 2023, 131: 103601

    2023

  43. [50]

    Hardware-efficient Rydberg atomic quantum solvers for NP problems[J/OL]

    Cao S, Li X. Hardware-efficient Rydberg atomic quantum solvers for NP problems[J/OL]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2507.22686, 2025

    2025

  44. [51]

    A fiber array ar- chitecture for atom quantum computing[J].Na- ture Communications, 2025, 16: 9728

    Li X, Hou J Y, Wang J C, et al. A fiber array ar- chitecture for atom quantum computing[J].Na- ture Communications, 2025, 16: 9728

    2025

  45. [52]

    Ro- bust quantum reservoir computing for molec- ular property prediction[J]

    Beaulieu D, Kornjača M, Krunic Z, et al. Ro- bust quantum reservoir computing for molec- ular property prediction[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2412.06758, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Continuous-time quantum walk-based ansätze on neutral atom hardware[J]

    Matwiejew E, Wurtz J, Chen J, et al. Continuous-time quantum walk-based ansätze on neutral atom hardware[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2509.00386, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Transversal architecture for megaquop-scale quantum sim- ulation with neutral atoms[J].PRX Quantum, 2026, 7: 020343 24

    Ismail R, Chen I, Zhao C, et al. Transversal architecture for megaquop-scale quantum sim- ulation with neutral atoms[J].PRX Quantum, 2026, 7: 020343 24

    2026

  48. [55]

    En- tangling gate performance and fidelity limits with neutral atom Förster resonances[J]

    Norrell S A, Shen Y, Saffman M, et al. En- tangling gate performance and fidelity limits with neutral atom Förster resonances[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2605.19245, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  49. [56]

    QuEra Computing releases a groundbreaking roadmap for advanced error- corrected quantum computers[EB/OL]

    QuEra Computing. QuEra Computing releases a groundbreaking roadmap for advanced error- corrected quantum computers[EB/OL]. (2024- 01-09)[2026-06-19].https://www.quera.com/ press-releases/quera-computing-release s-a-groundbreaking-roadmap-for-advance d-error-corrected-quantum-c...

    2024

  50. [57]

    Atom Computing and Mi- crosoft accelerate commercial quantum comput- ing with next-generation fault-tolerant quantum computer[EB/OL]

    Atom Computing. Atom Computing and Mi- crosoft accelerate commercial quantum comput- ing with next-generation fault-tolerant quantum computer[EB/OL]. (2025-01-20)[2026-06-19].ht tps://atom-computing.com/microsoft-par tnership

    2025

  51. [58]

    Pasqal releases 2025 roadmap show- casing upgradable platform from today’s quan- tum solutions to tomorrow’s fault-tolerant sys- tems[EB/OL]

    Pasqal. Pasqal releases 2025 roadmap show- casing upgradable platform from today’s quan- tum solutions to tomorrow’s fault-tolerant sys- tems[EB/OL]. (2025-06-12)[2026-06-19].https: //www.pasqal.com/newsroom/pasqal-relea ses-2025-roadmap

    2025

  52. [59]

    Controlled phase gate protocol for neutral atoms via off-resonant modulated driving[J].Physical Review Applied, 2020, 13: 024059

    Sun Y, Xu P, Chen P X, Liu L. Controlled phase gate protocol for neutral atoms via off-resonant modulated driving[J].Physical Review Applied, 2020, 13: 024059

    2020

  53. [60]

    High-fidelity entangle- ment of neutral atoms via a Rydberg-mediated single-modulated-pulse controlled-PHASE gate[J].Physical Review A, 2022, 105: 042430

    Fu Z, Xu P, Sun Y, et al. High-fidelity entangle- ment of neutral atoms via a Rydberg-mediated single-modulated-pulse controlled-PHASE gate[J].Physical Review A, 2022, 105: 042430

    2022

  54. [61]

    Suppression of high-frequency compo- nents in off-resonant modulated driving proto- cols for Rydberg-blockade gates[J].Physical Re- view Applied, 2023, 20: L061002

    Sun Y. Suppression of high-frequency compo- nents in off-resonant modulated driving proto- cols for Rydberg-blockade gates[J].Physical Re- view Applied, 2023, 20: L061002

    2023

  55. [62]

    Demonstration of a logical architecture uniting motion and in- place entanglement: Shor’s algorithm, constant- depth CNOT ladder, and many-hypercube code[J]

    Rines R, Hall B, First M H, et al. Demonstration of a logical architecture uniting motion and in- place entanglement: Shor’s algorithm, constant- depth CNOT ladder, and many-hypercube code[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2509.13247, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation[J].Physical Review A, 2012, 86: 032324

    Fowler A G, Mariantoni M, Martinis J M, et al. Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation[J].Physical Review A, 2012, 86: 032324

    2012

  57. [65]

    Assem- bly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits[J].Nature Communications, 2022, 13: 2779

    Barnes K, Battaglino P, Bloom B, et al. Assem- bly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits[J].Nature Communications, 2022, 13: 2779

    2022

  58. [66]

    Mid-circuit cavity measurement in a neutral atom array[J].Physi- cal Review Letters, 2022, 129: 203602

    Deist E, Lu Y A, Ho J, et al. Mid-circuit cavity measurement in a neutral atom array[J].Physi- cal Review Letters, 2022, 129: 203602

    2022

  59. [67]

    Midcircuit measurements on a single-species neutral alkali atom quantum processor[J].Phys- ical Review X, 2023, 13: 041051

    Graham T M, Phuttitarn M, Chinnarasu R, et al. Midcircuit measurements on a single-species neutral alkali atom quantum processor[J].Phys- ical Review X, 2023, 13: 041051

    2023

  60. [68]

    Large-scale atomic quantum computing system jointly developed by young Fudan scientists[EB/OL]

    Fudan University. Large-scale atomic quantum computing system jointly developed by young Fudan scientists[EB/OL]. (2025-08-30)[2026-06- 25].https://news.fudan.edu.cn/2025/0830/ c1247a146502

    2025

  61. [69]

    Hanyuan series neutral atom quantum com- puter[EB/OL]

    Zhongke Kuyuan Technology (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Hanyuan series neutral atom quantum com- puter[EB/OL]. [2026-06-25].https://www.qu antumchina.com/newsinfo/7282381.html

    2026

  62. [70]

    Ytterbium atom neutral atom quantum computing platform[EB/OL]

    Taiyi Liangsheng (Shanghai) Quantum Technol- ogy Co., Ltd. Ytterbium atom neutral atom quantum computing platform[EB/OL]. (2026- 03-17)[2026-06-25].https://finance.eastmo ney.com/a/202603173673595280

    2026

  63. [71]

    Quantum technologies with optically in- terfaced solid-state spins[J].Nature Photonics, 2018, 12(9): 516–527

    Awschalom D D, Hanson R, Wrachtrup J, et al. Quantum technologies with optically in- terfaced solid-state spins[J].Nature Photonics, 2018, 12(9): 516–527

    2018

  64. [72]

    ZAP: Zoned ar- chitecture and performant compiler for field pro- grammable atom array[J].IEEE Transactions 25 on Quantum Engineering, 2026

    Huang C, Zhao X, Xu H, et al. ZAP: Zoned ar- chitecture and performant compiler for field pro- grammable atom array[J].IEEE Transactions 25 on Quantum Engineering, 2026. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2411.14037

    2026 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes[J]

    Covey J P, Weinfurter H, Bernien H. Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes[J]. npj Quantum Information, 2023, 9: 90

    2023

  66. [74]

    Rydberg-blockade controlled-NOT gate and entanglement in a two-dimensional array of neutral-atom qubits[J].Physical Review A, 2015, 92: 022336

    Maller K M, Lichtman M T, Xia T, et al. Rydberg-blockade controlled-NOT gate and entanglement in a two-dimensional array of neutral-atom qubits[J].Physical Review A, 2015, 92: 022336

    2015

  67. [75]

    physi- cal basis—hardware scale—error correction and fault tolerance—application exploration

    Saffman M. Quantum computing with atomic qubit arrays: confronting the cost of connectiv- ity[J]. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2505.11218, 2025 Acknowledgements This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2023YFB4502500. Innova...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.