Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The What, Why, and How of Context Length Extension Techniques in Large Language Models -- A Detailed Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.07872 v1 pith:EXPQ7PMG submitted 2024-01-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords contextlengthtechniquesextensionlanguagellmsresearcherssurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) represents a notable breakthrough in Natural Language Processing (NLP), contributing to substantial progress in both text comprehension and generation. However, amidst these advancements, it is noteworthy that LLMs often face a limitation in terms of context length extrapolation. Understanding and extending the context length for LLMs is crucial in enhancing their performance across various NLP applications. In this survey paper, we delve into the multifaceted aspects of exploring why it is essential, and the potential transformations that superior techniques could bring to NLP applications. We study the inherent challenges associated with extending context length and present an organized overview of the existing strategies employed by researchers. Additionally, we discuss the intricacies of evaluating context extension techniques and highlight the open challenges that researchers face in this domain. Furthermore, we explore whether there is a consensus within the research community regarding evaluation standards and identify areas where further agreement is needed. This comprehensive survey aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers, guiding them through the nuances of context length extension techniques and fostering discussions on future advancements in this evolving field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Invisible Tokens, Visible Bills: The Urgent Need to Audit Hidden Operations in Opaque LLM Services

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A taxonomy and auditing framework for hidden operations that opaque LLM APIs bill users for, with proposals for commitment-based, predictive, behavioral, and hardware-based verification.

Pith tools