Factorizations of Schur functions

Jaydeb Sarkar; Ramlal Debnath

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 33 references

Factorizations of Schur functions

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a Schur-Agler class function with nonzero value at the origin factors into two Schur-Agler class functions exactly when its realizing isometric colligation has an explicit block structure, and gives explicit…

desk verdict The main factorization criteria are correct and useful, but the paper's 'complete answer' claim outruns what is actually proven: the n-variable vanishing-at-origin and Drury-Arveson results are merely stated. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01850 v3 pith:EXR5PUXK submitted 2019-08-05 math.FA math.CVmath.OAmath.OC

Ramlal Debnath , Jaydeb Sarkar This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.FAmath.CVmath.OAmath.OC MSC 32A1032A3832A7047A4847A1346E1593B1515A40

keywords SchurfunctionsSchur-Aglerclassfactorizationisometriccolligationstransferfunctionrealizationspolydiscblockoperatormatrices

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a transfer-function criterion for when a Schur-Agler class function on the unit polydisc $\mathbb{D}^n$ factors as a product of two Schur-Agler class functions. The criterion lives entirely on the isometric colligation that realizes the function: the colligation must have a block shape, called property $F(n)$, in which certain off-diagonal blocks vanish and others factor as products of the $C$ and $B$ rows. When the function does not vanish at the origin, the criterion is an if-and-only-if, and the paper gives explicit formulas for the two factors as transfer functions of reduced colligations. The same pattern classifies split-variable factorizations, where one factor depends on the first $m$ variables and the other on the rest, and it extends to multipliers of the Drury-Arveson space and to functions vanishing at the origin, where extra rigidity identities appear. This matters because factorization of bounded analytic functions in several variables is generally delicate, and the paper turns the question into checkable linear algebra.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the isometric colligation $V = \begin{bmatrix} a & B \\ C & D \end{bmatrix}$ and its transfer function $\tau_V(z) = a + B(I - E(z)D)^{-1} E(z) C$. A colligation satisfying property $F(n)$ has its $D$-block shaped so that the resolvent $(I - E(z)D)^{-1}$ becomes upper triangular after a flip, which makes the transfer function split into a product of two transfer functions. The factorization is produced by splitting each coordinate space into $M_i \oplus N_i$, rearranging the direct sum with a flip operator, and normalizing the off-diagonal data with scalars $\alpha$ and $\beta$; the identities $|\beta|^2 = |a|^2 + C(1)^*C(1)$ and $\alpha = a/\beta$ are exactly what force the two reduced blocks to be isometric colligations. The same machine, with different block conditions, handles split-variable factors and the vanishing-at-origin case.

What would settle it

Take any explicit isometric colligation $V$ of the form with $a \neq 0$, $D_{21}=0$, and $aD_{12}=C_1B_2$, compute $\tau_V$ and the two factors from (3.12), and check whether both factors are Schur functions whose product equals $\tau_V$; a single such $V$ for which the factors leave the Schur class or fail to multiply back to $\tau_V$ would disprove the characterization. The 3-by-3 Blaschke-product example in Section 5.2 is a concrete case where the formulas should recover the two Blaschke factors exactly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.4: for $\theta \in SA(\mathbb{D}^n)$ with $\theta(0) \neq 0$, $\theta = \phi\psi$ for some $\phi,\psi \in SA(\mathbb{D}^n)$ if and only if $\theta = \tau_V$ for some isometric colligation $V$ satisfying property $F(n)$. Property $F(n)$ means that, after decomposing each coordinate space as $M_i \oplus N_i$, the colligation has the block form with $D_{ij}(21) = 0$ and $a D_{ij}(12) = C_i(1) B_j(2)$ for all $i,j$, where $a = \theta(0)$. The factors are not merely shown to exist; they are constructed explicitly as $\tau_{V_1}$ and $\tau_{V_2}$ for reduced colligations $V_1, V_2$ whose entries are normalized by scalars $\alpha,\beta$ satisfying $|\beta|^2 = |a|^2 + C(1)^*C(1)$ and $\alpha = a/\beta$. The same equivalence, with property $F_m(n)$, classifies split-variable factorizations (Theorem 2.4), and Theorem 4.1 gives the vanishing-at-origin analogue on the disc, where the block conditions become rigidity identities such as $C_1 C_1^* D_2 = C_1^* C_1 D_2$ and $D_2 = XY$ with $X$ an isometry.

Load-bearing premise

The converse of the main equivalence assumes that the two reduced block matrices built from a colligation satisfying property $F(n)$ are themselves isometric colligations whose product recovers the original colligation; the entire sufficiency direction rests on that algebraic identity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any Schur-Agler function on the polydisc with nonzero value at the origin, deciding whether it factors into two Schur-Agler factors reduces to checking the explicit block conditions of property $F(n)$ on a realizing isometric colligation.
When the conditions hold, the two factors can be written down directly from the colligation via formulas (3.12), so the factorization is algorithmic rather than existential.
A Schur-Agler function on $\mathbb{D}^n$ with nonzero value at the origin factors as $\phi(z_1,\ldots,z_m)\psi(z_{m+1},\ldots,z_n)$ exactly when its colligation satisfies property $F_m(n)$; in the two-variable case this detects products of two one-variable Schur functions.
In the vanishing-at-origin case, factorization forces rigid identities on the colligation: on the disc, one-factor-nonzero factorizations correspond to $C_1 C_1^* D_2 = C_1^* C_1 D_2$ with $C_1^*C_1 > 0$, and both-factors-vanishing factorizations correspond to $D_2 = XY$ with $X$ an isometry and $X^*D_1 = 0$.
The same transfer-function criterion classifies split-variable factorizations of multipliers in the unit ball of the Drury-Arveson space, as stated in Theorem 5.3.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because property $F(n)$ is written as explicit equations among the blocks, a symbolic or numerical solver could turn the characterization into a computational factorization test for rational Schur-Agler functions with finite-dimensional realizations.
The proof mechanism uses only the isometry equations of the colligation, so the same scheme is likely to extend to operator-valued Schur-Agler functions and to other multiplier algebras that admit transfer-function realization theorems; Theorem 5.3 already points in that direction.
A natural extension question, not addressed in the paper, is whether all minimal isometric realizations of a factorable function share the $F(n)$ block shape, or only the canonical one constructed here; if they do, the block shape would be an invariant of factorability rather than of a particular realization.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core of this paper is solid. Theorems 2.4 and 3.4 give explicit, reversible block-matrix conditions for when a Schur-Agler function splits as a product, and I went through the isometry normalizations in the converse proof. The algebra works; the garbled line near (2.5) is a typesetting error, not a mathematical one, and the intended identity can be reconstructed from the surrounding equations. The explicit formulas for the factors in (3.11)-(3.12) are a genuine convenience, and the forward direction is properly credited to the classical product-of-colligations construction. If you work with transfer-function realizations, this is a directly usable criterion.

The novelty is real, though not dramatic. The forward direction is classical; the contribution is the converse and the clean statement of the block conditions, especially for the Schur-Agler class in more than two variables. That is worth having in the literature.

The soft spots are in the packaging. The introduction says the paper gives "a complete answer" to the factorization question, but Theorem 4.2 (the n-variable vanishing-at-origin case) and Theorem 5.3 (Drury-Arveson multipliers) are both stated without proof. Theorem 4.2's statement is also visibly corrupted: one condition reads "Bi(2) =" with nothing after it, and the class is misspelled as AS(D^n). That is not a minor typo; it makes the theorem uncheckable as printed. The one-variable vanishing-at-origin case (Theorem 4.1) is proven, so the gap is specifically in the advertised n-variable and multiplier claims. The authors should either prove these statements or explicitly mark them as conjectures and trim the "complete answer" language. The many smaller typos throughout the paper, while annoying, do not compromise the main argument.

This paper deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. The main theorems are correct and the explicit criteria are useful. A referee should be asked to check the unproved statements carefully and require revision before the paper is accepted. If you use realization theory, cite this for the proven nonzero-origin characterization; just don't cite it for the vanishing-at-origin or multiplier cases until they appear with proofs.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies factorization of Schur functions and Schur-Agler class functions on the polydisc through isometric colligations, building on Agler's transfer-function realization. For functions with nonzero value at the origin, it characterizes when theta in SA(D^n) is a product of two SA(D^n) factors (Theorem 3.4) or a product of functions in disjoint sets of variables (Theorem 2.4) by explicit block-structure conditions on any isometric colligation realizing theta, called property F(n) and F_m(n), respectively; explicit formulas for the factors are given in (3.12). A one-variable vanishing-at-origin classification is proved in Theorem 4.1, and extensions to vanishing functions in SA(D^n) and to Drury-Arveson multipliers are stated as Theorems 4.2 and 5.3. The paper also provides a product construction for several one-variable factors (Theorem 5.1), examples involving Blaschke factors, a connecting result between F_m(n) and F(n) (Theorem 5.2), and a discussion of the reversibility of the canonical constructions.

Significance. If the main results hold as stated, the paper provides a clean, checkable colligation-level answer to a natural factorization question for Schur-Agler class functions, with explicit factor realizations and a two-way correspondence. The proofs of Theorems 2.2-2.4, 3.2-3.4, 4.1, 5.1, and 5.2 are direct algebraic verifications; the constructions of V from V1 and V2 and the reverse construction are explicit and, as shown in Section 5.5, reversible up to a unimodular phase. These are genuine strengths. However, the advertised 'complete answer' is weakened by the fact that two stated classification results, Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 5.3, are given without proof and that the statement of Theorem 4.2 is not fully checkable as printed.

major comments (3)

[Section 4, Theorem 4.2] Theorem 4.2 is presented as a classification of factorizations of functions in SA(D^n) vanishing at the origin, yet the paper explicitly says 'we leave out the details to the reader' and the statement contains an incomplete condition ('one has Bi(2) =, Dij(21) = 0') and a typo ('AS(D^n)' instead of 'SA(D^n)'). Because the introduction advertises a complete answer and Section 4 is framed as a complete description, this unproved and partially unreadable statement is load-bearing for the paper's central claim. The authors must either supply a full proof and correct the statement, or visibly downgrade this part to a conjecture and adjust the advertised scope.
[Section 5.4, Theorem 5.3] Theorem 5.3, concerning factorization of multipliers of the Drury-Arveson space, is stated with the sentence 'We omit the proof'. Since the introduction and the section title present multipliers as part of the paper's scope, the absence of a proof leaves the 'complete answer' claim unsupported for this case. A complete proof should be added, or the result should be explicitly labeled as a conjecture with the completeness claim restricted accordingly.
[Section 2, proof of Theorem 2.3, around equation (2.5)] The displayed line after equation (2.2) contains an incorrect algebraic factor: it reads '\bar a^2 / alpha' where the argument requires '(\bar beta / alpha)'. This identity is the key decoupling step showing that V2 is an isometry, and it is reused in Theorem 3.3. As printed, the proof is not correct, although the intended identity is recoverable from V*V = I together with (2.5). The displayed computation must be corrected before publication.

minor comments (3)

[Throughout] There are several typographical errors, for example 'out results' in the introduction, 'Schu r' in the abstract, and 'opera tor matrix' in the abstract; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
[Section 4, Theorem 4.2] In addition to the incomplete condition already noted, 'AS(D^n)' should read 'SA(D^n)' in the statement of Theorem 4.2.
[Section 5.4, Theorem 5.3] In the statement of Theorem 5.3 the domain is the unit ball B^n, but the text writes 'z in D^n'; this should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the factorization criteria are proved by explicit colligation algebra; the unproved Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 5.3 are rigor/completeness gaps, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The core equivalences in Theorems 2.4 and 3.4 are obtained by direct construction, not by importing the conclusion. In the forward direction, Theorem 2.2 starts from isometric colligations V1 and V2 explicitly forms V = V1~ V2~, and verifies that V satisfies property Fm(n) and tau_V = tau_V1 * tau_V2. In the converse, the scalars alpha and beta are forced by the isometry condition V*V = I (|beta|^2 = |a|^2 + C1*C1, alpha = a/beta), not chosen to force factorability, and the isometry of V1 and V2 is checked algebraically. The product identity is then obtained directly, 'V = V1V2, by (2.2)'. The property Fm(n)/F(n) conditions are not synonyms for factorability; their equivalence to a product split is the content of the proofs. The realization theorems used are Agler's external results, and no load-bearing self-citation of the present authors appears. The genuine gaps are completeness gaps: Theorem 4.2 is stated for the vanishing-at-zero case with 'leave out the details to the reader', and Theorem 5.3 is stated with 'We omit the proof'. These omissions weaken the advertised complete-answer claim but do not make the proven non-vanishing theorems circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no invented entities (no new particles, operators, or spaces) and fits no constants to data. The properties F_m(n) and F(n) are conditions on matrices, not entities. The scalars alpha and beta are derived from the colligation data as part of the construction, with the phase ambiguity tracked in Section 5.5. The main imports from prior literature are Agler's realization theorems, the classical Schur realization theorem, and the von Neumann/Ando facts identifying the Schur class with the Schur-Agler class in one and two variables.

free parameters (2)

beta = |beta|^2 = 1 - C2*C2 = |a|^2 + C1*C1, phase undetermined
Chosen to normalize the reconstructed colligations V1 and V2 to isometries; determined by the colligation data up to a unimodular phase, an ambiguity the paper itself acknowledges in Section 5.5. It is not fitted to function data, but it is a scalar chosen by hand to make the construction work.
alpha = alpha = a/beta
Derived from beta and a = theta(0); not a free fit. Listed for completeness of the audit since it is part of the explicit factor-reconstruction formula.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Agler's realization theorems: every function in SA(D^n), and every Schur function on D or D^2, equals tau_V for some isometric colligation V with E(z) = z1 I1 xor ... xor zn In (Theorems 1.1 and 1.2).
The entire F_m(n)/F(n) framework lives inside this representation; without it the matrix conditions would not characterize any function class. Established by Agler (1990) and Agler-McCarthy, independent of this paper.
standard math Standard realization calculus: tau_V(0) = a, the transfer-function identity, block inversion of I - E(z)D, and the isometry identities V*V = I, including |a|^2 + C1*C1 + C2*C2 = 1.
Invoked in every proof in Sections 2-4; routine functional-calculus and block-matrix facts in the Hilbert-space operator setting.
standard math Class-equality facts: S(D) = SA(D) and S(D^2) = SA(D^2) by von Neumann and Ando, with proper containment S(D^n) strictly larger than SA(D^n) for n > 2.
Used in the introduction to justify restricting the n-variable results to the Schur-Agler class and to frame the two-variable Schur results as Agler-type results.
standard math For a factorization theta = phi*psi, the factors admit realizations with scalar corners equal to phi(0) and psi(0), so that products of colligations can be formed with the factor values appearing as the (1,1) entries.
Used in the necessary directions of Theorems 2.4, 3.4, 4.1 and 5.1; it follows from the fact that tau_V(0) equals the scalar corner of V for any realization.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Factorizations of Schur functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EXR5PUXK

@misc{pith2026190801850,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Factorizations of Schur functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EXR5PUXK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01850}
}

abstract

The Schur class, denoted by $\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{D})$, is the set of all functions analytic and bounded by one in modulus in the open unit disc $\mathbb{D}$ in the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$, that is \[ \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{D}) = \{\varphi \in H^\infty(\mathbb{D}): \|\varphi\|_{\infty} := \sup_{z \in \mathbb{D}} |\varphi(z)| \leq 1\}. \] The elements of $\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{D})$ are called Schur functions. A classical result going back to I. Schur states: A function $\varphi: \mathbb{D} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ is in $\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{D})$ if and only if there exist a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ and an isometry (known as colligation operator matrix or scattering operator matrix) \[ V = \begin{bmatrix} a & B \\ C & D \end{bmatrix} : \mathbb{C} \oplus \mathcal{H} \rightarrow \mathbb{C} \oplus \mathcal{H}, \] such that $\varphi$ admits a transfer function realization corresponding to $V$, that is \[ \varphi(z) = a + z B (I_{\mathcal{H}} - z D)^{-1} C \quad \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}). \] An analogous statement holds true for Schur functions on the bidisc. On the other hand, Schur-Agler class functions on the unit polydisc in $\mathbb{C}^n$ is a well-known "analogue" of Schur functions on $\mathbb{D}$. In this paper, we present algorithms to factorize Schur functions and Schur-Agler class functions in terms of colligation matrices. More precisely, we isolate checkable conditions on colligation matrices that ensure the existence of Schur (Schur-Agler class) factors of a Schur (Schur-Agler class) function and vice versa.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

[1]

Agler, On the representation of certain holomorphic functions deﬁ ned on a polydisc , Topics in operator theory: Ernst D

J. Agler, On the representation of certain holomorphic functions deﬁ ned on a polydisc , Topics in operator theory: Ernst D. Hellinger memorial volume, Oper. Theory Adv. App l., vol. 48, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1990, 47-66

work page 1990
[2]

Agler and J

J. Agler and J. McCarthy, Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation on the bidisk , J. Reine Angew. Math. 506 (1999), 191–204. 26 DEBNATH AND SARKAR

work page 1999
[3]

Agler and J

J. Agler and J. McCarthy, Pick Interpolation and Hilbert Function Spaces , Grad. Stud. Math., 44. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002

work page 2002
[4]

Alpay, A

D. Alpay, A. Dijksma, J. Rovnyak and H. de Snoo, Schur functions, operator colligations, and reproducing kernel Pontryagin spaces , Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 96. Birkh¨ auser V erlag, Basel, 1997

work page 1997
[5]

Anderson, M

J. Anderson, M. Dritschel and J. Rovnyak, Schwarz-Pick inequalities for the Schur-Agler class on the polydisk and unit ball , Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 8 (2008), 339–361

work page 2008
[6]

Andˆ o,On a pair of commutative contractions , Acta Sci

T. Andˆ o,On a pair of commutative contractions , Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 24 (1963), 88–90

work page 1963
[7]

D. Z. Arov and L. Z. Grossman, Scattering matrices in the theory of unitary extensions of i sometric operators, Math. Nachr. 157 (1992), 105—123

work page 1992
[8]

J. Ball, T. Trent and V. Vinnikov, Interpolation and commutant lifting for multipliers on rep roducing kernel Hilbert spaces , Operator theory and analysis, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications 122 (eds H. Bart, I. Gohberg and A. Ran; Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2001) 8 9–138

work page 2001

Show all 33 references

[9]

M. S. Brodski ˘i, Unitary operator colligations and their characteristic fu nctions, (in Russian) Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 33 (1978) no.4(202), 141–168, 256, English translation in: Russian Math. Surveys 33 (1978), 159–191

1978
[10]

Brodski ˘i and M

M. Brodski ˘i and M. Livˇ sic,Spectral analysis of non-selfadjoint operators and interm ediate systems . Am. Math. Soc. Transl. (2), 13, 265–346 (1960). English translation o f the Russian original, Uspehi Mat. Nauk (N.S.) 13 (1958) no. 1(79), 3–85

1960
[11]

S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron and V. Balakrishnan, Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory, SIAM Studies in Applied and Numerical Mathematics, vol. 15, SIAM, P hiladelphia, 1994

1994
[12]

Crabb and A

M. Crabb and A. Davie, Von Neumann’s inequality for Hilbert space operators , Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 7 (1975), 49–50

1975
[13]

Doyle, B

C. Doyle, B. Francis and A. Tannenbaum, Feedback control theory, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1992

1992
[14]

Eschmeier and M

J. Eschmeier and M. Putinar, Spherical contractions and interpolation problems on the u nit ball , J. Reine Angew. Math. 542 (2002), 219–236

2002
[15]

Foias and A

C. Foias and A. Frazho, The commutant lifting approach to interpolation problems , Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 44. Birkhuser Verlag, Basel, 1990

1990
[16]

Foias, A

C. Foias, A. Frazho, I. Gohberg and R. Kaashoek, Metric constrained interpolation, commutant lifting and systems. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 100. Birkh¨ auser V erlag, Basel, 1998

1998
[17]

Gohberg (ed.), I

I. Gohberg (ed.), I. Schur methods in operator theory and signal processing , Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 18, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1986

1986
[18]

Grinshpan, D

A. Grinshpan, D. S. Kaliuzhnyi-Verbovetskyi, V. Vinnikov and W. J. Woerdeman, Classes of tuples of commuting contractions satisfying the multivariable von N eumann inequality, J. Funct. Anal. 256 (2009), 3035–3054

2009
[19]

Helton, Operator theory, analytic functions matrices and electric al engineering, CBMS Lecture Notes, no

J. Helton, Operator theory, analytic functions matrices and electric al engineering, CBMS Lecture Notes, no. 68, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1987

1987
[20]

Helton, The characteristic functions of operator theory and electr ical network realization, Indiana Univ

J. Helton, The characteristic functions of operator theory and electr ical network realization, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 22 (1972/73), 403–414

1972
[21]

Kaczorek, Two-dimensional linear systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 68, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985

T. Kaczorek, Two-dimensional linear systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 68, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985

1985
[22]

Kailath, A theorem of I

T. Kailath, A theorem of I. Schur and its impact on modern signal processi ng, I. , Schur methods in operator theory and signal processing, Oper. Theory: Adv. App l., vol. 18, Birkh¨ auser, Basel (1986), 9–30

1986
[23]

Livˇ sic,On a class of linear operators in Hilbert space , Amer

M. Livˇ sic,On a class of linear operators in Hilbert space , Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2) 13 (1960), 61—83

1960
[24]

Livˇ sic,Operators, oscillations, waves , Moscow, Nauka, 1966 (Russian)

M. Livˇ sic,Operators, oscillations, waves , Moscow, Nauka, 1966 (Russian)

1966
[25]

Mittal and V

M. Mittal and V. Paulsen, Operator algebras of functions , J. Funct. Anal. 258(9), 3195–3225
[26]

P. S. Muhly and B. Solel, Schur class operator functions and automorphisms of Hardy a lgebras, Docu- menta Math. 13, (2008), 365–411. F ACTORIZATIONS OF SCHUR FUNCTIONS 27

2008
[27]

B. S. Pavlov, Irreversibility, Lax–Phillips approach to resonance scat tering and spectral analysis of non- self-adjoint operators in Hilbert space , Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 38(1):21–45 (1999). Irreversibility and cos- mology. Fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics (Peyresq, 1 997)

1999
[28]

Roesser, A discrete state-space model for linear image processing , IEEE Trans

R. Roesser, A discrete state-space model for linear image processing , IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-20 (1975), 1–10

1975
[29]

Sarason, Generalized interpolation in H ∞ , Trans

D. Sarason, Generalized interpolation in H ∞ , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1967), 179–203

1967
[30]

Schur, ¨Uber Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises besch r¨ ankt sind

I. Schur, ¨Uber Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises besch r¨ ankt sind. II., J. Reine Angew. Math. 148 (1918), 122–145

1918
[31]

Schur, ¨Uber Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises besch r¨ ankt sind

I. Schur, ¨Uber Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises besch r¨ ankt sind. I., J. Reine Angew. Math. 147 (1917), 205–232

1917
[32]

Tannenbaum, Invariance and system theory: algebraic and geometric aspe cts, Lecture Notes in Math- ematics, 845

A. Tannenbaum, Invariance and system theory: algebraic and geometric aspe cts, Lecture Notes in Math- ematics, 845. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1981

1981
[33]

N. Th. Varopoulos, On an inequality of von Neumann and an application of the metr ic theory of tensor products to operators theory , J. Funct. Anal. 16 (1974), 83-100. Indian Statistical Institute, Statistics and Mathematics Unit, 8th Mile, Mysore Road, Bangalore, 560059, Indi...

1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Agler, On the representation of certain holomorphic functions deﬁ ned on a polydisc , Topics in operator theory: Ernst D

J. Agler, On the representation of certain holomorphic functions deﬁ ned on a polydisc , Topics in operator theory: Ernst D. Hellinger memorial volume, Oper. Theory Adv. App l., vol. 48, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1990, 47-66

work page 1990

[2] [2]

Agler and J

J. Agler and J. McCarthy, Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation on the bidisk , J. Reine Angew. Math. 506 (1999), 191–204. 26 DEBNATH AND SARKAR

work page 1999

[3] [3]

Agler and J

J. Agler and J. McCarthy, Pick Interpolation and Hilbert Function Spaces , Grad. Stud. Math., 44. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002

work page 2002

[4] [4]

Alpay, A

D. Alpay, A. Dijksma, J. Rovnyak and H. de Snoo, Schur functions, operator colligations, and reproducing kernel Pontryagin spaces , Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 96. Birkh¨ auser V erlag, Basel, 1997

work page 1997

[5] [5]

Anderson, M

J. Anderson, M. Dritschel and J. Rovnyak, Schwarz-Pick inequalities for the Schur-Agler class on the polydisk and unit ball , Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 8 (2008), 339–361

work page 2008

[6] [6]

Andˆ o,On a pair of commutative contractions , Acta Sci

T. Andˆ o,On a pair of commutative contractions , Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 24 (1963), 88–90

work page 1963

[7] [7]

D. Z. Arov and L. Z. Grossman, Scattering matrices in the theory of unitary extensions of i sometric operators, Math. Nachr. 157 (1992), 105—123

work page 1992

[8] [8]

J. Ball, T. Trent and V. Vinnikov, Interpolation and commutant lifting for multipliers on rep roducing kernel Hilbert spaces , Operator theory and analysis, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications 122 (eds H. Bart, I. Gohberg and A. Ran; Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2001) 8 9–138

work page 2001