Axion-like-particle dark matter beyond the standard paradigm

Cem Er\"oncel

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 23 references

Axion-like-particle dark matter beyond the standard paradigm

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Axion-like-particle dark matter can become testable by gravitational observations alone when delayed misalignment triggers exponential growth of fluctuations, producing dense mini-clusters.

desk verdict Useful proceedings review of the author's KMM mini-cluster program, but the abstract oversells what the paper itself demonstrates and the key nonlinear step for the periodic potential is only semi-analytic. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11717 v1 pith:EZILCIEO submitted 2025-01-20 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Cem Eröncel This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phastro-ph.CO PACS 14.80.Va95.35.+d

keywords axion-likeparticlesdarkmattermisalignmentmechanismkineticparametricresonancetachyonicinstabilitymini-clustersgravitationalsignatures

topics Dark Matter

open problems Dark Matter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The standard misalignment mechanism, in which an axion-like particle (ALP) field starts oscillating when its mass becomes comparable to the Hubble scale, underproduces dark matter whenever the decay constant $f_\phi$ is low. This paper reviews and argues for an alternative picture: delay the onset of oscillations through large initial misalignment, large initial kinetic energy, or a non-periodic potential, which boosts the relic abundance. In these beyond-standard scenarios the ALP fluctuations grow exponentially through parametric resonance and tachyonic instabilities, and dense, compact ALP mini-clusters can form even in the pre-inflationary scenario. The paper's central assertion is that a sizable region of the $(m_\phi, f_\phi)$ parameter space becomes testable through purely gravitational observations, even if ALPs have no couplings to the Standard Model.

What carries the argument

The central object is the linear fluctuation equation for the ALP field, Eq. (8), whose Fourier modes obey $\ddot{\delta\phi}_k + 3H\dot{\delta\phi}_k + [k^2/a^2 + V''(\bar\phi)]\delta\phi_k = \text{source terms}$. Instabilities arise whenever the effective frequency $k^2/a^2 + V''(\bar\phi)$ is negative (tachyonic) or is itself oscillating (parametric resonance); this happens for every potential except a free quadratic one. The exponential growth rate depends sensitively on the ratio $m_{\rm osc}/H_{\rm osc}$, because a larger ratio lets the field amplitude decay more slowly and keeps the instabilities active longer. Once the growth is strong enough to make the power spectrum $O(1)$, linear theory fails and the field fragments; the paper uses the excursion-set formalism to convert the fragmented power spectra into mini-cluster mass functions and to identify the 'dense halo region' in parameter space.

What would settle it

A full three-dimensional lattice simulation of the pre-inflationary ALP field with the standard cosine potential, starting from realistic inflationary initial conditions that include adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations, would settle the claim: if the power spectrum never reaches $O(1)$ for $m_{\rm osc}/H_{\rm osc}\sim 40$, the predicted dense-halo band does not exist. Alternatively, a gravitational search (for example, through lensing or pulsar timing arrays) that rules out compact dark matter subhalos in the mass range predicted by the excursion-set calculations would directly test the observational signature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The author claims that the pre-inflationary production of ALP dark matter, normally considered smooth and homogeneous over cosmological scales, can actually fragment into dense mini-clusters. The mechanism is the delayed onset of field oscillations: when $m_{\rm osc}/H_{\rm osc}\gg 1$, the amplitude of the homogeneous field decays slowly, and the fluctuation equation (Eq. 8) has an effective frequency $k^2/a^2+V''(\bar\phi)$ that becomes negative or oscillates, driving exponential growth. For the kinetic misalignment mechanism the growth becomes so strong above $m_{\rm osc}/H_{\rm osc}\sim 40$ that linear perturbation theory breaks down and the power spectrum reaches $O(1)$ values; semi-analytic energy-conservation arguments and lattice simulations show the spectrum is then smoothed but seeded by strong growth. Applying the excursion-set formalism to these spectra gives a band on the $(m_\phi, f_\phi)$ plane in which the resulting mini-clusters are dense enough to survive tidal stripping, and this band mostly overlaps for large misalignment, kinetic misalignment, and non-periodic potentials. The conclusion is that observations of dense structures can constrain the ALP mass and decay constant even when the ALP has only gravitational interactions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the universe remained in the pre-inflationary scenario and that only adiabatic fluctuations seed the ALP field, with isocurvature perturbations neglected; if the Peccei-Quinn symmetry were restored after inflation or isocurvature modes mattered, the predicted mini-clusters and gravitational signatures would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Dense, compact ALP mini-clusters, previously thought to be smoking-gun signatures of the post-inflationary scenario, can form in the pre-inflationary scenario when oscillation onset is delayed.
There exists a band on the $(m_\phi, f_\phi)$ plane where dense structures form, and its location is largely independent of whether the large misalignment mechanism, kinetic misalignment, or a non-periodic potential produces the dark matter.
Observations of dense structures can determine the ALP mass and decay constant even if the ALP does not couple to the Standard Model.
The standard misalignment mechanism cannot produce the full dark matter abundance at low $f_\phi$, which motivates the beyond-standard production mechanisms.
For $m_{\rm osc}/H_{\rm osc}$ above the critical value, linear perturbation theory breaks down and stronger exponential growth yields a smoother power spectrum with smaller peaks, so the non-linear regime must be handled separately.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the dense-halo band is as mechanism-independent as the paper suggests, gravitational searches for compact subhalos could serve as a model-agnostic probe of ALP dark matter, independent of any coupling to the Standard Model.
The explicit neglect of isocurvature perturbations is the most consequential simplification; including inflationary isocurvature modes could shift the band or add extra small-scale power, so the overlap of the dense-halo region across mechanisms is an open target for lattice studies.
Because the same instability condition applies to any light scalar with a non-quadratic potential, the fragmentation mechanism may also be relevant for other scalar dark matter candidates, not just ALPs.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a well-written proceedings review of the author's own KMM/LMM mini-cluster program. It contains no new derivation, but it does a good job of explaining why the standard misalignment mechanism struggles at low f_a and how delayed oscillations change the perturbation story. The abstract overclaims: the paper says it will 'show' that a sizable parameter space becomes gravitationally testable, but the actual demonstration lives in Refs [1–3]. That framing is the main fixable issue.

What's genuinely useful: the review lays out the relic-density argument cleanly, states the LMM/KMM distinction, and walks through the fluctuation equation (8) with the source terms from curvature perturbations. For someone not following the literature, it's a compact entry point. The references are appropriate, and the review is transparent about the pre-inflationary assumption and the adiabatic-only treatment of fluctuations.

Soft spots. First, the central quantitative claims — the critical m_osc/H_osc ~ 40, the smoothing of the power spectrum, the dense-halo band — all come from the author's own papers, and the review does not show the supporting calculations. That's normal for a review, but the abstract should say 'we review' rather than 'we show'. Second, the nonlinear step for the periodic cosine potential is semi-analytic (energy conservation) with lattice confirmation only for a non-periodic potential. The linear instability is robust, but the shape of the power spectrum after saturation, and hence the location of the dense-halo band, could shift for the QCD axion case. The review states this honestly, but readers may miss how load-bearing it is. Third, the damping of isocurvature perturbations is explicitly excluded; if the PQ symmetry is restored after inflation, Eq. (8) and its consequences would not apply. The review is explicit about this, so it's a caveat rather than a flaw, but it should be repeated in the conclusions. Finally, Eq. (6) has an exponent that is typeset ambiguously; the claimed β→∞ limit is (f/M_pl)^{3/2}, but the displayed expression is hard to parse.

Who this is for: people who want a quick overview of the kinetic fragmentation program and its gravitational signatures. It is not a research paper, and it should not be cited as one. But it deserves a serious referee, because the accuracy of the review matters for how the field cites the mini-cluster claims. I would accept it conditionally: fix the abstract, correct Eq. (6), and add a sentence in the conclusions flagging the semi-analytic basis for the periodic potential and the adiabatic-only assumption.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This proceedings article reviews recent work on axion-like-particle (ALP) dark matter production beyond the standard misalignment mechanism. It argues that standard misalignment underproduces dark matter for low decay constants, describes Large Misalignment and Kinetic Misalignment as ways to delay the onset of oscillations, and summarizes how ALP fluctuations can grow exponentially through parametric resonance and tachyonic instabilities. The paper then states that dense mini-clusters can form even in the pre-inflationary scenario and that a 'dense halo region' on the (m_a, f_a) plane would be observable through gravitational effects alone. The quantitative results are drawn from Refs. [1-3], all co-authored by the present author.

Significance. The paper is a useful and clearly written review for a proceedings audience. It correctly identifies the low-f_a suppression in the standard misalignment relic-density estimate and explains the logic of LMM and KMM in an accessible way. It is also transparent in citing prior work and in noting that lattice confirmation of the nonlinear regime was obtained for a non-periodic potential. If the underlying calculations in Refs. [1-3] are correct, the gravitational-signature claim would be an important extension of the ALP dark-matter parameter space. However, because the manuscript presents no new calculation and the key nonlinear step for the periodic cosine potential remains semi-analytic, the paper is best viewed as a summary of an ongoing research program rather than a self-contained proof of the headline claim.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 4 and Sec. 5] The central claim that dense mini-clusters form in the pre-inflationary KMM/LMM scenario and that a 'dense halo region' exists on the (m_a, f_a) plane depends on the nonlinear fate of fluctuations after linear growth saturates. The text states that for KMM the nonlinear regime was treated semi-analytically via an energy conservation argument in Ref. [1], and that lattice confirmation in Ref. [3] was obtained 'albeit for a non-periodic potential.' Since the periodic cosine potential is precisely the QCD-axion/KMM case highlighted in the abstract, the dense-halo band for that case currently rests on a semi-analytic closure that has not been directly validated on the lattice. Please either provide such a validation for V(phi)=m^2 f^2(1-cos(phi/f)) at m_osc/H_osc ~ 40, or qualify the abstract and Sec. 5 conclusions to state explicitly that the periodic-potential result is an extrapolation whose failure would shift the predicted band.
[Sec. 4, Eq. (8)] The fluctuation analysis is restricted to adiabatic perturbations, as stated by the sentence 'In this proceeding, we will only consider adiabatic fluctuations.' The pre-inflationary scenario generically also produces isocurvature perturbations from the axion field's quantum fluctuations, and the sourcing terms in Eq. (8) would differ if such modes were non-negligible. The paper should state the conditions under which neglecting isocurvature modes is justified, for example particular inflationary scales or axion masses, or explicitly label the conclusions as applying only to the adiabatic component of the perturbations.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (6)] The exponent in Eq. (6) is displayed ambiguously; it appears without clear grouping around the beta-dependent term. Please typeset it as 2 - (beta/2)/(beta+2), or an equivalent unambiguous form, so that the beta-to-infinity limit giving (f_a/M_Pl)^{3/2} is easy to follow.
[Sec. 5] The text discusses a 'dense halo region' and claims that the regions for different production mechanisms mostly overlap, but no figure or table from Refs. [1-3] is reproduced. A plot of the band on the (m_a, f_a) plane would make the review more self-contained and would help readers assess the overlap claim.
[Sec. 2] The text uses both m_osc/H_osc ~ 1 and m_osc/3H_osc when discussing the onset of oscillations; please standardize the convention to avoid confusion.
[References] Several reference identifiers appear garbled in the manuscript text, for example Ref. [1] is shown as '22/zero.alt36.14259'. Please ensure all arXiv identifiers are printed correctly in the final version.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Headline 'gravitationally testable ALP parameter space' is inherited from Refs [1-3] by the same author; the only lattice check cited is for a non-periodic potential, so the periodic KMM/cosine case and the dense-halo band rest on self-cited semi-analytic work.

self citation load bearing [Section 4, fluctuation growth and its nonlinear saturation (after Eq. (8))]
"When m_osc/H_osc reaches to a critical value, which is found to be ∼ 40 in the case of KMM [1], the exponential growth becomes so strong that the power spectrum reaches to O(1) values. ... For the KMM scenario, this regime is studied semi-analytically via an energy conservation argument in [1]. ... This result has also been confirmed in [3] via lattice simulations, albeit for a non-periodic potential."

The threshold m_osc/H_osc ∼ 40, the O(1) saturation of the power spectrum, and the nonlinear smoothing that converts exponential growth into a mini-cluster spectrum are not derived in this paper; they are imported from Refs [1] and [3], both co-authored by the present author. The only cited lattice confirmation is explicitly for a non-periodic potential, so for the periodic cosine/KMM case—the case that opens the gravitational-testability window for the QCD axion—the load-bearing nonlinear step is a self-cited semi-analytic energy-conservation estimate. No independent reproduction or external benchmark is provided, so this part of the derivation chain reduces to the authority of the self-citation rather than to an independent calculation.
self citation load bearing [Section 5, Observational Consequences, and Section 6, Conclusions]
"Based on this observation, Ref. [3] derives a 'dense halo region' in the ALP dark matter parameter space, which indicates the parameter space where the exponential growth might yield dense structures that are likely to survive tidal stripping. ... Semi-analytical studies predict that there is a band on the (m_a, f_a)-plane where dense structures can be formed, and the location of this band does not depend drastically on the production mechanism."

The headline observational consequence—that dense structures provide information about the ALP mass and decay constant even without Standard Model couplings—is not derived from the equations of this paper. It is taken from Ref. [3], an overlapping-author paper. The 'dense halo region' is both the quantity that defines the claimed testable parameter space and the output of the self-cited calculation; the paper presents no independent calculation, observational input, or external benchmark that breaks this loop. Thus the central 'sizable region becomes testable' claim reduces to the self-cited derivation of that same region.

full rationale

The paper is largely a review of the author's own prior work. The Sec. 2 relic-density argument (Eqs. (4)-(6)) is self-contained and standard, and the existence of parametric-resonance and tachyonic instabilities is attributed to independent preheating and axion-fragmentation literature [16-23]; those portions are not circular. The circularity score comes from the paper's headline claims: the O(1) power-spectrum saturation at m_osc/H_osc ∼ 40, the nonlinear smoothing of the spectrum, the formation of dense mini-clusters in the pre-inflationary scenario, and the 'dense halo region' or band on the (m_a, f_a) plane that makes gravitational tests possible. All of these are presented as findings from Refs [1]-[3], whose authors include the present author. The paper itself flags that the lattice confirmation in Ref. [3] was obtained for a non-periodic potential, so the periodic cosine/KMM case, most directly relevant to the QCD axion, rests on a self-cited semi-analytic energy-conservation argument rather than on an independently reproduced calculation. This is a load-bearing self-citation chain for the central quantitative claim, but it is not a definitional equivalence or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, so the score is 6 rather than 8-10. The adiabatic-only assumption is a scope limitation, not itself circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims of this review are inherited from Refs [1-3], which are co-authored by the present author, so the ledger for this paper contains no new fitted parameters and no new entities. The assumptions listed are the standard ALP and cosmological modeling choices stated explicitly in Secs 2 and 4.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption ALP potential is periodic: V(phi,T) = m_phi(T)^2 f_phi^2 [1 - cos(phi/f_phi)] (Eq 2).
Used throughout the review; the standard ALP potential. The non-periodic case is mentioned only in passing (Sec 3) and delegated to Refs [3,6].
domain assumption Pre-inflationary scenario with negligible initial kinetic energy, so the field is frozen until H ~ m (Sec 2).
This is the starting point for both the standard paradigm and the fluctuation analysis; the paper explicitly assumes it.
domain assumption Only adiabatic perturbations source the ALP fluctuations; isocurvature modes are neglected (Sec 4).
The paper states 'we will only consider adiabatic fluctuations', which restricts the sourced modes in Eq (8).
domain assumption For the standard paradigm, the field starts oscillating with m_osc/3H_osc ~ 1 unless theta_i is very close to pi (Sec 2).
This anchoring value is used to derive the low-f_a suppression in Eq (6).
domain assumption The temperature dependence of the ALP mass follows Eq (3), with 2*beta ~ 8.16 and T_0 ~ 75.6 MeV for the QCD axion, and free beta and T_0 for a generic ALP.
This input, taken from Ref [4], underlies the relic density estimates in Eqs (4)-(6).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Axion-like-particle dark matter beyond the standard paradigm." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EZILCIEO

@misc{pith2026250111717,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Axion-like-particle dark matter beyond the standard paradigm},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EZILCIEO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11717}
}

read the original abstract

Axions and axion-like particles (ALPs) are among the most popular candidates that explain the origin of the mysterious dark matter. The most popular ALP production mechanism studied in the literature is the misalignment mechanism, where an ALP field with a quadratic or cosine potential has negligible kinetic energy initially, and it starts oscillating when its mass becomes comparable to the Hubble scale. Recently, there has been an interest in models that go beyond the standard assumptions. These models not only extend the ALP dark matter parameter space, but also provide a rich phenomenology which is absent in the standard scenario. In particular, the ALP fluctuations grow exponentially via parametric resonance and tachyonic instabilities. In this proceeding, we will first demonstrate why the standard paradigm cannot explain dark matter in experimentally interesting parts of the parameter space, and then we will give an overview of the alternative production mechanism with which this issue can be resolved. We will then discuss the exponential growth of the fluctuations in these models. Finally, we will comment on the observational consequences of the exponential growth and show that a sizable region of the ALP parameter space becomes testable even if ALPs have only gravitational interactions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

[1]

Eröncel, R

C. Eröncel, R. Sato, G. Servant and P. Sørensen, ALP dark matter from kinetic fragmentation: opening up the parameter window , JCAP 10 (2022) 053 [22/zero.alt36.14259]

work page 2022
[3]

Chatrchyan, C

A. Chatrchyan, C. Eröncel, M. Koschnitzke and G. Servant , ALP dark matter with non-periodic potentials: parametric resonance, halo form ation and gravitational signatures, JCAP 10 (2023) 068 [23/zero.alt35./zero.alt33756]

work page 2023
[2]

Eröncel and G

C. Eröncel and G. Servant, ALP dark matter mini-clusters from kinetic fragmentation , JCAP 01 (2023) 009 [22/zero.alt37.1/zero.alt3111]

work page 2023
[4]

Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lat tice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69 [16/zero.alt36./zero.alt37494]

S. Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lat tice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69 [16/zero.alt36./zero.alt37494]

work page 2016
[5]

Arias, D

P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redond o and A. Ringwald, WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP 06 (2012) 013 [12/zero.alt31.59/zero.alt32]

work page 2012
[6]

Chatrchyan, C

A. Chatrchyan, C. Eröncel, M. Koschnitzke and G. Servant , Gravitational signatures of ALP dark matter fragmentation, PoS EPS-HEP2023 (2024) 116 [24/zero.alt32.1/zero.alt3313]

work page 2024
[7]

Arvanitaki, S

A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, M. Galanis, L. Lehner, J.O . Thompson and K. Van Tilburg, Large-misalignment mechanism for the formation of compact axion structures: Signatures from the QCD axion to fuzzy dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083014 [19/zero.alt39.11665]

work page 2020
[8]

Zhang and T

U.-H. Zhang and T. Chiueh, Cosmological Perturbations of Extreme Axion in the Radiati on Era, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 063522 [17/zero.alt35./zero.alt31439]

work page 2017

Show all 23 references

[9]

R.T. Co, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya, Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 251802 [191/zero.alt3.14152]

2020
[10]

Chang and Y

C.-F. Chang and Y . Cui, New Perspectives on Axion Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015003 [1911.11885]

2020 arXiv
[11]

R.T. Co, L.J. Hall, K. Harigaya, K.A. Olive and S. Verner , Axion Kinetic Misalignment and Parametric Resonance from Inﬂation , JCAP 08 (2020) 036 [2/zero.alt3/zero.alt34./zero.alt3/zero.alt3629]

2020
[12]

R.T. Co, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L.J. Hall and K. Hari gaya, Lepto-Axiogenesis, JHEP 03 (2021) 017 [2/zero.alt3/zero.alt36./zero.alt35687]

2021
[13]

Di Luzio, B

L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez and A. Ringwald, Dark matter from an even lighter QCD axion: trapped misalignment , JCAP 10 (2021) 001 [21/zero.alt32./zero.alt31/zero.alt382]. 6 Axion-like-particle dark matter beyond the standard parad igm Cem Eröncel

2021
[14]

Di Luzio, B

L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez and A. Ringwald, An even lighter QCD axion , JHEP 05 (2021) 184 [21/zero.alt32./zero.alt3/zero.alt3/zero.alt312]

2021
[15]

Eröncel, R

C. Eröncel, R. Sato, G. Servant and P. Sørensen, Model implementations of axion dark matter from kinetic misalignment, 24/zero.alt38./zero.alt38355
[16]

Kofman, A.D

L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inﬂation , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 3258 [hep-ph/97/zero.alt34452]

1997
[17]

Felder and L

G.N. Felder and L. Kofman, Nonlinear inﬂaton fragmentation after preheating , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 043518 [hep-ph//zero.alt36/zero.alt36256]

2007
[18]

Greene, L

P.B. Greene, L. Kofman and A.A. Starobinsky, Sine-Gordon parametric resonance, Nucl. Phys. B 543 (1999) 423 [hep-ph/98/zero.alt38477]

1999
[19]

Jaeckel, V .M

J. Jaeckel, V .M. Mehta and L.T. Witkowski, Monodromy Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2017) 036 [16/zero.alt35./zero.alt31367]

2017
[20]

Cedeño, A.X

F.X.L. Cedeño, A.X. González-Morales and L.A. Ureña Ló pez, Cosmological signatures of ultralight dark matter with an axionlike potential , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 061301 [17/zero.alt33.1/zero.alt318/zero.alt3]

2017
[21]

Berges, A

J. Berges, A. Chatrchyan and J. Jaeckel, Foamy Dark Matter from Monodromies, JCAP 08 (2019) 020 [19/zero.alt33./zero.alt33116]

2019
[22]

Fonseca, E

N. Fonseca, E. Morgante, R. Sato and G. Servant, Axion fragmentation, JHEP 04 (2020) 010 [1911./zero.alt38472]

2020
[23]

Morgante, W

E. Morgante, W . Ratzinger, R. Sato and B.A. Stefanek, Axion fragmentation on the lattice , JHEP 12 (2021) 037 [21/zero.alt39.13823]. 7

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Eröncel, R

C. Eröncel, R. Sato, G. Servant and P. Sørensen, ALP dark matter from kinetic fragmentation: opening up the parameter window , JCAP 10 (2022) 053 [22/zero.alt36.14259]

work page 2022

[2] [3]

Chatrchyan, C

A. Chatrchyan, C. Eröncel, M. Koschnitzke and G. Servant , ALP dark matter with non-periodic potentials: parametric resonance, halo form ation and gravitational signatures, JCAP 10 (2023) 068 [23/zero.alt35./zero.alt33756]

work page 2023

[3] [2]

Eröncel and G

C. Eröncel and G. Servant, ALP dark matter mini-clusters from kinetic fragmentation , JCAP 01 (2023) 009 [22/zero.alt37.1/zero.alt3111]

work page 2023

[4] [4]

Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lat tice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69 [16/zero.alt36./zero.alt37494]

S. Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lat tice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69 [16/zero.alt36./zero.alt37494]

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Arias, D

P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redond o and A. Ringwald, WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP 06 (2012) 013 [12/zero.alt31.59/zero.alt32]

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Chatrchyan, C

A. Chatrchyan, C. Eröncel, M. Koschnitzke and G. Servant , Gravitational signatures of ALP dark matter fragmentation, PoS EPS-HEP2023 (2024) 116 [24/zero.alt32.1/zero.alt3313]

work page 2024

[7] [7]

Arvanitaki, S

A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, M. Galanis, L. Lehner, J.O . Thompson and K. Van Tilburg, Large-misalignment mechanism for the formation of compact axion structures: Signatures from the QCD axion to fuzzy dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083014 [19/zero.alt39.11665]

work page 2020

[8] [8]

Zhang and T

U.-H. Zhang and T. Chiueh, Cosmological Perturbations of Extreme Axion in the Radiati on Era, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 063522 [17/zero.alt35./zero.alt31439]

work page 2017