pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20870 · v1 · pith:F23HOXU4new · submitted 2026-05-20 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · physics.class-ph

Development of a xenon triple point apparatus suitable for calibrating long-stem SPRTs and preliminary measurements of the temperature

Yikun Zhao , Jintao Zhang , Xiaojuan Feng , Yu Liang , Yongdong He , Hua Zhuo , Xiangrui Deng , Haibing Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 02:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det physics.class-ph
keywords xenon triple pointimmersion apparatuslong-stem SPRTmelting plateauaxial heat leaktemperature measurementITS-90 fixed point
0
0 comments X

The pith

An immersion apparatus realizes the xenon triple point at 161.40571 K and agrees with prior adiabatic measurements to within 0.42 mK.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an immersion-type cell that realizes the xenon triple point using continuous heating and long-stem platinum resistance thermometers. It identifies axial heat leak as the main systematic effect and corrects for it by changing outer-wall offset temperatures. The resulting temperature at full melt is reported with an uncertainty of 0.55 mK and lies within 0.11 mK to 0.42 mK of earlier adiabatic values. This matters because a reliable immersion realization would allow xenon to serve as a stable, non-toxic replacement for the mercury triple point in practical thermometer calibrations.

Core claim

The work constructs an immersion xenon triple point apparatus suitable for both long-stem and capsule standard platinum resistance thermometers. Melting plateaus lasting 8-12 hours are produced by continuous heating, with temperature flatness between 0.37 mK and 1.0 mK over melted fractions 0.2 to 0.75. After correcting the principal axial heat leak effect through outer-wall temperature offsets, the triple point temperature at melted fraction 1.0 is 161.40571(55) K, differing from previous adiabatic-apparatus results by amounts well covered by the stated uncertainty.

What carries the argument

Axial heat leak correction obtained by varying the outer-wall offset temperatures of the xenon triple point cell.

If this is right

  • Xenon can be realized as a fixed point using immersion cells that accept standard long-stem thermometers without adiabatic shielding.
  • The continuous-heating method produces stable melting plateaus long enough for routine calibration work.
  • Agreement within 0.42 mK with adiabatic results supports xenon as a candidate to replace mercury in the defining fixed points of ITS-90.
  • The apparatus design allows calibration of both long-stem and capsule thermometers in the same cell.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful heat-leak correction in an open immersion geometry could reduce the equipment complexity needed for high-accuracy fixed-point realizations.
  • If the correction proves robust across different laboratories, xenon triple-point cells might become standard references for industrial temperature metrology.
  • Testing the same cell with multiple thermometer stem lengths would directly check whether immersion depth or lead conduction introduces uncorrected offsets.

Load-bearing premise

The axial heat leak correction, obtained by varying outer-wall offset temperatures, fully accounts for all systematic temperature offsets in the immersion setup without residual effects from impurities, pressure gradients, or thermometer self-heating.

What would settle it

A repeat measurement using an independent thermometer or apparatus that yields a xenon triple point temperature differing by more than 0.55 mK from the reported value after the same heat-leak correction would falsify the claimed agreement.

read the original abstract

Xenon is of high chemical-physical stability and health compatibility. The xenon triple point (Xe TP) is accounted for a promising candidate replacing the mercury triple point (Hg TP) from the set of the defining fixed points of the international temperature scale ITS-90. The success of the alternative highly depends on the level of the realization of the Xe TP using long-stem standard platinum resistance thermometers (LSPRTs). We report in this article our study on the development of an immersion-type Xe TP apparatus, which is suitable for calibration of both LSPRTs and capsule standard platinum resistance thermometers (CSPRT). We realize the melting plateaus of the Xe TP using the continuous heating method on the apparatus. The effective melting plateaus extend for 8-12 hours long with temperature flatness range of 0.37 mK-1.0 mK over the melted fractions from 0.2 to 0.75. We find the axial heat leak contributing a principal effect influencing measurements of the Xe TP. We investigate the effect by varying the offset temperatures on the outer wall of the Xe TP cell. We measure the Xe TP using two LSPRTs upon correction of the axial heat leak. The new measurement, giving the Xe TP of 161.405 71 (55) K (k=1) at the melted fraction F=1.0, agrees well with those previously obtained by the adiabatic apparatuses. Their differences fall within 0.11 mK to 0.42 mK. by. Those differences are well covered by the estimated measurement uncertainty.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the development of an immersion-type xenon triple point (Xe TP) apparatus suitable for calibrating both long-stem standard platinum resistance thermometers (LSPRTs) and capsule SPRTs. Using the continuous heating method, melting plateaus lasting 8-12 hours are realized with temperature flatness of 0.37 mK to 1.0 mK over melted fractions F = 0.2 to 0.75. Axial heat leak is identified as the principal effect and corrected by varying outer-wall offset temperatures; the resulting Xe TP temperature of 161.40571(55) K (k=1) at F=1.0 agrees with prior adiabatic-apparatus values to within 0.11 mK to 0.42 mK, with differences stated to be covered by the estimated uncertainty.

Significance. If the axial heat-leak correction is demonstrated to remove all significant immersion-specific systematics, the work would support Xe TP as a viable, safer alternative to the mercury triple point in ITS-90 and enable practical calibration of long-stem thermometers. The reported agreement with adiabatic results is a positive indicator, but the preliminary character of the measurements and absence of a detailed uncertainty budget limit the immediate significance for scale realization.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The Xe TP value is quoted at melted fraction F=1.0, yet usable plateau flatness is reported only for F = 0.2–0.75. The manuscript must specify how the F=1.0 value is obtained (extrapolation procedure, functional form, and associated uncertainty contribution) because this step is load-bearing for the headline result and its comparison to adiabatic data.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The axial heat-leak correction is derived solely from outer-wall offset-temperature variations. This single-parameter approach may leave residual immersion effects (impurity-induced depression, hydrostatic head, or LSPRT self-heating) unaccounted for; the manuscript should present explicit checks or bounds on these systematics to substantiate that the reported 0.11–0.42 mK agreement is not biased.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that differences are “well covered by the estimated measurement uncertainty” is made without a quantitative uncertainty budget, impurity analysis, or raw plateau data. This omission prevents verification that the stated 0.55 mK (k=1) uncertainty fully captures all relevant components and is therefore load-bearing for the central measurement claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains a stray “by.” before “Those differences” and the phrasing “accounted for a promising candidate” is awkward; both should be corrected for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the referee's thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript describing the development of an immersion-type xenon triple point apparatus. We have carefully considered each major comment and provide point-by-point responses below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The Xe TP value is quoted at melted fraction F=1.0, yet usable plateau flatness is reported only for F = 0.2–0.75. The manuscript must specify how the F=1.0 value is obtained (extrapolation procedure, functional form, and associated uncertainty contribution) because this step is load-bearing for the headline result and its comparison to adiabatic data.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the method for obtaining the Xe TP value at F=1.0 requires explicit specification. We will update the manuscript to detail the extrapolation procedure employed, the functional form of the fit, and the contribution to the uncertainty from this step. This information will be incorporated into both the abstract and the results section to support the headline result and comparisons. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The axial heat-leak correction is derived solely from outer-wall offset-temperature variations. This single-parameter approach may leave residual immersion effects (impurity-induced depression, hydrostatic head, or LSPRT self-heating) unaccounted for; the manuscript should present explicit checks or bounds on these systematics to substantiate that the reported 0.11–0.42 mK agreement is not biased.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the completeness of the correction is crucial. Our approach involved varying the outer-wall temperatures to quantify and correct the axial heat leak, which we identified as the dominant effect. To address potential residuals, we note that the close agreement with independent adiabatic measurements (differences of 0.11 mK to 0.42 mK) provides indirect validation that other effects like impurities, hydrostatic head, and self-heating are either negligible or accounted for within the uncertainty. In the revision, we will add explicit sensitivity analyses or bounds for these effects based on our data and literature values for xenon purity to further substantiate the result. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that differences are “well covered by the estimated measurement uncertainty” is made without a quantitative uncertainty budget, impurity analysis, or raw plateau data. This omission prevents verification that the stated 0.55 mK (k=1) uncertainty fully captures all relevant components and is therefore load-bearing for the central measurement claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for a transparent uncertainty budget to support our claims. The current manuscript estimates the uncertainty at 0.55 mK (k=1) based on the observed plateau variations and correction uncertainties, but we agree that a detailed component-by-component budget, including impurity effects, hydrostatic contributions, and repeatability, is necessary. We will include a full uncertainty budget table in the revised manuscript. Regarding raw plateau data, we will add representative figures showing the melting curves for different conditions to allow readers to assess the data quality. This will enable better verification of the uncertainty estimate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental measurement with empirical correction

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report on realizing the xenon triple point in an immersion apparatus for thermometer calibration. The central result is a measured temperature value obtained from LSPRT resistance readings after applying a correction for axial heat leak, where the correction is determined empirically by varying outer-wall offset temperatures. No mathematical derivation chain, self-definitional relations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present. The plateau data (F=0.2–0.75) and extrapolated value at F=1.0 are reported from direct observations, with agreement to prior work serving as external validation rather than internal reduction. The derivation is self-contained against the experimental inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement rests on standard assumptions of phase equilibrium at the triple point and the validity of the heat-leak correction procedure; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters beyond the reported temperature and its uncertainty are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The melting plateau at F=1.0 after heat-leak correction represents the true thermodynamic triple-point temperature.
    Invoked when stating the final Xe TP value of 161.40571(55) K.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5855 in / 1260 out tokens · 47250 ms · 2026-05-21T02:05:52.480395+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Preston-Thomas, The international temperature scale of 1990 (ITS -90), Metrologia 27 (1) (1990) 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/27/1/002

    H. Preston-Thomas, The international temperature scale of 1990 (ITS -90), Metrologia 27 (1) (1990) 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/27/1/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/27/1/002 1990

  2. [2]

    Preston-Thomas, Erratum: the international temperature scale of 1990 (ITS -90), Metrologia 27 (2) (1990) 107, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/27/2/010

    H. Preston-Thomas, Erratum: the international temperature scale of 1990 (ITS -90), Metrologia 27 (2) (1990) 107, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/27/2/010

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/27/2/010 1990

  3. [3]

    Crovini, H.J

    L. Crovini, H.J. Jung, R.C. Kemp, S.K. Ling, B.W. Mangum, H. Sakurai, The platinum resistance thermometer range of the International Temperature Scale of 1990, Metrologia 28 (4) (1991) 317-325, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/28/4/003

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/28/4/003 1990

  4. [4]

    Zhao, J.T

    Y.K. Zhao, J.T. Zhang, Y. Liang, X.J. Feng , Y.D. He, Evaluation on the uncertainty propagation with the replacement of the mercury triple point of ITS -90, IEEE Sens. J. 23 (16) (2023) 17951-17957, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3294260

    work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3294260 2023

  5. [5]

    Minamata Convention on Mercury (Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme). Sep. 2019. https://www.mercuryconvention.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/Minamata-Convention-booklet-Sep2019- EN.pdf

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Hill, A.G

    K.D. Hill, A.G. Steele, Temperature, Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, V ol.7, editor -in- chief D.C. Ripple, AIP, New York, 2003, pp. 53-58

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Michels, C

    A. Michels, C. Prins, The melting lines of argon, krypton and xenon up to 1500 atm; representation of the results by a law of corresponding states, Physica 28 (2) (1962) 101 -116, https://doi.org/10.1016/0031- 8914(62)90096-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0031- 1962

  8. [8]

    Bonnier, R

    G. Bonnier, R. Malassis, Realisation the triple point of oxygen, argon and xenon, Comité Consultatif de Thermométrie 11th Meeting, Document CCT/76-24, Paris, France, 1976, pp. 45

    work page 1976

  9. [9]

    Ancsin, Note concerning the suitability of xenon as temperature fixed point , Metrologia 14 (1) (1978) 45 - 46, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/14/1/008

    J. Ancsin, Note concerning the suitability of xenon as temperature fixed point , Metrologia 14 (1) (1978) 45 - 46, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/14/1/008

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/14/1/008 1978

  10. [10]

    Inaba, K

    A. Inaba, K. Mitsui, Realisation the triple points of krypton and xenon through sealed cells, Comité Consultatif de Thermométrie 12th Meeting, Document CCT/78-26, Paris, France, 1978, pp.111

    work page 1978

  11. [11]

    Kemp, W.R.G

    R.C. Kemp, W.R.G. Kemp, P.W. Smart, The triple point of natural xenon, In: Temperature, Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry V ol. 5, ed. By J. F. Schooley, AIP, New York, 1982, p. 229 -230

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    Kemp, W.R.G

    R.C. Kemp, W.R.G. Kemp, P.W. Smart, The triple point of xenon as a possible defining point on an International Temperature Scale, Metrologia 21 (2) (1985) 43-48, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/21/2/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/21/2/001 1985

  13. [13]

    Zhang, L

    G.Q. Zhang, L. Wang, The realization of triple point of xenon and the international comparison, Comité Consultatif de Thermométrie 16th Meeting, Document CCT/87-59, Paris, France,1987, pp. 40

    work page 1987

  14. [14]

    Ancsin, Triple point of xenon, Metrologia 25 (4) (1988) 221 -225, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026- 1394/25/4/004

    J. Ancsin, Triple point of xenon, Metrologia 25 (4) (1988) 221 -225, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026- 1394/25/4/004

    work page doi:10.1088/0026- 1988

  15. [15]

    Khnykov, M.I

    V . Khnykov, M.I. Losev, G.M. Gerasimov, D.N. Astrov, Realization of the triple point of Xenon, Comité Consultatif de Thermométrie 17th Meeting, Document CCT/89-8, Paris, France, 1989, pp. 33

    work page 1989

  16. [16]

    D.I. Head, Y . Hermier, R.L. Rusby, G. Bonnier, M. Wei, Measurements of carbon dioxide and xenon triple point cells, Proceedings of TEMPMEKO’90, 4th International Symposium on Temperature and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science, ed. by H.K. Graubner (Multiprint Oy, Helsinki), 1990, pp. 118-125

    work page 1990

  17. [17]

    Pfeiffer, M.L

    E.R. Pfeiffer, M.L. Reilly, Temperature: Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, vol. 6, part 1, ed. by J.F. Schooley, AIP, New York, 1992, pp. 271-276

    work page 1992

  18. [18]

    Bedford, G

    R.E. Bedford, G. Bonnier, H. Maas , F. Pavese, Recommended values of temperature on the International Temperature Scale of 1990 for a selected set of secondary reference points, Metrologia 33 (2) (1996) 133-154. https://doi.org 10.1088/0026-1394/33/2/3

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/33/2/3 1990

  19. [19]

    Hill, A.G

    K.D. Hill, A.G. Steele, The triple point of xenon, Metrologia 42 (4) (2005) 278 –288, https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/42/4/013

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/42/4/013 2005

  20. [20]

    Hill, The triple point of xenon, TEMPMEKO (2004) 153-158

    K.D. Hill, The triple point of xenon, TEMPMEKO (2004) 153-158

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    Steur, D

    P.P.M. Steur, D. Giraudi, Preliminary measurements of the xenon triple point, Int. J. Thermophys. 35 (3-4) (2014) 604-610, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-014-1580-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10765-014-1580-x 2014

  22. [22]

    P. P. M. Steur, P. M. C. Rourke, D. Giraudi, Comparison of xenon triple point realizations, Metrologia 56 (1) (2019) 015008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aaee3a

    work page doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aaee3a 2019

  23. [23]

    Kawamura, N

    Y. Kawamura, N. Matsumoto, T. Nakano, Investigation to replace the triple point of Hg in the ITS -90, AIP Conf. Proc. 3230 (1) (2024) 060004, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0235957

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0235957 2024

  24. [24]

    Fellmuth, K.D

    B. Fellmuth, K.D. Hill, J.V. Pearce, A. Peruzzi, P.P.M. Steur and J.T. Zhang, Guide to the realization of the ITS-90 fixed points: influence of impurities, Consultative Committee for Thermometry under the auspices of the International Committee for Weights and Measures , 2018. https://www.bipm.org/ documents/20126/41773843/Guide_9ITS-90_92_91_9Impurities_...

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Tew, Estimating the triple-point isotope effect and the corresponding uncertainties for cryogenic fixed points, Int

    W.L. Tew, Estimating the triple-point isotope effect and the corresponding uncertainties for cryogenic fixed points, Int. J. Thermophys. 29 (1) (2008) 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0371-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s10765-008-0371-7 2008

  26. [26]

    Strouse, J

    G.F. Strouse, J. Lippiatt, New NIST mercury triple-point cells, Tempmeko 2001: 8th International Symposium on Temperature and Thermal Measurement in Industry and Science, Berlin, Germany, Vol. 1 & 2, 2001, pp. 453-458

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Furukawa, J.L

    G.T. Furukawa, J.L. Riddle, W.R. Bigge, et al ., Standard reference materials: Application of some metal SRM's as thermometric fixed points, Gaithersburg, MD: NBS, 1982

    work page 1982

  28. [28]

    Lemmon, M.L

    E.W. Lemmon, M.L. Huber , M.O. Mclinden , NIST standard reference database 23: reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties-REFPROP (Version 9.1), 2013. https://www.nist.gov/srd/refprop

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    P. P. M. Steur, Recollections from the era of the 6th and 7th temperature symposium , AIP Conf. Proc. 3230 (2024) 150002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234131

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0234131 2024

  30. [30]

    Sutton, D.I

    G. Sutton, D.I. Head, A carbon dioxide triple point cell for use with long stem SPRTs, IMEKO Seminar on Low Temperature Thermometry and Dynamic Temperature Measurement, ed A. Szmyrka-Grzebyk, Wroclaw, Poland, 1997, pp. L-24

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    Liang Y , J.T

    Y . Liang Y , J.T. Zhang, X.J. Feng, P. Qiu, Realization of the triple point of carbon dioxide in a transportable cell using long-stem SPRTs, Metrologia 60 (1) (2023) 015006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aca417

    work page doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aca417 2023

  32. [32]

    Zhang, H

    J.T. Zhang, H. Lin, X.J. Feng, J.P. Sun, K.A. Gillis, M.R Moldover, Y.Y. Duan, Progress toward redetermining the Boltzmann constant with a fixed-path-length cylindrical resonator, Int. J. Thermophys. 32 (8) (2011) 1297-

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-011-1001-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10765-011-1001-3

  34. [34]

    Lin, Hong, X.J

    H. Lin, Hong, X.J. Feng, K.A. Gillis, M.R Moldover, J.T Zhang, J.P. Sun, Y.Y. Duan, Improved determination of the Boltzmann constant using a single, fixed -length cylindrical cavity, Metrologia 50 (5) (2013) 417-432. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/5/417

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/50/5/417 2013

  35. [35]

    Žužek, V

    V. Žužek, V . Batagelj, J. Drnovšek, J. Bojkovski , Effect of bushings in thermometric fixed -point cells , Measurement 78 (2016) 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.10.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.10.021 2016

  36. [36]

    CCT, Guide to the realization of the ITS -90 platinum resistance thermometry, Consultative Committee for Thermometry under the auspices of the International Committee for Weights and Measures , 2021. https://bipm.org/en/search?p_p_id=search_portlet&p_p_lifecycle=2&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view& p_p_resource_id=%2Fdownload%2Fpublication&p_p_cacheability=c...

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    A. H. HARVEY, On the melting curve of sulfur hexafluoride, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 46 (4) (2017) 043102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005537

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5005537 2017

  38. [38]

    Pavese, G

    F. Pavese, G. M. Molinar Beciet, Modern gas-based temperature and pressure measurements , 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2006, pp. 535

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    https://bipm.org/en/ committees/cc/cct/publications-cc.html

    CCT, Guide to the realization of the ITS–90: cryogenic fixed points, Consultative Committee for Thermometry under the auspices of the International Committee for Weights and Measures , 2018. https://bipm.org/en/ committees/cc/cct/publications-cc.html

    work page 2018