Multimodal Purcell enhancement and optical coherence of Eu$^{\text{3+}}$ ions in a single nanoparticle coupled to a microcavity

David Hunger; Diana Serrano; Hugues de Riedmatten; Nicholas Jobbitt; Philippe Goldner; Robert Huber; Shuping Liu; S\"oren Bieling; Timon Eichhorn; Tobias Krom

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Multimodal Purcell enhancement and optical coherence of Eu$^{\text{3+}}$ ions in a single nanoparticle coupled to a microcavity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A tunable microcavity halves the lifetime of a single europium-doped nanoparticle, bringing single-ion readout within reach.

desk verdict Solid cavity-QED step toward single Eu3+ readout, but the multimodal Purcell claim is under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06576 v2 pith:F36ARUEV submitted 2024-12-09 quant-ph

Timon Eichhorn , Nicholas Jobbitt , Sören Bieling , Shuping Liu , Tobias Krom , Diana Serrano , Robert Huber , Ulrich Lemmer

show 3 more authors

Hugues de Riedmatten Philippe Goldner David Hunger

This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords microcavityPurcelleffectrare-earthionseuropiumEu3+:Y2O3homogeneouslinewidthsingle-ionreadoutnanophotonics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Europium-doped nanocrystals are promising for quantum computing because europium has some of the longest spin coherence times known, but its optical transitions are so weak that reading out a single ion has been out of reach. This paper reports that a fiber-based microcavity, whose length can be tuned with sub-picometer precision, can be placed around a single ~60-nm Eu3+:Y2O3 nanoparticle at cryogenic temperature and made simultaneously resonant with two different europium transitions (580.8 nm and 611 nm). The result is a halving of the excited-state lifetime from 2.0 ms to 1.0–1.1 ms, corresponding to an effective Purcell factor of about 1.0 and an inferred single-ion Purcell factor of 140 for the 580 nm transition. The same setup yields an upper bound of 3.3 MHz for the homogeneous linewidth of a few-ion ensemble, and the authors estimate that a single optimally coupled ion should produce around 300 detected counts per second. If these numbers hold, single-ion readout of Eu3+ becomes feasible, a key step toward spin-photon interfaces and distributed quantum nodes in the solid state.

What carries the argument

The central object is the fiber-based Fabry-Pérot microcavity, a tunable open cavity whose length can be set so that two successive longitudinal modes are simultaneously on resonance with the two europium transitions (the double-resonance condition). The Purcell effect, the cavity-induced increase in spontaneous emission rate, is quantified by F_P = (6/$π^{3}$)(λ/n)^2 F / $w0^{2}$, with finesse F and mode waist w0, and the effective Purcell factor is obtained from the lifetime ratio F_eff^P = T1/T1,c − 1. Cooling to 3.5 K, active cavity-length stabilization (RMS jitter ~8 pm), and a small mode waist (~1.4 μm) provide a nominal Purcell factor of 580 at 580 nm and 330 at 611 nm. Transient spectral hole burning with an electro-optic frequency comb yields the homogeneous linewidth upper bound. The load-bearing relation is the linear additivity of the two Purcell factors when both transitions are resonant, justified by their lack of spectral overlap.

What would settle it

Measure the cavity-coupled lifetime for the 611 nm transition alone by detuning the 580 nm resonance off the cavity. If the 611 nm-only lifetime is not shorter than the free-space value by the expected ~0.15 (ensemble) or ~0.47 (ideal) effective Purcell factor, or if the dual-resonance lifetime does not decrease below the 580 nm-only lifetime by more than the error bars, the linear-additivity assumption behind the multimodal claim is violated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates multimodal Purcell enhancement of a single Eu3+:Y2O3 nanoparticle coupled to a fiber-based Fabry-Pérot microcavity under cryogenic conditions. Using the cavity length to spectrally overlap consecutive longitudinal modes with the 5D0→7F0 transition at 580.8 nm and the 5D0→7F2 transition at 611 nm, the authors observe the shortest excited-state lifetime (1.1±0.1 ms) when both transitions are resonant. Compared with the free-space lifetime of 2.0±0.1 ms, this is a halving, corresponding to an effective Purcell factor of up to 1.0(2). Because the 580 nm transition has a branching ratio of only 0.7(1)%, this translates to a Purcell factor of 140 for a perfectly coupled single ion, and the enhanced branching ratio becomes approximately 0.5. Transient spectral hole burning gives an upper bound of 3.3(6) MHz for the homogeneous linewidth, corresponding to a coherence time of T2* = 96±18 ns, and the pulse-excitation calculations predict single-ion count rates above 300 cps for small nanoparticles in contact mode, with a signal-to-noise ratio of about 54.

Load-bearing premise

The multimodal enhancement claim rests on the assumption that the two transitions' Purcell factors add independently when both are resonant; the measured lifetime difference between the 580 nm-only and dual-resonance cases (0.2 ms) is only twice the stated 0.1 ms error bars, so any interference, spatial-mode mismatch, or unequal degradation from cavity-length jitter would shrink the claimed effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Single-ion readout of Eu3+ at a few hundred counts per second is realistic: for a 40 nm nanoparticle in contact mode, the estimated count rate exceeds 300 cps, and the signal-to-noise ratio reaches about 54 with the current detector dark count rate.
Coupling the 611 nm transition in addition to the 580 nm transition increases the effective Purcell factor by about 20% (0.47/2.5), which directly raises the expected single-ion count rate in the double-resonance configuration.
The measured upper bound of 3.3 MHz for the homogeneous linewidth, combined with the cavity parameters, yields a cooperativity of C ≈ 8×10^-5 for the 580 nm transition; reaching C ≈ 1 would require linewidths near 25 kHz and a smaller mode waist, which the authors estimate could be achieved with a shorter-radius fiber and a finesse of 55,000.
The inhomogeneous linewidths of 30–74 GHz in these nanoparticles are broader than in bulk crystals, which may make individual ions easier to address spectrally because the spectral ion density is lower.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the linear additivity confirmed here is generic, the same double-resonance strategy could be applied to other multi-transition rare-earth ions to stack Purcell enhancement without demanding higher finesse or smaller mode volumes.
The 3.3 MHz linewidth is likely inflated by power broadening and instantaneous spectral diffusion, since photon echoes on the same material give 116 kHz; a testable follow-up is to perform spectral hole burning at much lower power on the same nanoparticle to see whether the homogeneous linewidth drops toward the photon-echo value.
Because the 611 nm transition is in the bad-emitter regime (Γ_h ≈ 680 GHz), its Purcell factor is capped by the cavity linewidth; improving the host crystal's phonon properties or cooling further would only marginally help, so the practical path to higher count rates is improving the 580 nm branching ratio or the cavity finesse.
The aerosol-printing placement of individual nanoparticles on the mirror, combined with scanning-cavity fluorescence imaging, could be adapted to other solid-state emitters that need deterministic positioning inside a cavity.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: This is a credible experimental step toward single Eu3+ ion readout, but the 'multimodal Purcell enhancement' in the title is the least-supported claim in the paper. The rest of the paper holds up.

What's new: they aerosol-print Eu3+:Y2O3 nanoparticles onto a cryogenic fiber-cavity mirror, use scanning cavity microscopy plus fluorescence to find single NPs, and exploit cavity length tunability to set a double resonance so the 580.8 nm and 611 nm transitions are enhanced simultaneously. That simultaneous enhancement, and the transient spectral hole burning linewidth (3.3 MHz upper bound) in this geometry, are new. The measured halving of the lifetime to ~1.0 ms is real.

What they do well: the effective Purcell factors come from measured lifetimes and are compared against a model whose inputs (finesse, waist, jitter, NP size) are not fitted to the lifetime data. The single-ion count rate is clearly labeled as a simulation. The inhomogeneous linewidth measurements are reproducible across scans. The exclusion of four high-power points in the linewidth fit is disclosed with a plausible physical reason.

Soft spots: the '140-fold' in the abstract is a model-inferred single-ion value, not an observed ensemble enhancement; the text does say this, but the abstract oversells it. More importantly, the multimodal additivity claim rests on 1.3(0.1) ms vs 1.1(0.1) ms, a 0.2 ms difference against 0.1 ms error bars, and there is no 611-only lifetime measurement. The expected 611 contribution is about the same size as the observed difference, so the linear additivity assumption is untested. If the two transitions don't couple independently, the 20% multimodal gain could disappear. That's the load-bearing weakness. It doesn't sink the paper—the single-transition Purcell and linewidth results stand alone—but the title/abstract make the multimodal claim a headline, so it needs direct experimental support.

Who this is for: the rare-earth nanophotonics and quantum memory community. I'd send it to peer review, with a request for a 611-only measurement and an abstract that says 'idealized single-ion' next to 140. Worth engaging with.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports cavity-enhanced spectroscopy of individual Eu3+:Y2O3 nanoparticles coupled to a fiber-based Fabry-Pérot microcavity at cryogenic temperatures. The authors demonstrate spatial and spectral tunability, measure inhomogeneous linewidths of 30–74 GHz for several nanoparticles, and observe a shortening of the 5D0 lifetime from the free-space value of 2.0 ms to about 1.0–1.1 ms when the cavity is resonant with the 580.8 nm and 611 nm transitions. From the lifetime data they extract an effective Purcell factor of about 0.8–1.0 and infer an idealized single-ion Purcell factor of 140 for the 580.8 nm transition. They also report an upper bound of 3.3(6) MHz for the homogeneous linewidth of a few-ion sub-ensemble using transient spectral hole burning, and use the measured parameters to estimate single-ion count rates up to about 300 cps, concluding that single Eu3+ ion readout is feasible.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work represents a substantial advance toward cavity-enhanced readout of single Eu3+ ions, which is a key step for rare-earth-ion-based quantum network nodes. The use of a fiber microcavity to simultaneously enhance two optical transitions is a novel and promising approach, and the paper provides a thorough characterization of the cavity, the nanoparticles, and the emitter ensemble. The manuscript also introduces an aerosol-printing method for controlled nanoparticle deposition and presents a detailed model connecting the measured effective Purcell factors to nanoparticle size, dipole orientation, and cavity jitter. The estimated single-ion count rates are concrete and falsifiable, and the work should be of interest to the quantum-optics and solid-state quantum technology communities. However, the experimental evidence for the multimodal Purcell enhancement is currently marginal, and the inference of the 140-fold single-ion Purcell factor from the measured lifetime requires careful qualification.

major comments (4)

[Section 4, Fig. 4A] The central claim of multimodal Purcell enhancement is based on a lifetime difference of 0.2 ms (1.3(0.1) ms for the 580 nm-only condition versus 1.1(0.1) ms for the both-transitions condition). If the quoted uncertainties are one standard deviation, this difference is only about 1.4σ, not a robust detection. The manuscript should report the number of repeated measurements, the standard error of the mean, and a statistical test of the difference. Furthermore, the text states that the cavity can selectively enhance only the 611 nm transition, but no lifetime data for this condition are shown. A direct measurement of the 611 nm-only lifetime is essential to validate the linear additivity assumption; without it, the multimodal enhancement claim in the title and abstract remains weakly supported.
[Section 4, paragraph following Fig. 4] The deduction of a 140-fold single-ion Purcell factor rests on the equation F_P = F_eff/ζ_580nm, where ζ_580nm = 0.7(1)% is a separately measured branching ratio. This is a model-derived, idealized value, not a directly measured ensemble enhancement. The abstract's statement 'corresponding to a 140-fold enhancement of the respective transition' and the conclusion's wording 'ideal (effective) Purcell factors up to 140 (1) have been measured' are misleading, because 140 is inferred rather than measured. The manuscript should clearly distinguish the measured effective Purcell factor (about 1) from the inferred single-ion Purcell factor (about 140) and propagate the uncertainty in ζ through the calculation.
[Section 5, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6] There is an inconsistency in the reported temperature: the text states that the homogeneous linewidth is measured at 4.3 K using transient spectral hole burning, while the caption of Fig. 5 states that the saturation behavior was recorded at 20 K. If the saturation curve and the hole-burning data were taken at different temperatures, the model of Eq. (2) used to extrapolate Γ0 may not be valid. Please clarify the temperature conditions for each dataset and, if both temperatures were used, explain how the linewidth upper bound at 4.3 K is obtained from data partially taken at 20 K.
[Section 4, Eq. (2)] The effective Purcell factor is defined from the measured lifetimes as F_eff = T1/T1,c − 1. The theoretical curves shown in Fig. 4B and C are computed from cavity parameters, nanoparticle sizes, and jitter that are not fitted to the lifetime data. This is appropriate, but the agreement between measurement and theory is only qualitative given the large error bars on the mean values (0.6(0.3) versus 0.8(0.2)). The manuscript should provide a quantitative measure of the goodness of fit, such as a reduced chi-square, and should discuss whether the 0.2 difference between the two mean values is consistent with the theory within the combined uncertainties.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] There is a typo: 'two transition' should be 'two transitions'.
[Section 4] The sentence 'see section 6 in supplementary material' for the linear additivity of Purcell factors refers to a supplement that is not provided to the reader in the main text. Please ensure that the supplementary material is included with the submission and that the derivation is complete and self-contained.
[Section 5, Eq. (2)] The parameter α1 in Eq. (2) is not defined in the text; its units should be specified (e.g., MHz/√μW) and its value reported in the fit results.
[Section 6] The expression for R_pulsed in the count-rate estimation is introduced without derivation. A short derivation or a reference to a standard result would improve the readability and allow readers to verify the dependence on F_eff, T1, and the detection window.
[Fig. 4A] The caption would benefit from explicitly stating which resonance conditions are used for the orange and green lifetime curves, and from indicating that the blue curve is the free-space confocal measurement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: measured lifetime ratios, independently measured branching ratios, and forward simulations carry the derivation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The effective Purcell factor is obtained from an independent lifetime ratio, Feff = T1/T1,c - 1, with the free-space lifetime measured by confocal microscopy and the cavity lifetime by pulsed excitation; the theoretical Feff curves in Fig. 4 are computed from independently characterized cavity finesse, mode waist, 8 pm RMS length jitter (using the formula of [19]), and nanoparticle size with dipole-orientation averaging, and are not fitted to the lifetime data. The headline single-ion factor FP = 140 is arithmetic: Feff,max = 1.0 divided by the independently measured branching ratio zeta_580nm = 0.7(1)%, obtained from broadband emission spectra. The homogeneous linewidth bound of 3.3(6) MHz is an extrapolated fit parameter from transient spectral hole burning, explicitly stated as an upper bound and acknowledged to be affected by instantaneous spectral diffusion; using it in Eq. (3) to compute saturation intensity is a forward calculation, not a prediction forced by the input. The single-ion count-rate estimate is likewise a simulation from measured parameters and previously reported cavity stability values, benchmarked against a similar Er3+ fiber-cavity experiment. Self-citations such as [19] supply platform parameters (jitter formula, best stability values) but are not used to define the measured quantities. The weakest point is experimental rather than logical: the multimodal enhancement rests on a 1.3(1) ms versus 1.1(1) ms lifetime difference, and no 611-only cavity lifetime is reported in the main text; this affects statistical robustness, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claims rely on measured cavity parameters, a geometric model of the nanoparticle in the standing wave, and two fitted functional forms (saturation power law and sqrt(P) linewidth broadening). The most load-bearing assumptions are the linear additivity of Purcell factors for the two transitions and the transfer of the room-temperature free-space lifetime to cryogenic conditions.

free parameters (3)

alpha1 (power-broadening coefficient in Eq. 2) = not reported
Fitted to the power-dependent linewidth data to extrapolate Gamma0 = 3.3 MHz; the extrapolated homogeneous linewidth depends on the assumed sqrt(P) functional form.
R0 and beta of the saturation power law = R0 = 105(5) cps, beta = 0.38(0.01)
Power-law fit to the emission vs power data in Fig. 5; beta deviates from the expected 0.5, and this deviation is not modeled. It affects the interpretation of the number of ions addressed.
p_ex (excited state population per excitation pulse) = 0.5
Assumed in the single-ion count rate estimate in Section 6 rather than measured; the count rate projection scales linearly with p_ex.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The 580.8 nm and 611 nm transitions are spectrally non-overlapping, so their Purcell factors add linearly.
Used in Section 4 to interpret the 'both transitions' lifetime and to sum F_P,both = F_P,580 + F_P,611. The validity relies on the two transitions being independent decay channels.
domain assumption The free-space lifetime at room temperature (T1 = 2.0 ms) equals the cryogenic free-space lifetime.
Free-space lifetime was measured at room temperature with a confocal microscope; the cryogenic reference under detuned cavity is mentioned as consistent but no data is shown.
domain assumption The homogeneous linewidth follows Gamma_h(P) = alpha1 sqrt(P) + Gamma0 in the power range used (Eq. 2).
Used to extrapolate the zero-power linewidth; the authors exclude the four highest power points because they deviate from this model, attributing the deviation to laser heating.
domain assumption Ions within the nanoparticle are randomly oriented and randomly positioned, and the nanoparticle is polycrystalline.
Underlies the ensemble-averaged effective Purcell factor model in Section 4; the model is used to interpret the measured Purcell factors and to project single-ion values.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multimodal Purcell enhancement and optical coherence of Eu$^{\text{3+}}$ ions in a single nanoparticle coupled to a microcavity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F36ARUEV

@misc{pith2026241206576,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multimodal Purcell enhancement and optical coherence of Eu$^\text3+$ ions in a single nanoparticle coupled to a microcavity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F36ARUEV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06576}
}

abstract

Europium-doped nanocrystals constitute a promising material for a scalable future quantum computing platform. Long-lived nuclear spin states could serve as qubits addressed via coherent optical transitions. In order to realize an efficient spin-photon interface, we couple the emission from a single nanoparticle to a fiber-based microcavity under cryogenic conditions. The spatial and spectral tunability of the cavity permits us to place individual nanoparticles in the cavity, to measure the inhomogeneous linewidth of the ions, and to show a multi-modal Purcell-enhancement of two transition in Eu$^{\text{3+}}$. A halving of the free-space lifetime to 1.0 ms is observed, corresponding to a 140-fold enhancement of the respective transition. Furthermore, we observe a narrow optical linewidth of 3.3 MHz for a few-ion ensemble in the center of the inhomogeneous line. The results represent an important step towards the efficient readout of single Eu$^{\text{3+}}$ ions, a key requirement for the realization of single-ion-level quantum processing nodes in the solid state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06576 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** A: schematic drawing of the fiber-based Fabry-Pérot microcavity. Laser light enters the cavity via a single mode optical fiber (SM-fiber), and the transmission is collected by a photodiode or a single photon counting module (see optical setup in supplementary material). B: Relevant level scheme of europium. C: emission spectrum of the 5𝐷0 excited state for the transitions depicted in B (blue line), together with a… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Scanning cavity microscopy scans recording the peak transmission through the cavity (A) and the fluorescence count rate (B) of the same region on the planar mirror. ror surface [24, 25]. By carefully adjusting the different printer parameters, we obtain a homogeneous distribution of single nanoparticles as well as small agglomerations with an average inter-particle distance larger than the cavity mode diameter of … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** PLE scans of the inhomogeneous line of europium ions from two different nanoparticles (A and B) at 20 K. A Lorentzian line (red) is fit to the data to extract the full width at half maximum (FWHM). A second scan (light blue and light green) is offset vertically to show the reproducibility of the measurement. In total, five different nanoparticles were measured in this way. C The FWHMs are plotted against the corres… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: B(C) for enhancing only the 580 nm (both) transition(s). The solid green (blue) line shows the calculation of the ensemble averaged (maximum) effective Purcell factors dependent on the size of the NP together with the error interval of plus and minus one standard de…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Saturation behaviour in the center of the inhomogeneous line at 20 K. The data is background-corrected and a fit of a power law (red) is shown. to different coupling strengths of the ions within the sub-ensemble. The homogeneous linewidth at a certain power level can n…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: A: transient spectral holes at three different intracavity power levels. The solid lines display fits of an inverted Lorentzian line. B: half-width of the transient spectral hole as a function of the intracavity power. Fitting the square root function of Eq. 2 (dark re…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Calculation of the detected count rate for a perfectly coupling, single europium ion in a pulsed, resonant measurement scheme. A: the cavity is operated in contact mode with an RMS length jitter of 0.8 pm. The blue line marks the nanoparticle size of 70 nm assumed for…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

Sub-kilohertz optical linewidths of the 7F0 - 5D0 transition in Y2O3:Eu3+,

R. Macfarlane and R. Shelby, “Sub-kilohertz optical linewidths of the 7F0 - 5D0 transition in Y2O3:Eu3+,”Op- tics Communications, vol. 39, pp. 169–171, Oct. 1981

work page 1981
[2]

Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time,

M. Zhong and et al., “Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time,”Nature, vol. 517, pp. 177–180, Jan. 2015

work page 2015
[3]

Designing gate operations for single-ion quantum computing in rare- earth-ion-doped crystals,

A. Kinos, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, and A. Walther, “Designing gate operations for single-ion quantum computing in rare- earth-ion-doped crystals,” Physical Review A, vol. 104, p. 052624, Nov. 2021

work page 2021
[4]

Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms,

D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, “Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, pp. 2208–2211, Sept. 2000

work page 2000
[5]

Quantum computer hardware based on rare-earth-ion-doped inorganic crystals,

N. Ohlsson, R. Krishna Mohan, and S. Kröll, “Quantum computer hardware based on rare-earth-ion-doped inorganic crystals,” Optics Communications, vol. 201, pp. 71–77, Jan. 2002

work page 2002
[6]

High-connectivity quantum processor nodes using single-ion qubits in rare-earth-ion-doped crystals,

A. Kinos, L. Rippe, D. Serrano, A. Walther, and S. Kröll, “High-connectivity quantum processor nodes using single-ion qubits in rare-earth-ion-doped crystals,”Physical Review A, vol. 105, p. 032603, Mar. 2022

work page 2022
[7]

Roadmap for Rare-earth Quantum Computing,

A. Kinos, D. Hunger, R. Kolesov, K. Mølmer, H. de Ried- matten, P. Goldner, A. Tallaire, L. Morvan, P. Berger, S. Welinski, K. Karrai, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, and A. Walther, “Roadmap for Rare-earth Quantum Computing,” 2021. Ver- sion Number: 1

work page 2021
[8]

Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Physical Review, vol. 69, no. 681, 1946

work page 1946

Show all 34 references

[9]

Atomic Source of Single Photons in the Telecom Band,

A. Dibos, M. Raha, C. Phenicie, and J. Thompson, “Atomic Source of Single Photons in the Telecom Band,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, p. 243601, June 2018

2018
[10]

Control and single-shot read- out of an ion embedded in a nanophotonic cavity,

J. M. Kindem, A. Ruskuc, J. G. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, Y. Q. Huan, and A. Faraon, “Control and single-shot read- out of an ion embedded in a nanophotonic cavity,”Nature, vol. 580, pp. 201–204, Apr. 2020

2020
[11]

Parallel single-shot measurement and coher- ent control of solid-state spins below the diffraction limit,

S. Chen, M. Raha, C. M. Phenicie, S. Ourari, and J. D. Thompson, “Parallel single-shot measurement and coher- ent control of solid-state spins below the diffraction limit,” Science, vol. 370, pp. 592–595, Oct. 2020

2020
[12]

Tunable microcavities coupled to rare-earth quantum emitters,

K. Xia, F. Sardi, C. Sauerzapf, T. Kornher, H.-W. Becker, Z. Kis, L. Kovacs, D. Dertli, J. Foglszinger, R. Kolesov, and J. Wrachtrup, “Tunable microcavities coupled to rare-earth quantum emitters,” Optica, vol. 9, p. 445, Apr. 2022

2022
[13]

Spectral mul- tiplexing of telecom emitters with stable transition fre- quency,

A. Ulanowski, B. Merkel, and A. Reiserer, “Spectral mul- tiplexing of telecom emitters with stable transition fre- quency,” Science Advances, vol. 8, p. eabo4538, Oct. 2022. arXiv:2110.09409 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

2022 arXiv
[14]

Detection of single ions in a nanoparticle coupled to a fiber cavity,

C. Deshmukh, E. Beattie, B. Casabone, S. Grandi, D. Ser- rano, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, D. Hunger, and H. De Riedmat- ten, “Detection of single ions in a nanoparticle coupled to a fiber cavity,”Optica, vol. 10, p. 1339, Oct. 2023

2023
[15]

A fiber Fabry–Perot cavity with high finesse,

D. Hunger, T. Steinmetz, Y. Colombe, C. Deutsch, T. W. Hänsch, and J. Reichel, “A fiber Fabry–Perot cavity with high finesse,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 12, p. 065038, June 2010

2010
[16]

Achievements and perspectives of optical fiber Fabry–Perot cavities,

H. Pfeifer, L. Ratschbacher, J. Gallego, C. Saavedra, A. Faßbender, A. Von Haaren, W. Alt, S. Hofferberth, M. Köhl, S. Linden, and D. Meschede, “Achievements and perspectives of optical fiber Fabry–Perot cavities,”Applied Physics B, vol. 128, p. 29, Feb. 2022

2022
[17]

Laser micro-fabrication of concave, low-roughness features in silica,

D. Hunger, C. Deutsch, R. J. Barbour, R. J. Warbur- ton, and J. Reichel, “Laser micro-fabrication of concave, low-roughness features in silica,”AIP Advances, vol. 2, p. 012119, Mar. 2012

2012
[18]

Ultrahigh-finesse, low-mode-volume Fabry–Perot microcav- ity,

A. Muller, E. B. Flagg, J. R. Lawall, and G. S. Solomon, “Ultrahigh-finesse, low-mode-volume Fabry–Perot microcav- ity,” Optics Letters, vol. 35, p. 2293, July 2010

2010
[19]

A highly stable and fully tun- able open microcavity platform at cryogenic temperatures,

M. Pallmann, T. Eichhorn, J. Benedikter, B. Casabone, T. Hümmer, and D. Hunger, “A highly stable and fully tun- able open microcavity platform at cryogenic temperatures,” APL Photonics, vol. 8, p. 046107, Apr. 2023

2023
[20]

Optical Line Width Broadening Mechanisms at the 10 kHz Level in Eu3+ :Y 2 O 3 Nanoparticles,

J. G. Bartholomew, K. De Oliveira Lima, A. Ferrier, and P. Goldner, “Optical Line Width Broadening Mechanisms at the 10 kHz Level in Eu3+ :Y 2 O 3 Nanoparticles,” Nano Letters, vol. 17, pp. 778–787, Feb. 2017

2017
[21]

Controlled size reduction of rare earth doped nanoparticles for optical quantum technologies,

S. Liu, D. Serrano, A. Fossati, A. Tallaire, A. Ferrier, and P. Goldner, “Controlled size reduction of rare earth doped nanoparticles for optical quantum technologies,”RSC Ad- vances, vol. 8, no. 65, pp. 37098–37104, 2018

2018
[22]

Defect Engineering for Quantum Grade Rare- Earth Nanocrystals,

S. Liu, A. Fossati, D. Serrano, A. Tallaire, A. Ferrier, and P. Goldner, “Defect Engineering for Quantum Grade Rare- Earth Nanocrystals,” ACS Nano, vol. 14, pp. 9953–9962, Aug. 2020

2020
[23]

Optical line broadening mechanisms in rare- earth doped oxide nanocrystals,

A. Fossati, D. Serrano, S. Liu, A. Tallaire, A. Ferrier, and P. Goldner, “Optical line broadening mechanisms in rare- earth doped oxide nanocrystals,”Journal of Luminescence, vol. 263, p. 120050, Nov. 2023

2023
[24]

Process considerations for Aerosol-Jet print- ing of ultra fine features,

G. Gramlich, R. Huber, F. Häslich, A. Bhutani, U. Lemmer, and T. Zwick, “Process considerations for Aerosol-Jet print- ing of ultra fine features,”Flexible and Printed Electronics, vol. 8, p. 035002, Sept. 2023

2023
[25]

Huber, Gedruckte Temperatursensor-Arrays mit hoher räumlicher Auflösung

R. Huber, Gedruckte Temperatursensor-Arrays mit hoher räumlicher Auflösung. PhD thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, 2024

2024
[26]

A scanning cavity microscope,

M. Mader, J. Reichel, T. W. Hänsch, and D. Hunger, “A scanning cavity microscope,”Nature Communications, vol. 6, p. 7249, June 2015

2015
[27]

Cavity-enhanced spectroscopy of a few- ion ensemble in Eu3+ :Y 2 O 3,

B. Casabone, J. Benedikter, T. Hümmer, F. Oehl, K. D. O. Lima, T. W. Hänsch, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, H. D. Riedmat- ten, and D. Hunger, “Cavity-enhanced spectroscopy of a few- ion ensemble in Eu3+ :Y 2 O 3,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 20, p. 095006, Sept. 2018

2018
[28]

Hole-Burning Spectroscopy,

S. Völker, “Hole-Burning Spectroscopy,”Annual Review Physical Chemistry, no. 40, pp. 499–530, 1989

1989
[29]

Narrow Optical Transitions in Erbium-Implanted Silicon Waveguides,

A. Gritsch, L. Weiss, J. Früh, S. Rinner, and A. Reiserer, “Narrow Optical Transitions in Erbium-Implanted Silicon Waveguides,” Physical Review X, vol. 12, p. 041009, Oct. 2022

2022
[30]

Kinos, L

A. Kinos, L. Rippe, A. Walther, and S. Kröll, “Microscopic treatment of instantaneous spectral diffusion and its effect TimonEichhorn,NicholasJobbitt,SörenBieling,ShupingLiu,TobiasKrom,DianaSerrano,RobertHuber,UlrichLemmer,HuguesdeRiedmatten,PhilippeGoldner,andDavidHunger,Mult...

2022
[31]

Under- standing laser stabilization using spectral hole burning,

B. Julsgaard, A. Walther, S. Kröll, and L. Rippe, “Under- standing laser stabilization using spectral hole burning,” vol. 15, pp. 11444–11465, Sept. 2007

2007
[32]

Controlling the dynamics of a coupled atom-cavity system by pure dephasing,

A. Auffèves, D. Gerace, J.-M. Gérard, M. F. Santos, L. C. Andreani, and J.-P. Poizat, “Controlling the dynamics of a coupled atom-cavity system by pure dephasing,”Physical Review B, vol. 81, p. 245419, June 2010

2010
[33]

A quantum-logic gate between distant quantum-network modules,

S. Daiss, S. Langenfeld, S. Welte, E. Distante, P. Thomas, L. Hartung, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, “A quantum-logic gate between distant quantum-network modules,”Science, vol. 371, pp. 614–617, Feb. 2021

2021
[34]

Colloquium : Cavity-enhanced quantum net- work nodes,

A. Reiserer, “Colloquium : Cavity-enhanced quantum net- work nodes,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 94, p. 041003, Dec. 2022

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Sub-kilohertz optical linewidths of the 7F0 - 5D0 transition in Y2O3:Eu3+,

R. Macfarlane and R. Shelby, “Sub-kilohertz optical linewidths of the 7F0 - 5D0 transition in Y2O3:Eu3+,”Op- tics Communications, vol. 39, pp. 169–171, Oct. 1981

work page 1981

[2] [2]

Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time,

M. Zhong and et al., “Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time,”Nature, vol. 517, pp. 177–180, Jan. 2015

work page 2015

[3] [3]

Designing gate operations for single-ion quantum computing in rare- earth-ion-doped crystals,

A. Kinos, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, and A. Walther, “Designing gate operations for single-ion quantum computing in rare- earth-ion-doped crystals,” Physical Review A, vol. 104, p. 052624, Nov. 2021

work page 2021

[4] [4]

Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms,

D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, “Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, pp. 2208–2211, Sept. 2000

work page 2000

[5] [5]

Quantum computer hardware based on rare-earth-ion-doped inorganic crystals,

N. Ohlsson, R. Krishna Mohan, and S. Kröll, “Quantum computer hardware based on rare-earth-ion-doped inorganic crystals,” Optics Communications, vol. 201, pp. 71–77, Jan. 2002

work page 2002

[6] [6]

High-connectivity quantum processor nodes using single-ion qubits in rare-earth-ion-doped crystals,

A. Kinos, L. Rippe, D. Serrano, A. Walther, and S. Kröll, “High-connectivity quantum processor nodes using single-ion qubits in rare-earth-ion-doped crystals,”Physical Review A, vol. 105, p. 032603, Mar. 2022

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Roadmap for Rare-earth Quantum Computing,

A. Kinos, D. Hunger, R. Kolesov, K. Mølmer, H. de Ried- matten, P. Goldner, A. Tallaire, L. Morvan, P. Berger, S. Welinski, K. Karrai, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, and A. Walther, “Roadmap for Rare-earth Quantum Computing,” 2021. Ver- sion Number: 1

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Physical Review, vol. 69, no. 681, 1946

work page 1946