Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the probability of major-axis precession in triaxial ellipsoidal potentials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/9308011 v1 pith:F3B3D2J5 submitted 1993-08-09 astro-ph

On the probability of major-axis precession in triaxial ellipsoidal potentials

classification astro-ph
keywords axisminororbitprecessangulardegreesellipsoidalmomentum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Orbits in triaxial ellipsoidal potentials precess about either the major or minor axis of the ellipsoid. In standard perturbation theory it can be shown that a circular orbit will precess about the minor axis if its angular momentum vector lies in a region bounded by two great circles which pass through the intermediate axis and which are inclined with minimum separation $i_T$ from the minor axis. We test the accuracy of the standard formula for $i_T$ by performing orbit integrations to determine $i_S$, the simulated turnover angle corresponding to $i_T$. We reach two principal conclusions: (i) $i_S$ is usually greater than $i_T$, by as much as 12 degrees even for moderate triaxialities, $A/1.2<B<C/0.8$. This reduces the expected frequency of polar rings. (ii) $i_S$ is not a single, well-defined number but can vary by a few degrees depending upon the initial phase of the orbit. This means that there is a reasonable probability for capture of gas onto orbits which precess about both axes. Interactions can then lead to substantial loss of angular momentum and subsequent infall to the galactic centre.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.