Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Smoothed analysis on connected graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1307.4884 v4 pith:F47JI74K submitted 2013-07-18 math.CO

Smoothed analysis on connected graphs

classification math.CO
keywords connectedgraphsanalysisgraphrandomsmoothedfracomega
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The main paradigm of smoothed analysis on graphs suggests that for any large graph $G$ in a certain class of graphs, perturbing slightly the edges of $G$ at random (usually adding few random edges to $G$) typically results in a graph having much "nicer" properties. In this work we study smoothed analysis on trees or, equivalently, on connected graphs. Given an $n$-vertex connected graph $G$, form a random supergraph $G^*$ of $G$ by turning every pair of vertices of $G$ into an edge with probability $\frac{\epsilon}{n}$, where $\epsilon$ is a small positive constant. This perturbation model has been studied previously in several contexts, including smoothed analysis, small world networks, and combinatorics. Connected graphs can be bad expanders, can have very large diameter, and possibly contain no long paths. In contrast, we show that if $G$ is an $n$-vertex connected graph then typically $G^*$ has edge expansion $\Omega(\frac{1}{\log n})$, diameter $O(\log n)$, vertex expansion $\Omega(\frac{1}{\log n})$, and contains a path of length $\Omega(n)$, where for the last two properties we additionally assume that $G$ has bounded maximum degree. Moreover, we show that if $G$ has bounded degeneracy, then typically the mixing time of the lazy random walk on $G^*$ is $O(\log^2 n)$. All these results are asymptotically tight.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.