Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Algebraic Ground Truth Inference: Non-Parametric Estimation of Sample Errors by AI Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.08312 v1 pith:F4RIFDNF submitted 2020-06-15 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords classifiersgroundtruthalgebraicerrorssampleapproachbinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Binary classification is widely used in ML production systems. Monitoring classifiers in a constrained event space is well known. However, real world production systems often lack the ground truth these methods require. Privacy concerns may also require that the ground truth needed to evaluate the classifiers cannot be made available. In these autonomous settings, non-parametric estimators of performance are an attractive solution. They do not require theoretical models about how the classifiers made errors in any given sample. They just estimate how many errors there are in a sample of an industrial or robotic datastream. We construct one such non-parametric estimator of the sample errors for an ensemble of weak binary classifiers. Our approach uses algebraic geometry to reformulate the self-assessment problem for ensembles of binary classifiers as an exact polynomial system. The polynomial formulation can then be used to prove - as an algebraic geometry algorithm - that no general solution to the self-assessment problem is possible. However, specific solutions are possible in settings where the engineering context puts the classifiers close to independent errors. The practical utility of the method is illustrated on a real-world dataset from an online advertising campaign and a sample of common classification benchmarks. The accuracy estimators in the experiments where we have ground truth are better than one part in a hundred. The online advertising campaign data, where we do not have ground truth data, is verified by an internal consistency approach whose validity we conjecture as an algebraic geometry theorem. We call this approach - algebraic ground truth inference.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Algebraic Evaluation Theorems

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Under an error-independence assumption, the decisions of three binary classifiers determine their true accuracies up to exactly two alternative solutions, and one of them is the true evaluation.

Pith tools