Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Probing Representations Learned by Multimodal Recurrent and Transformer Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.11125 v1 pith:F4WJ3LTG submitted 2019-08-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords representationssentencelanguagemodelsmodelingrecurrenttextualvisual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent literature shows that large-scale language modeling provides excellent reusable sentence representations with both recurrent and self-attentive architectures. However, there has been less clarity on the commonalities and differences in the representational properties induced by the two architectures. It also has been shown that visual information serves as one of the means for grounding sentence representations. In this paper, we present a meta-study assessing the representational quality of models where the training signal is obtained from different modalities, in particular, language modeling, image features prediction, and both textual and multimodal machine translation. We evaluate textual and visual features of sentence representations obtained using predominant approaches on image retrieval and semantic textual similarity. Our experiments reveal that on moderate-sized datasets, a sentence counterpart in a target language or visual modality provides much stronger training signal for sentence representation than language modeling. Importantly, we observe that while the Transformer models achieve superior machine translation quality, representations from the recurrent neural network based models perform significantly better over tasks focused on semantic relevance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For English-to-Czech MT evaluation, embeddings that win intrinsic semantic similarity benchmarks (SimCSE) perform worst after fine-tuning, while intrinsically poor models (XLM-R, FERNET) perform best.

Pith tools