New method of soft modes investigation by Little-Parks effect

Victor D. Lakhno

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 14 references

New method of soft modes investigation by Little-Parks effect

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts that soft phonon modes amplify Little-Parks critical-temperature oscillations in high-temperature superconductors by a factor $(T_c/\omega)^{1/2}$, offering a new phonon-detection method.

desk verdict A short, clear prediction for Little-Parks oscillations in the author's TI-bipolaron model, but the entire soft-phonon enhancement hangs on an unproven, self-cited single-particle spectrum. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05735 v1 pith:F524VZHC submitted 2019-08-13 cond-mat.supr-con

Victor D. Lakhno This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.25.Gz74.25.Kc

keywords Little-Parkseffecttranslation-invariantbipolaronhigh-temperaturesuperconductivitysoftphononmodesBose-Einsteincondensationcriticaltemperatureoscillationsmagneticfluxquantizationpolylogarithm

topics High-Temperature Superconductivity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Little-Parks effect—the periodic swing of a superconducting transition temperature as magnetic flux through a ring is varied—should be much stronger in high-temperature superconductors than in conventional ones if those materials superconduct through translation-invariant bipolarons, pairs of electrons bound as charged bosons. The predicted relative amplitude is $\Delta T_c/T_c \approx 10^{-4}(T_c/\omega)^{1/2}$ for soft phonon modes with $\omega \ll T_c$, so the oscillations grow abnormally large as a phonon mode softens. If the prediction is right, the effect becomes a practical detector of soft phonon modes in cuprate nanostructures, complementing neutron and x-ray scattering. The paper also notes that working near the critical magnetic flux maximizes the sensitivity of the oscillations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the translation-invariant bipolaron, a charged boson representing a pair of electrons, with the excitation spectrum $\epsilon(k) = \omega + k^2/2M + (\eta/M)Bk - ku$ in a magnetic field. Treating the bipolarons as an ideal Bose gas turns this spectrum into the density formula (3), and the fluxoid quantization condition (8) converts it into the Little-Parks formula (9), $\Delta T_c/T_c = (\xi^2/R^2)(n - \Phi/\Phi_0)^2$. The coefficient $\xi$ contains $\mathrm{Li}_{1/2}(e^{-\alpha})$, and the $\alpha = \omega/T_c$ dependence of that polylogarithm is what makes soft phonons produce large oscillations.

What would settle it

Take a thin-walled cuprate cylinder in which neutron or x-ray scattering has already measured a soft phonon frequency $\omega$ well below $T_c$, and measure $\Delta T_c/T_c$ as flux is swept: the paper predicts an amplitude near $10^{-4}(T_c/\omega)^{1/2}$, much larger than the BCS value. Seeing only the conventional amplitude, or a flux periodicity that does not follow the quantized-flux relation (8), would falsify the claim of soft-mode-enhanced oscillations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Little-Parks oscillations in high-temperature superconductors, computed from a translation-invariant bipolaron Bose gas, are controlled by the phonon frequency $\omega$ through the polylogarithm $\mathrm{Li}_{1/2}(e^{-\alpha})$ with $\alpha = \omega/T_c$. In the soft-mode limit $\alpha \ll 1$ this term behaves as $\sqrt{\pi/\alpha}$, turning the oscillation amplitude into $\Delta T_c/T_c \approx 10^{-4}(T_c/\omega)^{1/2}$. Because this exceeds the BCS-based estimate when $\omega \ll T_c$, the author concludes that anomalously large critical-temperature oscillations are a signature of soft phonon modes and that the Little-Parks effect can be used to detect such modes in high-temperature superconductor nanostructures and to enhance $T_c$.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction stands on the assumed bipolaron energy formula in a magnetic field, whose linear-in-field term is taken from earlier work with an unspecified constant; if real high-temperature superconductors do not obey that spectrum, the whole Little-Parks amplitude calculation loses its foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In a thin-walled high-temperature superconductor cylinder, the relative critical-temperature swing should grow as $(T_c/\omega)^{1/2}$ when a phonon mode softens, rising far above the conventional $10^{-4}$-scale estimate.
The Little-Parks measurement becomes a soft-phonon detector: a large $\Delta T_c/T_c$ at the usual flux periodicity signals $\omega \ll T_c$ even when neutron or x-ray scattering resolution is insufficient.
Operating near the critical flux $\Phi_c$ should maximize the oscillation amplitude, since the model makes $T_c$ highly sensitive to bipolaron velocity deviations there.
For ordinary phonons with $\omega \sim T_c$ the amplitude returns to conventional values, so the enhancement itself is diagnostic of the bipolaron mechanism rather than a generic superconducting effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: if the $(T_c/\omega)^{1/2}$ scaling is confirmed, Little-Parks measurements could map soft-phonon softening spatially by comparing rings of different radii across the same film.
Beyond the paper: because $\omega$ enters through $\alpha$, isotope substitution that shifts phonon frequencies should shift the oscillation amplitude; this is a testable consequence the paper does not explicitly draw.
Beyond the paper: the linear-in-field term in the spectrum (2) is the most precarious input; deriving the constant $\eta$ from a microscopic electron-phonon Hamiltonian would settle whether the predicted enhancement survives contact with real materials.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing to know: this paper makes a concrete, testable prediction — for soft phonons (ω << Tc), the Little-Parks oscillation amplitude should scale as ΔTc/Tc ≈ 10^{-4}(Tc/ω)^{1/2}, much larger than the BCS value. That scaling is new, as far as I can tell, and it is specific enough to be looked for in existing or future experiments on cuprate nanostructures.

What the paper does well: it is short and to the point. The logic from the bipolaron Bose-gas to the effective gap ω̃ = ω(1 - u²/u_c² - B²/B_c²) is transparent, and the final formula (9)-(12) is a clean, falsifiable expression. The author also connects the prediction to the unusually large magnetoresistance oscillations reported by Sochnikov et al., which gives an experimental anchor. And the concluding remark about using Φ → Φ_c to maximize the effect is a useful practical hint.

Where the soft spots are: the derivation is a sketch, not a proof. The key step from (5) and (8) to (9) is not shown, and the expansion in Δω̃ is asserted rather than justified. More importantly, the entire result rests on Eq. (2), the linear-in-B spectrum ǫ(k)=ω+k²/2M+(η/M)Bk−ku, which is imported from the author's own earlier paper without derivation. The stress-test note is right: this is not the standard Landau-quantized spectrum for a charged boson in a magnetic field. If that linear-in-B term is wrong, or if η vanishes, the effective gap doesn't depend on B and u in the assumed way, and the Li_{1/2} divergence disappears. The paper doesn't address this at all. There's also a smaller but real issue: Eq. (10) is dimensionally odd as printed — it looks like ξ² rather than ξ — so the formula should be read as defining ξ², not ξ.

Is the circularity fatal? Not on its own terms. The paper is an extension of the author's TI-bipolaron program, not an independent derivation of that program. If you don't buy Eq. (2), you won't buy the prediction. That's a serious limitation, but it's an honest one: the author clearly states the starting point and doesn't pretend otherwise.

Who this is for: anyone working on Little-Parks experiments in cuprates, or on bipolaron theories of high-Tc. It deserves a real referee — not a desk reject — because the prediction is concrete and potentially testable, and because the model, even if nonstandard, is coherent enough to warrant scrutiny. I'd send it to review with the request that the referee demand a derivation of Eq. (2) or at least a discussion of its physical basis. I would probably not cite it in my own work without seeing that derivation.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory of the Little-Parks effect in high-temperature superconductors (HTSC) based on the translation-invariant (TI) bipolaron model. Starting from an assumed excitation spectrum of a moving bipolaron condensate in a magnetic field, the author derives an expression for the oscillation of the critical temperature, ΔTc/Tc = (ξ²/R²)(n - Φ/Φ0)², with the coefficient ξ depending on the phonon frequency through a polylogarithm. The central prediction is that for soft phonon modes with ω << Tc, the oscillation amplitude is enhanced as ΔTc/Tc ≈ 10⁻⁴(Tc/ω)^{1/2}, and the paper proposes this as a new method for detecting soft phonon modes in HTSC nanostructures.

Significance. If the underlying model is correct, the paper offers a concrete and falsifiable prediction that could be tested in Little-Parks experiments on cuprate nanostructures. The specific scaling ΔTc/Tc ≈ 10⁻⁴(Tc/ω)^{1/2} provides a distinctive signature of bipolaron-based pairing and could, in principle, distinguish it from BCS behavior. The manuscript is concise and the argument is easy to follow in broad strokes. However, the result rests on a model-specific spectrum that is not independently derived, and a number of technical gaps and an outright dimensional inconsistency currently prevent the quantitative claims from being accepted as they stand.

major comments (4)

[Eq. (2)] The entire derivation hinges on the excitation spectrum in Eq. (2), ε(k) = ω + k²/2M + (η/M)Bk - ku, which is quoted from the author's previous paper [9] without derivation. For a charged Bose gas in a uniform magnetic field, the standard minimal-coupling Hamiltonian gives Landau quantization, not a linear-in-B term of the form (η/M)Bk. The linear term is a distinctive assumption of the TI-bipolaron model, and its physical basis is not explained in this manuscript. If this spectrum is incorrect or not applicable to real HTSC materials, then the effective gap in Eq. (5) and the critical field B_c in Eq. (6) do not follow, and the predicted enhancement disappears. A revision must either derive Eq. (2) from a microscopic model or clearly state the assumptions and range of validity of this non-minimal coupling.
[Eq. (9) and the paragraph before it] The derivation of Eq. (9) from Eqs. (3), (5), and (8) is not shown. The text states that for small Δω̃ the critical temperature deviation can be expressed, but the expansion is not given and the smallness parameter is not identified. This matters because the coefficient in Eq. (10) contains Li_{1/2}(e^{-α}), which diverges as α → 0; the linear-response approximation must be checked in precisely the soft-mode regime (ω << Tc) where the enhancement is claimed. Please provide the intermediate algebra and a quantitative condition for the validity of the linearization.
[Eqs. (9)-(10)] Equations (9) and (10) are dimensionally inconsistent. As printed, ξ in Eq. (10) has dimensions of length squared (from n_bp^{-2/3} multiplied by dimensionless factors), so ξ²/R² has dimensions of length squared, not dimensionless. The numerical estimate ΔTc/Tc ≈ 10⁻⁴ is obtained only if Eq. (9) is read as ΔTc/Tc = (ξ/R²)(n - Φ/Φ0)² (or if the right-hand side of Eq. (10) is interpreted as the square root of the intended quantity). This is a central formula, and the inconsistency makes the quantitative prediction meaningless unless corrected.
[Eqs. (5)-(8) and the parameter estimates] The paper does not discuss the critical velocity constraint. For the spectrum in Eq. (1), the critical velocity is u_c = sqrt(2ω/M), which vanishes as ω → 0. A moving Bose condensate is stable only for u < u_c. In the Little-Parks geometry, the maximum velocity is u_max ≈ ħ/(2 M_bp R) (at half-integer flux), so for soft modes the stability condition imposes R > ħ/(2 M_bp sqrt(2ω/M)), a bound that diverges as ω^{-1/2}. The paper's predicted large enhancement for ω << Tc arises in a regime where this constraint may prevent the experiment from being performed. The manuscript should map out the allowed parameter region and clarify whether the proposed detection method is realizable for realistic cylinder radii and soft-mode frequencies.

minor comments (5)

[Title] There is a typo in the title: 'eﬀec t' should be 'effect'.
[Notation] The relationship between M and M_bp is never explicitly stated. Since a bipolaron consists of two electrons, one expects M_bp = M = 2m; the text should state this to avoid ambiguity in Eqs. (8) and (10).
[Text after Eq. (6)] The text 'Plank constant' should read 'Planck constant'.
[Comparison with Ref. [2]] The claim that the large oscillations in Ref. [2] support the present model is qualitative. To be convincing, the paper should state the measured values of ΔTc/Tc from Ref. [2] and compare them with the predictions of Eqs. (9)-(12).
[Final paragraph] The statement that 'the results obtained can be also used to enhance the critical temperature of a superconducting transition' is not developed. A brief explanation of the proposed mechanism or a reference to a specific parameter regime would be useful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Central Little-Parks amplification rests on the linear-in-B bipolaron spectrum (Eq. (2)) quoted from the author's own Ref. [9] without derivation; the predicted soft-mode enhancement and detection method therefore reduce to that self-cited input.

self citation load bearing [Full text, display equation (2); used in Eqs. (5), (6), and (9)-(12)]
"According to [9], the excitation spectrum of Bose condensate of TI bipolarons which moves in a magnetic field of intensity B at the velocity of u will have the form: ǫ(k) = ω + k2/2M + η/M Bk − ku, (2) where η is a certain constant."

The entire magnetic-field and velocity dependence of the Little-Parks oscillation enters through the linear-in-B term (η/M)Bk of Eq. (2). From it the paper constructs the effective gap ω̃ = ω(1 − u²/u_c² − B²/B_c²) in Eq. (5), the critical scales u_c and B_c in Eq. (6), and finally ΔTc/Tc = ξ²/R²(n − Φ/Φ0)² in Eq. (9). The claimed soft-phonon amplification ∝(Tc/ω)^{1/2} appears only because the polylog Li_{1/2}(e^{-α}) with α = (ω/Tc)(1 − Φ²/Φ_c²) diverges as α→0. Eq. (2) is not derived or benchmarked in this manuscript; it is quoted from the author's earlier paper [9]. If Eq. (2) is not valid, or if η = 0, then ω̃ does not depend on B and u in the assumed way and the predicted enhancement disappears.

full rationale

The paper's formal sequence from the assumed TI-bipolaron spectrum (Eq. (2)) through the ideal Bose-gas integral (Eq. (3)) to the Little-Parks formula (Eq. (9)) is a legitimate mathematical derivation: substituting the fluxoid velocity (Eq. (8)) into the effective gap (Eq. (5)) and expanding the Bose integral does yield the quoted oscillatory dependence on n − Φ/Φ0. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and the comparison with the magnetoresistance oscillations of Ref. [2] is an external benchmark, not a fitted input. However, the physical content that makes the result novel — the field- and frequency-dependence — enters only through Eq. (2), which is imported from the author's own Ref. [9] and contains an unspecified constant η. The effective gap, the critical field B_c, and the divergence of Li_{1/2}(e^{-α}) for α→0 all trace back to that unproven linear-in-B term. The manuscript provides no independent derivation, machine-checked proof, or parameter-free validation of Eq. (2). Consequently, the claim that Little-Parks oscillations can be anomalously high in HTSC and can serve as a detector of soft phonon modes reduces to a self-citation chain. This warrants a score of 6: the later algebra is not itself an identity and the paper states its assumptions, but the central prediction is not independent of the author's prior model input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unproved spectrum (Eq. (2)) and an ideal Bose gas model, both from the author's own prior publications. The parameters η, n_bp, m, and M_bp enter the amplitude and numeric estimates; none are constrained by independent data in this paper. No new entities beyond the TI bipolaron are introduced.

free parameters (4)

η = not specified
Introduced in Eq. (2) as 'a certain constant' in the magnetic-field term of the bipolaron spectrum; it determines Bc via Bc = sqrt(2Mω/η) and hence the flux scale. No derivation or value is given.
n_bp (bipolaron concentration) = 10^19 cm^-3 (from [6])
Used in Eqs. (3) and (10) to compute the Bose-gas number and the amplitude coefficient; the numeric estimate in the paper assumes this value.
m (band electron effective mass) = m0 in estimates
Used to set M = 2m; the estimate sets m = m0, but in real materials m is a material parameter.
M_bp (bipolaron mass) = ≈ M in estimates
Appears in Eq. (8) and (10); the paper approximates M ≈ Mbp for the numerical estimate.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The excitation spectrum of a moving TI bipolaron in a magnetic field has the Landau-roton form of Eq. (2).
Quoted from the author's earlier paper [9] without derivation; it is the central modeling assumption that makes the Little-Parks calculation possible.
domain assumption The TI bipolaron gas is an ideal Bose gas with single-particle spectrum (1).
Taken from [6,7]; used to write Eq. (3) for the particle number and Tc.
domain assumption HTSC pairing is described by translation-invariant bipolarons, equivalent to Cooper pairing.
This is the foundational premise of the author's bipolaron theory; accepted as a working hypothesis, not proven here.
standard math The condensate velocity is related to fluxoid quantization via Eq. (8).
Standard fluxoid quantization for a thin-walled cylinder, applied to bipolarons.
ad hoc to paper For small deviations of ω̃ from ω̃0, the Bose integral can be expanded linearly, yielding Eq. (9).
The expansion is not proved; it is a necessary step to obtain the quadratic oscillation formula.

invented entities (1)

Translation-invariant bipolaron (TI bipolaron)
purpose: Composite boson charge carrier that condenses and gives superconductivity; it replaces Cooper pairs in this model.
The TI bipolaron is the central object of the theory, introduced in the author's prior work [6,7]; this paper provides no new experimental or independent evidence for its existence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New method of soft modes investigation by Little-Parks effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F524VZHC

@misc{pith2026190805735,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New method of soft modes investigation by Little-Parks effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F524VZHC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05735}
}

read the original abstract

As is known, Little-Parks effect concerned with oscillations of the critical temperature of a superconducting transition was one of the first effects which suggested the existence of Cooper pairing in conventional superconductors. It is shown that in high-temperature superconductors (HTSC) the Little-Parks effect based on bipolaron mechanism which in HTSC is the equivalent of Cooper pairing can be anomalously high. The results obtained can be used as a new method for detecting soft phonon modes in nanostructures on the basis of HTSC. The results can be also used to enhance the critical temperature of a superconducting transition.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[9]

Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density TI-Bipolaron Gas in Mag- netic Field, Condens

V.D. Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density TI-Bipolaron Gas in Mag- netic Field, Condens. Matter, 4, 43, (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat4020043

work page doi:10.3390/condmat4020043 2019
[1]

W. A. Little and R. D. Parks, Observation of Quantum Periodicity in the Transition Temperature of a Supercon- ducting Cylinder, Physical Review Letters 9, 9 (1962), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.9

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.9.9 1962
[2]

5, 516 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.111

Sochnikov I., Shaulov A., Yeshurun Y., Logvenov G., Boˇ zovi´ c I., Large oscillations of the magne- toresistance in nanopatterned high-temperature super- conducting ﬁlms, Nature Nanotech. 5, 516 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.111

work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.111 2010
[3]

de Gennes, Champ critique d’une boucle supracon- ductrice ramiﬁ´ ee, C.R

P.-G. de Gennes, Champ critique d’une boucle supracon- ductrice ramiﬁ´ ee, C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. II 292, 279 (1981)

work page 1981
[4]

Staley and Y

N.E. Staley and Y. Liu, Manipulating superconducting ﬂuctuations by the Little-Parks-de Gennes eﬀect in ul- trasmall Al loops, PNAS 109(37) 14819-14823 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200664109

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1200664109 2012
[5]

Y. Liu, Y. Zadorozhny, M. M. Rosario, B. Y. Rock, P. T. Carrigan, and H. Wang, Destruction of the Global Phase Coherence in Ultrathin, Doubly Connected 3 Superconducting Cylinders, Science 294, 2332 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066144

work page doi:10.1126/science.1066144 2001
[6]

Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density Translation-Invariant Bipolaron Gas, Adv

V.D. Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density Translation-Invariant Bipolaron Gas, Adv. Cond. Mat. Phys. 2018, 1380986, (2018) https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1380986

work page doi:10.1155/2018/1380986 2018
[7]

Lakhno, Superconducting properties of a nonideal bipolaron gas, Physica C: Supercon- ductivity and its applications, 561, 1-8, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2018.10.009

V.D. Lakhno, Superconducting properties of a nonideal bipolaron gas, Physica C: Supercon- ductivity and its applications, 561, 1-8, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2018.10.009

work page doi:10.1016/j.physc.2018.10.009 2019

Show all 14 references

[8]

Landau, Theory of the Superﬂuidity of Helium II, J

L.D. Landau, Theory of the Superﬂuidity of Helium II, J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941)); Phys. Rev. 60, 356 (1941) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.60.356

1941 doi
[10]

Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975

M. Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975

1975
[11]

In this case the oscillations of ∆ Tc/Tc can be abnormally high

which are associated with structural instability and structural phase transitions in HTSC. In this case the oscillations of ∆ Tc/Tc can be abnormally high. Presently, the main methods for investigation of phonon spectra are inelastic x-ray scattering and inelastic neutron scat...
[12]

Kimura, Y

H. Kimura, Y. Noda, H. Goka, M. Fujita, K. Yamada, and G. Shirane, Soft Phonons and Structural Phase Tran- sitions in La 1.875Ba0.125CuO4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 445- 449, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.74.445

2005 doi
[13]

Wakimoto, S

S. Wakimoto, S. Lee, P.M. Gehring, R.J. Bir- geneau, G. Shirane, Neutron Scattering Study of Soft Phonons and Diﬀuse Scattering in Insulating La1.95Sr0.05CuO4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73, 3413-3417, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.73.3413

2004 doi
[14]

Reznik, Giant Electron-Phonon Anomaly in Doped La 2CuO4 and Other Cuprates, Adv

D. Reznik, Giant Electron-Phonon Anomaly in Doped La 2CuO4 and Other Cuprates, Adv. Cond. Mat. Phys., 2010, ID 523549, (2010); https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/523549

2010 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [9]

Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density TI-Bipolaron Gas in Mag- netic Field, Condens

V.D. Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density TI-Bipolaron Gas in Mag- netic Field, Condens. Matter, 4, 43, (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat4020043

work page doi:10.3390/condmat4020043 2019

[2] [1]

W. A. Little and R. D. Parks, Observation of Quantum Periodicity in the Transition Temperature of a Supercon- ducting Cylinder, Physical Review Letters 9, 9 (1962), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.9

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.9.9 1962

[3] [2]

5, 516 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.111

Sochnikov I., Shaulov A., Yeshurun Y., Logvenov G., Boˇ zovi´ c I., Large oscillations of the magne- toresistance in nanopatterned high-temperature super- conducting ﬁlms, Nature Nanotech. 5, 516 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.111

work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.111 2010

[4] [3]

de Gennes, Champ critique d’une boucle supracon- ductrice ramiﬁ´ ee, C.R

P.-G. de Gennes, Champ critique d’une boucle supracon- ductrice ramiﬁ´ ee, C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. II 292, 279 (1981)

work page 1981

[5] [4]

Staley and Y

N.E. Staley and Y. Liu, Manipulating superconducting ﬂuctuations by the Little-Parks-de Gennes eﬀect in ul- trasmall Al loops, PNAS 109(37) 14819-14823 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200664109

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1200664109 2012

[6] [5]

Y. Liu, Y. Zadorozhny, M. M. Rosario, B. Y. Rock, P. T. Carrigan, and H. Wang, Destruction of the Global Phase Coherence in Ultrathin, Doubly Connected 3 Superconducting Cylinders, Science 294, 2332 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066144

work page doi:10.1126/science.1066144 2001

[7] [6]

Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density Translation-Invariant Bipolaron Gas, Adv

V.D. Lakhno, Superconducting Properties of 3D Low-Density Translation-Invariant Bipolaron Gas, Adv. Cond. Mat. Phys. 2018, 1380986, (2018) https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1380986

work page doi:10.1155/2018/1380986 2018

[8] [7]

Lakhno, Superconducting properties of a nonideal bipolaron gas, Physica C: Supercon- ductivity and its applications, 561, 1-8, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2018.10.009

V.D. Lakhno, Superconducting properties of a nonideal bipolaron gas, Physica C: Supercon- ductivity and its applications, 561, 1-8, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2018.10.009

work page doi:10.1016/j.physc.2018.10.009 2019