Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Spectrum of a Supersymmetric Color Superconductor

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper derives the low-energy meson spectrum of a supersymmetric color superconductor and finds type-II Goldstone modes with dispersion $\omega = \pm k^2/(2\mu_I)$, a pseudo-Goldstone gap $2M_q$, and moduli-driven massless modes.

desk verdict A genuinely new spectrum for a supersymmetric color superconductor, with a Goldstone-counting argument that currently does not hold up; send to referees but flag Sec. 3.1. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00227 v1 pith:F5UUFYAY submitted 2019-08-31 hep-th

classification hep-th MSC 81T3081T6081T13
keywords supersymmetriccolorsuperconductorGoldstonemodesdyonicinstantonmesonspectrumisospinchemicalpotentialholographicmodelsupertubeN=2hypermultiplets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the mesonic excitation spectrum of a supersymmetric color superconductor, a strongly coupled four-dimensional gauge theory with fundamental quarks held at finite isospin and R-charge densities. Working from a gravitational dual description, it finds non-relativistic Goldstone modes with dispersion $\omega = \pm (1/(2\mu_I)) k^2$, and a pseudo-Goldstone mode whose gap is approximately twice the quark mass when the quark mass is small. It also finds ungapped modes that are not Goldstone modes, because they arise from exact supersymmetric moduli such as the instanton centre. For more than two flavors, unequal R-charge densities cause the dissolved strings and D3-branes to blow up into a D5-brane supertube. The result matters because it provides a controlled strongly coupled system in which superfluid Goldstone physics, color Higgsing, and exact moduli coexist and can be compared with other approaches to dense matter.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dyonic instanton on the D7-brane worldvolume, governed by the super-Yang–Mills–Higgs action (2.19). The solution combines a self-dual instanton with an electric field equal to the covariant derivative of the scalar embedding; the crossed electric and magnetic fields generate the angular momentum that fixes the instanton size through $\Lambda^2 \propto n_R/\mu_I$. This BPS object does the double work of Higgsing the color group and spontaneously breaking $SU(2)_R \times U(1)_I \rightarrow U(1)_D$, and its zero modes organize the low-energy meson spectrum.

What would settle it

Solve the linear fluctuation equations around the same dyonic-instanton background using the full non-Abelian Dirac–Born–Infeld action (2.13); the central claim fails if the gapless modes acquire a gap or if the low-momentum dispersion is not $\propto k^2$ with coefficient $1/(2\mu_I)$. An independent check would be a real-time lattice simulation of the $N=2$ theory at finite isospin density searching for a massless mode with quadratic dispersion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working from the gravitational dual description of ${\cal N}=4$ SU($N_c$) super Yang–Mills with $N_f=2$ fundamental hypermultiplets, the paper studies small fluctuations around the supersymmetric, superfluid color-superconducting ground state described by a dyonic instanton on the flavor branes. It finds two (likely three) exactly massless modes with non-relativistic dispersion $\omega = \pm (1/(2\mu_I)) k^2$, independent of the 't Hooft coupling and of $\Lambda/M_q$. When the quark mass is much smaller than the symmetry-breaking scale $\Lambda$, a pseudo-Goldstone mode appears with gap $\omega_{\rm gap}\approx 2M_q$, a consequence of the explicit breaking of an approximate scale symmetry. A further set of ungapped modes is not Goldstone-like: it arises from supersymmetric moduli, including the position of the instanton centre in the transverse space. For $N_f>2$ with unequal R-charge densities, the same construction describes a D5-brane supertube stretched between D7-branes, making the earlier point-like instanton solutions a collapsed limit.

Load-bearing premise

The linearized vibration equations are taken from a simplified low-energy action, and if the full brane action changes those equations the exact dispersion coefficients could move.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The coefficient $1/(2\mu_I)$ is a parameter-free prediction for the low-energy constant of this strongly coupled charged superfluid: the Goldstone slope is set solely by the isospin chemical potential, with no dependence on the 't Hooft coupling or $\Lambda/M_q$.
  • The $\omega_{\rm gap}\simeq 2M_q$ relation turns the pseudo-Goldstone mass into a direct measurement of the quark mass in a regime where the theory is strongly coupled.
  • Ungapped, non-Goldstone modes imply that massless states in this system cannot all be attributed to broken symmetries, so any spectral identification of symmetry breaking must be supplemented by a moduli calculation.
  • In the $\Lambda \ll M_q$ limit, the massive spectrum approaches the known meson spectrum of the underlying theory, with the isospin chemical potential shifting each charged channel by $\pm 2\mu_I$ in frequency.
  • For $N_f>2$, unequal R-charges force the dissolved strings and D3-branes to blow up into a D5-brane supertube, so the spectrum must be interpreted on a tubular worldvolume rather than on pointlike instantons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the full non-Abelian Dirac–Born–Infeld action (2.13) is used instead of the truncated super-Yang–Mills–Higgs action, the leading $k^2$ coefficient could shift; computing that correction would test how robust the $1/(2\mu_I)$ prediction really is.
  • The coupling independence of the Goldstone slope suggests a direct weak-coupling check: a perturbative computation in the same theory at small 't Hooft coupling should recover $\omega = \pm (1/(2\mu_I)) k^2$ to leading order or reveal where the probe approximation breaks down.
  • The instanton-centre ungapped modes are a supersymmetric signature; in a non-supersymmetric analogue of dense quark matter they would generically acquire a gap, which would distinguish supersymmetric from real-world quark matter in low-energy experiments.
  • The supertube realization offers a geometric handle on the finite-isospin ground state that may generalize to configurations with baryon charge, where the absence of a sign problem would permit direct comparison with lattice methods.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the mesonic spectrum of a strongly coupled N=2 SCFT (N=4 SYM with Nf=2 fundamental hypermultiplets) at finite isospin and R-charge densities, whose ground state is a supersymmetric color superconductor. The holographic setup is a pair of D7-brane probes in AdS5×S5 supporting a dyonic instanton, reviewed from the authors' previous work. The authors solve linearized fluctuation equations obtained from a super-Yang-Mills-Higgs truncation and report: (i) type II Goldstone modes with ω=±k^2/(2 μ_I); (ii) a pseudo-Goldstone mode with gap ~2 Mq for Mq << Λ; (iii) additional ungapped modes associated with supersymmetric moduli, including the instanton center; and (iv) for Nf>2, new brane-embedding features and a supertube interpretation. The paper includes a proof (Appendix A) that the background is an exact solution of the non-Abelian DBI action.

Significance. If the central claims survive, this is a rare example of a holographic supersymmetric color superconductor with a calculable low-energy spectrum, including a parameter-free low-momentum coefficient 1/(2 μ_I) and a pseudo-Goldstone gap proportional to the explicit breaking scale. The BPS proof in Appendix A is explicit and a strength, and the fluctuation equations in Appendix C are given in enough detail to make the numerical treatment reproducible. However, the physical interpretation of the three gapless modes as 'type II Goldstone modes' conflicts with the paper's own symmetry counting unless one accepts the unsupported assertion that SU(2)_R lacks a conserved current; this makes the central claim as stated unreliable. The spectrum and moduli interpretation are of sufficient interest that the issue should be correctable by reinterpretation or additional argument.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.1, Eqs. (3.15)-(3.17)] The counting of Goldstone modes in §3.1 rests on an unproved and, as stated, questionable claim. The paper argues that SU(2)_R has no conserved current because the dual graviphotons are non-dynamical in the probe approximation. In the boundary N=2 SCFT, however, SU(2)_R is a genuine global symmetry with a conserved current; the probe limit suppresses the backreaction of the flavor branes on the closed-string fields but does not remove the current. The paper itself uses SU(2)_R as a global symmetry to generate the would-be Goldstone modes in Eqs. (3.8)-(3.10). With the stated breaking pattern (2.57), the broken generators are τ^1, τ^2, and τ^3−σ^3, giving NBG=3 and rank(B)=2, so Eq. (3.17) predicts n_I+n_II=2, not 3. Either the extra mode in channel 6 is not a Goldstone mode (for example, an instanton-orientation modulus), and the abstract's claim of three Goldstone modes should be revised, or a concrete argument for the absence of the conserved SU(2)_R current must be supplied. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [3, opening; Eq. (2.19)] The fluctuation spectrum is computed from the SYMH action (2.19), not from the full non-Abelian DBI action (2.13). Appendix A proves equivalence of the equations of motion for the background, but not for fluctuations. Since the central quantitative results, Eq. (3.12) and Eq. (3.23), are derived within this truncation, the coefficients 1/(2 μ_I) and 2M_q may receive corrections from the omitted DBI terms. The manuscript should either estimate these corrections or state explicitly in the abstract and conclusions that these coefficients are predictions of the SYMH truncation rather than of the full string-theory action.
  3. [3.1, channel 6 degeneracy] The numerical evidence for n_II=3 is incomplete. Section 3.1 states that 'our numerical analysis has not allowed us to establish whether the Goldstone mode in channel 6 is a single mode or actually corresponds to two exactly degenerate modes.' Since the central claim of three type II Goldstone modes depends on this degeneracy, the claim should be resolved numerically or explicitly downgraded in the abstract and conclusions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [3.2] The section title contains a typo: 'Pseudo-Goldtstone modes' should be 'Pseudo-Goldstone modes'; the same typo appears in the text of §3.2.
  2. [3.2, Eq. (3.19)] The symbol Λ denotes both the dimensionful instanton-size scale appearing in Eq. (2.30) and the dimensionless ratio Λ/M_q; please use a distinct notation (for example, ρ = Λ/M_q) to avoid confusion.
  3. [3.1, Fig. 3] Figure 3 is produced with L=1; please state in the caption whether the plotted quantities are rescaled by L, since L enters the fluctuation equations through the factor L^4.
  4. [5, Eq. (5.4)] Equation (5.4) is presented without derivation; given its complexity, a brief definition of the terms or a direct reference to the corresponding equation in [63] would help the reader.
  5. [C.2, Eq. (C.25)] Equation (C.25) uses a source tuple S_gauge without defining its entries; please specify explicitly that this is the 6-tuple of sources corresponding to the pure-gauge solution (C.7).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spectrum is computed from the stated fluctuation equations, not fitted or reduced to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central results—the type-II Goldstone dispersion (3.12), the pseudo-Goldstone gap (3.23), and the additional ungapped modes of Sec. 3.4—are obtained by solving the linearized fluctuation equations collected in Appendix C around the explicit background (2.30), which is re-derived in Sec. 2.4 from the BPS equations (2.29). The coefficient 1/(2 mu_I) and the gap 2Mq are numerical outputs of the spectral search, not parameters adjusted to match a target. The background solution of the authors' earlier work [32] is not imported as a black box; it is re-derived in this paper, and Appendix A proves that the equations of motion from the full non-Abelian DBI action (2.13) and from the SYMH action (2.19) coincide for the supersymmetric configurations used here. The only caveat is the stated truncation to the SYMH action for fluctuations (Sec. 3), which the authors explicitly acknowledge may affect quantitative details; this is an approximation assumption, not a circular reduction. The Sec. 3.1 assertion that SU(2)_R has no conserved current, needed to reconcile n_II=3 with the Watanabe-Brauner bound (3.17), is physically contentious and unsupported, but it is a correctness risk rather than a circularity, because it does not identify a claimed prediction with an input by construction. No equation was found in which a claimed prediction equals a fitted parameter or a self-citation by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data. The model parameters Mq and Lambda are physical inputs or are fixed by the charges through Eq. (2.47); the central dispersion relations emerge from solving the fluctuation equations. The derivation relies on the holographic probe-brane framework and on the SYMH truncation for fluctuations, plus a non-standard assertion about the non-conservation of SU(2)_R currents.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence between N=4 SU(Nc) SYM with Nf fundamental hypermultiplets and Nf D7-brane probes in AdS5 x S5
    Used throughout; the holographic dictionary is the framework of the paper.
  • domain assumption Probe approximation Nf << Nc with no backreaction of D7-branes on the geometry
    Sec. 2.1; allows treating D7-branes as probes; used to ignore metric backreaction.
  • domain assumption The non-Abelian DBI action (2.13) reduces to the SYMH action (2.19) for supersymmetric configurations; fluctuations around the BPS background are governed by the SYMH action
    Appendix A proves equality of EOMs for the background; Sec. 3 assumes the fluctuation dynamics is governed by (2.19), with the caveat that quantitative details may differ.
  • domain assumption The dyonic instanton solution (2.30) is the ground state of the theory at finite isospin and R-charge densities with mu_I = Mq
    Established in the authors' previous paper, summarized in Sec. 2; the present paper relies on it.
  • ad hoc to paper SU(2)_R symmetries do not have associated conserved currents in the dual gauge theory in the probe approximation, so they are outer automorphisms rather than broken global symmetries
    Stated in Sec. 3.1 after Eq. (3.18); used to reconcile the number of Goldstone modes with the Nielsen-Chadha-Watanabe-Brauner counting theorems; no proof is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectrum of a Supersymmetric Color Superconductor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F5UUFYAY

@misc{pith2026190900227,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectrum of a Supersymmetric Color Superconductor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F5UUFYAY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00227}
}
abstract

We have recently shown that the ground state of ${\cal N} = 4$, SU($N_{\rm{\tiny c}}$) super Yang--Mills coupled to $N_{\rm{\tiny f}} \ll N_{\rm{\tiny c}}$ flavors, in the presence of non-zero isospin and R-symmetry charges, is a supersymmetric, superfluid, color superconductor. The holographic description consists of $N_{\rm{\tiny f}}$ D7-brane probes in AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ with electric and instantonic fields on their worldvolume. These correspond to fundamental strings and D3-branes dissolved on the D7-branes, respectively. Here we use this description to determine the spectrum of mesonic excitations. As expected for a charged superfluid we find non-relativistic, massless Goldstone modes. We also find extra ungapped modes that are not associated to the breaking of any global symmetries but to the supersymmetric nature of the ground state. If the quark mass is much smaller than the scale of spontaneous symmetry breaking a pseudo-Goldstone boson is also present. We highlight some new features that appear only for $N_{\rm{\tiny f}}> 2$. We show that, in the generic case of unequal R-symmetry charges, the dissolved strings and D3-branes blow up into a D5-brane supertube stretched between the D7-branes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00227 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Embedding profile of the D7-branes in the z 1 -direction for Λ = Mq (dashed, red curve) and Λ = Mq/10 (continuous, blue curve). We have extended the range of the radial coordinate to negative values to represent a section of the solid of revolution in the y i directions. whose solution of interest to us is at(r) = φ(r) = Mq r 2 r 2 + Λ2 , (2.30a) a(r) = − Λ 2 r 2 + Λ2 , (2.30b) with Mq and Λ constants of integration… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effective number of D3-branes on the D7-branes within a sphere of radius r — see (2.56) — for Λ/Mq = {1/10, 1, 10} (solid blue, dashed red and dotted green curves, respectively). 2.6 Spontaneous symmetry breaking In Sec. 2.1 we discussed the explicit breaking of symmetries, first by coupling the original N = 4 SYM theory to dynamical quarks, and then by the non-zero mass of these quarks in the resulting N = 2 theory… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dispersion relation of the Goldstone bosons for Λ/Mq = 1/10 (solid, blue curve), Λ/Mq = 1 (dashed, red curve), and Λ/Mq = 10 (dotted, green curve) at small (top) and large (bottom) momenta. The thin black line corresponds to the low-momentum behavior (3.12) and we have set L = 1 in this integration. larger momenta the dispersion relation is modified and approaches the form ω = ω0  λ, Λ Mq  + k , (3.13) as illustra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass of the pseudo-Goldstone mode. The thin, black line corresponds to the relation ωpseudo = 2Mq. with no associated energy cost. Indeed, if we set Mq = µI = 0 then there is a simple solution to the fluctuation equations of motion of Sec. C.2 given by α33 = 1 2 α± = δ…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral function (with arbitrary normalisation) of the gauge theory operator dual to the β3 scalar for Λ = 1 (dashed, red curve) and Λ = 1/10 (solid, blue curve). pseudo-Goldstone mode (3.23) as the partner of the Goldstone modes of the previous section. However, ther…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Brane embeddings of the form (4.8) for different values of Mβ. In all the plots we have fixed Mα = 1. the instanton orientation invariant. A direct embedding in SU(3)f of the SU(2)f solution of previous sections would yield At = Z = Mα h 1 + a(y) i Hα , (4.7) where we …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Brane embeddings of the form (4.10) for different values of Mα. In all the plots we have fixed Mβ = 1. D2-brane with the same charges as the original system. The supergravity description of two￾charge supertubes was found in [57] and the generalisation to three charges…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cross-section of the supertube at y 1 = y 2 = 0 for different values of Λ0. For Λ0 = 0 the supertube collapses to the k = 1 instanton configuration centred at the origin (denoted by a black square) that we have studied in detail in this paper. For 0 < Λ0 ≈ 2.285 the ze…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergrav- ity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergrav- ity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] doi:10.1023/A:1026654312961, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [hep-th/9711200]

  2. [2]

    Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals - A Review,

    J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch and E. Threlfall, “Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals - A Review,” Eur. Phys. J. A 35 (2008) 81 doi:10.1140/epja/i2007-10540-1 [arXiv:0711.4467 [hep-th]]

  3. [3]

    Introduction to the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    A. V. Ramallo, “Introduction to the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Springer Proc. Phys. 161 (2015) 411 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12238-0 10 [arXiv:1310.4319 [hep-th]]

  4. [4]

    Introduction to Gauge/Gravity Duality (TASI Lectures 2017)

    J. Erdmenger, “Introduction to Gauge/Gravity Duality,” PoS TASI 2017, 001 (2018) doi:10.22323/1.305.0001 [arXiv:1807.09872 [hep-th]]. 42

  5. [5]

    Gauge theory correlators from non- critical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non- critical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3 [hep-th/9802109]

  6. [6]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 [hep-th/9802150]

  7. [7]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal and T. Sch¨ afer, “Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1455 (2008) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1455 [arXiv:0709.4635 [hep-ph]]

  8. [8]

    Simulating QCD at finite density,

    P. de Forcrand, “Simulating QCD at finite density,” PoS LAT 2009, 010 (2009) doi:10.22323/1.091.0010 [arXiv:1005.0539 [hep-lat]]

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    QCD at finite isospin density,

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD at finite isospin density,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 592 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.592 [hep-ph/0005225]

  2. [10]

    Towards a Holographic Model of Color-Flavor Locking Phase,

    H. Y. Chen, K. Hashimoto and S. Matsuura, “Towards a Holographic Model of Color-Flavor Locking Phase,” JHEP 1002, 104 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)104 [arXiv:0909.1296 [hep-th]]

  3. [11]

    Towards A Holographic Model of Color Superconductivity,

    P. Basu, F. Nogueira, M. Rozali, J. B. Stang and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Towards A Holographic Model of Color Superconductivity,” New J. Phys. 13, 055001 (2011) doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/055001 [arXiv:1101.4042 [hep-th]]

  4. [12]

    Holographic Higgs Phases,

    M. Rozali, D. Smyth and E. Sorkin, “Holographic Higgs Phases,” JHEP 1208, 118 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2012)118 [arXiv:1202.5271 [hep-th]]

  5. [13]

    A Holographic Description of Colour Superconductivity,

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, J. Cruz Rojas and N. Evans, “A Holographic Description of Colour Superconductivity,” arXiv:1803.03107 [hep-ph]

  6. [14]

    Supersymmetric color superconductivity,

    R. Harnik, D. T. Larson and H. Murayama, “Supersymmetric color superconductivity,” JHEP 0403, 049 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/03/049 [hep-ph/0309224]

  7. [15]

    Color superconductivity in N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories,

    M. Arai and N. Okada, “Color superconductivity in N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 045004 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.045004 [hep- th/0512234]

  8. [16]

    Color superconductivity in supersymmetric gauge theories,

    B. S. Rajput and S. Kumar, “Color superconductivity in supersymmetric gauge theories,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50, 1342 (2011). doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0643-4

  9. [17]

    Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions,

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal and U. A. Wiedemann, “Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions,” book:Gauge/String Du- ality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014 doi:10.1017/CBO9781139136747 [ar...

  10. [18]

    Gauge/string duality applied to heavy ion collisions: Limitations, insights and prospects,

    D. Mateos, “Gauge/string duality applied to heavy ion collisions: Limitations, insights and prospects,” J. Phys. G 38, 124030 (2011) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/12/124030 [arXiv:1106.3295 [hep-th]]

  11. [19]

    Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,

    A. Karch and E. Katz, “Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,” JHEP 0206, 043 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/043 [hep-th/0205236]

  12. [20]

    Holography and the Higgs branch of N=2 SYM the- ories,

    Z. Guralnik, S. Kovacs and B. Kulik, “Holography and the Higgs branch of N=2 SYM the- ories,” JHEP 0503, 063 (2005) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/03/063 [hep-th/0405127]. 43

  13. [21]

    Strong coupling dynamics of the Higgs branch: Rolling a Higgs by col- lapsing an instanton,

    Z. Guralnik, “Strong coupling dynamics of the Higgs branch: Rolling a Higgs by col- lapsing an instanton,” Nucl. Phys. B 732, 46 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.09.018 [hep-th/0412074]

  14. [22]

    AdS / CFT duality and the Higgs branch of N = 2 SYM,

    Z. Guralnik, S. Kovacs and B. Kulik, “AdS / CFT duality and the Higgs branch of N = 2 SYM,” Fortsch. Phys. 53, 480 (2005) doi:10.1002/prop.200510207 [hep-th/0501154]

  15. [23]

    Moduli Spaces of Cold Holographic Matter,

    M. Ammon, K. Jensen, K. Y. Kim, J. N. Laia and A. O’Bannon, “Moduli Spaces of Cold Holographic Matter,” JHEP 1211, 055 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2012)055 [arXiv:1208.3197 [hep-th]]

  16. [24]

    Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density,

    S. Kobayashi, D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R. C. Myers and R. M. Thomson, “Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density,” JHEP 0702, 016 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2007/02/016 [hep-th/0611099]

  17. [25]

    Isospin diffusion in thermal AdS/CFT with fla- vor,

    J. Erdmenger, M. Kaminski and F. Rust, “Isospin diffusion in thermal AdS/CFT with fla- vor,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 046001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.046001 [arXiv:0704.1290 [hep-th]]

  18. [26]

    Holographic vector mesons from spec- tral functions at finite baryon or isospin density,

    J. Erdmenger, M. Kaminski and F. Rust, “Holographic vector mesons from spec- tral functions at finite baryon or isospin density,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 046005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.046005 [arXiv:0710.0334 [hep-th]]

  19. [27]

    Finite baryon and isospin chem- ical potential in AdS/CFT with flavor,

    J. Erdmenger, M. Kaminski, P. Kerner and F. Rust, “Finite baryon and isospin chem- ical potential in AdS/CFT with flavor,” JHEP 0811 (2008) 031 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2008/11/031 [arXiv:0807.2663 [hep-th]]

  20. [28]

    Holographic QCD with Isospin Chemical Potential,

    A. Parnachev, “Holographic QCD with Isospin Chemical Potential,” JHEP 0802 (2008) 062 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/062 [arXiv:0708.3170 [hep-th]]

  21. [29]

    Rho meson condensation at finite isospin chemical potential in a holographic model for QCD,

    O. Aharony, K. Peeters, J. Sonnenschein and M. Zamaklar, “Rho meson condensation at finite isospin chemical potential in a holographic model for QCD,” JHEP 0802 (2008) 071 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/071 [arXiv:0709.3948 [hep-th]]

  22. [30]

    Meson spectroscopy in AdS / CFT with flavor,

    M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers and D. J. Winters, “Meson spectroscopy in AdS / CFT with flavor,” JHEP 0307, 049 (2003) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/07/049 [hep-th/0304032]

  23. [31]

    Spectral flow on the Higgs branch and AdS / CFT duality,

    J. Erdmenger, J. Grosse and Z. Guralnik, “Spectral flow on the Higgs branch and AdS / CFT duality,” JHEP 0506, 052 (2005) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/06/052 [hep- th/0502224]

  24. [32]

    A Supersymmetric Color Su- perconductor from Holography,

    A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, C. Pantelidou and J. Tarro, “A Supersymmetric Color Su- perconductor from Holography,” JHEP 1905 (2019) 106 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)106 [arXiv:1807.09712 [hep-th]]

  25. [33]

    On nonAbelian generalization of Born-Infeld action in string theory,

    A. A. Tseytlin, “On nonAbelian generalization of Born-Infeld action in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 501 (1997) 41 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00354-4 [hep-th/9701125]

  26. [34]

    Dielectric branes,

    R. C. Myers, “Dielectric branes,” JHEP 9912, 022 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/1999/12/022 [hep-th/9910053]

  27. [35]

    The Shape of branes pulled by strings,

    A. Hashimoto, “The Shape of branes pulled by strings,” Phys. Rev. D 57, 6441 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.6441 [hep-th/9711097]. 44

  28. [36]

    Dynamics of BPS states in the Dirac-Born-Infeld theory,

    D. Bak, J. H. Lee and H. Min, “Dynamics of BPS states in the Dirac-Born-Infeld theory,” Phys. Rev. D 59, 045011 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.045011 [hep-th/9806149]

  29. [37]

    Dyonic instantons in five-dimensional gauge theories,

    N. D. Lambert and D. Tong, “Dyonic instantons in five-dimensional gauge theories,” Phys. Lett. B 462, 89 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00894-1 [hep-th/9907014]

  30. [38]

    Holographic flavor on the Higgs branch,

    D. Arean, A. V. Ramallo and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, “Holographic flavor on the Higgs branch,” JHEP 0705 (2007) 044 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/044 [hep-th/0703094 [HEP-TH]]

  31. [39]

    Geometry of the nonAbelian DBI dyonic instanton,

    M. Zamaklar, “Geometry of the nonAbelian DBI dyonic instanton,” Phys. Lett. B 493, 411 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01164-3 [hep-th/0006090]

  32. [40]

    Strong coupling effective Higgs potential and a first order thermal phase transition from AdS/CFT duality,

    R. Apreda, J. Erdmenger, N. Evans and Z. Guralnik, “Strong coupling effective Higgs potential and a first order thermal phase transition from AdS/CFT duality,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 126002 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.126002 [hep-th/0504151]

  33. [41]

    The Heterotic dyonic instanton,

    E. Eyras, P. K. Townsend and M. Zamaklar, “The Heterotic dyonic instanton,” JHEP 0105, 046 (2001) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/05/046 [hep-th/0012016]

  34. [42]

    Thermodynamics of spinning D3-branes,

    S. S. Gubser, “Thermodynamics of spinning D3-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 551, 667 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00194-7 [hep-th/9810225]

  35. [43]

    Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, “Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 064018 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.064018 [hep-th/9902170]

  36. [44]

    Phases of R charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories,

    M. Cvetic and S. S. Gubser, “Phases of R charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories,” JHEP 9904, 024 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/1999/04/024 [hep-th/9902195]

  37. [45]

    Holographic Type II Goldstone bosons,

    I. Amado, D. Arean, A. Jimenez-Alba, K. Landsteiner, L. Melgar and I. S. Landea, “Holographic Type II Goldstone bosons,” JHEP 1307, 108 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)108 [arXiv:1302.5641 [hep-th]]

  38. [46]

    On How to Count Goldstone Bosons,

    H. B. Nielsen and S. Chadha, “On How to Count Goldstone Bosons,” Nucl. Phys. B 105, 445 (1976). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90025-0

  39. [47]

    On the number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons and its relation to charge densities,

    H. Watanabe and T. Brauner, “On the number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons and its relation to charge densities,” Phys. Rev. D 84, 125013 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.125013 [arXiv:1109.6327 [hep-ph]]

  40. [48]

    Unified Description of Nambu-Goldstone Bosons without Lorentz Invariance,

    H. Watanabe and H. Murayama, “Unified Description of Nambu-Goldstone Bosons without Lorentz Invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 251602 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.251602 [arXiv:1203.0609 [hep-th]]

  41. [49]

    Redundancies in Nambu-Goldstone Bosons,

    H. Watanabe and H. Murayama, “Redundancies in Nambu-Goldstone Bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no. 18, 181601 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.181601 [arXiv:1302.4800 [cond-mat.other]]

  42. [50]

    Implications of Relativity on Nonrelativistic Gold- stone Theorems: Gapped Excitations at Finite Charge Density,

    A. Nicolis and F. Piazza, “Implications of Relativity on Nonrelativistic Gold- stone Theorems: Gapped Excitations at Finite Charge Density,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) no.1, 011602 Addendum: [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 039901] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.011602, 10.1103/Phys...

  43. [51]

    Remarks on nonrelativistic Goldstone bosons,

    A. Kapustin, “Remarks on nonrelativistic Goldstone bosons,” arXiv:1207.0457 [hep-ph]

  44. [52]

    Heavy-light mesons from the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    J. Erdmenger, N. Evans and J. Grosse, “Heavy-light mesons from the AdS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP 0701 (2007) 098 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/098 [hep- th/0605241]

  45. [53]

    Holographic heavy-light mesons from non-Abelian DBI,

    J. Erdmenger, K. Ghoroku and I. Kirsch, “Holographic heavy-light mesons from non-Abelian DBI,” JHEP 0709 (2007) 111 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/111 [arXiv:0706.3978 [hep-th]]

  46. [54]

    AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 556, 89 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00387-9 [hep-th/9905104]

  47. [55]

    Holographic thermodynamics at finite baryon den- sity: Some exact results,

    A. Karch and A. O’Bannon, “Holographic thermodynamics at finite baryon den- sity: Some exact results,” JHEP 0711 (2007) 074 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/074 [arXiv:0709.0570 [hep-th]]

  48. [56]

    Supertubes,

    D. Mateos and P. K. Townsend, “Supertubes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 011602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.011602 [hep-th/0103030]

  49. [57]

    Supergravity supertubes,

    R. Emparan, D. Mateos and P. K. Townsend, “Supergravity supertubes,” JHEP 0107, 011 (2001) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/07/011 [hep-th/0106012]

  50. [58]

    A Supersymmetric black ring,

    H. Elvang, R. Emparan, D. Mateos and H. S. Reall, “A Supersymmetric black ring,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 211302 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.211302 [hep- th/0407065]

  51. [59]

    Supersymmetric black rings and three-charge supertubes,

    H. Elvang, R. Emparan, D. Mateos and H. S. Reall, “Supersymmetric black rings and three-charge supertubes,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 024033 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.024033 [hep-th/0408120]

  52. [60]

    One ring to rule them all ... and in the darkness bind them?,

    I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “One ring to rule them all ... and in the darkness bind them?,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9, no. 5, 667 (2005) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2005.v9.n5.a1 [hep-th/0408106]

  53. [61]

    Concentric black rings,

    J. P. Gauntlett and J. B. Gutowski, “Concentric black rings,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 025013 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.025013 [hep-th/0408010]

  54. [62]

    General concentric black rings,

    J. P. Gauntlett and J. B. Gutowski, “General concentric black rings,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 045002 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.045002 [hep-th/0408122]

  55. [63]

    Dyonic instanton as supertube between D-4 branes,

    S. Kim and K. M. Lee, “Dyonic instanton as supertube between D-4 branes,” JHEP 0309 (2003) 035 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/09/035 [hep-th/0307048]

  56. [64]

    Conformal Properties of Pseudoparticle Configura- tions,

    R. Jackiw, C. Nohl and C. Rebbi, “Conformal Properties of Pseudoparticle Configura- tions,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1642. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1642

  57. [65]

    Higgs structures of dyonic instantons,

    M. Y. Choi, K. K. Kim, C. Lee and K. M. Lee, “Higgs structures of dyonic instantons,” JHEP 0804 (2008) 097 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/097 [arXiv:0712.0735 [hep-th]]

  58. [66]

    Unquenched flavor on the Higgs branch,

    A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, C. Pantelidou and J. Tarrio, “Unquenched flavor on the Higgs branch,” JHEP 1611, 021 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)021 [arXiv:1607.07773 [hep- th]]. 46

  59. [67]

    D3-D7 Quark-Gluon Plas- mas at Finite Baryon Density,

    F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone, J. Mas, D. Mayerson and J. Tarrio, “D3-D7 Quark-Gluon Plas- mas at Finite Baryon Density,” JHEP 1104 (2011) 060 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)060 [arXiv:1101.3560 [hep-th]]

  60. [68]

    Towards a Holographic Quark Matter Crystal,

    A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, C. Pantelidou and J. Tarrio, “Towards a Holographic Quark Matter Crystal,” JHEP 1710 (2017) 139 Erratum: [JHEP 1907 (2019) 058] doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)139, 10.1007/JHEP07(2019)058 [arXiv:1707.06989 [hep-th]]

  61. [69]

    D3- D7 Quark-Gluon Plasmas,

    F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone, J. Mas, A. Paredes, A. V. Ramallo and J. Tarrio, “D3- D7 Quark-Gluon Plasmas,” JHEP 0911 (2009) 117 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/117 [arXiv:0909.2865 [hep-th]]

  62. [70]

    Holography with a Landau pole,

    A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, C. Pantelidou and J. Tarrio, “Holography with a Landau pole,” JHEP 1702 (2017) 047 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)047 [arXiv:1611.05808 [hep-th]]

  63. [71]

    Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT cor- respondence: Recipe and applications,

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT cor- respondence: Recipe and applications,” JHEP 0209, 042 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2002/09/042 [hep-th/0205051]

  64. [72]

    Hydrodynamics of Holographic Supercon- ductors,

    I. Amado, M. Kaminski and K. Landsteiner, “Hydrodynamics of Holographic Supercon- ductors,” JHEP 0905 (2009) 021 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/021 [arXiv:0903.2209 [hep-th]]

  65. [73]

    Holographic Operator Mixing and Quasinormal Modes on the Brane,

    M. Kaminski, K. Landsteiner, J. Mas, J. P. Shock and J. Tarrio, “Holographic Operator Mixing and Quasinormal Modes on the Brane,” JHEP 1002 (2010) 021 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)021 [arXiv:0911.3610 [hep-th]]. 47

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.