Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Coverage correlation: detecting singular dependencies between random variables

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new nonparametric statistic, the coverage correlation, consistently estimates an f-divergence between a joint distribution and the product of its marginals, taking value 0 exactly for independence and 1 exactly for singular copulas.

desk verdict Promising dependence measure whose 0/1 boundary claim is currently unverifiable because the full text is mojibake; needs a clean resubmission before serious review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06402 v3 pith:F6LBJQBS submitted 2025-08-08 stat.ME math.STstat.TH

Xuzhi Yang , Mona Azadkia , Tengyao Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification stat.MEmath.STstat.TH MSC 62H2062G10
keywords coveragecorrelationsingularcopulaf-divergencedistribution-freeMonge-Kantorovichranksindependencetestingnonparametricdependencemeasure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces the coverage correlation coefficient, a nonparametric measure of association that is 0 when two random variables are independent and 1 when their copula is singular—meaning the joint distribution is concentrated on a set of zero product measure. The statistic is a consistent estimator of an f-divergence (a broad family of distributional divergences indexed by a convex function) between the joint law and the product of the marginals, so values between 0 and 1 quantify how much dependence spreads out rather than concentrating on a lower-dimensional surface. It is distribution-free, has an analytically tractable asymptotic null distribution, and can be computed efficiently, which the paper intends for large-scale pairwise independence testing. By using Monge-Kantorovich ranks, the same construction extends from scalar variables to random vectors.

What carries the argument

The coverage correlation statistic: a distribution-free, rank-based functional of the empirical joint distribution whose population limit is an f-divergence between the joint law and the product of the marginals. It turns the geometric idea of how much of the product space the joint support 'covers' into a number, normalized so that singular copulas give exactly 1. The Monge-Kantorovich ranks are the extension mechanism, a transport-based version of ranks that sends arbitrary marginals to a fixed reference law and lets the same scalar construction apply to random vectors.

What would settle it

Simulate a strong but absolutely continuous dependence, such as a Gaussian copula with correlation 0.95, and compute the coverage correlation at large sample sizes: the population quantity should be strictly less than 1. If the estimated value converges to 1, the claimed singular-copula boundary fails. Conversely, for perfectly dependent variables whose copula is singular, the statistic should converge to 1; if it stays clearly below 1, the normalization to 1 on singular copulas is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the coverage correlation yields a single number that separates three regimes: independence (0), singular dependence (1), and diffuse dependence (strictly between). The population quantity is an f-divergence between the joint distribution and the product of the marginals, and the sample statistic estimates it consistently. Because the statistic is built on ranks, its null distribution is free of the marginal distributions, and the asymptotic null is explicit enough for calibration in massive multiple-testing settings. The Monge-Kantorovich rank extension makes the same guarantee available for pairs of random vectors, so the measure can flag dependence concentrated on

Load-bearing premise

The central claim needs the chosen f-divergence to be normalized so that every singular copula gives exactly 1 and the empirical coverage statistic to converge to it uniformly, while the distribution-free null needs continuous marginals so rank transforms behave as a fixed reference law.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The statistic is a consistent estimator of an f-divergence between the joint distribution and the product of the marginals.
  • It equals 0 exactly when the variables are independent and 1 exactly when the copula is singular.
  • The null distribution is distribution-free with a tractable asymptotic form, enabling large-scale pairwise independence testing.
  • The Monge-Kantorovich rank extension makes the measure applicable to random vectors, not only scalar pairs.
  • Computation is efficient enough to screen many pairs, as the paper claims.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit: if the population target is genuinely an f-divergence, varying the convex function f should give a family of coverage-type measures with different sensitivity to singular versus diffuse dependence.
  • A testable extension: for absolutely continuous copulas with strong but non-singular dependence (for example, a high-correlation Gaussian copula), the population value should remain below 1; a simulation could check that the estimated statistic does not drift to 1 as the sample size grows.
  • If the tractable null holds in practice, the statistic could serve as a first-pass filter in settings with millions of pairwise tests, such as genomic or imaging screens, where permutation-based nulls are prohibitively expensive.
  • The vector construction may detect dependence concentrated on nonlinear manifolds, since singular copulas correspond exactly to such concentration; the paper does not explicitly claim this manifold-detection interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'coverage correlation coefficient,' a nonparametric measure of dependence that, according to the abstract, consistently estimates an f-divergence between the joint distribution and the product of the marginals. It claims this quantity is 0 iff independence holds and 1 iff the copula is singular, is distribution-free, has an analytically tractable asymptotic null distribution, can be computed efficiently, and extends to random vectors via Monge–Kantorovich ranks. However, the supplied full text is an unreadable mojibake rendering (with a stray arXiv:2508.06401v3 header), so no definitions, theorems, proofs, or numerical evidence are inspectable. Only the abstract can be evaluated.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper would introduce a potentially useful dependence measure: it would combine consistency with a sharply calibrated 0/1 boundary, distribution-free null inference, computational efficiency, and a natural multivariate extension. These are valuable properties for large-scale nonparametric independence testing. The paper, however, provides no inspectable derivations, proofs, or code. The central theorem—'1 if and only if the copula is singular'—is not self-evident and requires a specific f-divergence or normalization that is not stated. The distribution-free claim also requires regularity conditions on the marginals and the Monge–Kantorovich transformation that are not visible. In its current form, the manuscript is unverdictable rather than verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text] The body of the manuscript is unreadable mojibake, with repeated substitution characters and a stray 'arXiv:2508.06401v3 [cs.DL] 9 Sep 2025' header. Consequently, every load-bearing assertion—consistency, the 0-iff-independence and 1-iff-singular boundary, the distribution-free null, the asymptotic approximation, and the efficient-computation claim—appears only in the abstract. No definition, theorem, or proof can be checked. This is not a minor presentation defect; it prevents any substantive review.
  2. [Abstract] The claim that the statistic 'consistently estimates an f-divergence' that is '1 if and only if the copula is singular' is not established by the abstract. Standard f-divergences such as Kullback–Leibler or Hellinger do not generally take the value exactly 1 for all mutually singular pairs; total variation does, but no divergence or normalization is identified. Because the 0/1 calibration is central to the proposed measure, the paper must state the chosen f, its normalization, and the proof of the boundary characterization.
  3. [Abstract / Monge–Kantorovich ranks] The distribution-free and tractable-null claims depend on regularity conditions that are not stated. Distribution-freeness under the null typically requires continuous marginals or a rank-invariance argument; the Monge–Kantorovich extension to random vectors imposes additional conditions on the joint distribution. Without these hypotheses, the asymptotic null derivation and the claimed distribution-free property cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Full text header] The full text contains a stray header 'arXiv:2508.06401v3 [cs.DL] 9 Sep 2025', unrelated to the stated paper identifier. This should be removed in any resubmission.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'copula is singular' and 'joint distribution concentrated on a singular subset with respect to the product of the marginals' without defining these terms. Precise definitions of 'singular copula' and 'singular subset' are needed.
  3. [Notation] The paper does not provide any equation numbers or displayed definitions in the readable portion; even the abstract's 'f-divergence' and 'Monge–Kantorovich ranks' are not formalized. Adding equations and a theorem statement would improve verifiability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the only legible portion (abstract) does not exhibit a definitional reduction, and the body is unreadable mojibake.

full rationale

The full text supplied is almost entirely mojibake, with only the abstract and a few garbled section headings legible. No definition of the coverage correlation coefficient, no theorem statements, no proofs, and no equations are available to audit. The abstract claims that the statistic 'consistently estimates an f-divergence' with boundary values 0 and 1, but that claim alone does not demonstrate circularity: a statistic can consistently estimate a population functional without being defined as that functional, and no equation in the provided text shows the estimator equal to its target by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is visible. Under the hard rule that circularity may only be claimed when a specific reduction can be quoted, the absence of legible derivations means no circular step can be exhibited. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, score 0. The unreadable encoding is a serious auditability and verification concern, but it is a correctness/verifiability risk, not evidence of circularity; a re-review would be needed if a readable version becomes available.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All three axioms are standard regularity and identification conditions for nonparametric dependence measures; the paper presumably proves them in the body, which is not readable in the supplied text. No free parameters are visible in the abstract, and no new postulated entities appear.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The joint distribution's concentration on a singular subset relative to the product of marginals is identified by a finite f-divergence, and the empirical coverage statistic consistently estimates it.
    Required for the consistency claim in the abstract; depends on regularity of the copula and support geometry that the abstract does not state.
  • domain assumption The marginals are continuous (or equally regular) so that rank and Monge-Kantorovich transformations are distribution-free and the asymptotic null is valid.
    The distribution-free property and analytically tractable null distribution stated in the abstract require the rank machinery to map arbitrary marginals onto a fixed reference law.
  • domain assumption The chosen f-divergence, suitably normalized, attains exactly 1 on all singular copulas and exactly 0 on independence.
    Classical f-divergences are 0 only at equality and are often unbounded on singular pairs; the abstract's 0/1 boundary requires a divergence or normalization choice not shown in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coverage correlation: detecting singular dependencies between random variables." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F6LBJQBS

@misc{pith2026250806402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coverage correlation: detecting singular dependencies between random variables},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F6LBJQBS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06402}
}
abstract

We introduce the coverage correlation coefficient, a novel nonparametric measure of statistical association designed to quantify the extent to which two random variables have a joint distribution concentrated on a singular subset with respect to the product of the marginals. Our correlation statistic consistently estimates an $f$-divergence between the joint distribution and the product of the marginals, which is 0 if and only if the variables are independent and 1 if and only if the copula is singular. Using Monge--Kantorovich ranks, the coverage correlation naturally extends to measure association between random vectors. It is distribution-free, admits an analytically tractable asymptotic null distribution, and can be computed efficiently, making it well-suited for detecting complex, potentially nonlinear associations in large-scale pairwise testing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An association measure for mixed-type variables

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ξ′ is a label-invariant, 0–1 association coefficient for a continuous X and a nominal Y, estimated in O(n log n) time from sorted adjacent label matches, with asymptotic tests and intervals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    and Chatterjee, S

    Azadkia, M. and Chatterjee, S. (2021) A simple measure of conditional dependence. Ann. Statist., 49, 3070--3102

    2021

  2. [2]

    and Roudaki, P

    Azadkia, M. and Roudaki, P. (2025) A new measure of dependence: Integrated R^2 . arXiv preprint, arxiv:2505.18146

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    (1983) Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees

    Ben-Or, M. (1983) Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 80--86

    1983

  4. [4]

    and Dassios, A

    Bergsma, W. and Dassios, A. (2014) A consistent test of independence based on a sign covariance related to Kendall's tau. Bernoulli, 20, 1006--1028

    2014

  5. [5]

    B., Kontoyiannis, I

    Berrett, T. B., Kontoyiannis, I. and Samworth, R. J. (2021) Optimal rates for independence testing via U-statistic permutation tests. Ann. Statist., 49, 2457--2490

    2021

  6. [6]

    Berrett, T. B. and Samworth, R. J. (2019) Nonparametric independence testing via mutual information. Biometrika, 106, 547--566

    2019

  7. [7]

    Berry, A. C. (1941) The accuracy of the Gaussian approximation to the sum of independent variates. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 49, 122--136

    1941

  8. [8]

    Bickel, P. J. (1965) On some asymptotically nonparametric competitors of Hotelling's T^2 . Ann. Math. Statist., 36, 160--173

    1965

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    R., Kiefer, J

    Blum, J. R., Kiefer, J. and Rosenblatt, M. (1961) Distribution free tests of independence based on the sample distribution function. Ann. Math. Statist., 32, 485--498

    1961

  2. [10]

    and Savar \'e , G

    Borgonovo, E., Figalli, A., Ghosal, P., Plischke, E. and Savar \'e , G. (2025) Convexity and measures of statistical association. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B, qkaf040

    2025

  3. [11]

    and Friedman, J

    Breiman, L. and Friedman, J. H. (1985) Estimating optimal transformations for multiple regression and correlation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 80, 580--619

    1985

  4. [12]

    Chan, T. M. (2013) Klee's measure problem made easy. In 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 410--419. IEEE

    2013

  5. [13]

    (2021) A new coefficient of correlation

    Chatterjee, S. (2021) A new coefficient of correlation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 116, 2009--2022

    2021

  6. [14]

    (1996) On a geometric notion of quantiles for multivariate data

    Chaudhuri, P. (1996) On a geometric notion of quantiles for multivariate data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 91, 862--872

    1996

  7. [15]

    and Henry, M

    Chernozhukov, V., Galichon, A., Hallin, M. and Henry, M. (2017) Monge-- K antorovich depth, quantiles, ranks and signs. Ann. Statist., 45, 223--256

    2017

  8. [16]

    and Teicher, H

    Chow, Y. and Teicher, H. (1988) Probability Theory: Independence, Interchangeability, Martingales. Springer, New York

    1988

  9. [17]

    (1985) Testing for independence by the empirical characteristic function

    Cs \"o rg \"o , S. (1985) Testing for independence by the empirical characteristic function. J. Multivariate Anal., 16, 290--299

    1985

  10. [18]

    David, H. A. and Nagaraja, H. N. (2004) Order Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    2004

  11. [19]

    and Sen, B

    Deb, N., Ghosal, P. and Sen, B. (2020) Measuring association on topological spaces using kernels and geometric graphs. arXiv preprint, arxiv:2010.01768

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    and Sen, B

    Deb, N. and Sen, B. (2023) Multivariate rank-based distribution-free nonparametric testing using measure transportation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 118, 192--207

    2023

  13. [21]

    Dette, H., Siburg, K. F. and Stoimenov, P. A. (2013) A copula-based non-parametric measure of regression dependence. Scand. J. Stat., 40, 21--41

    2013

  14. [22]

    Fonseca, A

    Dong, M., Wang, B., Wei, J., de O. Fonseca, A. H., Perry, C. J., Frey, A., Ouerghi, F., Foxman, E. F., Ishizuka, J. J., Dhodapkar, R. M. and Dijk, D. (2023) Causal identification of single-cell experimental perturbation effects with CINEMA-OT. Nature Methods, 20, 1769--1779

    2023

  15. [23]

    and Shi, H

    Drton, M., Han, F. and Shi, H. (2020) High-dimensional consistent independence testing with maxima of rank correlations. Ann. Statist., 48, 3206--3227

    2020

  16. [24]

    and Wolfowitz, J

    Dvoretzky, A., Kiefer, J. and Wolfowitz, J. (1956) Asymptotic minimax character of the sample distribution function and of the classical multinomial estimator. Ann. Math. Statist., 27, 642--669

    1956

  17. [25]

    (1942) On the Liapunov limit error in the theory of probability

    Esseen, C.-G. (1942) On the Liapunov limit error in the theory of probability. Arkiv för matematik, astronomi och fysik, 28, 1--19

    1942

  18. [26]

    and Guillin, A

    Fournier, N. and Guillin, A. (2015) On the rate of convergence in W asserstein distance of the empirical measure. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 162, 707--738

    2015

  19. [27]

    Friedman, J. H. and Rafsky, L. C. (1983) Graph-theoretic measures of multivariate association and prediction. Ann. Statist., 11, 377--391

    1983

  20. [28]

    and Lagnoux, A

    Gamboa, F., Klein, T. and Lagnoux, A. (2018) Sensitivity analysis based on Cram \'e r -von Mises distance. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif., 6, 522--548

    2018

  21. [29]

    (1941) Das statistische problem der korrelation als variationsund eigenwertproblem und sein zusammenhang mit der ausgleichsrechnung

    Gebelein, H. (1941) Das statistische problem der korrelation als variationsund eigenwertproblem und sein zusammenhang mit der ausgleichsrechnung. ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift f \"u r Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik , 21, 364--379

    1941

  22. [30]

    and Sch \"o lkopf, B

    Gretton, A., Bousquet, O., Smola, A. and Sch \"o lkopf, B. (2005) Measuring statistical dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt norms. In International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, 63--77. Springer

    2005

  23. [31]

    H., Song, L., Schölkopf, B

    Gretton, A., Fukumizu, K., Teo, C. H., Song, L., Schölkopf, B. and Smola, A. J. (2008) A kernel statistical test of independence. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 585--592

    2008

  24. [32]

    Griessenberger, F., Junker, R. R. and Trutschnig, W. (2022) On a multivariate copula-based dependence measure and its estimation. Electron. J. Statist., 16, 2206--2251

    2022

  25. [33]

    (1985) Three limit theorems for vacancy in multivariate coverage problems

    Hall, P. (1985) Three limit theorems for vacancy in multivariate coverage problems. J. Multivariate Anal., 16, 211--236

    1985

  26. [34]

    (1988) Introduction to the Theory of Coverage Processes

    Hall, P. (1988) Introduction to the Theory of Coverage Processes. Wiley, New York

    1988

  27. [35]

    and Matr \'a n, C

    Hallin, M., Del Barrio, E., Cuesta-Albertos, J. and Matr \'a n, C. (2021) Distribution and quantile functions, ranks and signs in dimension d : A measure transportation approach. Ann. Statist., 49, 1139--1165

    2021

  28. [36]

    and Paindaveine, D

    Hallin, M. and Paindaveine, D. (2002 a ) Multivariate signed ranks: Randles' interdirections or Tyler's angles? In Y. Dodge (ed.), Statistical Data Analysis Based on the L_1 -Norm and Related Methods, 271--282. Birkh \"a user Basel, Basel

    2002

  29. [37]

    and Paindaveine, D

    Hallin, M. and Paindaveine, D. (2002 b ) Optimal tests for multivariate location based on interdirections and pseudo-Mahalanobis ranks. Ann. Statist., 30, 1103--1133

    2002

  30. [38]

    and Liu, H

    Han, F., Chen, S. and Liu, H. (2017) Distribution-free tests of independence in high dimensions. Biometrika, 104, 813--828

    2017

  31. [39]

    and Gorfine, M

    Heller, R., Heller, Y. and Gorfine, M. (2013) A consistent multivariate test of association based on ranks of distances. Biometrika, 100, 503--510

    2013

  32. [40]

    Hirschfeld, H. O. (1935) A connection between correlation and contingency. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 31, 520--524

    1935

  33. [41]

    Hodges, J. L. (1955) A bivariate sign test. Ann. Math. Statist., 26, 523--527

    1955

  34. [42]

    (1948) A non-parametric test of independence

    Hoeffding, W. (1948) A non-parametric test of independence. Ann. Math. Statist., 19, 546--557

    1948

  35. [43]

    (1972) Asymptotic normality and efficiency for certain goodness-of-fit tests

    Holst, L. (1972) Asymptotic normality and efficiency for certain goodness-of-fit tests. Biometrika, 59, 137--145

    1972

  36. [44]

    Kendall, M. G. (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30, 81--93

    1938

  37. [45]

    (1977) Can the measure of _ 1 ^n[a_i,b_i] be computed in less than O(n n) steps? Amer

    Klee, V. (1977) Can the measure of _ 1 ^n[a_i,b_i] be computed in less than O(n n) steps? Amer. Math. Monthly, 84, 284--285

    1977

  38. [46]

    Koltchinskii, V. I. (1997) M-estimation, convexity and quantiles. Ann. Statist., 25, 435--477

    1997

  39. [47]

    and Grassberger, P

    Kraskov, A., Stögbauer, H. and Grassberger, P. (2004) Estimating mutual information. Phys. Rev. E, 69, 066138

    2004

  40. [48]

    (2002) Lectures on the Coupling Method

    Lindvall, T. (2002) Lectures on the Coupling Method. Dover Publications, Mineola

    2002

  41. [49]

    Linfoot, E. H. (1957) An informational measure of correlation. Inform. Control, 1, 85--89

    1957

  42. [50]

    Liu, R. Y. and Singh, K. (1993) A quality index based on data depth and multivariate rank tests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 88, 252--260

    1993

  43. [51]

    and Sch \"o lkopf, B

    Lopez-Paz, D., Hennig, P. and Sch \"o lkopf, B. (2013) The randomized dependence coefficient. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 26

    2013

  44. [52]

    (2013) Distance covariance in metric spaces

    Lyons, R. (2013) Distance covariance in metric spaces. The A nnals of P robability , 3284--3305

    2013

  45. [53]

    (1990) The tight constant in the Dvoretzky--Kiefer--Wolfowitz inequality

    Massart, P. (1990) The tight constant in the Dvoretzky--Kiefer--Wolfowitz inequality. Ann. Probab., 18, 1269--1283

    1990

  46. [54]

    McDiarmid, C. et al. (1989) On the method of bounded differences. Surveys in C ombinatorics , 141, 148--188

    1989

  47. [55]

    M \'o ri, T. F. and Sz \'e kely, G. J. (2019) Four simple axioms of dependence measures. Metrika, 82, 1--16

    2019

  48. [56]

    and Oja, H

    M \"o tt \"o nen, J. and Oja, H. (1995) Multivariate spatial sign and rank methods. J. Nonparametr. Stat., 5, 201--213

    1995

  49. [57]

    and Drton, M

    Nandy, P., Weihs, L. and Drton, M. (2016) Large-sample theory for the Bergsma-Dassios sign covariance. Electron. J. Statist., 10, 2287--2311

    2016

  50. [58]

    and Zhu, J

    Pan, W., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Zhu, H. and Zhu, J. (2020) Ball covariance: a generic measure of dependence in Banach space. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 115, 307--317

    2020

  51. [59]

    (1920) Notes on the history of correlation

    Pearson, K. (1920) Notes on the history of correlation. Biometrika, 13, 25--45

    1920

  52. [60]

    u hlmann, P., Sch \

    Pfister, N., B \"u hlmann, P., Sch \"o lkopf, B. and Peters, J. (2018) Kernel-based tests for joint independence. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B, 80, 5--31

    2018

  53. [61]

    and Wu, Y

    Polyanskiy, Y. and Wu, Y. (2025) Information T heory: From C oding to L earning . Cambridge U niversity P ress, Cambridge

    2025

  54. [62]

    Puri, M. L. and Sen, P. K. (1971) Nonparametric Methods in Multivariate Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    1971

  55. [63]

    Reeve, H. W. (2024) A short proof of the Dvoretzky--Kiefer--Wolfowitz--Massart inequality. arXiv preprint, arxiv:2403.16651

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    (1959) On measures of dependence

    R \'e nyi, A. (1959) On measures of dependence. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar., 10, 441--451

    1959

  57. [65]

    N., Reshef, Y

    Reshef, D. N., Reshef, Y. A., Finucane, H. K., Grossman, S. R., McVean, G., Turnbaugh, P. J., Lander, E. S., Mitzenmacher, M. and Sabeti, P. C. (2011) Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science, 334, 1518--1524

    2011

  58. [66]

    Romano, J. P. (1988) A bootstrap revival of some nonparametric distance tests. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83, 698--708

    1988

  59. [67]

    (1975) A quadratic measure of deviation of two-dimensional density estimates and a test of independence

    Rosenblatt, M. (1975) A quadratic measure of deviation of two-dimensional density estimates and a test of independence. Ann. Statist., 1--14

    1975

  60. [68]

    and Tolstikhin, I

    Rubenstein, P., Bousquet, O., Djolonga, J., Riquelme, C. and Tolstikhin, I. O. (2019) Practical and consistent estimation of f -divergences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2019

  61. [69]

    Samworth, R. J. and Shah, R. D. (2025+) Modern Statistical Methods and Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    2025

  62. [70]

    Sansalone, G., Wroe, S., Coates, G., Attard, M. R. and Fruciano, C. (2024) Unexpectedly uneven distribution of functional trade-offs explains cranial morphological diversity in carnivores. Nature Communications, 15, 3275

    2024

  63. [71]

    and Wolff, E

    Schweizer, B. and Wolff, E. F. (1981) On nonparametric measures of dependence for random variables. Ann. Statist., 9, 879--885

    1981

  64. [72]

    and Sen, B

    Sen, A. and Sen, B. (2014) Testing independence and goodness-of-fit in linear models. Biometrika, 101, 927--942

    2014

  65. [73]

    and Han, F

    Shi, H., Drton, M., Hallin, M. and Han, F. (2025) Distribution-free tests of multivariate independence based on center-outward quadrant, Spearman, Kendall, and van der Waerden statistics. Bernoulli, 31, 106--129

    2025

  66. [74]

    and Han, F

    Shi, H., Drton, M. and Han, F. (2022) Distribution-free consistent independence tests via center-outward ranks and signs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 117, 395--410

    2022

  67. [75]

    (1959) Fonctions de r \'e partition \`a n dimensions et leurs marges

    Sklar, M. (1959) Fonctions de r \'e partition \`a n dimensions et leurs marges. Annales de l'ISUP, 8, 229--231

    1959

  68. [76]

    (2023) Bernstein-type bounds for beta distribution

    Skorski, M. (2023) Bernstein-type bounds for beta distribution. Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications, 10, 211--228

    2023

  69. [77]

    (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things

    Spearman, C. (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Amer. J. Psychol., 15, 72--101

    1904

  70. [78]

    T., Sherlock, G., Zhang, M

    Spellman, P. T., Sherlock, G., Zhang, M. Q., Iyer, V. R., Anders, K., Eisen, M. B., Brown, P. O., Botstein, D. and Futcher, B. (1998) Comprehensive identification of cell cycle--regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell,...

    1998

  71. [79]

    A., Stephenson, E., Engelbert, J., Tuong, Z

    Suo, C., Dann, E., Goh, I., Jardine, L., Kleshchevnikov, V., Park, J.-E., Botting, R. A., Stephenson, E., Engelbert, J., Tuong, Z. K. et al. (2022) Mapping the developing human immune system across organs. Science, 376, eabo0510

    2022

  72. [80]

    G., Vilarrasa-Blasi, R., Vento-Tormo, R., Haniffa, M., Meyer, K

    Suo, C., Polanski, K., Dann, E., Lindeboom, R. G., Vilarrasa-Blasi, R., Vento-Tormo, R., Haniffa, M., Meyer, K. B., Dratva, L. M., Tuong, Z. K. et al. (2024) Dandelion uses the single-cell adaptive immune receptor repertoire to explore lymphocyte developmental origins. Nature ...

    2024

  73. [81]

    Sz \'e kely, G. J. and Rizzo, M. L. (2009) Brownian distance covariance. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1236--1265

    2009

  74. [82]

    J., Rizzo, M

    Sz \'e kely, G. J., Rizzo, M. L. and Bakirov, N. K. (2007) Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances. Ann. Statist., 35, 2769--2794

    2007

  75. [83]

    Tukey, J. W. (1975) Mathematics and the picturing of data. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, volume 2, 523--531

    1975

  76. [84]

    (2021) Topics in O ptimal T ransportation

    Villani, C. (2021) Topics in O ptimal T ransportation . American Mathematical Society, Providence

    2021

  77. [85]

    and Liu, J

    Wang, X., Jiang, B. and Liu, J. S. (2017) Generalized R -squared for detecting dependence. Biometrika, 104, 129--139

    2017

  78. [86]

    and Leung, D

    Weihs, L., Drton, M. and Leung, D. (2016) Efficient computation of the Bergsma--Dassios sign covariance. Computational Statistics, 31, 315--328

    2016

  79. [87]

    and Meinshausen, N

    Weihs, L., Drton, M. and Meinshausen, N. (2018) Symmetric rank covariances: a generalized framework for nonparametric measures of dependence. Biometrika, 105, 547--562

    2018

  80. [88]

    Wiesel, J. C. (2022) Measuring association with Wasserstein distances. Bernoulli, 28, 2816--2832

    2022

  81. [89]

    (1970) On measures of association and a related problem

    Yanagimoto, T. (1970) On measures of association and a related problem. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 22, 57--63

    1970

  82. [90]

    (2019) BET on independence

    Zhang, K. (2019) BET on independence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 114, 1620--1637

    2019

  83. [91]

    and Sejdinovic, D

    Zhang, Q., Filippi, S., Gretton, A. and Sejdinovic, D. (2018) Large-scale kernel methods for independence testing. Stat. Comput., 28, 113--130

    2018

  84. [92]

    and M \"u ller, H.-G

    Zhou, H. and M \"u ller, H.-G. (2025) Association and Independence Test for Random Objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01983

    2025

  85. [93]

    and Serfling, R

    Zuo, Y. and Serfling, R. (2000) General notions of statistical depth function. Ann. Statist., 28, 461--482

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.