Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The interpretation of quantum mechanics and of probability: Identical role of the 'observer'

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1106.3584 v1 pith:F6NZDODG submitted 2011-06-17 quant-ph math.PRphysics.hist-ph

classification quant-phmath.PRphysics.hist-ph
keywords probabilityquantuminterpretationmechanicsconceptcopenhagenobserverrole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The aim of the article is to argue that the interpretations of quantum mechanics and of probability are much closer than usually thought. Indeed, a detailed analysis of the concept of probability (within the standard frequency theory of R. von Mises) reveals that the latter concept always refers to an observing system. The enigmatic role of the observer in the Copenhagen interpretation therefore derives from a precise understanding of probability. Besides explaining several elements of the Copenhagen interpretation, our model also allows to reinterpret recent results from 'relational quantum mechanics', and to question the premises of the 'subjective approach to quantum probabilities'.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools